I recently rejoined Joymii and it now seems seems to be for 100% non-downloading mobile users. Navigation is big-button easy until you want to download, say, individual images. To do this, as far as I can tell, you go to the thumbnail images in a set, click on an image, SCALE IT TO THE SIZE YOU WANT on a sliding scale-bar, guessing you got the size you want, then right click to download that image. Yes, you can download a whole set via a zip file, but I no longer download whole sets. Oh, and in Chrome, once you open an image, there are no visible buttons to navigate back (they are there but hidden). I am a long time annual subscriber to Femjoy, but this site is just too messed up, navigation-wise. Oh, and if that isn't bad enough, when I went to complain on the contact page (using both Chrome and IE), the SUBMIT BUTTON DOESN'T WORK!! What a cluster!
I joined this site because the Girl they call Katie Fey is a personal favorite. Katie was Jenya at Met Art and was in Playboy as a Russian by the name of Yevgeniya Diordiychuk. I never expect much from these solo sites, but there was a lot of material here from between 2004 and 2008. I counted 300 sets!
Apparently, she is either retired or is no longer updating this site because the last sets were from 2008. Although she is smoking hot, she is not a porn model and most of the images were barely nude. The resolution of the images was 1000k or smaller.
There are some other sites that came with the deal, but they were of nobody I'd ever heard of, were very old (i.e. small and pooor quality) and most were not nude. I may have saved maybe one set from the other sites.
If you are "Katie Fay" collector, this site is worth it. If you hang around on the sign-up page long enough, you will get a "chat" pop-up and doing so will reduce the cost by $5.
I visited this site a couple of months ago on an intro offer from Met-Art. The site is very small and includes masturbation videos of many of the girls you see on Met-Art. These are a little more interesting than the videos found on Met-Art, but not much. If you like the girls on Met-Art and can't find them doing harder stuff on other sites, then this might be a good place to find them.
Watch out for network discount offer issues if you are already a subscriber
I've been a member of Met Art for many, many years and have an annual subscription. I rotate through the other MA network sites and typically have 3-5 subscriptions at a time. I sometimes get highly discounted offers. However, whenever I try to sign up to a discounted offer, the Met Art system recognizes the cookies on my browser and something goes wrong. Either the offer changes to a higher price or I get an error. The last time this happened was when I got an internal trial offer for MetArtX with a subsequent discounted monthly rate. I signed up within the MetArt network and got an error on the approval page. I knew I was going to sign up for longer, so I just went ahead and signed up for the monthly discounted rate using a different browser and email and billing method. Worked. 2 months later I realized I was being double billed for MetArtX as the original sign up that gave me an error had actually cleared. The problem then was that I did not know which account was attached to my single sign-on, so I reached out to MetArt help to see if they could resolve the issue and maybe make it right. That was nearly 3 weeks ago and all I have from them so far is a "We're working on it." I was just billed for one of the accounts again, so I cancelled both of them, one through the MetArt singl-sign-on and one through Epoch because the login credentials didn't work. Now....I really like this network and will probably be a subscriber until I'm dead, but not being able to take advantage of discount offers without signing up from a different browser with different credentials because you are already a subscriber to a site on the network is just rediculous. I just reviewed a couple of the MA sites and was about to re-review Met Art (for the 4th or 5th time), but I think I will wait until they respond to this issue so I can include it in the review.
Update: The support folks responded and, after looking into the issue, sign-up timing and billing records, refunded all of the double billing and gave me access to the site of my choice for a couple of weeks for my troubles. They also recommended that I contact them before signing signing up with a discounted rate so that they could make sure it goes smoothly. They came through, as I expected. I'll comment again if there are any significant issues with adding sites under the single-sign-on process again.
Has anyone ever heard of ECHST? I just signed up for an additional site in the network and was charged to join the site and ALSO charged to join Met-Art again, even though I'm already an annual member. Unlike EPOCH and CCBill, I did not get any conformation emails from ECHST. The only way I knew about it was the credit card charge. I sent a note to Met Art Support, who is usually very good about this type of thing, but have not yet heard back.
I am an annual member on Met-Art and often join one or two of the other sites in their network or among their affiliates for a month or two. I've noticed that the prices will vary (i.e. $29 in most places, $19 in others) depending on where you look inside or outside of the network. Typically, though, The Porn Users site will have the best pricing other than the occasional $1-$5 teaser price for members of one site who never sign up for other sites. Personally, I think they should offer members long-term discounts to the other sites, especially the ones that don't update as often, but it is hard to blame them for not offering deep discounts given the perfection often found on their sites.
So...after many years of having what I have always considered the highest standard for websites, literally a model for others to emulate, Met-Art is changing their website layout. When they first started floating a "beta" version of the new layout, I thought it was pretty awful and gave them my reasons why. Now, it looks like the old layout is just about to go away completely and we will be stuck with a site where the "live girls" portion, now taking up almost half of the main page, preventing me from clearly seeing what sets that I've already paid for are new. In my book, this greedy move falls just short of creating pop-ups or redirecting people at login to other offers. And the really sad thing is all they needed to do is adjust screen width slightly or establish a separate layout for mobile (which is probably part of why they made the change). I still click on the "classic site" option every chance I get because you get four models across and can see what is new, and once you get to a set you can actually see what you need to click to download a zip file rather than having to find some really tiny, cryptic camera icon. Clearly, I'm pretty annoyed about this and think they've taken a giant step backwards.
So....for those of you who subscribe to Met-Art, what do you think of the new web layout?
I firmly believe that a web site is only as good as its customer service. Once again this week, Met Art demonstrated that it is an AWESOME web site by providing some of the best online customer service I have ever experienced.
I upgraded my subscription from monthly to annual. My monthly subscription was through Epoch and my annual subscription is now through their new biller(Rocketgate?). What I did not realize is that Epoch had already queued me up for my monthly charge, which I saw on my account a few days after upgrading. I sent an email to Met Art support telling them about the issue. Within a few minutes, here is first class the response I got:
So sorry for your trouble; however rest assured you are in great hands and our support team is looking into this issue ASAP.
we will make you happy.
all the best,
Amnon
===========================
OK, I'm not easily impressed, but here is a guy who truly understands how important it is to be responsive to customers.
So many other websites (adult or otherwise) really don't care when there are problems and some (often adult) are downright obnoxious (Go look at the chain of my MPL Studios comments. I complained about an easily resolvable problem and MPL Studios blamed ME and permanently kicked me off of their site.)
Oh, and yes, I was promptly refunded the Epoch overcharge and received a follow up email from Met Art customer service to ensure everything was OK.
Kudos to Met Art for not only having a terrific web site, but for ensuring that, in the words of the CEO, "I am happy". Yes, I am happy. Thank you very much!
Here's a letter I just sent ccBill within 20 minutes of joining MPL Studios. PU Sysadmin, there isn't really a forum here to discuss account management systems, so I'm dropping this on the related website in the hope that both companies will notice. CCbill is generally MUCH better than the other account managers, but lately, I've had a lot of problems with them.
Here's the letter.
I’ve been happy to use ccBill and have been trusting you as a billing provider for years. Check my email address and you will see a history that is as long as your business has existed. But lately, service has gotten so poor that I am uncertain if joining a site that uses ccBill is worth it.
Tonight I joined MPL Studios for the first time. Not only did ccBill generate a RANDOM password and username, which I hate enough to cancel subscriptions over, but the lsgmodels login pop-up prevented me from toggling back and forth from the ccbill username page to the login. When I finally opened ccBill in a different browser and was able to get the insane user name and password info, the MPL Studios site would not let me in. I can only assume that I exceeded some kind of login attempt limit imposed by you.
Look, you guys are among the better account administrators out there, but I recently cancelled my subscription to met-art because I attempted to log in on several occasions and was unable to because YOUR login servers were down. I cancelled a subscription to Watch 4 Beauty because the random password was soo damn difficult to deal with, I gave up.
As a 20 year IT professional, I understand the importance of security, etc. You are going to tell me something like “the host web site required...” Bullcrap. As a leading service provider, you are in a position to explain to the host that random passwords cause them to lose customers. And a lockout after a certain number of attempts should redirect me to YOUR site to reset the account, not leave me mad enough to cancel the account immediately. In the end, any web based service must satisfy two needs to be successful. It must be convenient and it must be reliable. Random passwords make your service incredibly inconvenient and the inability of a user in good standing to log in to a site he/she paid for makes your service unreliable.
PLEASE FIX THESE ISSUES!!
And while you are at it, unlock my account on MPL Studios so I can use the account I JUST PAID FOR!
==========
Now, after I wrote this letter, I went ahead and called ccBaill. They told me that MPL Studios will not allow them to reset passwords that get locked out and that only they can do it. So now I'm sitting here witha paid subscription I cannot use. I will be sneding a letter to MPL Studios, as well, and I have already cancelled my brand new subscription because no website should subject thier customers to this kind of nonsense.
I joined this site and instead of finding girls ready to go to private chats, I find kind of a carnival of spin games and similar antics. Most of the girls are clothed or partially nude, mostly just talking or chatting with their viewers. Guys are throwing tokens at them and there is NOTHING HAPPENING... The girls sell things like snapchats and videos and have posted lists for things like flashing and other activities. It really seems like this site is set up to sort of milk money from viewers who are very hard pressed to "make friends" with the girls. There are a few active "shows" and lesbian things going on, but it doesn't really seem that exciting. What am I missing here?
Nubiles.net no longer included in NP subscription.
Today, 1/1/18, I linked to nubilesporn.com from PU and see a good $15 a month rate, but when I look at the sites included, nubiles.net isn't listed. When I got to nubiles.net, the rate is a much steeper $24.00 a month but the list of sites included shows all of the network sites include NP. So apparently, they no longer include NN with the NP subscription. I opened a different browser and went straight to NP and the rate is $24 a month and still does not include NN. So it looks like if you want NN, which is the largest site in this network, you will need to join NN.
I've recently started subscribing to sites for a year at a time because, after doing the math, I realize I spend that much at my favorite sites anyway and the longer memberships are usually great values. Usually...except...not with nubiles.net. A 1 year membership with Nubiles WITH the PU discount is $209.00!!! $209??? Wow, that is a lot! A regular, undiscounted 1 year membership with Met Art is $99. Femjoy: $99. MC Nudes: $99. Twisty's: $119. Als Scan: $139. There are a couple of sites that charge $150 or so for a 1 year membership, but very, very few that charge $209. Since there is no real incentive for me to sign up for a year (3 months free compared to others 6 months free), I guess I will have to join for a month or two and then quit for awhile like I used to do. Oh well... A pain for me and a loss of revenue for them.
I tripped over this site again the other day. The photography is awesome and the models are beautiful but I notice several 10+ year old photo shoots among the samples. Has anyone joined lately?
I replied to Ladylover below, but I didn't want this to get lost in the responses. The $99 lifetime membership is a sleazy cash grab. I just chatted with support on Playboy Plus and, yes, to get ANY useful features (like the ability to download ANYTHING and actual HD videos), you need VIP, which is another $10 a month. SO....$99 for a half-assed lifetime subscription of limited use and duration and ANOTHER $120 a year to be able to download anything or get HD. TOTALLY DECEPTIVE!!!!!
My comment below still holds. This site and many others by this site management group offer a standard or discounted price for membership that ONLY allows browsing and streaming. I've seen other sites from other companies that have a special streaming-only price, but to charge $10 a month more for the ability to download images is absurd. I recall a representative saying that "most of our customers prefer streaming and don't want to download" which, of course, is complete bullshit. This is a cash-grab bait and switch and I recommend that nobody sign up until this management company changes this stupid tactic or fails.
Hey, guys, if you are going to include a price in your review, especially a discounted price, you REALLY need to explain that it is for streaming only. You SHOULD NOT quote a streaming only price, and then list "NO DOWNLOAD LIMIT" and go on to describe file formats in your review summary section. Either quote a full price that includes downloads, or OMIT THE INFORMATION THAT DOES NOT APPLY TO THE PRICING YOU GIVE! I have seen this for almost all of the reviews you have done for the MG Billing sites and that is A LOT of sites. This is the only site management group that has a bait-and-switch hidden tier. You sort of mention it in the body of the review, but the pricing and review details are contradictory. PLEASE START HIGHLIGHTING IT IN THE PRICING!
I'm looking at this site on the TBP front page and am having a hard time understanding how they can charge $30 a month for 11 sets. There are no full sized samples whatsoever, no dated releases or release schedule and you can't even see what is on the 2nd page of updates. It has the popular stars, but a very, very small number of them.
I'm also a little confused since I can't see the sets...is this a handjob site or full-sex POV like POVD?
Put a $19 promo rate on TBP and I'll join and write a review. Otherwise, $30 can get me hundreds or even thousands of great sets elsewhere, so that's where I'm going.
I need to write a new review here. I've been a member of this network for a year or more, now. There are several different niches within the pay-once network with an update someplace every day. As a result, the total network collection is pretty huge and they seem to be adding new specialty sites (like holed.com and baeb.com) fairly often.
Before you join, find the cheapest site on this network and join that, then choose the all-site option from that site for a $69 one time fee. As long as you stay a member to that one site, you will have access to all of them.
This site has grown pretty significantly (200 videos) and the network has matured also. I rejoined this site and then added the $69 option to join all of the network sites and there is a ton of good content here. Lubed and Tiny4K are also good. I wrote a review about Tiny4K that is a more current impression.
After realizing I usually have a membership to one of the sites on this network, I went ahead and bought the upgrade for permanent access to the entire network for $69. Unfortunately, the upgrade does not provide me with the ability download many of the top rated set videos or images, just watch them...not really what I signed up for. I tried contacting thier tech support about this, but got no response back from anybody.
I'll follow up and let you know if it ever gets resolved.
Follow-Up - 10-18-16:
The limited download option has been resolved somehow. I can now download any video within the network.
I'm looking at this site and realize it is a pay-per-download site, which is simply not an acceptable site format in my book. A single download costs $9.95, with 5 videos costing $24.99 or $4.99 each. They have over 120 videos, so that means you would pay $600 to get them all. No thanks.
With so many other great VR sites, the idea that I'm spending at least $5 a video at this site is ridiculous. Some of the videos look pretty good, too, but I wont be visiting until the pricing model changes.
OK, first of all, there have been no new anal scenes that I can find since the few that were posted in 2014. So if you are avoiding the site because you don't like anal, go ahead and join up.
Second, to the webmaster. The marketing and page positioning of the additional-purchase "Staff Selection" videos is annoying and insulting. On at least one page (streaming), there is no indication at all that the video is an axtra cost purchase until you click on it and see the option for the preview and offer to purchase. I subscribe to many of the Met Art sites (6 currently) and this is the only one that tries to sell me extra videos. On this MA site, the spot normally reserved for the newest video or photo shoot is always occupied by this bait Staff Selection video. Just fricking STOP IT! If you want to sell videos seperately, establish a site for that or at least put them over on the side where you market the live site. We know you have the resources to do that. You guys have terrific sites! Don't cheapen them by doing things that some of the other, sleazier sites try.
I just rejoined this site and am really annoyed at how slow the downloads are. First download takes an hour and forget about queuing any other downloads up because they have a throttle allowing only one download at a time. Several times I queued up multiple downloads and only got the SBVR intro in the file and nothing else. The video quality is good and the girls are hot but the download issues are a deal killer for me.
Am I the only one getting insanely slow downloads?
I did not renew my 1 year membership because the file download speeds from this site were so slow. (30-40 mins for 7gb and only one file at a time actively downloads). I decided to join back up and see that downloads are still slow. 1-file download speeds are 3-5mb/s. Download speeds for my set up peg at 200mb/s so it is not my cable company, LAN or PC. For comparison, WanksVR and BaDoink files both download at about 9-11mb/s. Is anyone else experiencing really slow downloads from SexBabesVR?
I just joined this site and will try to write a review soon. It looks like it might be a WowGirls spin-off or something similar. Layout and color scheme is the same. About 40 videos, most are participatory. Video quality is the best VR I've seen so far. Really well done! The scene with Nancy A is so good I swear I can smell her.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
