Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
Hey, I was just reading this and wanted to mention that MPL Studios long ago resolved my issue and I am now a happy member there. I wrote a review of that site here on Porn Users.
|
01-18-17 07:41am
|
Reply
352
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yesterday the option changed again to "Thanks for using our public beta. Click here to set this as default" but there was no way to go back to the "classic format". Fortunately, there is a setting in "options" that allows you to set your default to "classic". This works, but my browser spends a lot of time switching from the now global-default new format to my personal setting classic format.
I would not mind the new format so much if it provided me with one-row per day (i.e. 4 sets) like the old one did, if it used the same naming conventions and if I could do the same things in the same number of clicks. (i.e. download a zip file) Both formats leave huge amounts of unused space on the sides. If the goal was to provide larger thumbnails, just take up some of that unused space.
|
12-14-15 08:39am
|
Reply
353
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
OK, just to clarify, the refund was for a double billing. I paid Rocketgate for the annual subscription and then a few days later, Epoch charged me for the old monthly subscription because they did not get notice of the change. One moral to the story is that if you are going to upgrade, don't wait until a day or two before your original subscription would normally rebill. Give it a little more time than that....maybe a week in advance. You aren't losing anything because the upgrade only kicks in when the old subscription ends.
|
09-19-13 07:53pm
|
Reply
354
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
OK, I'm an idiot. I even sent an email off to Met-Art about the "Christina" problem above. Then as I was trying it again, I realized the girls name is CRISTINA! SO....operator error on my part. Apologies. (I would delete the whole comment, but comments on reviews can only be edited for 10 minutes after writing them.) I would still like to see an auto-login feature when traversing between paid sites in the same network.
|
08-29-12 06:29pm
|
Reply
355
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Thought I would add a little here. I DID finally go ahead and join the other sites in the network. There is a special to join them for $12.50 USD each once you join Met Art. Those annoying links referencing other sites are still there, but when I click on one, I am not automatically logged in to the other site. So I then have to log in and when I do, all reference to the girl I was following from the original site is gone. In one case today, there is a link from Met Art to Christina A on Erotic Beauty. I followed the link and saw the beginning of a set but was required to log in before seeing it all. I logged in and, of course, the site lost track of why I logged in and sent me to the home page. I then searched for Christina A. NO SUCH GIRL! So the links trying to get you to sign up to the other sites in the network REALLY ARE BAITING YOU! In this case, to a girl that doesn't even exist on the destination site (or who goes by a different name with no way to find her). I will give the webmaster the benefit of the doubt and hope they are just not aware of how broken (and annoying)this is, but I really hope it is fixed before I write my reviews on the other sites in this network.
|
08-29-12 04:35am
|
Reply
356
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Hi. Beautiful is such a broad term that applies to many things including women. There is no word that falls between beautiful and perfect that applies only to women other than maybe goddess but that's kind of cheesy. A woman could be beautiful and still be about an 8 on the female scorecard, but most of these women are 9s or better and a few are 11s. Awesome natural figures, pretty faces, great form, grace, confidence and a mix of wonderful poses. Damn near perfect. There are a lot of sites out there that have women that are not particularly beautiful. I just wanted to be sure people know this is not one of those sites.
OK, the next time I see a special, I'll try to post a comment. I have seen them in the "deals" section on other sites in the past. If there were holiday specials, they are probably over now so next chance will be February.
|
01-07-19 10:45am
|
Reply
357
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
MPL STUDIOS's Reply
Apparently they WERE telling me to screw off since future sign-up is "no longer an option". Here's the final message I got from the webmaster. You have to wonder what people are thinking in terms of marketing when there are public review forums like this. Was it retaliation for writing the comments? I don't know. It's just very dissappointing. And I'd bet that they never even try to replicate the problem I outlined.
Hello,
No disrespect intended and no justification is necessary on either end. Our site is not a good fit for you. We both recognize that. Your $19.95 has been promptly refunded
Future signup is no longer an option. As I said earlier, we're sorry it was so difficult for you. Login authentication is not supposed to be a complicated, frustrating experience.
Webmaster
MPL Studios
On 2/8/2013 5:22 PM, skippy99 wrote:
Hi,
Well, I’m more than a little disappointed that you just closed my account and refunded my money, but I suppose that is your prerogative. The reason I contacted ccBill and not you was that I really wasn’t expecting anyone to respond to me from your site at 1:00 in the morning. Usually, ccBill can reset locked passwords and even change them and I know they are there 24/7.
From: Webmaster at MPL Studios
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:53 AM
To: skippy99
Subject: Re: Your login process is a nightmare!
|
02-09-13 09:04am
|
Reply
358
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
MPL STUDIOS's Reply
Wow, now I just read the entire message from the webmaster and read the email he sent me. Although I can't really tell if he's telling me to screw off or not...the message was pretty polite...I am a little dissappointed that he just closed the account.
I'll try again some other time. Knowing what I do now about the login issue, I should be able to get around it without getting locked out.
|
02-08-13 04:17pm
|
Reply
359
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Hi,
I absolutely agree that ccBill is perhaps the best billing system. The problem, though, is that the site determines policy and ccBill abides by it. The random password is the site. Login attempts is the site. the tab issue is probably a comibination of site and ccbill as niether seem aware that it is an issue.
The reason I went to ccBill is because they are the site's wallet. If the issue comes from ccBill to the site, chances that it will be addressed are sometimes better than if it were just a little old user.
And lastly, I've had a few instances lately where login servers have been down and I was unable to get into sites. The login servers belong to ccbill. In those cases, you need to complain to both ccBill and to the paysite. There are usually quality of service clauses in the service level agreement between them and you want both parties to think at least a little bit about whether those clauses have been broken.
|
02-08-13 04:09pm
|
Reply
360
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
MPL STUDIOS's Reply
Interesting response. No "Sorry" message. No possible way that the web site could have done anything wrong. Operator error is the only thing it could have been. (Did I mention that I've been in IT for 20 years?) Kind of arrogant and politically incorrect, don't you think? The ONLY way to accurately enter in a cryptic username password combination like the one you assigned to me is to copy it from the ccbill site and paste it into the host site and that is exactly what I did. About 20 times.
YOUR site locked me out after multiple attempts based on the IP address I was using. When I loaded an anonymous browsing client that uses a proxy server, I was able to get in, but was unable to download more than a few images before, within 60 seconds of logging in, I got a message from YOUR site that said I was accessing the site from an unauthorized IP address (i.e. the proxy server) and tossed me out again. I clicked on the download button for the ZIP, but did not get the file. Probably an issue with the proxy server, not yours.
It's kind of too bad, too, because I liked the little bit I saw of your site.
I'll tell you what. I'll try again tonight to get in. If you look at my other revews for similar sites you will see that I write fair and in many cases glowing reviews. If I get in I will write a review that is untainted by this incident. But in return, you need to secret shop your own site from outside your facility on a typical IP connection. Use Internet Explorer. Buy a subscription. Click on the link in the "Approved" page that ccBill provides and watch as a tab within IE opens. See for yourself that it is physically impossible to get back to the ccBill login page (in an IE tab) once you click login and your website login pop-up appears. Try it a dozen times like I did and see if your site locks you out. Then get back to me and either say "Yes, we can see how this might be a problem" or "No, we tested this exactly as you described and were able to toggle tabs once the login pop-up appeared and were not locked out.
Your call. Actually replicate the issue as I carefully described above, or continue to be a defensive sysadmin who refuses to beleive something an intellegent, experienced customer tells them about their site.
Deal?
|
02-08-13 03:53pm
|
Reply
361
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I went ahead and took this lifetime offer at Mr. Skin. It does include naked news and Playboy Plus, but the PP subscription is streaming only with no downloads. When I tried to pay the $10 for downloads, the PP system says I am not a valid user and won't allow me to upgrade. Kinda sucks, but I'm used to it from the douche bags that run the Playboy site and many others that don't allow downloading unless you pay the extortion fee.
|
01-01-18 07:44pm
|
Reply
362
|
My Free Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
perversecult's Review
I visit MFC and chaturbate moderately often, but I do not look for privatge shows there. There are other sites that are set up for private shows, like metcams. With MFC and Chaturbate, mostly Chaturbate, I'll give tokens to the girls that are particularly impressive so they do things in thier public room. I don't care if somebody else is geting off on my dime. I'm not really there for the conversation anyway.
Just look at the numbers of viewers in each girl's room on these sites and you will see that for every one person paying tokens, there are hundreds just watching.
Don't expect a first class private experience on these sites. Just go to one that specializes in private if that is what you want.
|
04-02-18 06:10pm
|
Reply
363
|
My Free Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
I hate to admit it, but I've been lurking around MFC and I know what you mean. There are a handful of girls who are basically naked all the time in the top couple of rows and they get money thrown at them, often without doing much of anything else. The new girls, who probably think in terms of a traditional one-on-one private experience, are at the very bottom of the list and when you peek into their rooms, they are just sitting there.
I also have to wonder if there is some Amazon.com-like marketing model where the models on the top row are paying extra to stay in those slots. That model works great for those top-row girls and for MFC, but not so much for the new models who aren't yet making enough money to buy a higher position. So they quit.
In the end, the psychology of it is very similar to stripping. Some girls try it, some girls enjoy the money for a while, but very few girls have the emotional fortitude or psychological make-up to stick with it and really excel.
OK, I'm headed over to Chaturbate now. :-)
|
12-14-16 10:30pm
|
Reply
364
|
My Free Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Thanks for the info. I tried POVlive a couple times and that seems like a pretty straightforward buy a chatroom site. Also tried the Met Art live site, metcams. Metcams was a decent site, but they kept telling me my account had been hacked and cutting me off. I think many of these sites are all run by the same parent company/master website, but I can't think of the name.
|
10-23-16 07:23pm
|
Reply
365
|
Nextdoor Models
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
This is one of those cases where I read the review and did not quite get what you were saying. I was thinking the site has probably changed a lot since you signed up 5 years ago. Guess what? It hasn't.
|
02-08-13 07:40pm
|
Reply
366
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
That has to be the best webmaster response I've heard in a long, long time! Thanks, Captain!
|
12-14-16 10:15pm
|
Reply
367
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Hi,
Just to clarify, the $60 lifetime thing is contingent on maintaining one membership. So I'm paying $10 a month for one of the sites but have access to all of them. If/when I quit that one site, I will lose access to the other sites too. It is kind of a gimmick, but it seems worth it.
|
02-01-17 09:58pm
|
Reply
368
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Rearadmiral,
I wrote a review for Passion HD several years ago and was just reading through yours when I realized I'm a current member! I joined POVD a while back and, not satisfied with the infrequent updates, went ahead and paid the $70 for the one-time fee to join the whole network. I wrote reviews for POVD and Tiny4K that included some comments about passion HD, I think. Just be sure you are paying the smallest monthly fee you can, then buy the one-time ticket.
I also wanted to let you know they have a new site in the network package called "holed.com" that is probably, um, right up your alley. It is a brand new site that only has 24 scenes, but some of them are really good and I'm not into anal. And you already know the network has some great and very popular young US models. There are some other anal scenes in the network in POVD and Lubed also. The best thing about joining the network is that there are often one or two updates a day and the quality is very consistent across the board.
Looks like I need to write a new review....
|
01-29-17 09:28pm
|
Reply
369
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Hi, I'm about to do a review of this one, but I'll answer your questions. There are about 120 videos and about 60 models as of this date. Admission to the sit does NOT give you access to PP network.
|
09-18-12 07:36pm
|
Reply
370
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
LadyLover's Comment
I also just got a promotion for the $99 lifetime memership. Does anyone know if this is streaming only or if it includes downloads and HD? Even if it only lasts for two years, this seems like a decent deal, but not if it will cost me another $10 a month to be able to download anything.
Update: I just chatted with support on Playboy Plus and, yes, to get ANY useful features, you need VIP, which is another $10 a month. SO....$99 for a half-assed lifetime subscription of limited use and duration and ANOTHER $120 a year to be able to download anything or get HD. TOTALLY DECEPTIVE!!!!!
|
03-02-19 06:02am
|
Reply
371
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Done. I'll leave it on for a day.
|
02-12-17 11:09am
|
Reply
372
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
Rearadmiral,
So...what happened? I would hate to think that a company/brand as reputable as Playboy would give you the runaround. I found your note because I was here looking before signing up. I think I'll wait to hear what happens with your case before I do.
Thanks,
Skippy
|
12-04-15 06:55pm
|
Reply
373
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Thank you SO MUCH for that HD tip in advanced search! Without that, it was like looking for a needle in a field full of haystacks.
|
02-02-13 10:54pm
|
Reply
374
|
POVD
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Hi RA,
Yes, they are different. Maybe it changed as the sites matured and they realized they were leaving money on the table. Mine was a on-time payment for access as long as I maintained a subscription to one account. IT still works out to more than an annual subscription to one site, but not to 5-7 sites.
No, my "lifetime" bonus option did not include Baeb. I joined Baeb separately because of a particular model and I did not know until I joined that it was part of this network. I get all the sites you get. I only had it for a month because it is really, really small. I wrote a review, I think.
I've also had a site or two added since I joined. The "Holed" site was added, I know.
So it seems like the gimmick is the same, but they changed the time from forever to one year.
|
05-29-17 02:26pm
|
Reply
375
|
POVD
(0)
|
Reply of
frank nasty's Reply
The videos in general are very high quality but there are a few that don't rank up there with the rest. In general the video is MUCH better than your typical hardcore or amateur site.
|
08-30-14 07:15am
|
|
