| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
Simpson Twins
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
*Porn featuring identical twins is certainly an intriguing idea.
*32+ exclusive scenes: At the moment two straight scenes, the rest are split about evenly between lesbian and masturbation scenes, but it changes with every update (see cons). Average length about 13 minutes, all scenes offered as okay looking 352x240 resolution and 3,000 kbps mpg files.
*32+ exclusive picture sets with 60-90 pictures each, lowish picture resolutions ranging from about 700x500 to 1400x1100. A mix of straight, lesbian and masturbation sets.
*About 4-6 updates per week (Half picture sets, half movies).
*Easily navigable due to its small size: First there's links to the two most recent updates and dates for when the next updates are, then there's links to the 32 picture sets, followed by links to the 32 scenes and that's it except for an (to the twins unrelated) livecamshows advertisement.
*Download managers supported and no download limits. |
| Cons: |
*When a scene or picture set is added one of the old ones are removed, leading me to suspect that if one stays member long enough one will see previously removed content presented as "new".
*Scenes are generally much too short and video quality, though passable, could be a lot better.
*Boring, artificial and passionless are all words that can be used to describe the scenes.
*No scene descriptions, just a handful of stills to judge from.
*Picture size also at the lower end of the scale and no zip files available for easy downloading.
*No interaction or anything with the twins. |
| Bottom Line: |
Simpson Twins
I joined this site because I find it to be quite a kinky idea to have a pair of twins screw other girls and guys together, however this site's execution of the idea is just a major letdown.
Though the twins themselves look good (a bit like Kirsten Dunst if you ask me), the videos are first of all much too short: Only a single scene, where the twins screw a bald dude, just barely scrapes past the twenty minute mark (and this is also the site's best scene). The rest of the scenes are shorter and usually in the 10-14 minutes range, one foursome is a mere 8 minutes long (!!!), which is just way too short for a good lesbian scene to develop in my opinion.
Another problem is that the twins don't seem much into it, sure they can moan and smile, but when they say something it just sounds artificial. Most of the lesbian scenes opens with one of the twins saying something like "Hi, we're here with X, we thought you might wanna join us, We have about 15 minutes before we have to go to the mall/park/etc what should we do?" and then follows some well-lit and well-shot, but ultimately passionless "I do you/you do me"-sex.
Not even visits from fellow porn twins the Miltons does much to heat these scenes up.
The masturbation videos aren't much better with sometimes the camera guy either jabbering or "helping" the twins by fucking them with their dildos. I don't really like dildos to begin with and then when they're handled by a male it's just terrible...
As I've probably mentioned before I'm not much of a picture lover so it hard for me to judge them, but what I can say is that the pictures aren't that big, there's no zip files and the order is mixed up (In the middle of one set the twins suddenly appear with cum on their face and then in the next picture it's gone?!?)
Moving on to the issue of updates:
According to TBP's site facts there was per 3/15-2008 42 videos and 38 photo sets, which is more than there is today... That only strengthens my suspicion that content is being rotated and will be taken off the site only to reappear again months later, of course I could only prove it definitively by staying a member for a number of months until the old content reappeared. That would however be a waste of money, since I don't like the content enough to keep it on my harddrive once this review is done.
In my opinion you have to really really REALLY like either twins or lesbians to find something worthwhile on this site. For others I won't recommend joining this site, not even if you did it through All Teen Rev Pass where you get 10 other sites (Including the Milton Twins and the Texas Twins) for the same price I foolishly paid just for this one site. |
|
09-19-09 09:16am
Replies (2)
|
Rating
77
|
VideosZ
(0)
90.0
|
No Review.
|
09-10-09 09:05am
|
Rating
78
|
VideoBox
(0)
88.0
|
No Review.
|
09-10-09 09:03am
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I use reviews from PU and the TBP factsheet, but usually not the TBP reviews. Then, if I'm satisfied with what I've seen, I'll check the site's preview page for a final impression.
Outside reviews often seem to be too old and too enthusiastic about the site, I never bother with those.
|
07-22-09 10:45am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
It's their body, if there's something they don't wanna do then it's their right to refrain. Personally I also feel that the attitude and enthusiasm they bring to a scene are much more important than whether they do anal or not (which I'm not much of a fan of anyway). Some of my favourite stars (Dani Woodward, Penny Flame, Roxy Deville) have never done anal on camera, but the attitude they always bring to what they do mean that when they're in a scene I know it's gonna be good and I can download it without hesitation.
|
07-19-09 11:50am
|
Reply
81
|
Lez Love
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thank you for the tip and kind remarks, I have started joining a couple of sites to get my Silvia collection going. Club Silvia Saint and Videosz, I'm even getting her solo/masturbation videos, which I usually wouldn't care about with any other models. She's the only one where I'll watch the scenes just for her looks, though her attitude is great too, even if it has annoying things like music and jumpy cuts during which she lose her clothes and/or changes position. With her everything seems to come together her hair, her eyes, her face, her mouth, her breasts...
|
07-19-09 12:49am
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I prefer videos, can't imagine a video where the model gradually puts her clothes on.
|
07-19-09 12:35am
|
Reply
83
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
moby dick's Review
Hello and welcome to PU moby dick. :) I can't help but feel your review is a bit on the harsh side, as well as being a little short on arguments to back it up.
Okay, so you obviously want porn to have dialogue, a story element or set-up (and I usually do too) which few Sapphic Erotica scenes have, but a 50 rating is usually reserved for sites that fall barely short of being fraudulent. Your review is of course your opinion, but a site with regular updates, as you mention beautiful girls, videos of high technical quality and despite some of the action's repetitiveness many hot scenes to be found, is not a terrible site that needs lots of improvement to earn even a conditional recommendation.
There are fans of lesbian porn who don't need every scene to have a set-up or who, regardless of the soundtrack, always turn the sound off, certainly they shouldn't avoid Sapphic Erotica?
|
07-18-09 04:45am
|
Reply
84
|
Deluxe Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
csbadger49's Review
I was about to say welcome to PU, but you've been a member a lot longer than I have so I'll just skip that. ;-)
Nice little review, Deluxe Pass was one of the first sites (if not the first) I ever joined, I didn't know it was still updating. Back then I thought it was great, but these days I agree with you that getting access to hundreds of small sites with overlapping content isn't that attractive an idea.
|
07-16-09 01:39pm
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
Well, I'll change my vote then. Wish you could do that after a real election. ^_^
|
07-16-09 01:34pm
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
I thought that was what the poll asked about? Among my Firefox bookmarks I have no porn sites, they're in my favourites here at PU.
|
07-16-09 01:26pm
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I have seven at the moment and it serves as a "to-do list" of sites I want to join at some point. It will probably never shrink, I always find more sites I'm interested in joining than I actually get around to join. Just like I always download more than I'll actually get to look at before I download some more...
|
07-15-09 10:17am
|
Review
88
|
Lez Love
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
*50 Viv Thomas DVDs available for download in 500x370 resolution and 700-800 bitrate
*250 vintage lesbian clips from various old American and European adult films, each clip is about 5-15 minutes long
*Several hundred other clips in other categories
*About 500 erotic stories (Not the pro that should ever make you join a site, but they're not a con so I list 'em here)
*Thousands of images, in the following categories: Vintage, kissing, breast, oral & 69, bondage & fetish, soft, series, strap-on & dildo, and miscellaneous.
*A Viv Thomas scene and a 'vintage' scene added each week
*Update log where you can see the past months' updates.
*Download managers supported, no download limit
*The three sections (Videos, images and stories) and their subcategories makes it easy to navigate around |
| Cons: |
*Only the Viv Thomas scenes sneak up to mediocre in terms of image quality
*The 'vintage' clips have a resolution on par with Viv Thomas section, but image quality suffers from poor source material. Each clip about 5-15 mins long
*The 100 'kissing' clips from various porn movies, are low quality and short (No more than a few mins at most)
*150 'web video classics', popular lesbian clips from when dial-up was the norm, quality is as low as back then and they're only a few minutes long. Maybe a bit of nostalgia value for those who surfed for porn back then
*50 'main gallery' clips from various sources, including three scenes from Little Mutt. Clip length from 2-30 minutes. Except for a few newer scenes and clips, most of this could just as well have been put in the other categories.
*The most recent updates to the image section was in June 2008 (the vintage category), but the other categories not since 2005. Consists mostly of scans from old magazines and such, poor-to-average quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
Certainly, the main thing Lez Love has going for it is the 50 Viv Thomas DVDs you can download, the rest of the site's content is in my opinion little more than curiosity pieces for fans of early lesbian porn.
Viv Thomas nearly always produces good scenes with hot European models. If you're into lesbians and haven't seen any of his stuff, you're really missing out and owe it to yourself to give 'em a shot.
Lez Love is a cheap way to get a large sample of his material, though the image quality might be higher at his own site, that's on my to-do list to find out.
The vintage video category is the only other part of the site that's being updated, but unless you're really interested in 70ties and 80ties lesbian porn (both American and a host of European countries), the original image quality is generally too poor and the scenes are taken out of the context of the movie they were in, so all you get is some murky minutes of a pair of lesbians rubbing and kissing each other and that's it.
The remaining three video categories (kissing, web video classics and main gallery) have clips that are of even lower quality than the previous two and it will inevitably overshadow whatever hotness there might be in the clips.
All video clips only have one download option and comes with at least a title (where it's taken from), length and file size, many also have a brief description of what happens in the scene or what makes the clip special/noteworthy. In the Viv Thomas section, the models in each scene are also named.
Quality in the image section is generally as good as can be expected when scanning in old photos, magazines and such, which isn't very good. All the image updates here are at least one year old and most are three or four years old, which also lowers the quality you can expect to find.
The greatest thing I got from Lez Love was when I stumbled upon a certain blonde in some scenes in the Viv Thomas section. The only scene I've ever seen with her previously was way back before I started creating my porn stash, it blew me away back then, but her name wasn't mentioned anywhere so I didn't know who she was. And then suddenly here she was in all her glory, sexiest face I ever seen and breasts that are somehow just so mesmerizing my heart skips a beat and I get vertigo, it's was like finding a dear long lost friend. The blonde I'm talking about is Silvia Saint. That's who's material I'll be out chasing now. :-)
I recommend Lez Love for those who want a large sample of Viv Thomas DVDs relatively cheap ($19.95) and those with a more than keen interest in vintage lesbian porn.
They also have an excellent forum for fans of lesbians, but that's also available for non-members
Feel free to ask away if there's anything that's unclear or comment if there's something I missed or there's something you never want to see in my reviews again. ;-) |
|
07-13-09 12:59pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
They is without a doubt some truth to the saying, but there's also exceptions aplenty.
|
07-13-09 10:24am
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I never have and hopefully I never will, the thought has never turned me on.
|
07-12-09 08:57am
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
No, my sex life is private. I rarely talk with outsiders about it, I would certainly never film it. ;-)
|
07-12-09 08:55am
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I don't care for awards in general be they porn or non-porn awards. Whether it's professionals or 'the people' who pick the winners it's always just whatever crap is most popular at the time.
|
07-12-09 08:53am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Most likely not, the girl would really have to be something special.
|
07-12-09 08:36am
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I do every time, it's almost the best part in my opinion.
|
07-12-09 08:33am
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
No, I've never uploaded anything to a sharing site or given any of it to anyone I know. I obviously discuss and share my experiences with it in anonymous places like here at PU, but in "real life" I'll never discuss or watch porn with anyone besides what me and my significant other might watch now and then.
|
07-12-09 08:29am
|
Reply
96
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I voted no, I've never come across anything that turned me off in that regard. But I haven't strayed very far beyond the mainstream sites, when I have it's usually been lesbian sites and getting the girls as close to eighteen as possible always struck me as more of a straight porn thing (As I write this I remember some of the accusations levelled against Abby Winters, but still...).
|
07-12-09 08:13am
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
As a kid when I was home alone I used to look through my dad's stash and there was one roll of some film, but I didn't bother with it due to all the hassle with viewing it versus the VHS tapes that were much easier.
|
07-12-09 07:38am
|
Review
98
|
Kiss Me Girl
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
*All exclusive content
*Scenes filled with hot and passionate kissing
*61 scenes at the time of this review, each about 30-40 minutes long, of which 48 look at least passable on my 17" monitor in full screen
*No fake boobs
*Good interaction with the webmaster through the forum, a model index was for instance suggested and few weeks later it was there
*No download-limit
*Download manager supported
*Two scenes made available in a high quality resolution each month |
| Cons: |
*No pictures worth mentioning, the videos is the site's main thrust
*All scenes are split into four parts
*While most scenes look passable, video quality is by no means great
*No hardcore, but if you like watching lesbians it won't bother you
*Only 2-3 new scenes each month
*No update schedule
*Scenes not dated, you have to go to forum to get an approximate time when a scene was added
*Rather rudimentary site design |
| Bottom Line: |
Finally I've found time and inspiration to do another review. :D In general I agree with sitsat, he hit the nail on the head with his review.
Starting with the amount of content: The earliest 13 scenes in 320x240 with a low bitrate are just to grainy looking for me to enjoy the otherwise hot action.
The remaining 48 scenes seems to have been shot with a better camera and bitrates have certainly improved (the 18 most-recent scenes also have slightly higher res) to make the scenes look just good enough for full screen on my 17" screen. Nothing spectacular, just enough that I can enjoy them without being bothered by the too blurred image of the earliest scenes.
Spectacular is reserved for the two scenes each month that are made available in 720x480.
The scenes are well-lit and well-shot, sometimes the scene has a set-up sometimes it doesn't, the scene are mostly set somewhere in a house and consist of a pair of girls (except for one threesome) kissing, sucking, groping, rubbing and worshipping each other while they gradually undress. When the girls get to tribbing or fingering each others pussies (while kissing of course) you will at most get a brief glimpse of a pair of pussy lips, which is probably what makes the scenes not hardcore, but the scenes are so hot that whether it's properly categorized as hard or soft is just semantics in my opinion.
Besides the passion, the kissing, and the natural focus it puts on the girls' tongues, is what I find particularly attractive about this site. A pair of girls working those soft slippery things - yummy! Tongue sucking is probably my new favourite thing to behold, it's just incredible.
Girls with long tongues are naturally popular on a site like this and when a model is found who performs well, she'll usually appear in multiple scenes (E.g. Sammie Rhodes is in 8 scenes, Samantha Ryan 6, Brynn Tyler 6 and so on).
Since I joined 28th April, only 6 new scenes have been added. There is only two membership types, both cost the same: One month recurring and one month non-recurring, the latter because the site is clearly aware that most people won't stay members for months.
Access to downloading the scenes (and a free DVD if you decide to order some DVDs) is all that comes with the membership. Everything else you can use and view also as a non-member: The forum, blog, model index, VOD and DVD store, scene descriptions, what scenes are available in high quality this month etc.
The forum is an excellent place to give your suggestions for the site and you'll usually receive a reply from the webmaster.
If this had been just another site with run-of-the-mill generic content, then the cons would have meant a much harsher rating, but the site's content is such a pleasure to watch that it more than compensates for the mostly just passable quality of the videos. Higher video quality is the one thing that this site is really missing in my opinion. But still, any fan of lesbians should definitely pay it a visit. |
|
07-12-09 03:02am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I think my first pay site was Deluxe Pass and I liked it back then. As far as I know it doesn't update (regularly) any more, even if it did I probably wouldn't join it since getting access to hundreds of sites with non-exclusive videos doesn't seem as good an idea as it used to do... So I guess my perception of it would be worse regardless of it still having the same qualities.
|
07-09-09 10:52am
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I don't care about file sizes, just up everything and gimme gimme gimme!
|
05-24-09 06:19am
|
|
