Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
Not really my thing, always seemed sort of awkward and goofy to me.
|
09-07-11 10:23pm
|
Reply
477
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Perhaps it is in one of the site disclaimers ;)
Just one of the many not-so-useful facts I have picked up along the way...
|
09-06-11 10:38pm
|
Reply
478
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
lk2, pee is actually quite sanitary provided the person doesn't have some type of urinary tract infection. Of course, that doesn't mean I find it sexual or interesting, just pointing it out. I find it very odd, but I guess it must be a popular fetish as it is quite common.
|
09-05-11 11:49pm
|
Reply
479
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm with most, in that I generally can't stand it, although like manhole I think it is okay in the context of S&M. This is one of the reasons I hate sites like BangBros.
|
09-04-11 09:54pm
|
Reply
480
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
hey dracken,
I haven't been a member of Nubiles in a while, over a year I think, but I'd say it is pretty comparable from what I recall. Nubiles certainly has better video and photo quality, although I think Teen Dreams has better shot photos. I believe Nubiles also has a higher percentage of original material. Judging from what I have kept from both I would say Nubiles must be better for videos and TD is better for photos.
|
09-04-11 09:49pm
|
Review
481
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Good price through TBP discount
-Many attractive ladies
-Huge site, and archives go back quite far
-Download speeds are good much of the time, maxed my 10 Mbps connection
-Updates are frequent, I count 24 in the last week - 9 movies and 15 photosets
-Nice variety of content, softcore-hardcore
-Photosets are generally well shot
-Zip downloads of photosets
-No DRM and download managers work (I used DTA)
-Didn't experience any login timeouts
-Helpful and reasonably active forum
-Have search function, model index, and model ratings
-Newer photos generally good, about 2600 long end was typical, older photos get a bit worse (1024 in 2006)
-Video quality is acceptable on newer videos (3000 kbps, 960x540 was the best I saw). |
Cons: |
-Site is a bit disorganized, many models appear under multiple listings
-Content is semi-exclusive at best, there is a good amount of material that isn't "exlusif"
-Older photo and video quality is not the best
-Only one download option for videos (newer videos are all wmv, older are mpg), plus a flash player
-Only bonus content is some Viv Thomas videos, but it is pretty low quality (640x480 780 kbps wmv) and cam sites, although I didn't really check them out
-Per exotics comment, some of their advertising can be misleading
-Some videos are from DVDs
-Site can be slow during peak hours |
Bottom Line: |
I think this is a very good site, and definitely one worth joining if you are into young ladies. While their content is not all exclusive, they do have plenty of quality material.
It would be nice if the site were a little better organized, and they could at least put all the sets for one model in the same location. The search function, and the search by category ability are nice, but I didn’t find them to be particularly effective. Perhaps that is because the site is so large. In general the navigation of the site just seems a bit outdated compared with their competition. The content is not all unique, and if you have been a member at sites like youngporn and smackmybitch I am sure you will see some scenes you recognize.
There is a good variety of content, from softcore to hardcore. I would say their content is not particularly ethnically diverse. However, with 13,500+ sets I'm sure most anyone could find something they would like here. There is also a refreshing lack of ridiculous fake breasts, I'm sure there are some, but I didn't see much.
I didn't have any experience with customer service, so I can't comment on that.
Overall, I think this is an excellent site, and definitely one worth joining. Particularly for someone who hasn't joined many sites in this niche, and even more so for those that are fans of photosets. While they do have videos, I still consider the photosets to be the best part of this site. |
|
09-03-11 12:10am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
482
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Once, on a bait-and-switch site that particularly pissed me off, didn't get a very nice response, after that didn't really see the point. I think posting good/bad experiences here is good enough.
|
09-01-11 12:57am
|
Reply
483
|
The Garden Of Adam
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
perhaps she didn't intend it as a slight and more as a statement of purpose for her site. I agree she doesn't sound very welcoming, especially to a group that I would think account for a rather large percentage of her clientele, but maybe she just intended it as a warning of sorts for potential customers.
|
08-30-11 11:04pm
|
Reply
484
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'm with messmer on this one, for some reason big toothy grins always seem weird to me in porn, subtle is better.
|
08-30-11 10:55pm
|
Reply
485
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Like everyone else I prefer to pick, and like rearadmiral I keep a text document with all the sign in info just in case.
|
08-28-11 02:42pm
|
Reply
486
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Goofy, wonder why they keep changing it back and forth... $45/month seems pretty high compared to other sites so I guess it is a good time to join. Seems like last time I was a member here it was much cheaper.
|
08-27-11 03:27am
|
Reply
487
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Did once, but it was too expensive for me.
|
08-26-11 11:34am
|
Reply
488
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
hey exotics, I will try inquiring in the forum as PP suggested and will let you know what folks say. They are updating quite frequently, it seems 3-6 updates per day, which is more than most I have seen aside from DVD sites.
|
08-26-11 11:32am
|
Reply
489
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hey exotics,
I am a current member at TD, and I do not see more than one set of her, it is possible that she is under multiple names I suppose as TD is sort of notorious for that (but that would make their preview page very odd). All of the photos from the preview link you posted are from the one set they have, so I'm thinking it isn't that content has been removed, more likely they entered the wrong number (maliciously or not).
I did a search as well, so I don't think they would be lesbian sets either. Personally I think TD isn't doing so great lately. The content is decent, there has just been so much of it that I have seen before elsewhere.
|
08-24-11 04:13pm
|
Reply
490
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Poll
no real reason, just seemed appropriate for this site.
|
08-22-11 12:08am
|
Reply
491
|
Ariel's Blog
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
hey tangub, just curious the site is called Ariel's blog - yet there is no blog? Sort of funny. Nice review.
|
08-21-11 01:37am
|
Reply
492
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
LewdyPig's Review
Nice review LewdyPig, welcome to PU, hope to hear more from you.
|
08-21-11 01:34am
|
Reply
493
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I honestly can't recall ever having seen broken images on a tour, but I guess if I did that would probably not be a good indicator of quality.
|
08-21-11 01:31am
|
Reply
494
|
N/A
|
Reply of
manholelover's Reply
interesting, I guess we here in the states just know how to fuck up a language... I could never get over the Philly/Jersey "yous", always made me want to smack the person in the face.
|
08-21-11 01:30am
|
Reply
495
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope. Would be kind of interesting though.
|
08-19-11 12:45am
|
Reply
496
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm with Denner too, although only very rarely do a check another users profile.
|
08-16-11 10:21pm
|
Reply
497
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think .xxx is fine, but I doubt they will mandate it, and I'm sure sites that are porn but technically not XXX would not be happy.
|
08-14-11 01:52am
|
Reply
498
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
firefox and IE, use firefox mostly, but for some reason some sites for work only work with IE.
|
08-13-11 01:46am
|
Reply
499
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
BadMr,
From what I understand "could care less" is an American English colloquialism. I always assumed it arose from sarcasm. Couldn't is clearly more logically correct, but could is pretty common in the States.
|
08-10-11 11:42pm
|
Reply
500
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I guess it can be interesting, but for the most part I could care less. Often too much oil for me I guess.
|
08-10-11 12:04am
|