| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
The Sperm Lover
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I actually did keep a couple of sets from this place the last time I was a member, but I totally agree this site is sort of a worthless throw-in with all the other Deisel stuff.
|
01-11-11 10:37pm
|
Reply
652
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
The last time I was a member was some time ago, and when I had joined it has very unclear what sites you got - if you used the TBP discount only like 15 sites showed up on the little thumbnails, if you didn't 20 or so showed up. Glad to hear they have clarified that as well.
|
01-11-11 10:33pm
|
Reply
653
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Nice review Denner, good to see this network is keeping the new talent coming. This network is definitely one of my favorites, my main complaint being I wish they were a bit more clear on the join pages exactly what sites you were joining - as it isn't always super clear.
|
01-10-11 02:12pm
|
Reply
654
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Rotterdam854's Reply
One of my cons was that the camerawork wasn't the best, and I stated it was POV for the most part, so I sort of figured that covered it. But I agree the camerwork is sketchy.
It's an okay place, but if you were to join one of the two I'd go with casting couch first, I think it is defnitely better - unless you like asshole male talent, in which case you might prefer this one.
|
01-10-11 02:07pm
|
Reply
655
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Lovely Drooler, I can just imagine that first baker coming down to the kitchen after nailing his lady and thinking to himself, hmmm...
I chose real life cumshot, although I don't really need to see the money shot in any form, as they tend to focus on face or wherever the specimen was placed, and often are pretty degrading.
|
01-08-11 11:14pm
|
Reply
656
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
pretty much always, and i haven't experienced many places where download managers don't work - or there is some kind of workaround to get them to work.
|
01-06-11 09:57pm
|
Reply
657
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Reply
i have an active membership here, and i haven't experienced any noticeable slowdowns from the last time I was a member a year or so ago. download speeds aren't great, but decent at 600 KB/s the last time I tried. I have always found the page load times to be sort of slow at this site (especially if you open a bunch of tabs really quickly), but nothing terrible, and I've definitely seen worse.
|
01-05-11 09:54pm
|
Reply
658
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I suppose, but even when she was younger it was more about acting than singing. Either way she's got a nice backside...
|
01-04-11 05:15pm
|
Reply
659
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'd definitely go with Tina Turner, or maybe Beyonce or Lopez (although I don't know that Lopez really counts as being in the music business).
|
01-04-11 09:41am
|
Reply
660
|
BB Films
(0)
|
Reply of
Th3Dodg3r's Reply
I have also been curious about this place for a while, but haven't yet joined because I'm a bit unsure of their content quality and particulars. Hopefully someone will provide some feedback soon.
|
01-02-11 10:31pm
|
Reply
661
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
yeah, for the most part i just trimmed out most of the chit-chat. I like setup to some extent, but this place took it kind of far...
|
01-01-11 11:40pm
|
Reply
662
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Totally agree with your review pat362,
Although I sometimes like this type of material, I also found the site more or less frustrating. I didn't even end up downloading much from here when I was a member because I kept going in and trying to cut the films down to reasonable sizes (eventually I just gave up on the site entirely).
|
01-01-11 01:13am
|
Reply
663
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As sort of the opposite of Lionheart (fewer expenses but less income), I'll probably should be joining less - but it'll probably end up being the same.
|
01-01-11 01:09am
|
Reply
664
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
ha, now I feel stupid, I see too big, too long and just think size not time... duh.
|
12-30-10 12:18am
|
Reply
665
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
It is possible to hit a woman's cervix, I'm sure a longer penis (and inconsiderate partner) would make this more likely. Although I don't think this leads to soreness, so much as immediate pain
|
12-29-10 03:50pm
|
Reply
666
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
yeah, i'm sure some would disagree with the score given a lot of folks seem to complain about the short sets and short videos, but I think the site is pretty decent.
|
12-28-10 10:50pm
|
Review
667
|
X-Art
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Beautiful ladies from all over
-Good photography and videography
-Good download speeds
-Download managers work
-No DRM
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Decent navigation, model index, and update index, model ratings.
-Photo quality is decent, typically available in three sizes (1200, 2000, 4000)
-Videos are not huge (edited, yay!)
-Video quality is decent (960x540 3500 kbps SD, 1920x1080 16000 kbps HD) SD is pretty crips, HD is very nice. Either Quicktime or wmv.
-3 updates per week, has been very consistent since I've been here |
| Cons: |
-Smallish site, 99 models at time of review with typically a couple of photosets per model, not as many of the models have videos - maybe 50% or so.
-Photosets can be short, espicially older sets. Although, in some cases this could be seen as a positive if they removed duplicates and whatnot.
-Videos can also be short, which is probably a con for some, but for the post part I consider it a good thing.
-No bonus content
-No real forum, but you can post comments on sets and there is a blog.
-A lot of toy use in the softcore sets, and not stripping to speak of, many sets start out pretty much nude. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall I think this site is pretty decent. The models are very attractive for the most part and I like the mix of hardcore and softcore materails on a site that focuses a little bit more on eroticism. I definitely like the style of the shoots. I could see how some might complain that the sets are too short of the vidoes are edited pretty substantially, however I find this quite refreshing. Most sites these days post ridiculously long videos with too many closeups and way too much repetitive or unnecessary material (that just ends up wasting hard drive space or wasting my time editing the crap out). So in my opinion it is nice to see a site where they appear to be attempting to trim the sets to the material they think is best.
My main complaint with the site is that it still a little small, and has no bonus content. However, for the price with the PU discount, I think the site is definitely worth joining for a month if you are into well photographed, athletic, young women.
The mix of hardocre and midcore is nice, it would be nice to see a litttle more stripping in the midcore/softcore sets, and given that they have models from all over the place a little more ethnic diversity might be nice as well. While I did like their hardcore material, if this is the only thing you are looking for, this site probably isn't worth joining as there isn't that much of it.
Bottom line for me, with the decent price, I found this site to be worth joining, probably just for a month every now and again, but definitely worth considering. |
|
12-28-10 10:37am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
668
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Too bad man, no one likes being lied too. This site has been on my "maybe" list for a while, I guess it will just have to stay there.
Thanks for the info, though.
|
12-28-10 10:11am
|
Reply
669
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Never been called the old part, but my partner calls me a dirty man all the time. Perhaps when I get older she will include the old too...
|
12-28-10 10:09am
|
Reply
670
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Reply
I didn't think your initial response sounded cocky, although your use of the word communist in this context is a bit off.
The reason for the poll is that some folks here believe people are too quick to "trust" a new user - as trusting enough users in a week gets you a ticket in the drawing. I tend to give users trust votes if they provide useful seemingly trustworthy information, which is the basis for the trust, it has nothing to do with my personal opinion of that users overall trustworthiness, just that they seem to have provided trustworthy information on this site.
|
12-23-10 11:39pm
|
Reply
671
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Curious, I wonder what the problem is. When I was a member about a year ago I had no problems downloading - I have at least 50 scenes on one of my externals, and I don't recall ever experiencing any problems. Perhaps they just don't have the server capacity to meet demand. Does streaming work well, or is there a ton of load time, lag, etc.?
|
12-23-10 10:55pm
|
Reply
672
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Reply
If the user has submitted useful information, that is apparently trustworthy, what is the harm in trusting them? I think trust votes for new users can help get them to submit more reviews. No one wants to be a part of a standoffish community.
I gave you a trust vote Thedebilman666, as I though you provided useful information to fellow PUs, and hope you continue to.
|
12-23-10 12:48am
|
Reply
673
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yeah, with the downloads it is definitely a pretty good value. I found the site navigation to be quite annoying when I was a member, and I agree that some videos were glitchy - although I'd say most of the scenes I downloaded were decent quality with no major glitches. I went back and watched a few, and didn't notice any audio sync problems, so perhaps it was just that one scene or movie?
|
12-19-10 11:39pm
|
Reply
674
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Do you mean there are no downloads at all PinkPanther, or no downloads of newer videos? When I was a member practically everything was downloadable, most of the newer stuff downloadable in HD. It'd be a shame if they got rid of that feature...
|
12-18-10 04:44pm
|
Reply
675
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
glad you don't hate it, man. I was fearing your wrath!
did you join the network or just 18onlygirls? there was something when i joined about getting free access to an additional site, but since i joined the network this didn't apply to me.
|
12-10-10 09:49am
|
