It isn't really a clone anymore they release material on the two sites seperately now - although the older material is pretty commonly shared. The videos I dowloaded all seemed fine to me, the camerawork can be a bit poor - given the self-shot nature of some of the shoots, but this didn't really bother me that much The mid-mp4 was plenty crisp for me.
I went all the way back to their 2007 releases, and they have both low and high h.264 videos (mp4). I'm pretty sure they had these when I was a member here last time...
I agree the login is fucking irritating, but they email you a link now that fills out all the security info for you except the captcha.
I can understand the frustration of joining a site and finding a lot of duplicate material from another site, I haven't seen any of that lately, but maybe its just new to me.
I'm not sure about your complaint on variety, there are 300 models on this site. Given they are all young, and euro, so there isn't a lot of variety in ethnicity or age. But I think it is a reasonable variety of models that is consistent with most euro sites.
Everyone has their own tastes I suppose, I think the material is pretty good here and I don't feel as though I wasted my money. I guess maybe I go against the grain sometimes, I for one can't understand why people like 21sextury so much, that place just pisses me off for some reason.
To each their own, I suppose. I also read Denner's review, and I agree with many of his cons for the site, browsing photos on the site is a nuisance, although I usually just check a couple and download the zip if it looks good so this didn't bother me. This site and Youngporn.net share a lot of the same content, especially with older material, however newer updates appear to be released seperately on each site. I am not sure why they don't just merge the two given the large amount of overlap.
I think most of their newer content has been good to me, I hope you like it if you join, I don't need any more enemies!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-attractive, mostly euro ladies
-good variety of content, ranging from very softcore to group
-reasonable update schedule usually 1 photo or video set per day
-good navigation, search, tags, model index, ratings
-custom zip downloads of photosets
-no DRM
-download managers work
-no apparent download limit
-largely original content, the newer stuff appears entirely original
-decent sized site, 308 models at the time of this review
-video quality decent, downloadable in 3 sizes for the newer videos HD wmv, high mp4, and low mp4. I usually just downloaded the high mp4 which is typically 640x360 3700 kbps and reasonably crisp.
-photo quality is good, newer photos are 4032x6048 and reasonably well photographed
Cons:
-not a fan of accessing through the deisel access site
-no bonus content unless you pay extra
-if you pay extra for the bonus content, there is a lot of duplicate scenes across the network
-some of the paid bonus sites are no longer updating
-site can load sort of slow at times, even though download speeds were always better than 1 MB/sec
-since some of the material appears to be self produced by the talent, the video and photo camerawork can get a bit iffy at times
Bottom Line:
Overall I think this site is pretty decent, my only hesitation with the site is whether or not it is worth the extra $10 to join the network.
Given that Policeman.net, Kamilla18.com, thespermlover.com, sashafucksdasha.com, and laythekat.com all appear to be no longer updating, it is probably not worth joining the network if you have been a member of it before. However, if you haven't it is probably worth considering spending the extra $10. While there is duplicate content all over the network, there are some unique scenes to each site, especially on the individual model sites.
Bottom line, I like the variety of the site, and that generally the photography is pretty good, especially with the softcore material. It would be nice if they could get some of the models to do more work in the studio with professional photographers, especially with the hardcore material. They could also do some work to fix some of their website load issues. Even with the sites drawbacks, I still think it is worth joining for a month if you are into attractive young ladies.
There are an aweful lot of scam websites and bait-and-switch websites out there, and I'm sure most of them operate on the idea that most, like me, would not be willing to raise a ruckus over porn. Although I'm sure many of these also use less than reputable billers...
Is all the material from their old site Beauty is Divine on this site as well, or just some of it? Looking at the preview it seems as though perhaps not...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-attractive ladies
-interesting group content
-decent bonus material
-navigation is pretty good, they have a model index, rating system, and member comments
-no DRM
-video quality is good (mpeg-4).
-zip downloads of photosets
-download managers worked for me
-exclusive content as far as I can tell
Cons:
-price is a bit high
-scenes are excessively long and large
-download speeds are inconsitent, sometimes poor
-in-browser video player is glitchy
-not a huge site 178 girls in 52 parties
-videos are broken up into pieces, although as one file they would be enormous.
-advertisements on home page
Bottom Line:
This site has decent, unique content, however like some other sites from this company it can be a bit hard to get at. The files sizes are very large, and many parts of some of the scenes are just background and chit-chat. It is very necessary with this site to preview the material before downloading the content, as I have several times downloaded scenes with little to no nudity in them at all, let alone sex.
I think if you have the time and the harddrive space this site is a pretty good site for group sex action with euro ladies. However, I gave the site some demerits for the fact that it takes so long to find material you want to download and to download it.
There are definitely some attractive ladies here, and the video quality is generally good - although the camerawork can get a bit iffy at times.
Considering the bonus content available at the time I joined, this site may be worth considering if you are into group sex with euro ladies, however expect to spend a lot of time sorting through what you want to download - and expect to immediately delete some of the content you do. I'm all for having fun and drinking, however I don't think I need a 50 minute clip of some folks boozing, smoking and chatting. If only they had some better editing and made it easier to get at their material I would recommend this site more highly.
Yeah I noticed it went away a few months ago, not sure if maybe it is at a different location but the last time I was there it didn't appear as though it had updated in quite some time.
It is interesting content, it is just a bit frustrating to download a scene that is basically home videos for 50 minutes, and like 10 minutes of poorly shot, poorly lit sex or nudity. I like the concept as well, they just didn't execute.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-attractive euro ladies
-chance to see the models acting naturally (although this can also be a con)
-download managers work
-no DRM
-decent network content
-video quality is pretty decent - SD DivX mpeg4, some scenes have iPod m4v vids as well
-decent sized site, only 32 couples but each one typically has 7-10 scenes
-zip downloads of photos
-original content, including some ladies i haven't seen before
-subtitled
Cons:
-sort of expensive
-camerawork is poor, although this is to be expected since it all does appear to be truly "self-shot"
-only two connections allowed, so if you have two downloads going (even in a manager), can't browse site
-videos are excessively long. i like seeing some natural stuff, but a 60 minute video with 10 minutes of posing and 15 minutes of sex seems like a lot of extra material
-navigation is odd
-in-browser flash player is very glitchy, normally this wouldn't bother me but it is actually very important when the files are this large (to preview so you know what you will get)
-photo quality is poor
-download speeds inconsistent (600 KB/sec was the best I experienced)
-files are too big, 1 GB or more, given what you get
-sort of expensive
-photo quality is poor, incomplete, and often out of order in the zips
Bottom Line:
This site has an interesting concept, and they do get some very attractive ladies. There are definitely some Euro pros here, but there were a few women I hadn't seen before, but maybe I just haven't been looking enough. The content is very inconsistent, and while the website can't be held responsible for the quality of the videography on self-shot scenes, they certainly could EDIT! cut out some of the camera jostling, and a good bit of the banter. I enjoy seeing the models act somewhat naturally, however this is a bit excessive.
You can see they definitely tried to make navigation better, adding keywords, a model index, and many other useful things, however if they are going to post these long-ass videos, probably the most important thing they could have included is the ability to edit the videos yourself before downloading.
They certainly have found a nice collection of attractive euro women, and it is very nice that they provided subtitles (I am one that is interested in what they are saying, I'm sure others might not care), howeve the execution is miserable. There are some scenes here that I will definitely keep, and there are many others that I might consider keeping if only the files were smaller, or the videos were better edited.
Based upon all these faults it is a difficult site to recommend, even though I somewhat liked the site.
With regard to elephant's comment they did add hardfucktales to the network, however there are only 11 scenes. Gangbang isn't really my niche so I haven't downloaded any of the scenes, but based on the file sizes it appears as though this site doesn't suffer from the same excessively long scene problem as the other sites on this network. Although there are only 11 scenes.
Interesting site concept, and many of the models are quite attractive. However, this site has far too many drawbacks. The scenes are very large, and very long, with a lot of filler. I'm one that likes plot and buildup, but this place takes it a bit far. Also, download speeds have been horrible so far - which just adds to the excessively long scene problem.
But Cap'n, tease implies lack of nudity... The name of the site isn't onlysexyoutfitstofullynude.com, eh? I understand that this is what you want, but that's just not what this site is.
While I understand your complaint, it seems similar to complaining that playboy.com doesn't have hardcore material (I assume it doesn't).
not to start any kind of fight, but movie companies have been using aspect ratios larger than 4:3 for decades. I'm no film historian or anything, but I believe most movies starting in the 70s were shot in 2.4:1 panavision. I'm sure there are some films that have been shot in 4:3, but I doubt it is very many. Just because a movie was 4:3 when it originally came out on VHS or Betamax or whatever doesn't mean that was the aspect ratio that it was shot in.
You have it a bit backwards, in that most films were "pan and scanned" to fit the 4:3 aspect ratios of televisions, the widescreen releases of older films are not cropping the original film, they are actually returning to something closer to the orginal aspect ratio, it is the 4:3 film that has been cropped.
In fact Blu-rays of modern movies still have black bars on the top and bottom because they are preserving the original aspect ratio which is greater than 16:9. A full screen HD hollywood movie has likely still been cropped to conform to 16x9, although somewhat less than it would have to be for 4:3.
prefer 16x7 for porn, just cause most of my gear is in that aspect ratio. For "real" movies it has to be widescreen, particularly with any kind of action or scenic movie. Pan and scan just doesn't work for me in those types of films.
Good review, welcome to PU! Any idea if they are still recycling older content, or are they releasing any new material? I know you were only a member for 3 days, so you might not have seen many, if any, updates.
The company is paying for the network and bandwidth, so they can do whatever they want I suppose. Unless you work in certain industries, I don't think allowing people to look at porn on their computers during business hours is a great idea - especially in a cubicle environment!
Although some companies take it a bit far, mine blocks ESPN, the Onion, and many other not-so-offensive sites, even during lunch!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
