Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : slutty (0)  

Feedback:   All (955)  |   Reviews (70)  |   Comments (65)  |   Replies (820)

Other:   Replies Received (467)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 751-775 of 958 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
751
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of Khan's Reply

Ah, me stupid. Sorry Khan...

09-09-10  01:17pm

Comment
752
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)

PU Discount Doesn't Work

Or is it just me? Tried deleting cookies and such, no dice.

09-09-10  01:19am

Replies (3)
Reply
753
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(0)
Reply of BadMrFrosty's Review

Thanks for the review, I've been curious about this place for a bit, sounds like I can cross it off the list!

09-09-10  12:32am

Reply
754
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Agree with pat, I think the "star" part is a bit overused, but I am always in for more hardcore performers - provided they don't have stupid tats or ridiculous fake parts...

09-09-10  12:30am

Reply
755
Visit Exploited College Girls

Exploited College Girls
(0)
Reply of dracken's Reply

Yeah, I have edited a few of the scenes to take that content out, I have never heard of anyone who was a fan of this niche either. Perhaps my porn veiwing habits are more mainstream than I though...

09-06-10  10:46pm

Reply
756
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

I gotta say, all three are pretty bad from my perspective. Last time I joined RK I was quite surprised by what seemed to be a significant increase in plastic.

09-06-10  02:10am

Reply
757
Visit Fuck Studies

Fuck Studies
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

No problem, when I joined I looked through all the company sites listed on PU to see if any had Fuck Studies as a bonus site, and none of them did, so I just joined that site directly. Unfortunately it seems full price is the only option for now...

09-05-10  11:09pm

Reply
758
Visit Fuck Studies

Fuck Studies
(0)
Reply of elephant's Comment

Hey elephant,

When I was a member, I got all of the sites you listed as bonus content. However, be careful when you join, as this company often switches bonus content around, and sometimes you don't get the same set of bonus sites if you use the PU discount. In my experience what is listed on the join page is what you get.


09-05-10  01:41am

Reply
759
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

Hey Denner,

The last time I was a member I re-downloaded some of their older material as I had also lost it, and the quality didn't appear to be any better. Perhaps they have re-encoded some stuff since then, that was back in March. I doubt it though, I'm sure their focus is much more at getting new material out.


09-04-10  01:18pm

Comment
760
Visit My 18 Teens

My 18 Teens
(0)

Decent Download Speeds

Just wanted to give an update on this site since no one has in a while, I've been getting pretty decent download speeds, so I guess they have resolved the issues MargulisAZ experienced. They have also added a mirror download site. I've been maxing my connection when downloading via both the mirror and regular sites (1.2 MB/sec).

09-04-10  02:30am

Replies (0)
Reply
761
Visit Polish Busty

Polish Busty
(0)
Reply of Roy Stone's Review

You made several good points in your review that I'm sure people will find useful, although not exactly my niche of choice. Welcome to PU!

09-03-10  07:40pm

Reply
762
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Surprising responses, I would have thought more folks would have said yes.

09-02-10  03:28pm

Reply
763
Visit Exploited College Girls

Exploited College Girls
(0)
Reply of Tree Rodent's Reply

Yeah he's a pretty major tool, for some reason I thought it was the same guy as backroomcastingcouch, then realized this guy didn't have the outie... I like this type of niche as well, that's why I joined, but the negatives are pretty major.

09-02-10  02:59pm

Review
764
Visit Exploited College Girls

Exploited College Girls
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Some attractive ladies
-Interesting concept, videos typically provide both a "regular" scene and either POV or behind the scenes
-Newer videos pretty decent quality, 640x360 4150 kbps WMV was the best I saw
-Zip downloads of photosets, although photosets are pretty limited
-Decent sized collection, 156 models at time of review. A lot of the models that appear here also appear on their sister site: backroomcastingcouch.com. Most models only have 1 scene (with a POV and regular video) some have multiple.
-Better navigation than their sister site, have model index, but no search function.
-Provide model information
-Exclusive content
-No DRM
-Download managers work
Cons: -Model attractiveness is pretty variable
-Download speeds are not great, best I have seen is 400 KB/s
-Older videos are poor quality, 480x360 1600 kbps MPG was worst I have seen so far
-Camerawork isn't the best
-Photo quality is mediocre
-Price is a little high given the quantity of content
-Too many tattoos
-The guy in the scenes is sort of a douche
-Guy censors his face, which can be distracting in the scenes
-1 update per week
-No real bonus content, some non exclusive steaming sites is all you get.
Bottom Line: I joined this site primarily because they have a few models I liked from backroomcastingcouch, and I figured this site was bigger so it'd probably also be better. While the site does have some good content, and I like the concept of providing the POV and the regular scene, I found it to be sort of lacking compared with backroomcastingcouch. I can't really put my finger on why, perhaps the models weren't as good (although the two sites have many of the same models), perhaps I am now realizing that the dude is a pretty standard porn douchebag. He seems to get off much more on humiliation than on the other site. Edit: Just realized its a different dude than the other place.

I don't get what is sexy about having the ladies lick his ass, perhaps this is a turn-on for some, but certainly not for me. I plan on editing all that crap out of the videos - and this is not a rare occurence, I'd say almost half of the videos have this type of content.

There is definitely more anal on this site than on their other site, for those that are interested in that kind of stuff. Although I would say it is still not super-common, maybe 15-25% of the videos or so.

There are definitely some videos from this site I will keep, and there are a couple that may become favorites, so I wouldn't say this site is a total waste of money, but it definitely isn't great, and definitely could use some work. Get rid of the dude, if he doesn't want to show his face, find someone that will, or at least teach him some manners. He is starting to sound an aweful lot like those jackasses on the BangBus.

Also, merge these two sites for the same price. There are tons of sites out there that are cheaper with 10x the content, 60% of the price of these two sites combined. If they still have to source material, they really should re-encode the old stuff, that bitrate is just totally unacceptable these days.

Bottom Line, a site worth joining if you see some models you like in the preview. Although don't count on being overly impressed with the material. Certainly not worth joining for more than a month given the infrequent updates.

09-01-10  11:04pm

Replies (8)
Reply
765
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

As many have said, probably not a discussion worth joining - I'd probably shrug my shoulders and walk away unless I were particularly drunk and they were being particularly obnoxious about it.

08-31-10  10:11pm

Reply
766
Visit In Focus Girls

In Focus Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

Sorry, price listed at PU when I looked said 29.95, you are right, it is correct now. I will try to be more clear with my comments next time!

08-31-10  10:02pm

Comment
767
Visit In Focus Girls

In Focus Girls
(0)

Wrong Special Price?

I get 19.95 as a special price option when I go to the join page.

08-31-10  12:40am

Replies (4)
Comment
768
Visit BB Films

BB Films
(0)

Anyone ever been a member here?

Seems like a new studio, iafd shows all their films having been produced in 2009-2010. The content looks somewhat interesting, you can get a full preview if you enter your email address.

Probably wont join, as it seems expensive and never heard of their biller, just curious if anyone had any experience here.

08-30-10  10:30pm

Replies (2)
Reply
769
Visit Kscans

Kscans
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

I agree, any site with sketchy cancellation processes is a poor site in my mind and I would skip it. Although, I would skip it anyway given the content...

08-29-10  01:52am

Comment
770
Visit Exploited College Girls

Exploited College Girls
(0)

Poor download speeds

I have been averaging less than 200 KB/sec (total DL speed) since joining this site, hopefully it is just a technical problem, but certainly not promising. Also since logins timeout, download managers haven't been working so well (path disappears).

On the plus side, the content I have been able to download is pretty decent.

Also, in response to dracken's question, no network access from this site either - there are bonus sites but they all appear to be streaming only.

08-28-10  02:44am

Replies (0)
Reply
771
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

? I must not browse enough porn, as I can only think of having seen this a couple of times. Are there sites dedicated to this activity, how long do they keep them up there? Do they tie a string to 'em tampon-style so they don't get stuck?

08-27-10  03:27pm

Reply
772
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(0)
Reply of Tree Rodent's Reply

Wow, that is crazy low. Weird, maybe it is a Europe thing? Perhaps local ISPs in the UK were capping their bandwidth since they are such a hog? What'd it take, like 5 days to download a small video?

08-27-10  03:23pm

Reply
773
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(0)
Reply of Tree Rodent's Reply

Really? I never had any problems with download speeds, sometimes during what I'm sure are peak download times it would slow a bit. Perhaps you were logging in at bad times or they had technical problems when you were a member? Certainly not the best download speeds, I'm sure they use a ton of bandwidth.

I agree that a lot of people probably join the site and think "holy shit, what a ton of content", but in my experience I have typically only downloaded like one scene out of every 10 DVDs (which is not a good ratio) - and I probably end up going back and deleting 50% of those later...


08-27-10  03:12pm

Reply
774
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(0)
Reply of Rob12's Reply

Thanks, its a pity they don't improve the navigation elements a bit, this site would be so much better if they did. As you said, I assume they just don't care since the site is so enormously popular - why bother?

08-27-10  03:07pm

Review
775
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Vast amount of content
-Decent price, one of the few sites I have ever seen where it is cheaper to join by renewing free trial membership than by joining outright, although probably a mistake on their part
-Plenty of variety, although some niches aren't as well represented
-Download managers work
-Download speeds are decent, I averaged 900 KB/s
-Excellent member interaction with reviews and opinions of videos and scenes
-Frequent updates
-Ability to creat custom clips, so you only have to download what you want.
Cons: -Site navigation is mediocre. For a smaller site, their style might be great, but for a site this large it just doesn't work
-Search function often returns a mixed bag of seemingly random stuff, or doesn't work at all
-Model labels are often incorrect. I can accept that they can't be held responsible for what is on the DVD, but when the members comment that the model name is incorrect, would it be that difficult to fix it?
-Video quality is mediocre in this age, and the file size of newer videos seems quite large given the quality of video
-Site bills directly rather than using a 3rd party biller
-Quality of videos is very hit-or-miss, with most in my opinion being miss.
Bottom Line: I know there are tons of reviews of this particular site, and I am sure that everyone at PU has been or will be a member eventually. This site used to be one of the best if not the best porn site on the net. However, lately I feel like they are focussing on stupid little user interface issues rather than resolving major issues with the site. How many times have they redesigned the front page? While adding user costum edited clips is interesting, who has the time to dig through that shit?

They should focus more on fixing the problems with the site. Get quality rather than quantity. They already have a huge archive, I don't think many would be dissappointed with 4-5 updates per week if they were good updates. Also, a site this large needs better navigation. The videos can easily be tagged with more info than gonzo and one on one. Tags for tats, breast size (other than large), and body type would be nice. If they don't want to do it, let the users tag the scenes - I'm sure plenty will.

This overall is a good site, and there is a reason it is so popular, but they could certainly take a cue from sites like American Vice that unfortunately failed. Like I said, everyone here should and will become a member here at some point or another, but that doesn't mean videobox doesn't have plenty of issues to resolve.

08-27-10  12:47am

Replies (9)

Shown : 751-775 of 958 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.38 seconds.