messmer, is it only the new updates that are realeased as downloadable, or are the letting you download older HD releases from a few months ago as well? Thanks!
Why does he do castings with girls on their period? Am I the only one that finds it a bit of a turn off for the girl to strip down and he immediatly zooms in on the tampon string? Maybe its just me, but a bit disturbing...
Pretty much agree with dracken's review, however, interesting site, certainly has its share of flaws, but pretty good.
she's still cute, the back tattoo isn't that bad (not nearly as bad as belicia's anyway). looked around a bit and didn't see any photos showing her huge feet, so i'll have to take your word for it on that one...
Just wondering if any recent members had any updates on this site? I've been thinking about joining for a while, but their biller makes me nervous, never heard of them before.
Also, from poking through the site it looks like some (a lot?) of the material is available elsewhere, I know Hustler has a bunch, and some others looked familiar but couldn't place them.
Also, the forum for some of the girls people ask why the girl didn't even get naked, how common is this?
Nope, but there are way too many that do! I still hear bozos talk about how nudity in art is too sexual for kids to see - it is the human form jackass!
Edit: the jackass was directed at the bozos I spoke of, not the pollster.
I agree MetArt definitely gets more attractive models to pose nude, but it is a bit too "artistic" than "erotic" for my tastes. I imagine the artsy nudes are what allow Met to get more attractive models to pose - "hey its art, so don't worry about nudity"
Thanks for clarifying Mike, I wasn't really sure about the bonus content, it seemed like licensed material when I looked through it, but I'll take your word for it.
Curious, I never had any problems downloading from any of this company's sites. Perhaps the files were so big your connection timed out after a while, I dunno. Partial WMV downloads sometimes work for me...
Hey man, interesting review. I actually kind of liked some of the material on this site, probably just cause I thought the Flora model was cute. I agree the site navigation is poor, but it is consitent with all of the network sites. And the site is small. But I think it was kind of nice to have a somewhat "lighter" BDSM site, instead of the crazy rought stuff you often see - or at least in the scenes I downloaded. Also, in my experience scenes from sites in this niche often run quite long.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
09-26-1012:01am (Update History) Reason: Deleted note that bonus content may not be exclusive per webmaster's response
Pros:
-Good variety of attractive ladies, mostly younger euro models
-Excellent download speeds (I averaged better than 1 MB/sec)
-Good quality photography, both size and general photography
-Zip downloads of photosets in 3 sizes
-Decent navigation
-Good bonus content
-Good price with PU discount
-Decent quality videos 1280x720 3000 kbps
-No DRM
-Some download mangers work, DTA did, GetRight didn't
-Ladies are natural from what I can tell, there are some tattoos but nothing too nasty
-Decent sized collection, 153 models with most having a few picture sets and a couple of videos at time of review
-Exclusive content as best I can tell
-Good update schedule, 4 photo sets and 3 videos on average
-Decent navigation, model index and search.
Cons:
-Bills through netbilling, which I don't like, but I suppose this is personal preference
-While the models are attractive, most are pretty common, it'd be nice if they had some fresh faces
-Bonus content is a bit iffy, "HD" video has the HD frame size (1280x720), but has poor bitrate (2000 kbps or less).
-As exotics stated, it'd be nice if they named the files a little better.
-Not a huge site, still could use some more growth.
-A bit heavy on toy use/insertions for my tastes
Bottom Line:
This is a pretty decent site, especially for those that like toy/masturbation content from young attractive european ladies. As with many of these types of sites I'd prefer there were more stripping and eroticism rather than just cramming stuff up in there, but it is a pretty well done site. The quality of the photography is pretty good and the model quality in general is outstanding.
The bonus content is pretty hit-or-miss. While it does provide some additional hardcore content for those that are looking for that type of material, the quality of the content is generally subpar and the navigation/use of the bonus sites isn't the best.
As Cap'n stated in his comment, if you are looking for a good quality softcore site, this isn't it. This site pretty much fits the definition of midcore.
Overall I'd say this is a pretty good site, it could use some improvement and expansion, but worth joining if you are into young fit european ladies, especially if you like harder lesbian and solo material.
I agree that scoring is very subjective, and I wasn't intending to throw it out there as a disagreement with you, that was just my opinion of the network so far - sorry if I came off as compative. I have been pleasantly surprised so far, and there are a good number of models I hadn't ever seen before. The outdoor sex site and light bondage site are both pretty decent as well.
I haven't downloaded a huge amount of stuff from here yet, but I'll have to check out Klara.
I would say, that while the navigation is better than the rest of the network, it isn't exactly good (different models listed under same name, same model listed under different names, etc.). There are also some duplicate scenes across the network. Also, download speeds are a bit inconsistent for my tastes.
All the same, I agree with most of your points, I'd probably score it a smidge lower - maybe 86 or something including the bonus sites.
I agree that the material is definitely better than most euro sites, and plenty of American ones.
I hadn't really lokked at this site since it had "stream" in the name. But after looking it appears as though it isn't a streaming video site, I guess I'll have to look into it more...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some attractive euro-teen models
-Decent sized collection, 244 models, 545 videos, 589 photo sets.
-Video quality is decent (best I saw was 1280x720 4000 kbps wmv, worst I saw was 720x480, 3000 kbps). Reasonably crisp, although not the best I've seen.
-No DRM
-Download managers work, although had some trouble with them with photosets.
-Decent navigation for a site like this, model index, model rating, and comments on scenes are available - although not always reliable
-Zip downloads of photo sets
-Decent photo quality
-Mostly hardcore, but good variety of solo and a few lesbian scenes mixed in
-Content is exclusive as best I can tell
-Bills through Epoch
Cons:
-No real bonus content
-Expensive for what you get compared with some other sites
-Unreliable servers, download speeds are all over the place - 1 MB/sec one day, 200 KB/sec the next.
-Updates aren't very frequent, 7 photo sets and 7 video sets in the last month (photos and videos are usually the same scene)
-Camerawork is not the best
Bottom Line:
Overall I'd say this is a decent euro-teen site. The site is not very large, although the collection is pretty well sized. For those used to seeing a boatload of content with tons of bonus sites, they might find this site lacking. It could certainly use some improvement, and more consistent download speeds would be nice.
I primarily joined the site because I knew it had content by some models I liked, so I was reasonably pleased with what I got. However, as with most sites of this nature there are some drawbacks. Model quality is somewhat inconsistent, and while some of the scenes try to have a plot it is pretty much a gonzo site.
I think this site would be a lot better if paired with the other JTCash site as a bonus, or if they just merged the two sites into one as the content is similar and they have many of the same models.
As with this company's other site, some of the scenes are a little odd (a girl screwing some guy while her mother is sleeping at the table, overly long jerking at the end, etc), and some of the models, while attractive, look like they are doing their taxes rather than having sex.
This place is probably worth joining if you are a fan of some of the models they offer. There are definitely some decent scenes here. Of course there are also plenty of not so good scenes as seems typical of most of these smaller euro-teen sites. If they offered their other site as a bonus (or lowered the price), and increased their server capacity I would probably recommend this site a little more highly.
I think the reason they charge extra for these two channels is that they are perfectly aware that most of the material on their site is crap, and thus they feel they can charge more for material that has a higher percentage of decent content.
In my opinion, no, especially if you have joined as a member of both anytime recently. Of course, I generally dislike evil angel, so others might value it more. The updates from those studios aren't super-common, and for the most part I don't think they are all that new of material.
You can easily browse all they offer and decide if it is worth it to you, unless they have significantly changed the preview in the last couple of months.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
