| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
As far as I know, the whole reason that Hardcore Gang Bang exists is because they're not going to be shooting any more updates for Bound Gangbangs (as in, future releases will be the scenes that they'd already had shot when they made the switch). So while both sites are up, they aren't really separate, which is why they include it.
|
01-13-13 01:31pm
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
Mine tended to be older women on TV and in movies, though not that much older than me (generally about 18-20 when I was 12-14). Most of my teachers growing up weren't that young, and the few that were weren't really my type.
|
01-11-13 11:12pm
|
Reply
78
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
marvin's Reply
I'll third(?) the applause of the removal of the pre-checked cross-sale. I understand why sites do it, and I'm not at the point where I don't subscribe to a site because of it, but I still think it's a shady practice. I don't mind upsells and cross-sells in general, you just have to give me (the user) the initial choice in whether or not I want to do it. I'll say right now that most of the time I'll say no, but sometimes, sometimes I won't.
|
01-10-13 09:22pm
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
Nope. I think people of a reasonable mind should be able to, but I don't have any plans to.
|
01-09-13 06:43am
|
Comment
80
|
Tonight's Girlfriend
(0)
|
|
01-07-13 10:10pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
4. Two versions of Firefox (one for general browsing, the other for development), Chrome, and IE.
|
12-30-12 09:14am
|
Reply
82
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Reply
Yup. No one has said how long the contract is supposed to last, but I believe it's been in effect for about the past 3-4 months. She still has scenes she shot for other companies that haven't been released yet, though, so you'll probably still see some of her in other places for the next few months.
|
12-29-12 12:27am
|
Reply
83
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
Good review. To add a little bit of info, Holly Michaels is signed an exclusive contract with them a few months ago, which is why she appears so much on the site.
|
12-28-12 07:52pm
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Tons. I have a decent amount of free time and a large amount of channels, so I can usually find something to watch.
|
12-28-12 07:47am
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
You're all a bunch of Scrooges.
|
12-25-12 06:32pm
|
Reply
86
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
It might have something to do with when you signed up, because over the past month they've had a $5.00 special (right now, but just started), a $7.95 special(over the US Thanksgiving holiday weekend), and a $9.99 special(last week). So it could be that the PU discount wasn't working and they gave you their special price instead (as opposed to purely regional pricing).
|
12-22-12 12:11pm
|
Reply
87
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
For many people here, I can see how it would feel like a large percentage. But the more I look around at other sites, the more I don't think it's seems like that much to a majority of the market. And, like you said, compared to most American porn sites that aren't specifically trying to focus on young and/or natural girls, it really isn't. They all seem to live somewhere between 30/70 and 70/30, as far as the fake to natural ratio goes, and the bigger the site, the more likely it is to fall on the 70/30 side of that spectrum. And if you stick to just the young sites on this network (for example, just My Sister's Hot Friend/Naughty Bookworms/Fast Times), you end up with a ratio around 85/15 natural to fake, and about 2-3 scenes a week (120 so far this year over 50 weeks). And for the most part, even if you completely ignored the updates with implants and pretended they didn't exist, you'd still have a site that posts somewhere between 4-8 updates every week.
I can definitely understand someone like messmer's issue, where he's specifically looking for older natural women and the majority of the most popular American mature models have implants, so he's not gonna be able to find much that he likes. But, like I was kind of trying to say, to say something along the lines of it being difficult to find natural models at all almost goes beyond hyperbole into saying something that is flat out incorrect.
Also, as an aside, why did you bring up the large breasted natural women? I don't understand it in the context of this discussion.
|
12-21-12 10:01pm
|
Reply
88
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I apologize for going a little overboard. It's just a pet peeve of mine when people say things that can be proven incorrect with a little bit of research (and not just here, anywhere). When I first read your post, because you included Faye Reagan, I assumed that the post was talking about all women, and not just the older ones. Because the older ones skew fake, and the younger ones skew natural, if you look at the whole site, it does end up being about 50/50. And that's not an assumption, you can see it using their tagging system (click the porn finder link at the top of the page, and on the right hand side is a list of all the tags they use and the numbers across all the sites).
|
12-20-12 09:33pm
|
Reply
89
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
It looks like it re-bills at a price higher than the normal subscription price, though, so if someone's going to do this, they're gonna want to make sure they cancel after before the next billing cycle.
|
12-20-12 02:55pm
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The slightly more of having days off is negated by the slightly less of having more people around, so about the same.
|
12-20-12 01:21pm
|
Reply
91
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I said this to someone else, and I'll say it again: Half. They're basically half-natural and half-fake as a whole.
I realize that may not be enough for your tastes, but to act like natural breasts are a rare occurrence just isn't correct.
Edit: unless you're talking about ONLY mature models, and even then it's rare but not impossible to find.
|
12-20-12 01:04pm
|
Reply
92
|
Best Hard Hunks
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
Well, technically, since you aren't paying, they're not giving you bad customer service for your money.
But I do agree about there being a large amount of websites out there that need better previews.
|
12-17-12 05:10pm
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No, because I don't need a physical DVD to be able to watch things on my TV, and I'd rather have portable hard drives as backups.
|
12-16-12 02:58am
|
Reply
94
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Money rules everything. If enough people are still joining from the affected countries, then it doesn't matter if a few people are complaining.
|
12-15-12 10:36am
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
That depends entirely on how old you are and the type of people you associate with. A 22 year old living in a college/university town is much more likely to run into a teen than they are a MILF.
That being said, I feel like this poll, more than almost any other that isn't explicitly asking how old everyone is, shows that that the members tend to be on the older side (not that that's a bad thing at all). While I'm not young enough that the girls playing teenagers in porn (who, while some are 18-19, are usually around 20-23) would be my contemporaries, I'm nowhere near old enough that it would be unlikely that a woman that old would want to sleep with me. For me, it's about watching attractive women, no matter what age they are or what age I am.
|
12-14-12 09:15pm
|
Reply
96
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
The name is Lesbian Girl on Girl, not 1 on 1. It's a fairly bad name, if I'm being honest, but the content looks okay.
|
12-13-12 07:43pm
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never have, never will.
|
12-10-12 08:51am
|
Reply
98
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
Working alright for me, though it takes a minute to get used to it.
|
12-08-12 11:34am
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
alexbrawn's Poll
3 days of streaming but no downloads (for video sites). That sounds about right.
|
12-08-12 01:33am
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I would argue that having it password encrypted makes it hidden, as you'd have to know the password to see it.
|
12-06-12 12:28pm
|
