I once saw a guy on a plane reading a Hustler, and he wasn't trying to hide it. I can sort of understand Playboy, as it actually used to be funny sometimes, but Hustler in an aisle seat? I'm sure if you looked carefully you could catch someone looking at porn on their iPad or something.
Well Cap'n, seems like they keep suckering you back in... I have to admit there is one site that I always find very irritating, but still join like once a year. Don't know why I do it.
Personally I think tease can be pretty hot, even without a full-nude "payoff", provided it is well shot.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-some very attractive, i believe euro ladies
-no DRM
-download managers work
-zip downloads of photosets
-photo quality is good (3000x2000)
-video quality is good (1280x720, 8000 kbps was the best i saw)
-content appears to be exclusive
Cons:
-expensive
-only 43 scenes at the time of this review
-some scenes are a little odd, there are a few where there are like 4 small scenes within the one video
-download speeds are inconsitent
-many scenes are in parts, usually 2
-wmv is only video option i saw
-no real update schedule
-navigation is poor - no model index, search, etc. just a list of scenes
Bottom Line:
As a bonus site, this site is pretty decent, however if you were ever to join it as a standalone, I don't see the value. while there is some decent material here, especially if you are a fan of 1 guy with 2 or more girls, it just has too many cons to make it worth it, not to mention the size and price of the site.
I did find many of the scenes to be pretty good, the camerawork is generally better than usual and the video quality is reasonably crisp. There are definitely some scenes here that I will add to my favorites.
The content appears to be original from what I can tell, and they do have some models I haven't seen anywhere else (they have probably worked for other sites, but I haven't seen them).
Overall, an okay site as a bonus for joining oldje, but if this deal ever goes away I would probably not join unless they drop the price and/or increase the size of the site.
users should be able to give a site whatever score they think is appropriate. If the place only has 5 scenes, but they are all excellent and the user feels it was worth it, why shouldn't they be able to score it well?
Just thought I would point out that if you wish to join the network it is cheaper to join through 18onlygirls.com by $5. Of course the last time I was a member of this network there was a huge amount of overlap, so I am not sure it is worth the extra $5 anyways...
None of the above for me as well, the film was a friends - he might still have it however... It was some aweful 90's style fake breasted movie with Ron Jeremy in it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Attractive euro women
-Reasonably well filmed scenes
-No DRM
-Download managers work, although mine did have some timeout problems (I tried DTA and GetRight)
-Looks to be all original content
-Scenes have a "plot" to some extent
-Zip downloads of some photosets (in rar)
-Photo quality is variable, newer material is good
-Bonus site is pretty interesting (class3-some), although has most of the same cons as this site
-Decent sized archive (300+ scenes), although about half of it is poor quality.
-Newer video quality is pretty good, 1280x720 8000 kbps was the best I saw, although the video doesn't look as good as the specs might suggest.
-The mid-aged material was decent at 720x400 3000 kbps. I don't have specs on the RM material, but the file sizes are very small and look very poor.
Cons:
-Poor navigation
-Logins timeout relatively fast
-Expensive, about $40 US at current exchange rate
-Slowish download speeds, best I saw was 400 KB/s using DTA
-Poor navigation, no model index, no search function, etc.
-Older videos are RealMedia, and very poor quality.
-Some sets don't have photosets associated with them, only screencaps, and some sets don't have zips.
-Most videos are in multiple parts, between 2 and 4 was typical.
-Video quality on newer material is pretty good, older material is quite poor.
-Limited download options, newer material is wmv (high or low) older material is realmedia only (high or dialup - neither are "high")
-I have no idea what the update schedule is, no dates on the scenes, but I somehow doubt it is frequent
Bottom Line:
The material on this site is pretty decent, there are certainly some attractive ladies. Personally I am not a fan of the young/old fetish, I joined mostly because of the attractive ladies.
It is a pity that the site makes it so hard to get at their content. The navigation is poor, most of the scenes do not even give the model a name. A model index would be nice, just for sorting purposes. The navigation pretty much consists of a list of scenes with some preview pictures, with 5 scenes on each page. Pretty much nothing else.
The scenes themselves are pretty good, although the editing can be a bit odd. Most of the scenes I downloaded have quite loud background music that pretty much drowns out everything else. This is one of the only sites I can think of that uses slow motion during sex scenes, and the slow motion is a bit odd to me.
I did not have any experience with customer support, so I can't comment on that. There is no user forum or anything of that nature.
I actually very much liked the bonus content. Although some of the scenes are a bit weird (like a guy has sex with two ladies, then two other ladies, etc.).
Overall I think this site is decent, it would be nice to see them provide a model index and fix some of their many download and navigation issues. Given the price, it is hard to recommend unless there are specific models you like in the preview (or you are really fond of old/young niche). The bonus site is nice, but certainly doesn't make it worth the price for me. If you like to see "attractive men" in scenes, this is most definitely not the site for you, as many are fat, old and hairy (not that there is anything wrong with that...)
If someone thinks a site is excellent they should have the ability to rate is as such, I'm probably a bit too nitpicky to score a site 100, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be allowed to.
by sex ed do you mean safe sex and such, or learning "skills" for sex?
if it the former i'd say school as i actually had a decent sex ed class in high school, as for the latter i'd probably say non-porn internet. so i said other...
this type of annoying navigation is pretty common in porn sites these days, as RustyJ said it is a good idea to open a model page in a new tab, which isn't that much of a nuisance.
i haven't been a member of this network in about a year, but based on the last time i was a member i didn't find the navigation particularly poor (i've seen many that are much much worse).
If someone writes a decent review, I typically trust them right away, if it is an iffy review I will wait and see if they post anything else. I agree with BadMrFrosty that giving newbies trust ratings helps motivate them to post more reviews as it helps them feel appreciated and like they fit in, certainly nothing wrong with that.
Just wanted to point out that while their newer videos are getting better quality from a technical standpoint, it appears as though they have some encoding problems as there are many more artifacts and glitches in the videos than you typically see at that bitrate.
The site is entirely based on their DVDs with some magazine content as well, and the video content is not HD. The best video bitrate they offer is 1700 kbps, which is decent - but not great (and is only available on stuff released more recently, like the last 6 months or so). The DVDs are split up into scenes, if your preference is single scenes not from DVDs, this probably isn't the place for you.
The subsite set-up is pretty much bullshit, as far as I could tell most of their content could be found on either Hustler or Barely Legal, the subsites are somewhat useful in sorting content I suppose, but it is basically just mirrors of subsets of their content from what I could tell.
They have photos from their magazines on the site as well, however it is a real nuisance to dig through these and the picture qualitiy is generally mediocre anyways (also the sets are typically small - 8 pictures or so).
yeah, but based on those comments I would be hesitant to join their sites until I hear otherwise! Hopefully someone will take the plunge and update us sometime soon...
yeah looking back at my review it does seem a bit negative given the score, I was mainly trying to point out all the flaws, as this place certainly has its problems.
I did enjoy the site, there were just many scenes where after it downloaded I looked at it and was like, what the fuck is this? I guess I am just willing to overlook the bad for the good in this case...
I agree with pat362, anything but porn - probably just generic bullshit, and perhaps even politics if the conversation was headed a more intellectual route (one can always hope, right?)
Hey man, a site like this is kind of difficult to review. On one hand they have some excellent content, but then there are other scenes that are pretty big "misses". I am personally a fan of castings with interviews and stuff before the model gets naked, so that is probably why I scored the site so high even though the content is pretty variable. He definitely gets some attractive models, it is just too bad that a lot of the hardcore castings are single-camera on a tripod type deals, although that it pretty much what I expected.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Many attractive mostly euro young ladies
-Good sized site: 356 hardcore scenes (plus an additional 103 "beahind the scenes" hardcore sets), 1160 total castings.
-Good forum, webmaster is actually pretty active and answers questions from users
-newer movie quality is good from a technical standpoint - 1280x720 2500 kbps was the best I saw
-zip downloads of photosets, although there aren't a ton of photos
-download managers work
-no DRM
Cons:
-large watermark on videos
-expensive
-no bonus content aside from access to some of the casting DVDs
-download speeds are inconsistent, best I got was 500 KB/sec
-some models don't get naked for very long, a few don't get naked at all
-poor navigation, although I am not sure how it could be easily improved on a site like this
-photo quality is mediocre, and only about 10% of the castings have photosets
-uses a biller I am not familiar with
-some content is available elsewhere
Bottom Line:
Overall this site is pretty good and I'd recommend joining if you are a fan of casting syle videos. However, bear in mind that a lot of these videos are 90% chit-chat, 10% nudity. Some of them have sex in the casting, but the camerawork in these is pretty poor (single camera on a tripod).
His update schedule seems pretty regular, although I am not sure how long he holds onto some of these scenes before releasing them. He has a recent update of an Evelyn/Faith scene, that I would assume is several years old - although can't be sure.
The forum is quite interesting, and I believe you can access it for free. It is often curious what he says about a given model - although the forum is bilingual, with some comments in french and some in english. Either way, rare interaction you don't really see from most sites.
Overall I think this site is pretty good, Woodman definitely has a talent for getting very attractive ladies to take their clothes off - and for some to do hardcore. However, if you are not a fan of casting style videos, or are searching for particularly erotic scenes, this probably isn't the site for you.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
