Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Tree Rodent (0)  

Feedback:   All (612)  |   Reviews (24)  |   Comments (23)  |   Replies (565)

Other:   Replies Received (360)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 451-475 of 615 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
451
N/A Reply of badandy400's Poll

Because of my love for fetish I have gone for single sites, but 2nd place would go to DVD.

04-08-09  08:14am

Reply
452
N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

Still love America, so it has to be there.

04-06-09  12:05pm

Reply
453
Visit Premium Pass

Premium Pass
(0)
Reply of roseman's Comment

This is what they say under the FAQ's about cancelling memebership.

"If you’ve decided to cancel your membership, nothing could be easier. Just click here to advise our support staff. Your membership will automatically be cancelled when the next payment is due"

The implication is obviously that you will have access to the material for a month, as they say your membership will be cancelled WHEN the next payment is due. So you should have full access until then because you are a memeber until then. Get in touch with your credit card company.


04-01-09  11:13am

Reply
454
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(0)
Reply of messmer's Comment

I guess it hardly needs to be said that I agree. I think these people need to start concentrating much more on quality. From comments on PU it seems they also need to get some decent customer service, and also stop going down the road of trying to trick people into paying for something they didn't intend to sign up for.

03-31-09  06:23pm

Reply
455
N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

This is true to a certain extent, but I have to say I don't even trust CCBill or Epoch that much either. There is too much that is underhand and has the appearance of being underhand and dishonest, in the internet porn industry. Having said that, I get the impression that CCBill and Epoch seem to be more trusted by members here than most. But if sites do all of those things I mentioned and more, and CCBill and Epoch are their billing agents, what does that say about CCBill or Epoch, and how trustworthy they are? I do agree to a certain extent though.

03-28-09  07:18pm

Reply
456
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I used to visit them a lot, but now only occasionally, so I've gone for "sometimes." It's all very well going on about security and not getting or wanting a free meal, but nearly every day on here I read of someone who is
1. Getting increased spam after signing up for a site.
2. Locked out of the site, and customer service doesn't give a shit because once they've got your money they don't care.
3. Magically signed up for something they didn't want, and once again, customer service doesn't give a shit because once they've got your money they don't care.
4. Charged more money than they expected because they're from Europe or non American country.
5. Trying to find a way of cancelling the subscription, but can't, because there's no customer service, mainly because once they've got your money they don't give a shit.

There is also the worry that once you give your credit card details you are in danger of having your details stolen or passed on, because if they are underhand enough to do the other 5, how do you know you're safe in giving them your credit card details? The answer is you don't, so these people have to get their shit together and run a smooth, clean, and totally honest ship. Otherwise people will feel safer tuning into the free stuff, despite the risk of viruses.

Here endeth the sermon.


03-27-09  02:28pm

Reply
457
Visit Fetish Network

Fetish Network
(0)
Reply of Jay G's Review

I had been thinking about maybe joining, but from reading your review, there doesn't appear to be too much quality here, even though there seems to be quantity. I'm not crazy about the quality of vids from RealSpankings either. In fact fetish material in general seems to be a little behind the rest in picture quality.

03-24-09  09:03pm

Reply
458
Visit NS All Access

NS All Access
(0)
Reply of wiild1's Reply

Yeah I've decided to give it a miss too.

03-24-09  08:56pm

Reply
459
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
Reply of Denner's Reply

Just read it. Thanks Denner I really appreciate it, especially as you are one of the most objective members here, and one who's opinion I always valued, even before I was a member.

03-18-09  12:17pm

Reply
460
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
Reply of Denner's Reply

Thanks Denner. Will do.

03-18-09  11:43am

Reply
461
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
Reply of Denner's Review

Great review Denner. I was thinking of joining this one as I refuse to joing Video Box or New Sensations because of regional discrimination. I would rather pay more for this site than be insulted by Video Box's higher price for Europeans. VideosZ sounds like a really good site. That review has sort of settled it as far as I'm concerend. Your review was very timely, so I think this will be my next site to join.

03-18-09  11:01am

Reply
462
Visit NS All Access

NS All Access
(0)
Reply of wiild1's Comment

I sent Epoch billing this email

"I followed the link from The Best Porn in order to get the New Sensations $14.95 offer. I found the site seems to support regional discrimination. The price is now £13.95. I find this an insult and am urging everyone on Porn Users to boycott these sites. I would never join a site that discriminates against me in this way. I have heard the arguments for this sort of discrimination, and I find them dishonest and an insult. It's just best to say "we are going to get out of you what we can, as europeans are stupid enough to pay more for the same service. Not me."


03-17-09  11:45am

Reply
463
Visit Spanked Cutie

Spanked Cutie
(0)
Reply of Jay G's Comment

It reminds me of Reginald Perrin - "amazing sale, 25% ON." Yes, it's regional discrimination again. You could do what Denner suggests. Email them and hassle them about the price. Even if they don't relent and give you the correct price, it costs them time and money to deal with you, and also lets them know they've lost a customer.

03-15-09  07:51am

Reply
464
N/A Reply of atrapat's Poll

80.0-84.9. This may surprise those who know what a miserable mean bastard I am. But I only join sites that I know I am really going to like. Even though I have a high average, my marks for the site I have reviewed are mainly lower than TBP or PU reviews.

03-15-09  06:55am

Reply
465
Visit XXX Movie Online

XXX Movie Online
(0)
Reply of TrashMan's Reply

It's only a con if you believe the 100.

03-14-09  05:11pm

Reply
466
Visit XXX Movie Online

XXX Movie Online
(0)
Reply of pornoman's Review

If you look you will see this is a clone of EI-DVD.com. This is what pornjackker thought of that site. He awarded a 65.

"DVD site updates up to 10 new titles weekly
Titles from studios most sites do not carry
No DRM
Cons: Very expensive price of 52.00 per month
Tacky looking grainy graphics
Navigation is the worst I've seen
Only one preview pic per scene doesn't cut it
Downloads can take forever
Scenes cannot be streamed period

WMV is the only download option and most files
are way too big to begin with.
too big
Bottom Line: There are hardly any DVD sites I know that carry
titles from Historical Erotica or Maximum Grind
and various foreign ones this site has- not even
Vixeo. It's a mess with slow downloads, terrible
navigation and it's priced way too high."


03-13-09  11:27am

Reply
467
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of Khan's Comment

Ik2 - Look under the comment and your vote is there, even though it doesn't register if you ring up his profile.

Khan - Yeah I sorta figured you'd have to be the one who decides on the trust votes! You shoulda been a judge.


03-12-09  07:30pm

Reply
468
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

Look at the top of the page. He has a talkback badge. It's under "Khan PU Staff."

03-12-09  07:26pm

Reply
469
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of Khan's Reply

Sounds reasonable. I sort of guessed you and Rick must have been working on something in the background. They were really taking the piss.

03-12-09  07:23pm

Reply
470
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

As a natural subversive with an evil sense of humour I was tempted to press the "no" button. But the poor old bugger doesn't deserve it.

03-12-09  07:19pm

Reply
471
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of Khan's Comment

At last! Hooray! How about removing all the ones that have already been done?

03-12-09  07:11pm

Reply
472
Visit Black Cream White Ass

Black Cream White Ass
(0)
Reply of Wittyguy's Comment

As an anal retentive Englishman I am thoroughly ashamed to have left the "r" out of covert. My old English master would be shouting at me. So I may have to beat him up again. Just so I don't waste this post entirely here are some more misspelled words.

MISSPELLED
ACCOMMODATE
EMBARRASS
HARASS
OCCURRENCE
ANTIDISESTABLISHMENTAREANISM (One of my old English master's favourites)
Some people claim ATHEIST is too, but I don't believe that.

There wil be a test tomorrow.


03-11-09  11:19am

Reply
473
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment

The site has some serious supporters on here. I'm not one of them, for all the reasons stated. My taste also does not stretch to enjoying tons of fake breasts, tattoos, and 30 or 40 somethings with a ton of make up trying to look 20. Even if the girls were to my taste, I would not touch the place given what some some say about customer service.

I guess I know the site is not to my taste. I could join, give the place a 60 and so could others. I am not going to join just to give the place a low mark. I think this is the reason for the high average. The high marks come from those who know they are going to love the place. If you look at Trashman's justification for such a high mark when I questioned the 98 he gave, he said that he does not "downgrade on the type of content." If you look at his review it will give you a very good idea about the site, and the reasoning behind his score. At least he gave his reasons for such a high mark. I know enough about the site to not want to join, even if it were 5 dollars a month.


03-11-09  09:31am

Reply
474
Visit Black Cream White Ass

Black Cream White Ass
(0)
Reply of Wittyguy's Comment

I'd keep well away if I were you. Unless you want to get the CIA to try and cancel for you. Even they may give up, and consider a covet undercover operation to overthrow the Chinese government an easier proposition.

03-11-09  08:56am

Reply
475
Visit Real Spankings

Real Spankings
(0)
Reply of Jay G's Reply

Ah yes, a lot of spankers do like the clothed spankings. At least with RealSpankings there's enough material to satisfy everyone's taste. The one thing I have noticed about the site which may be a bit picky, is if you go to the model directory, and look up a model, the list does not necessarily contain all the clips for that model. But then their system has always been a little haphazard.

03-10-09  08:06pm


Shown : 451-475 of 615 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.38 seconds.