Most of the other sites in this network are on the same poor level:
archive sites (stopped updating years ago), small content, videos you would not want to watch because the definition is so low (I mean really grainy, blurry pictures). Primitive navigation. No search.
There is one site in the network that is worth joining:
exclusiveteenporn
But compared to other pay sites that are available, you are much better off spending your money elsewhere: You will find better quality content, a larger amount of content, sites that are easier to use because of site design.
It makes you realize, if you didn't before, there are good sites out there. But this network is not one of them. What I mean is, it makes you really appreciate sites like Teen Mega World, Nubiles, or the specialty sites like X-Art, Diesel network, etc. Where you can find good to great quality, large amounts of content, and sites that are so easy to use, you forget that site design is so important.
The best thing about this site (pearl teens), is that I downloaded the entire contents in less than a day, and checked every video and photoset, so that my review is based on real-time experience.
At most sites I do not check every video and photoset, because there is too much content. But this is a tiny site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The only reason I am writing pros is because PU wants a balanced review. But basically, this site has little or no value. Anyone who subscribes to this site is wasting their time and money.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-DownThemAll manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Some videos can be downloaded as either MPG or WMV files. Some videos only have a WMV option.
Cons:
-Zip file for each photoset downloads with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename the zip to know what photoset you have downloaded.
-Video files download with a generic default filename. So you have to re-write the filename to know what the video is. And since the model is not usually identified, and there is no description of what the action is, you make up your own description if you want to save the file.
-No streaming option to view the video before downloading it. So, you have to download each video and play it, before you can decide if the video is worth viewing or saving.
-But there are only 13 videos at this site, and none of them are worth saving. Or even viewing.
-Only have one option for the videos and photosets for definition. No high, medium or low choices.
-The photosets and videos are very low definition.
-This is an archive site. No updates in years.
-Tiny site. 13 videos. 55 photosets.
-Navigation is primitive.
-No search.
Bottom Line:
CONS(continued):
-No posting date for videos or photosets.
-No model bio data.
-No models are named in any of the photosets.
-A few models are named in a few of the videos. But most of the models in the videos are not named.
-The video files are very low definition.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 13
Video size: 320x240 352x240 720x480
Total bitrate: 712 kbps 1628kbps
Different video files will have their own specifications. You don't get a choice of specifications. Most of the videos have the low 320x240 size. A few have 720x480, but even then, the video is poor, maybe from lack of focus or other factors.
Number of photosets: 55
Photo dimensions: 768x1152p or 1024x683p
Number of photos per set: 33 to 141
This is a hardcore teen site.
This is an archive site. The content was made years ago.
You get better looking photos at archive sites like My Precious Vigins and Teen Stars Magazines, as well as better looking models at those other sites.
If you like this style of photography, Amour Angels is a site that is still updating, and has superior photography and more attractive models, as well as superior site design.
There are some cute models at this site, and their photosets are OK. Not great, but OK. And if you're already a member, it's pobably worth saving some of their sets for completeness.
The videos are worthless, because of the low definition. Even if some of the models are cute, the picture is so poor no PU member would waste his time watching these videos.
Bottom line:
Because of the small amount of content, the poor quality of the content, poor site design, most PU members would give this site a miss.
The truth is, there are plenty of good and bad sites willing to take our money.
I don't mind an archive site (no longer updating), as long as there is good content available and I know beforehand that the site is no longer updating.
But like most things, there are plenty of porn sites that are a complete waste of time and money.
I was a member of a Japanese porn site that had a download limit. I didn't exceed the limit, but I was blocked anyway, because their download limit counter didn't count correctly. That happened to me a few times, and I got so frustrated, I barely used my 1 month membership at the site. Emotions triumphing over practicality.
So that's why I am hesitant about joining this network, even though some of the videos might be appealing.
I've read comments by other PU members that say the download limit is no problem. Other PU members say they've had real problems with the download limit, even though they did not exceed the stated download limit.
The TBP review states:
Download Limit: There is a daily download limit (all sites in the network have a limit: you may download up to 10 gigabytes of data each day, and additionally up to 15 big movies.).
If what TBP says is true, it doesn't seem that many people would have any problem with the download limit.
But apparently the mechanism that controls the download limit is not accurate.
So I am wondering if I should pay for a membership, and then find out whether I will have download limit problems.
And, apparently, the support staff is little or no help in resolving the problem of a false download limit.
First, Wow Girls is not part of the Diesel network. It's marketed separately.
Second, you can join one of the Diesel network sites, and you will also get Super Skinny Girl site as a bonus.
Or you can join the Diesel network for 5 months, paying $99, and that gives you access to the entire Diesel network, all of their sites (but not Wow Girls).
There were different options in the past to get access to the entire Diesel network.
But I don't think that remaining a member for 2 or more months to a single site will give you access to the entire network.
Alternatively, you can sign up to Wow Girls for 6 months for about $100, but that only gives you access to Wow Girls. It does not give you access to the Diesel network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Content is dated. The video dates range from November 2006 thru November 2008. The photosets are from 2007 and 2008.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Can download the videos.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-DownThemAll file manager works at this site.
Cons:
-Primitive site layout.
-No search.
-Archive site. No updates.
-Videos are from years ago. The definition is very low.
-Videos download with the default filename of full.avi or full.wmv. So you have to re-name each download, or else the succeeding videos will either over-write the previous video, or it won't download. Also need to rewrite the filename so
you know what the video is about.
-No model bios.
-Models not named in the videos or photosets.
-No streaming option for videos. Have to download the file to watch.
-Only one definition for each video.
-Only one definition for each photoset.
-You have a thumbnail illustrating each photoset and video. But the thumbnail is so small, and such poor quality, you don't really know what the model looks like.
Bottom Line:
Videos:
Number of videos: 106
Width by height: 360x240 or 288x216
Total bitrate: 1340 kbps or 216 kbps
Runtime: 8 to 23 minutes
Photosets:
Number of photosets: 532
Number of photos per photoset: 70 to 170
Photo: 370x560 pixels or 600x336 pixels or 768x1024 pixels
This is a hardcore teen site.
Because of the low definition of the videos, they are only useful as a reminder of the early days of internet porn. No one who has access to most internet porn sites today would want to watch, or be satisfied with, the low-definition videos available at this site.
I didn't save a single video from this site. The girls might be attractive, but they are so blurry, and the videos are so low-definition, it's just a waste of time looking at them.
The photosets are like screenshots. The photoset is usually like a video-capture of a video shoot. So there is no posing for best effect, no artistic or sensual value to the photos. The colors are poor.
The truth is, I've been spoiled by the good and fine and excellent quality of the videos and photosets at today's porn sites. Looking at the content of this site makes me realize how far we've come in a few short years. This site might
have some curiosity value. But comparing the contents to what is available at other sites, this site is a waste of time and money.
If you've been a past member of Devils Film or their network, you should check your email. They are currently offering a 30-day membership for $9.95. That renews at $29.95 every 30 days.
Also, if you take that offer, make sure you uncheck the pre-checked offer to a separate site/network.
I didn't even realize there was no search, until I found a listing for a photoshoot of a model that was at that site. And now I can't find that photoshoot. So I don't know if the photoshoot is hidden somewhere on the site, or if it was deleted.
From a reply by the webmaster of this site, at the time he wrote the reply, it seemed that all past material was still available at this site.
The site design is clean, making it easy to look over the material under each model.
But there is no search function, where you can enter a model's name in a blank box, and search for her content. Or to see if there is any content under that name.
Also, the videos at the site can be grouped for a manual search through the videos.
But you can't group the photosets for a manual search. And that seems like an oversight that should be fixed.
Some sites in the network update. A lot of them don't. As far as I can tell, they choose the sites that update randomly.
I think the network is a bargain, because of the massive content, a lot of very attractive girls, and a lot of videos that are nice quality. The quality is below what you get at Diesel or X-Art, but there is a lot of nice videos at this network.
Post a reply on what specific sites you are checking for updates, and I will tell you if they are updating. If that would help.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Can download videos as AVI or WMV files.
-Can download a video as a single file, or download segments of the video.
-Can use a download manager. I used DownThemAll.
-Good download speeds. I regularly got about 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
Cons:
-Content not dated.
-The zip file for a single photoset offers only one size definiton. There is no low, medium, high quality choices.
-The models in the photosets are not named.
-You only get a single, low-definition choice for the videos. No medium or high definition option. And the low-definition is really poor, 400x300.
-The photosets download with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename each download, or the following zip files either won't
download, or will over-write the previous "gallery.zip" file.
-The captcha on login is hard to read.
-No search function.
-Navigation is basic.
-I found no videos worth keeping.
-The photos are better quality than the videos, but I found no photos worth keeping.
-No streaming. Have to download a video to watch it.
-No model index.
-No model bios.
-Some WMV video files can't be played, because neither Windows Media Player or VLC Player could recognize the file's input.
Bottom Line:
Site specs:
Number of videos: 38
Average runtime of video: from 10 to 40 minutes.
Videos can be downloaded in AVI and WMV format.
AVI files:
400x300 width x height.
1,213 kbps total bitrate
WMV files:
400x300 width x height.
1,214 kbps total bitrate
Number of photosets: 219
Average number of photos per set: from 25 to 40.
Photo dimensions: 768x1024 pixels.
The number of photosets seems large. Certainly far larger than the 38 videos. But the reason for the large number of photosets is that photos of
a single video shoot are often separated into a number of photosets, so that the site contents appear larger. A single photoset is small, usually between 20 and 40 photos.
This is a hardcore teen site.
This is an archive site. Even though the content is not dated, I believe the content was shot years ago.
The video quality is poor. There are many reasons for the poor video quality. The main factor is the low definition of the videos. You only get
one definition in the video, and this is such a low definition that you see lines in the video on playback. This is such a low-definition video
that it's lower than the lowest definition offered at major sites like Teen Mega World or Nubiles. The colors in the videos are poor. The
costumes the models wear are cheap. The sets are cheap.
The models can be good looking, and they can put on a good show sexually. But they are wasted in these low-quality videos.
The photos are better quality than the videos. The video quality is just awful. The photos are decently photographed softcore and hardcore. Not
artistic, or sensual, but ok shots of hardcore action. The photos are low-definition, very little production values, but still better than the god-awful videos.
This site's contents might have had some value maybe 10 years ago. But compared to what is being offered today at other teen sites, this site is a waste of time and money.
Truthfully, you will find better quality videos at free tube sites than what you can find at this site.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
