Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This is part of the Porn Pros network. Site membership gives you access to 22 sites.
-With 22 sites, you get a wide variety of porn niches.
-Large amount of content in the network. Over 3,00 videos.
-The models are late teens, early twenties. Mostly attractive.
-Try to select Epoch as the billing agent. A trusted name.
-You can stream videos in standard or high definition.
-You can download videos in 480p or 1080p definition.
-Each video comes with a matching photoset. The photos are high-quality screencaps.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale. Even if you uncheck the cross-sale, you might still be charged for the cross-sale.
So check your email confirmation, or your credit card company, to see if you are signed up for the cross-sale site. If you are signed up for the cross-sale site, either dispute the charge, or cancel immediately, before it turns into an expensive charge for a site you probably did not want.
-Slow update rate. About 1 new scene per week for the entire network.
-$69.95 charge to upgrade to all the premium sites in the network.
-Have to click through an offer to upgrade to premium status to enter the main member site.
-Some of the statistics given for scenes are false. Example: The time/lengh of the video titled "Tennis Tease" featuring Cece Capella is shown as 00:01 (one second). But the video has a runtime of 25 minutes 13 seconds.
Actually, most of the videos show a time/length of 0 or 1 or 2 seconds. Which makes no sense.
CONS CONTINUED BELOW:
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
My guess is that the site software engineer put a marker to show the runtime of each video.
But then did not follow through, and the static runtimes shown are 00.00 or 00.01 or 00.02.
However, when you play the video, you can see the actual runtime at the bottom of the screen.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site theme: Guys posting videos of former girlfriends for revenge. Which is fake. The girls are porn stars/models.
Actually, that might have been the original theme of the site. But for the last few years, the videos do not emphasize or show the ex-girlfriend theme. The videos are basically just a guy and girl fucking. With no background theme information to show the girl is a former girlfriend.
This is part of the Porn Pros network.
So membership to this site gives you access to the Porn Pros network. You get access to 22 sites in the Porn Pros network:
Most of the sites update rarely or not at all.
In the last 30 days, the entire network added 5 new scenes.
So that works out to 1 new scene per week.
The number of scenes per site ranges from 4 at Lolcumshots to 571 at Realexgirlfriends.
Obviously, the sites with more content have more value.
My favorite site is Massagecreep.
Many of the girls are attractive, and the sex can be hot.
Realexgirlfriends is the largest site in the network (of the basic network, not including the premium sites).
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
This is based on the large amount of network videos you have access to.
The videos are mainly professionally shot.
The models are mainly attractive.
The site navigation is easy.
So you get a lot of hardcore teen videos, for a discounted PU price of $17.95/month.
A few years ago I stood in line at a Target store to buy a hard drive at a discounted price.
I waited hours to get inside the store.
Then waited more hours to get to the electronics section.
Where the hard drives were sold out (limited quantities available).
Never again!
I might buy a few items online if I find something I want at a discounted price.
But Black Friday is more of a marketing gimmick than anything else.
There might be bargains out there, but I don't have the time or energy to find the ones I want. Or need.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Over 1,300 models.
-The network covers a number of niche fantasies: screwing the babysitter, the naughty high school girl, small girls, teen pies, anal, blowjobs, massage, etc.
-Many of the girls are attractive. But the site does not put a lot of effort into presenting them at their most attractive.
-CCBILL is the payment processor. A trusted name.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on signup (that I can remember).
-Currently, there is a special link at TBP for a rate of $9.87/month (recurring).
I don't know how long that rate will be available.
-One update per day for the network.
-24 sites in the network.
-You can stream the videos in low, medium or high definition.
-You also have the choice of low, medium or high definition for video downloads.
Cons:
-Have to pass through a upsell page (with ads) to enter the main site.
-Ads clutter the pages.
-Some of the network sites are premium sites, that you have to pay extra to access.
-The models are teens, many of them attractive. But not much effort is put into making the models appear attractive: either in make-up, costume, sets, or superior camera-work.
You have hundreds of cute models: Alice Green, Alice March, Apolonia Lapiedra, Kharlie Stone, Dillon Harper, Alexia Gold, etc. But the models appear so much more attractive when presented at some other paysites.
-The content is advertised as 100% exclusive. But many of the Rub-A-Teen site videos are found at Teen Mega World (at their Tricky Masseur site) and at Diesel network (at the All Fine Girls site).
-The camera-work of the videos is often mediocre. The video is not smooth, the lighting is just OK, the sets are inexpensive. A good amateur would shoot better videos than many of the Team Skeet videos.
Bottom Line:
Team Skeet is a network of hardcore teen sites.
-Over 20 sites.
-Over 1,300 models.
-Over 2,300 videos
With over 20 sites, you get a nice variety of teen fantasy themes.
The acting is mainly poor. The girls are usually attractive, but not much effort is put into making the girls appear attractive.
For example, Apolonia Lapiedra appears at Team Skeet and at MetArt. At MetArt, she is gorgeous: Lovely face, great body.
At Team Skeet, she appears in two videos.
I know it's the same girl, because the name is the same (which is unusual with porn models, because they often have a number of different names for different sites). And Apolonia has the same physical characteristics:
long black hair, face and body resembles the MetArt girl.
If I saw this Team Skeet girl at a shopping mall, I would not give her a second look.
She's nothing special (appearance-wise) in her Team Skeet videos.
What the fuck? I'm being serious.
She is a jewel at MetArt.
She is a piece of meat at Team Skeet.
I don't mean Team Skeet is a gonzo site.
But they took a great-looking model, and present her as a average-looking or below-average-looking teen in her videos.
It just makes you realize that not only is porn fantasy, but that the camera-work can make an incredible difference in how appealing some of these models are. Which I already knew. But what a waste of talent to take these attractive girls and present them without their natural sparkle.
That is why I give MetArt a score of 99.
And Team Skeet a score of 80.
(But there are other reasons why I give Team Skeet a score of 80):
-The poor quality of the videos: they need to hire a professional for their camera work.
-The cheap sets.
-This is a personal quirk, but I don't like "Unlock" sites in the network that require added payments to access their content. If I pay for a membership, give me access to all the sites, and don't tease me with added sites that require more money.
They are already using part of the page space to advertise other non-related sites.
So they are over-loading you with advertisements to take your money. I paid for a membership.
Let me enjoy it in peace.
End of rant.
For bread-and-butter hardcore teen porn, I much prefer Teen Mega World, over Team Skeet.
Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) is borderline between gonzo and glamcore.
Diesel has outstanding models (physically attractive), and they look great in the photos and videos.
For glamcore, X-Art and Blacked and Tushy are outstanding sites.
Lovely models, presented with care and precision to look gorgeous: with great camera-work, expensive sets, etc.
The Best Porn review writes in his latest review on Team Skeet (released Jul 22, 2016):
"One of the best networks of teen-oriented sites on the Net."
Thanks, Amanda.
PU/TBP (but mainly PU) is the number one source for information and discounts to porn sites for most of us PU members.
We already knew you folks were looking out for us.
But you said it best, when you wrote: "We try our hardest to provide assistance in all manners for our community, including customer service when needed."
I assume you are located in Europe, which is why they are charging you in Euros.
I'm located in the US.
My Porn Users link to the site leads to a join page where the price is $14.95 USD for the first 30 days.
After 30 days, membership renews at $39.95 USD every month.
I would contact the biller, which is probably FAMECARE.COM.
Tell them the membership fee you agreed to was 39.95, and not 47.54.
If you are willing to pay 39.95/month.
If not, just cancel the membership immediately. Definitely cancel before you are charged the higher rate.
You should have site access until your 10 membership fee term runs out at 30 days.
Actually, I personally would just cancel my membership anyway.
And re-sign-up at a later date at the 10 rate.
If I couldn't sign-up at the 10 rate later, I would just skip the site.
Even 39.95 seems like a high price to pay. For me, anyway.
There are plenty of other sites that are less expensive.
FAMECARE.COM has a chat line.
(They also have a telephone line, and an email. But the chat line is available, and very fast.)
I tried the chat line today, they answered almost immediately. And the operators are very helpful.
I asked what the membership fee to Evil Angel is, they told me within a few seconds.
They also gave me a code for a 50% reduced fee membership (for the first 30 days).
That membership would renew at 39.95.
So, famecare seems fast, helpful, responsive.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discounted price of $14.95/month if you join through Teen Mega World link.
Joining Fuck Studies directly (using the PU link) costs $29.95/month.
So save 50% and join through the PU Teen Mega World link, which gives you access to all the Teen Mega World sites.
-Fuck Studies is part of the Teen Mega World network, which is a large network of hardcore teen sites. Teen Mega World positives:
Over 4,500 videos, most with matching photosets.
Over 1,200 teen models, many of them attractive to extremely attractive.
About 36 separate sites, covering a wide variety of teen niches.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM. No download limits.
-Fast download speeds. I average 3-5 MB/sec. My max download speed is 6.25 MB/sec.
-Navigation is good. This is a mega network, with a huge amount of content.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
Navigation: It's fairly easy to move around the network. No dead links that I found. Excellent model listing pages with a nice-sized thumbnail to show you what the model looks like, with hot links to all her videos. You can use the hot links to go directly to her video content, without having to re-log-in to each site.
-Basically, Teen Mega World is one of the best values for hardcore teen porn. The network has been around for over ten years. So there is a lot of older content, which is lower quality: lower definition videos, cheap sets, no effort to make the girls look attractive. But even the older content is acceptable because many of the models are not just young but also cute, and the sex can be hot.
-Epoch is one of the billers, a trusted name.
CONS:
-Cons are basically minor.
-The content size, variety, large amount of attractive teen models, and easy navigation and excellent download speeds, mean you are getting more than your money's worth.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-However, keep in mind: this is basically a bread-and-butter teen hardcore network. Do not expect a glamcore approach. In the last few years the network has been spending more money upgrading their videos: cleaner, more expensive sets, better lighting, more attention paid to making the appearance of the models better (but still far below the attention paid at site like X-Art, Blacked, Tushy).
-The network has always tried to offer new sites to appeal to members. Quite often they start a new site, and stop updating soon afterward.
-Need to re-name the video downloads to know what the video is: Videos download with a generic file name such as n3.sethigh.wmv or 15sethigh.wmv.
BOTTOM LINE:
This site exposes the underlying corruption and deceit of the Russian method of education (my attempt at satire or humor).
The site theme is: Young girls getting seduced by their tutors.
The plot and acting are primitive: but the girls are young and mainly attractive, and the sex can be hot.
When a guy tutors an attractive girl, instead of teaching her the course materials, he acts like a Russian thug, putting his hands on the girl and giving her the fuck of her young life.
The videos are shot in Russia, so the actors mainly speak Russian. There are subtitles, but many of the subtitles are hard to read: the text is small, and white against a clear background and disappears quickly.
So it's best to ignore the subtitles completely, because what the models are speaking has little impact anyway:
the sex is what counts. The male Russian is tutoring some bimbo, and he decides to fuck her. And she enthusiastically cooperates because he is such a stud.
So turn off your brain, and enjoy the show.
Or maybe have a few beers before you watch.
Joining Fuck Studies (or any of the other sites in the Teen Mega World network) gives you access to the entire Teen Mega World network.
There are no premium sites that require an extra payment.
Maybe it's a personal quirk, but I dislike the come-on at networks that charge extra for their premium sites: Team Skeet, Naughty America, etc.
Giving the site a score of 92. That is because the site gives access to the entire Teen Mega World network. Teen Mega World network is one of my favorite porn networks.
The reasons are simple:
-You gain access to a boatload of hardcore teen videos. Over 4,500 videos.
-There are matching photosets for many of the videos.
-Over 1,200 teen models. Many of them attractive.
-The network is easy to use/navigate.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Fast download speeds.
-Good model index. Nice-sized thumbnails to show you each model. With hot links to the model's videos.
-This is not a glamcore network. But in recent years, the network has been spending more money to upgrade the newer videos in different ways: more expensive sets, better lighting, camera-work, etc.
As well as offering a virtual reality site, and a 4K Ultra High Definition site.
If you haven't been a member of this network, I think it's worth at least a one-month join, to sample their wares. You will get your money's worth. As long as you are not expecting a glamcore network. The main offering is bread-and-butter hardcore teen videos. No glamor. Not a lot of story or plot. But plenty of fresh young Russian teens who are into sex.
If you base the score on Fuck Studies site only, the score would be much lower.
There are many sites that give alternate names for porn models.
One of my favorites is: www.indexxx.com
It's free, and easy to use.
You can search by the model's name.
You can also search, under the "Website list" hot link, for the models that appear at a specific website.
(That is helpful for model names that are used by many different models.)
You can also build a listing of your favorite porn models, if you register for a free account.
(I've registered, and have never gotten a bunch of spam from indexxx.com, that I know of.
But I do get a bunch of spam from porn sites.)
If you want to track a model, indexxx.com will list most of the web sites she appears at.
As well as her name at each web site.
Which can be very useful.
Separately, "incest" porn seems to be very popular. By "incest", I mean step- brother, sister, father, etc.
So you can get your fix of old-young from those videos.
Teen Mega World has an Old-n-Young site.
That hasn't updated since October 2015.
But it has about 85 videos.
I'm sure you've been a member of TMW (a lot of the PU members probably have).
If you skipped the Old-n-Young site at TMW, it's probably worth a visit.
Or if you've forgotten the videos you watched.
(As I get older, I watch a lot of videos I've seen before, almost as if it's for the first time).
PU discount is $14.95 to join through Old-n-Young.
Or you can join through TMW PU discount for the same price.
Both memberships give access to all the TMW network sites.
I don't know why, but a lot of the TMW models really appeal to me. They are not made up to appear their best, and in many of the scenes the clothes and sets are cheap, but the girls are young and physically attractive and can give a hot performance.
I just read your recent review of the same network, and it's surprising how well my review agrees with what you wrote.
Years ago, I got a negative trust vote (my only negative trust vote) because the person, Anonymous, wrote:
"Reviews are too much like other members and english prof. would most likely think that you copied some material just makes your reviews a little questionable for me."
But this is the first time that I know of that the negative trust vote comment might seem real:
It surprises me how we both agree on many points in our different reviews of this network.
You mention that Blacked, Tushy and Vixen are producing great porn.
In several of my last reviews, I've mentioned that Blacked, Tushy, (sometimes Vixen), and X-Art are producing great glamcore porn.
Are you sure we aren't related? Or sharing the same telepathic thoughts?
LOL.
I do appreciate your reply. Years ago, reviews seemed to get replies more often.
It lets the writer know that someone is reading the reviews.
Which is useful positive confirmation.
In spite of the large amount of content, and the large number of attractive models, my main negatives are:
-Being charged for a pre-checked trial subscription, when I unchecked the trial subscription, meaning I said no.
-The jerky editing, which destroys the flow of the videos.
-The lack of heat of the videos. These are fine-looking girls, having hardcore sex, but it doesn't hold my interest, or passion.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Primary billing agent is Epoch. A major plus, because Epoch means you can easily cancel your membership, and offers help if you have a billing problem with the site.
-Nice assortment of teen, hardcore sites. You get access to 22 sites (listed in the "Bottom Line" section of this review).
-Many of the models are late teens, early twenties. Mainly white, mostly attractive.
-Professionally shot videos: OK or good camera work, lighting, sound control, etc. But poor editing.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Allows download managers. I use Down Them All, a free, easy to use download manager.
-Good download speeds. I get around 3-5 MB/sec. My max download speed is 6.25 MB/sec.
-Can stream videos in high definition or standard definition.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
Warning: I unchecked the pre-checked cross-sale on the join page when I subscribed, but found that I was charged for the cross sale anyway. I had to contact the biller to reverse the charge. The biller was Epoch, who allowed me to cancel the "fraudulent" sale, since I told them I had unchecked the cross-sale.
-$69.95 one-time charge to upgrade your membership to access all the sites in the network (as long as you keep your original membership open).
-You have to click through/decline the $69.95 upgrade page to enter your paid membership sites each time you log in to the site. Which is irritating.
-Only one definition (1080p) is offered for downloading many videos. Which is surprising. I've seen very few sites that offer such a limited choice to download a video.
-Even though the downloaded video is listed as 1080p, when you download the video, and check its specs, you find: frame width: 852 frame height: 480.
Based on those specs, I would assume
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
the video is not 1080p, but 480p.
Since I am viewing the video on a 14" laptop (that's a few years old), the videos are nice and crisp images.
But if you were watching the videos on a large-screen monitor, you might be disappointed with the quality since these are 480p videos.
-There's not a lot of buildup or plot to the videos: they are basically hardcore sex. There might be some kissing before the bj and fucking, but it's minimal. Most videos are just basically hardcore sex. A little plot would add to the videos. Even though a lot of the videos feature attractive models, the sex can get repetitious. If I were new to porn, just looking at these naked, attractive models having sex would be a real turn-on. But I'm not new.
Sites like Blacked and Tushy offer high quality models and a glamcore style of shooting that makes the videos much more appealing than the straight hardcore videos at Porn Pros.
-The editing is very abrupt: there are missing jumps in the action where the girl is naked by herself, then a guy is eating her pussy, then he is fucking her, and the action is jerky because they delete the intervening motions. The action is not continuous, but disconnected, which is poor editing.
The porn pros network is basically a collection of teen sites.
The network is mainly hardcore videos.
You also get a matching photoset for most videos. The matching photosets are quality screencaps of the video shoot. The software program used to make the screencaps from the video does an excellent job--far better than the screencaps that used to accompany hardcore videos from years ago.
Since many of the models are really attractive, many of the photosets are worth collecting.
This is not categorized as a photo network, but the quality of the screencaps is impressive.
This is a large network: you get access to over 3,000 videos.
For $17.95/month with a PU discount, you get your money's worth.
Many of the models are attractive young women. Engaged in hardcore sex.
If the videos had some plot to give the sex more meaning, it would increase the value of the network.
Even though sites like Blacked and Tushy and X Art have less content, I enjoy the videos at those sites more, because those sites make an effort to:
-select the most outstanding attractive models
-present the models in the most visually attractive way (with excellent camera-work, outstanding lighting, make-up, etc.)
-base the sex on some plot to make the video more erotic than just hardcore sex.
I'm giving the network a score of 83. That is very subjective.
If you are new to porn, the videos would have more of an impact on you, and you would rate the network higher.
But in the last few years, I've joined a number of paysites, and have seen so many attractive young models, that I want videos that have more plot or variety than straight hardcore sex. An element of eroticism.
Sites like Blacked, Tushy or X-Art are high quality glamcore sites.
But you can find gonzo sites that can have an element of eroticism, or strong visual appeal.
If you watch the videos at Rocco Siffredi, which is mainly gonzo hardcore sex, some of those videos have a potent effect because the sex seems real. Those videos do not have the ultra-refined camera-work and lighting and colors compared to Blacked, Tushy or X-Art, but some of the Rocco Siffredi videos can be very hot in spite of the lower quality, because the action/plot is so strong.
I also give Teen Mega World a higher rating, another teen hardcore network, because many of their videos appeal to me.
It's probably better if you make this a new comment.
If you re-post this as a new comment, it will have a better chance of being noticed by more members.
Anyway: 18OnlyGirls changed its name to AllFineGirls some time back.
Recently, 18OnlyGirls is no longer listed at PU.
I'm not sure why.
Sometimes sites are no longer listed because they go out of business.
Or because there is some problem at the connection with PU and PU stops promoting the site (listing the site).
Separately, even though I posted at PU that 18OnlyGirls had changed its name to AllFineGirls, PU never bothered to list AllFineGirls as the new name of 18OnlyGirls (probably because the name change slipped through the cracks).
It's difficult, or unlikely, that you will find current information on 18 Only Girls or All Fine Girls at PU (or at TBP, the sister site of PU), because 18 Only Girls is no longer listed.
Since I'm not a current member of any of the three sites, I don't know what the update rate is.
I like the models at the sites, and the videos are professionally shot.
But the membership fee is too expensive for me, to be a continuing member.
I'm sorry I can't give you the details on the update rate for 18OnlyGirls.
Perhaps a current member of that site will post that information, if they happen to read this comment.
I'm a fan of Blacked and Tushy sites.
Think they are excellent.
As soon as Vixen grows some more, I will be a fan of Vixen as well.
Quality product, with lovely models.
-You also get random samples from many other partner sites.
The samples give you a flavor of those other sites. So you can have a better idea of whether those other sites are worth joining.
(I list the sites you get sample videos from in the Bottom Line section).
-The four main sites at PornMasterMind feature young porn models in their late teens, early twenties.
Most of the models are attractive. The videos are professionally shot.
Cons:
-Expensive. Price is $29.95/month (recurring). No PU/TBP discount.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. 1-day trial at $1.00 to realitysexnetwork.com converts to a $38.89/month membership. Uncheck the trial offer unless you think realitysexnetwork is worth $38.89.
-Archive site. The latest update appears to be one video from April 2015.
In the updates section, there is one video from April 2015, one video from December 2014, one video from October 2013, one video from April 2011.
-Poor navigation. Site structure is clumsy and takes a lot of mouse clicks to see what the site contents include.
-Hard to view all the videos at the site. Hard to determine the number of videos at the site. Hard to determine the exact update rate (other than updates appear to be extremely rare).
-The streaming software is primitive. If you stream a video, and try to fast forward, the screen turns blue or green.
The site theme for FuckedHardGFs, as shown by the video content, appears to be young porn models appearing naked: they might take a shower, masturbate, or have sex. But, in truth, there does not appear to be any unifying theme other than showing naked girls.
Let me expand that: the idea of the site is that these videos are supposed to be from ex-boyfriends who are selling these "homemade videos" to the internet to make some extra money off their former girlfriends.
So the boyfriends are not only getting extra money, but they are also getting revenge on the ex-girlfriends by exposing them on the internet.
This is a popular niche.
However, you would not get that slant from watching the videos. You get that slant from the title of the site.
So if the title of the site rocks your boat, then that gives the videos a spicy thrill.
In contrast, if you watch the tushy.com and blacked.com videos (competing paysites), their videos spend a couple minutes or more setting up the basic plot of the video. That setup/plot adds to the value/fantasy of the video, because it gives the sex more meaning.
Tushy.com, blacked.com, and vixen.com are three paysites from the same owners, who are creating paysites where effort is spent on making the models as attractive as possible, as well as choosing their models for the physical beauty, and making sexy videos with a slight plot that builds the sex into a performance.
The settings, camera-work, sound control, costumes, etc. are first-rate.
So those 3 sites empasize a glamour-style shoot.
I think of Blacked, Tushy, and Vixen as glamcore, in their approach to porn. Except that there is not a lot of romance in the plots. The videos are basically supposed to show one or more girls who are attracted to a man and they fuck. It's not very romantic, but it is several steps above gonzo porn.
Is it worth joining Fucked Hard GFs or the network? I give the site/network a lukewarm recommendation. FuckedHard18 is probably the best site of the network, because it's a good massage site. The girls are attractive, the sex can be hot.
The other 3 main sites are OK, but nothing special.
The random samples from the partner sites gives you a taste of those sites. Which is nice.
I'm giving the site/network a score of 78.
For a price of $29.95/month, it's expensive.
A lower price would give you more value for your money.
I just came across this site today for the first time.
Interesting niche site.
Every once in a while some Mormon missionaries come to my front door.
But none of them ever acted like the girls at this site.
LOL.
Quote:
"More of the ATK underarm fetish present. I've joined three of their sites now, and it's definitely not coincidence. It's not so bad to be offensive, but it's very noticeable if you're not into underarms."
Since most people have underarms, I am willing to look at women's underarms.
I think it's kind of funny how so many men complain about women's pubic hair and underarm hair.
I realize it's a fashion statement. But still. As long as it's not a hairy forest, I don't mind a bit of hair.
$29.99/month plus a VIP upgrade per month to enable downloads?
Ridiculous.
Makes me want to join a tube site where I can watch Twistys videos.
(Except it's been many years since I joined Twistys, and can't remember whether they were worth viewing in the first place.)
@Amanda,
Thanks for the quick response and the explanation of the site system.
When skippy mentioned he had done a previous review of the site, I was curious to compare the previous and current reviews, to see if his ideas had changed a lot.
But skippy writes excellent reviews, and they are stand-alone reviews, not really depending on previous reviews.
This is not a comment directly about your review, but something I noticed about the PU site.
You mentioned that your earlier review of Femjoy expired.
I was curious to see how your earlier review of Femjoy compared to your current review.
When I looked at the Femjoy review pages, I did not find your earlier review of Femjoy.
It was not listed.
However, when I looked at your listing of reviews (under the skippy list of review pages), I did find the expired review of Femjoy by skippy.
No big thing. But software for PU seems buggy, because your expired review of Femjoy should be listed under the Femjoy listing of reviews.
However, there are so many past reviews of Femjoy, that one (or more) missing reviews is not terribly important.
There must be something wrong at CCBILL, because their chat has not been available for several days.
If I were you, I would contact my credit card company, and dispute the payment for the paysite.
Tell them you paid for a subscription, and were denied access.
The credit card company should refund your purchase price.
Best of luck. But you should not have to pay for something you did not receive.
Go to https://support.ccbill.com/
Select the chat hot link.
Chat is faster than email, and it gives you an immediate response to the situation.
CCBILL (and EPOCH) are reliable companies.
You should have no problem cancelling your subscription and getting a refund.
Or, they might give you a new username and password, and then see if you can access the site.
But I've always had good luck dealing with CCBILL and EPOCH, and got wonderful service from them.
The representatives are friendly, helpful, and believe what you tell them.
You will need your email that you signed up with at the site, plus your Credit Card # or Subscription ID.
If you don't have Credit Card or Subscription ID (that should be in your confirming email that was sent for your subscription), they might do a search on username and password.
But you should have no problem getting your problem resolved:
Either entry into the site, or a full refund.
NOTE: I go to paysite, click on Members Login, and a popup box appears, asking for username and password.
So maybe there's a problem with your computer.
Try clearing your cache, and then going to the site, and see if you can enter your username and password. That might help.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Membership in Massage Creep gives you access to 22 sites in the Porn Pros network.
-The sites cover a variety of niches: massage, squirting, blowjob, etc.
-A large number of mainly attractive, white models in their late teens, early twenties.
-Professionally shot videos: clear images, good sound control, good lighting.
-PU discount of $17.95/month.
-OK download speeds. I averaged about 3-4 MB/sec. My max download speed limit is 6.25 MB/sec, which I rarely get. At most sites, I average about 4-5 MB/sec.
-Allows download managers. I use Down Them All, a free, easy to use manager.
Cons:
-There is a pre-checked cross sale on join page.
NOTE: Even if you uncheck the cross sale, you might still be charged for the cross sale.
So make sure you join through Epoch, which will send you an email if you are signed up for the cross sale.
And Epoch will be able to cancel (and refund) the trial cross sale.
-There is a $69.95 fee to upgrade to all the sites in the network.
I hit the "No thanks" link to enter the regular site, but fear these idiots will charge me the $69.95 fee anyway, because they do not appear to recognize the word "No".
-Requires captcha to log in to site.
-First page at site is an upsale for $70 to access all the sites in the network. You have to view and accept or reject the upsale page to enter the member's area you paid for.
--Sometimes videos stop streaming with the message: Network error.
-Sometimes photos fail to load: Message states:
Forbidden
We're sorry, the server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.
Massage Creep theme: girl gets message, is so turned on by the masseur that they have sex.
Massage is a popular theme in porn. And the Massage Creep site does this well. Although there is not much variety in the plot, the girls are young, attractive, and the sex can be hot. So Massage Creep is one of the better massage-themed porn sites.
Site has 202 videos. Plus a matching photoset for each video. The photos are screencaps.
You can choose to stream or download the videos.
The streaming is offered in standard and HD definition.
Most videos offer a choice of definition for download: 480p, 720p, 1080p.
There is a zip file for each photoset. Only one definition for the zip file, not offered in high, medium and low.
The quality of the screencaps is good, but not great. Much better than the screencaps that porn sites offered years ago, but: because many of the models are attractive, and the screencaps are almost-collectible in quality, you wish that the screencaps were even better, because then the photosets would really be worth collecting.
You can view thumbnails of the photoset screencaps, or enlarge any individual photo, but if you want to view the entire photoset, the best idea is to download the zip and use a software program to slide show the photos.
Otherwise, the software mechanism for viewing the photos online is clunky, and takes too many mouse clicks to move from one photo to the next.
I am not technically proficient, so I don't understand how the screen caps are made from the video.
But the Teen Mega World screen caps have better clarity than the Porn Pros screen caps.
And I prefer the Teen Mega World mechanism for displaying the photos online over the Porn Pros system.
Both Porn Pros and Teen Mega World are basically hardcore teen sites that focus on video over photos.
But the Teen Mega World has made a large improvement over their past system of displaying the photos, and the quality of the Teen Mega World screen caps has also improved, to the point where many of the Teen Mega World photosets are worth collecting. Because the models are attractive young teens, and the images are centered and clear.
The Teen Mega Word screencaps are not up to the standard of MetArt or MPL Studios, obviously, but in erotic content, they can sometimes surpass MetArt and MPL Studios. Partially because you are comparing Teen Mega World (hardcore teen) to what used to be softcore teen (MetArt and MPL Studios--that are now making an effort to increase the hardness of their content to attract today's porn audience).
I've said it before, but I think it's worth repeating:
My system for joining a site:
-content that I can enjoy.
-is easy to use.
-gives value for the money I pay.
-lack of annoying features.
Massage Creep has content that I can enjoy. You get access to over 3,000 videos (at the Porn Pros network).
Many of the models are young teens, early twenties.
Mainly white. Attractive to very attractive.
The girls seem to be mainly enjoying the sex.
The site/network is OK to navigate.
I wish they would remove the captcha for login.
I wish they would remove many of the advertisements for "Upgraded" status costing $70.
I wish they would remove many of the advertisements for other paysites.
And I wish they would make the screencaps better quality, and the onscreen viewing of the screencaps easier.
For $17.95/month, it's definitely worth a visit, to see what the site has to offer.
But the site could be improved.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
