| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
576
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Many ISP accounts here in the UK are capped lately. Mine is 8mbps with a cap of 80gb, that I often come close to.
They're upgrading to fibre and I just got offered 40mbps for a similar price, but with a 40gb cap. Missing the point...
|
03-31-11 06:05am
|
Reply
577
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Concur with tangub - and with lk2fireone in that it's degrading - although that's just my feeling, I'm sure that some girls go for it and wouldn't, er, get in their way.
As it relates to Japanese porn, I wish there was some middle ground between smiling girlies in flowery bikinis, and girls (sometimes the same ones) getting defiled in various ways by multiple guys :|
|
03-31-11 06:03am
|
Reply
578
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
As opposed to... oh, never mind :|
|
03-31-11 06:00am
|
Reply
579
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
Thanks for the review, Cap'n - this looks a bit more playful/erotic than some art nude sites and there are a few models I like - particularly Mai Ly. But will give it a wide berth for the time being.
I'm tempted to sign up at Digital Desire - have you visited recently/at all?
|
03-27-11 01:42am
|
Reply
580
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Well, I'm not really that kinky, but I guess some of my interests are a little off-centre, hence having to take a risk sometimes...
|
03-21-11 01:19am
|
Reply
581
|
Cinema Erotique
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
The price phased me a bit too... although if you join at $30 for two weeks, renewal is only $10/2 months - which is probably inline with TBP's note that updates aren't often. Given the relatively small amount of content, I guess you could download what you needed within that 2 weeks.
One to add to the list, anyway!
|
03-20-11 04:19am
|
Reply
582
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Oh, that's an easy one, both work for me big time. Either the transition between nylon and skin at the top of the thigh with stockings, or the view of a girls' pussy with sheer mesh of pantyhose pressed against it... I'll stop here before I write a dissertation on it.
|
03-19-11 12:23am
|
Reply
583
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just the built-in one on Firefox. It doesn't catch everything - some sites are very crafty in triggering them - but I've never bothered to specifically install something extra to block ads or popups.
|
03-17-11 01:36am
|
Reply
584
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Unshod, but nyloned, works for me.
|
03-16-11 08:29am
|
Reply
585
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks tangub! Your own reviews always appreciated - looks like we agreed on this site too.
|
03-14-11 12:09am
|
Reply
586
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's not something I openly admit to... but I do find myself increasingly hinting at it in polite company - probably to do with getting older and caring less about raising the odd eyebrow...
|
03-13-11 03:00am
|
Reply
587
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I'm with BadMrFrosty, agree there's a distinction! :D
I like and enjoy regular (whatever that means) porn, but I'm not sure I'd consider myself a collector of it. But where it falls in my area of interest - pinups, erotica, nylon/latex fetish - then I do keep (and revisit) any good material I find.
|
03-12-11 05:38am
|
Reply
588
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Pretty much concur with messmer - this is a tricky one to vote on.
If I'm a long-term member of a site that updates daily, I might visit a couple of times a week to see what's new.
On the other hand, if I'm subscribing for a month, I might visit every day for a week or so and work my way through the site, downloading what I like - then visit back a couple of times a week for the remainder of the subscription to pick up any new stuff.
|
03-12-11 04:40am
|
Reply
589
|
Hot Pics Direct
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
Well, good point - it is what is is so I'm not really complaining as such.
It just seems an odd model; I can't see that the material is unique enough to warrant it when there are many sites around offering their whole catalogue to download from for a similar fee.
|
03-09-11 02:50pm
|
Reply
590
|
I Am Trouble
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Review
Thanks for this helpful review, PP. I'm a huge fan of this kind of pinup/fetish/glamour content, and am very familiar (well, not quite as much as I'd like to be...) with Ms Max from various books, magazines and sites she appears in.
Great to know that her own site is also good, and that she's as charming as I'd imagined! Suspect I'll join Mosh's site before Masuimi's, but I'll be interested to see how it compares.
|
03-09-11 04:56am
|
Reply
591
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Anal doesn't really work for me in general, so I'd have to say no on this one.
|
03-08-11 08:01am
|
Reply
592
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just getting a new one, the last couple lasting me 3 years apiece. I work in IT and like to keep reasonably current... but I have a lot of stuff set up on my computer and its a PITA to do it again, so I try not to upgrade too often!
|
03-05-11 01:21am
|
Reply
593
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I do wonder why some sites still post 1200px or 1600px when, for probably the past 5 years, even a relatively modest camera will produce 3K or 4K pics :|
But agree re photoshopping!
|
03-04-11 11:38pm
|
Reply
594
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I like interviews, but as others have said, it depends on the interviewer. If it's a girl, cool; but many of the guys just ask really inane stuff.
On sites that post multiple videos of any given model, I like to see one that's just an interview - it then makes their other videos and/or photo sets that bit sexier to know a bit about what she's like.
|
03-04-11 02:29am
|
Reply
595
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
4K is a pretty good size for pics - I'd prefer to see at least 2K and ideally 3K on sites I like.
If you're really into the details, then newer sets Hegre-Art are almost 9K!
|
03-04-11 01:00am
|
Reply
596
|
1Pondo.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
Some time ago, I subscribed to a site in the same network and found the same issue - probably in common with some other folk here, I have a separate webmail address (gmail in this case) for, er, extra-curricular activities.
I got round it by setting up a dummy address on one of my personal domains and forwarding it to my gmail account. Works fine, but obviously only if you have a domain you can play with.
Depending on your ISP, you may be able to play around with their email setup? Eg some ISPs may give you an address of anything@slutty.isp.com and give you the tools to forward varations of the anything@ etc.
|
03-04-11 12:57am
|
Reply
597
|
Latex Style
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
Thanks for the review, which I read with interest, although my own interest in latex is a little milder and doesn't go as far as the full body and face variety. But looking at this site, and some others you've reviewed, I can see the appeal...
|
02-25-11 02:47pm
|
Reply
598
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I really like the fact that nowadays, it can be more of a personal choice with more things being web-based, and less reliance on OS-specific applications.
10 years ago, I was building GUI software that had to be run on Mac or Windows. Now, with very few exceptions, I'm building web apps instead - I only care where and what my server is, but users can be Mac/Windows/Linux/Android/iOS - anything with browser.
|
02-25-11 08:59am
|
Reply
599
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Well, I have, on a number of PCs, downloaded and burned a Ubuntu/UNR ISO, started from the CD, said yes to everything in the GUI install, and ended up with a good, working computer for browsing and other typical tasks - with no tweaking or configuring. I guess I've just been lucky!
However, I'm not willing to bet any organs, let alone the reproductive ones... so by that measure, you win :)
|
02-25-11 06:36am
|
Reply
600
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I'd argue that Windows is more of a tax - if I want a Linux computer, chances are I have to pay for Windows anyway as part of the price, and then get rid of it. Whereas anyone paying the - admittedly steep - premium for a Mac is doing so because they want Mac OS in the first place.
Anyway, agree that Linux can be fiddly, and if I was doing all my usual stuff on it (I'm also working in IT), it would drive me nuts - but Ubuntu has installed and worked well on any old PC I've tried it on without any tinkering and I'd still recommend if it you use a PC largely for web browsing (and especially UNR, which I far prefer to Windows on a netbook).
|
02-25-11 04:37am
|
