Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some attractive, obviously euro (I assume mostly Czech models), some I’ve seen many I haven’t
-Content has some interesting themes, castings, outdoor action, etc.
-Video technical quality is reasonably good, most are downloadable in two options 3000 kbps wmv and 1100 kbps mp4. I thought the mp4 actually looked pretty good even with the quite low bitrate and most of the videos I downloaded were in that format.
-Reasonably sized site, will review overall number in BL, 10 total sites.
-Good update schedule, 1 a day seems typical
-Reputable biller, I had CCBill
-Have subtitles, which is sort of a con in some scenes
-DL managers work (I used DTA), no DRM, get to choose login/password
-Content looks entirely exclusive to me
-Plenty of diversity in body types (which could also be a con I suppose)
Cons:
-Somewhat pricy compared to other sites
-Camerawork is poor, particularly the HC scenes which are mostly self-shot, and pretty bad for self-shot
-Some of the scenes make you a little uncomfortable; I’ll elaborate on that later
-Model quality is highly variable. I realize this is subjective, but there are quite a few, umm, not such attractive ladies here
-Scenes can get repetitive, and castings in particular are not very erotic
-Download speeds are inconsistent, varied for me between 300 KB/s and 1 MB/s
-Navigation is very basic, and a pretty major flaw. No real model index, some scenes are just given numbers, thumbnail previews are quite small for my laptop.
-No forum, ratings, or any other interactive elements
-Pretty much no photos
-Very little diversity in ethnicity
Bottom Line:
Overall I think this is a reasonable site, although it has some pretty major flaws. The major flaws being the ones I mentioned in the cons, and some of them really detract from the site. I find the self-shot scenes to be particularly irritating, and there are way too way too many of them here for me.
The site breakdown is as follows:
-Casting: 364 scenes, I assume 364 different models. Basic casting site, usually girl walks in, chats for a bit, gets undressed. In some scenes there is masturbation, toy, oral, and HC. I would estimate 30-40% of the material has some HC or oral aspect to it.
-Streets: 60 scenes, seems like more or less 60 different models. Mostly consists of them “finding” a girl, followed by sex in a public place
-Swingers: 16 scenes split into parts (70 total videos), group action.
-Amateurs: 43 scenes, mostly POV, amateurs, generally very poorly filmed.
-Gang Bang: 12 scenes, as the name implies, appears inactive no updates since March
-Sharking: 20 scenes, mostly involving them running around pulling shirts off women, short scenes, while I am sure it is probably set up, it did make me feel sort of icky
First Video: 22 scenes, amateur HC material, probably the best shot of any of the sites
Parties: 7 parties, 24 videos, typical party material with HC, also typically the most attractive ladies don’t get involved.
Lesbians: 8 scenes, large lesbian groups, appears to be inactive
As I said previously, the main thing that detracts from this site for me aside from the poor camera work is the sort of uncomfortable aspects to some of the scenes. I would assume most of these uncomfortable scenes were set up, but it still ruins the eroticism of it. The sharking site, and the casting site in particular are the worst offenders in this regard. Some of the casting scenes that go beyond nudity are a little odd, with the cameraman pulling out his member and trying to get the women to get him off in some fashion (in some of them the women refuse), while I have seen stuff like this before, in this case it really did seem like some of the women were actually not comfortable with the situation.
Other than those aspects, it is an interesting site, with sometimes interesting material. If you are particularly interested in some of the women here (the best way I could find out is via EBI although many aren’t listed), it may be an okay site to join for you. However, be prepared to get that icky feeling from time to time, and to spend an awful lot of time digging through it all. There are some attractive ladies here, even a few that I thought had retired, and some Czech models you will likely have seen elsewhere, but the navigation issues, and the general ick factor make it a difficult site for me to recommend.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good download speeds
-Excellent price
-Some interesting content
-Some very attractive models
-Pretty large site (~3600 videos, 1250 models)
-Good variety, both in model ethnicity/body type, and type of content (soft, mid, hard).
-Some of the content appears to be "real" amateur girlfriend stuff, but this is a very small minority of the content
-Download managers work, but connections do timeout fast (I used DTA)
-Updates appear to be about once a week, but it is somewhat hard to tell
Cons:
-Many photo sets are not zipped, this is pretty unacceptable these days
-Camerawork and lighting can get pretty bad. A lot of the content is POV, and not particularly well shot or lit
-Login timeouts are pretty short, maybe 30 minutes, even when actively using the site
-Navigation is poor, and really slow
-Videos start playing when you go to the set
-Pre-checked cross sale
-Some, probably most, of the content is not exclusive
-Video quality ranges from above average to poor, only two formats available for most scenes (720, 360p), the 720p is decent, but not super crisp with typical bitrates of around 3800 kbps
Bottom Line:
This site consists of a reasonably wide variety of content, from models posing to hard core material. There is a pretty good diversity of models here, mostly relative "amateurs" and very few well known pros. Some of the content is the typical non-exclusive eastern european stuff you see everywhere these days.
I joined this site for a few specific sets I knew they had that I was interested in based on information from a model index site, and the price was right. This site does have some good stuff going for it, but it has an aweful lot of negatives which would make it hard for me to recommend.
The site is a "network", but the individual network "sites" don't serve much of a purpose, as navigating by niche has the same effect. But, there is the typical variety of sites for such a network: Babes, asian, busty, black, emo, etc. The "real ex girlfriend", as you would expect, is not true for the most part, but there are some self shot nudes which at least conform to the niche, even if they aren't truly real ex girlfriends.
The main thing you notice when you login is the site seems very outdated, the interface is bland, and navigation can be a bit annoying (there are more things to click on the menu bar on the left than fit on my screen, and you can't scroll down, for example). There is a search function, but I never really used it, but testing it, it seemed to function acceptably.
But, my main gripe with this site, as with most sites of its ilk is the camerawork and lighting. They have plenty of attractive women, but they do themselves a pretty big disservice by failing in these two areas. Shots can tend to be framed on the same body parts for minutes at a time, very few full body shots. Obviously for the "self shot" styled sets, this type of thing is acceptable, and adds to the feeling that they may be genuine, but for the casting and other sets, it is just terribly frustrating.
It is an okay site, pretty much the definition of mediocre, but for the PU price you will probably find enough here for it to be worth joining once, but I doubt you will come back.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Download speeds are excellent
- Newer (see cons) videos are reasonable quality, 1080p mp4 is the highest quality available
- 108 scenes available
- Photos and screencaps zipped
- Camerawork and lighting is generally good, although given the genre, it can be a bit jumpy
- Unique genre, don't recall having come across a site like this before
- A very diverse set of women present in most videos, including body type and ethnicity
- There are some attractive women in the videos
Cons:
- Affiliated with Bang Bros, suspect billing practices, see reviews and comments of that site for more
- Site is dead, last update is listed as October, 2015
- File sizes are large. Many of these videos are very long, ~60 minutes or more, so at 1080p they can get very big
- Streaming starts instantly
- Limited download options on many videos, most are just mp4
- In a lot of the videos, the most attractive women (at least to me) don't participate
- Not a big deal, but the music is terrible, I know they are supposed to be strippers, but god it is aweful
- Pretty expensive for what you get
Bottom Line:
I honestly didn't think I would find this site very appealing, but it is sort of interesting, and I did end up keeping more scenes than I thought I would. The basic concept is a male stripper shows up at some party, sexual hijinks ensue. Most of the scenes involve more than one male stripper, and a large number of women (probably 10-30 on average), although in the scenes with many women, many do not participate in the action, and some appear to be genuinely uncomfortable. The general setup is a stripper shows up, gets near instantly nude (not a very good stripper if you ask me, what is wrong with a little titillation for your clients), proceeds to get blown by some of the women present, sometimes has sex, he gets off. In most scenes a few more strippers will show up following the same pattern. In some, a costumed bear shows up and follows the same pattern.
It is an interesting site, and perhaps worth joining if this particular scenario is one that excites you, personally I find it a bit unrealistic and at times awkward and uncomfortable, even for porn. Having talked to many women about bachelorette parties, the general consensus seems to be that most don't like getting dicks waved in their faces, and would definitely not start just blowing the guy. Regardless, it can be a sort of fun site, but bear in mind if you join that it hasn't updated in almost a year, and I sort of doubt it will start again soon. The other major con is its affiliation with Bang Bros, so if you do decide to join, please be very careful in doing so, and consider getting a new card number soon after.
I'd guess it is most likely Norton that is at fault, I use Norton on my girlfriend's computer and get false warnings all the time, even for normal sites like CNN. Good that you let us all know, hopefully it is just a false positive.
Nice review RustyJ. Too bad they are recycling material so much, I have been meaning to rejoin here at some point, but was a bit disappointed last time. I wish I had a connection like yours, of course then I'd probably burn through hd's every month...
Goofy, wonder why they keep changing it back and forth... $45/month seems pretty high compared to other sites so I guess it is a good time to join. Seems like last time I was a member here it was much cheaper.
I suppose that is the case, but there are other sites are putting out decent content, many euro sites included amongst those, so what is their excuse? It just seems like their standards have gone way down, I'd rather a site put out 1 decent scene a week than 5 mediocre ones. I was a member of x-art for a few months even though their update rate is relatively slow, because their updates were usually pretty good (albeit short).
Joined primarily for the new Zuzana Z hardcore material, which was pretty underwhelming, but even aside from that this place in general seems to be going downhill. The updates are pretty frequent, but I find the model quality vastly inferior to 1byday's heyday of a few years ago.
Should have read my own comment from last year and not wasted my well earned birthday cash here... Oh well, I think this was their last and final chance for me, don't think I'll be coming back.
Thanks for the updated info exotics, I may have to give it a try again at some point in the future - the price the last time I joined was pretty steep, the new TBP price seems much more reasonable.
Although the models still look a little overdone to me now.
Well, the trial is $10 for 2 days, so it is pretty steep as far as trials go. I always used to like this site as well, it certainly seems as though it has been going consistently in the wrong direction for the last couple of years.
So, after realizing the price had changed, I figured I'd do the full access trial to see what was new. The good news is the trial is in fact full access, the bad news is I find this site to be pretty mediocre. While I think the high scores are fair, given they have some great older content, there isn't really all that much that is new that is all that good.
They "remastered" some older material to "HD", while it does look better than the sets I downloaded before a couple of years ago, it is most certainly not HD - I'm not sure why the encoded some of it at such a high bitrate with poor source material.
There is still plenty of good material here to get, however if you have been a member in the past, it probably isn't worth joining, especially given the new price.
I would post a review, but it would end up sounding pretty much exactly like exotic's. Although I would score it a bit lower, and would strongly note that the new site design is downright shitty. You can browse by model from the main DDF page, however be aware that this is usually not all the material available for that model (for older stuff you have to go to the individual site). I also fine the design of the site to be quite ugly, and there are many glitches - mismatched screenshots with sets and several models where you click on them and it says 0 sets available. Sometimes you can find sets by those models if you dig through the individual sites, but to me the whole point of joining the "mother" site is to get easy access to ALL their material.
Though I'm not a huge fan of the way 21sextury merged all their sites, they did a much better job than DDF.
That sucks man. Too bad, it is a decent site that I tend to join from time to time, guess I will have to hold off until this billing situation is resolved...
Good review man, haven't been a member here in a while - they didn't even have HD content the last time I was. I probably don't consider non-downloadable HD as a deal-breaker like you do. The main thing I hated was the site layout/navigation when I was there, perhaps it has improved?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
