| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
Several Porn stars have committed suicide (i.e. Savannah, August Ames). They were probably disturbed enough by their profession and situation to take thier lives. This really bothers me and I have deleted any material I had of them.
|
08-09-19 12:36pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
There are a few pornstars that have committed suicide but many sites continue to show their material. I can't really watch their stuff and haev a hard time understanding why the sites keep it.
|
06-06-19 05:32am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
My tastes range from 18 to 30-ish but I think it is also about the look of the model and whatever mood I'm in. For example, Femjoy has a potographer named Stefan Soell that takes very conservative images of OMFG beautiful women in their 20s. But there are also some a-MAZ-ingly beautiful tattoo covered women on Suicide Girls and some great 1st-person sex on POVD and the VR sites. The only category I am not that fond of is the traditional, more mature US porn stars and sites.
|
04-02-19 07:20am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
PU Folks, please read this entire comment.
I got a "not trusted" vote by another reviewer because he did not agree with my review of one of his favorite sites. The no-trust was anonymous, but it could only have been one person as he also wrote a rebuttal to my review to the site flexy teens. He wrote "Inaccurate reviews" in the no trust comment. I even went back to the site and double checked everything I had said to make sure I wasn't misrepresenting it. (It was and I wasn't.) I responded to the rebuttal and responded to the no trust vote. Never heard from the guy again and as far as I can tell, he doesn't come to PU anymore.
The other factor is that any legitimate reviewer getting a no-trust rating has the potential to be discouraged and annoyed with the PU site. I can say that personally, I have been much less interested in writing reviews since this anonymous douchebag no-trusted me in January of 2018. I think everyone has a right to disagree, but a no-trust mark is permanent, universal and..can it even be reversed? That's just wrong.
I know I took this too personally, but as a top-20 reviewer who takes pride in my reviews, I really feel like that was a kick in the nuts. PU could have a better system. Other review/comment systems use thumbs up/thumbs down at the review level, with cumulate votes and the option to report. That seems to be much more fair.
Dump the no-trust option.
|
04-02-19 07:05am
|
Reply
5
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
LadyLover's Comment
I also just got a promotion for the $99 lifetime memership. Does anyone know if this is streaming only or if it includes downloads and HD? Even if it only lasts for two years, this seems like a decent deal, but not if it will cost me another $10 a month to be able to download anything.
Update: I just chatted with support on Playboy Plus and, yes, to get ANY useful features, you need VIP, which is another $10 a month. SO....$99 for a half-assed lifetime subscription of limited use and duration and ANOTHER $120 a year to be able to download anything or get HD. TOTALLY DECEPTIVE!!!!!
|
03-02-19 06:02am
|
Reply
6
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
OLd Viv Thomsa is what I think of as glam porn.
|
01-21-19 02:36pm
|
Reply
7
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Hey. Thanks for the review. I have been a member of this and pretty much all the MA sites off and on (and some continuously) since they were new and never really thought of this as "glam porn", but I guess perhaps it might be. I've always thought of glam porn as that photography stuff in the early 2000s and earlier with heavily made-up models. (Playboy-soft and Penthouse-medium maybe) This is....something different...something that needs it's own defintion...which they tried to do with the name Sexart. But the idea that it is not hard, rough or in any way crude is dead-on correct. So let's come up with a new name! :-)
Oh, and depending on the device or browser you are using, you can make the text pretty big. :-))
|
01-21-19 02:21pm
|
Reply
8
|
Horror Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
There are a couple of rather gory shoots on Burning Angel, which I honestly skipped right by as soon as I realized what they were, but Horror Porn takes this to a new level... I mentioned elsewhere that I think this is some extension of monster-sex animation that is popular in some circles. There is a site that specializes in selling tools to create 3d porn animation, but I can't find it at the moment. That site has lots of monster models to purchase and include in animations and from what I can tell, the site is moderately successful. So maybe this is just a mental evolution for the type of person that does that.
I have to wonder......anal sex is moderately popular among heterosexual millenials because they have such easy access to porn and consider it a normal sex thing (I think) because they see it there. I wonder what this kind of stuff will bring to sex in general? Hopefully nothing.
|
01-21-19 01:53pm
|
Reply
9
|
X Virtual
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
Thanks for the review! I've never seen this site but from the previews it looks pretty specialized. As I'm sure you know "monster sex" is an odd but growing niche in the animation world so I guess it was only a matter of time before somebody adapted it into this format. There a few other very good cosplay VR sites and one or two pretty good BDSM VR sites, but I have to say this is the first time I've ever seen VR fuck-an-alien porn. Um. Eww. It is also probably worth mentioning that although this is VR, it is not all POV. Anyway, thanks for letting us know about this site!
|
01-20-19 09:42am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
There is an entire subculture of pro and semi-pro girls milking wallets in return for images or whatever. The site Patreon.com is set up to support artists of various types, but it has a LOT of instagram, ex-Playboy and other models that will show you skin for money. (Remember Sara Underwood?) It is sort of a lazy version of a webcam site and it is set up like imgur, so the only way to find a girl is to get a link. Apparently, some girls make decent money posting short videos there. I was referred there by one model and her videos ranged from $5 to well over $100. (She is not a model I particularly want to see more of, but I was curious about the site.) I also saw that they try to get you to sign up to be a "recurring patron" which draws $5-50 a month from your funds so you can "support your artist". What a racket! The site was created to serve musicians but it looks like they found a very profitable niche in porn "patronage"..... Google "porn on patreon" to get a list of porn models with links there. Apparently Patreon is trying to crack down on the porn stuff because they want to launch an app, but it is all pretty interesting that this even exists.
|
01-20-19 07:38am
|
Reply
11
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
SelenaMetArt's Reply
Hello Selena,
Yes, the issue has been resolved. THank you very much! :-)
|
01-11-19 05:14pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
For the most part, I enjoy 2.5 categories of porn. The first is softcore with unbelievable, young, generally untattood pro models like Met Art, MPL Studios, Watch4beauty and Femjoy. The second is POV and VR stuff where beautiful women are pretty much tasked with paying attention to the viewer and getting him/her off. The .5 category is this niche of beautiful women that you don't see anywhere else because they have tattoos. Many of them have beautiful, intricate, amazing, sometimes body covering tattoos. There are thousands of these women, with body types as diverse and as spectacular as anything on the sites I listed above. I've been a member of the strictly softcore and social-network site SuicideGirls off and on for years, but the site has changed since a relaunch and everything about it has improved. If you are curious, the SG thread on reddit is fairly representative of the images there, but the site is much more than just images. I humbly acknowledge that this is all about a middle-aged guy fantasizing about beautiful women that are more badass than anything I could ever handle, but, hey, isn't that why many of us are here? :-)
|
01-10-19 08:26am
|
Reply
13
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Nice review. It looks like a genuine and natural amatuer site. But a 97? Really? That is your 3rd highest review rating EVER out of several hundred reviews that include prety much every soft and hardcore site that ever was. Looking at the models and the available videos from this site, I am hard pressed to figure out why it rates so high. I suppose I will just have to join to find out. :-)
|
01-09-19 09:19am
|
Reply
14
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Hi. Beautiful is such a broad term that applies to many things including women. There is no word that falls between beautiful and perfect that applies only to women other than maybe goddess but that's kind of cheesy. A woman could be beautiful and still be about an 8 on the female scorecard, but most of these women are 9s or better and a few are 11s. Awesome natural figures, pretty faces, great form, grace, confidence and a mix of wonderful poses. Damn near perfect. There are a lot of sites out there that have women that are not particularly beautiful. I just wanted to be sure people know this is not one of those sites.
OK, the next time I see a special, I'll try to post a comment. I have seen them in the "deals" section on other sites in the past. If there were holiday specials, they are probably over now so next chance will be February.
|
01-07-19 10:45am
|
Reply
15
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
Thanks for the review! I checked my archive and see I last joined this site in 2009 and have images back to 2006, so the site has been around a while. Back then the models were European and American, the shoots were done in more of a "glam" style and the images and video were comparable to Twisty's or One-girl-a-day. It is interesting how that recent "russian" factor is so unpopular with western Europeans and Americans. When I joined a similar site with a lot of unknown Czech models, they all had neon eye shadow. Some girls can pull-off the fun clown-clothing clothing look just like some can-pull-off (I guess that was a pun...) the school-girl uniform look, but most can't. I'll put this on my list and look for discounted rates. 9 years of material should keep me entertained for a while....
|
12-26-18 10:30am
|
Reply
16
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Not life, just one or two sites. As you know, most of my reviews are quite positive and I really do try to give sites a 2nd chance by rejoining when a bad experience may have been a fluke.
I would suggest Irish Creme but since you are lactose intolerant, maybe some warm brandy? It's not eggnog but you won't notice after a while... :-)
Happy Holidays!
|
12-24-18 09:27am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Body part? The usual. In softcore modeling, there is a trend to provide more images with the model reclined and the photographer above, shooting down. I like that a lot.
|
12-21-18 03:50pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Nope.
|
12-21-18 03:15pm
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
All of the above is too rough for me. Sex is still about love and trust. It doesn't have to be tender-sweet all the time, but it should never be brutal or hugely demeaning.
|
12-21-18 03:14pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Giffy.com, Sexclub.com, EuropeanCenterfolds.com. dreambabes.com, hustler.com, barelylegal.com. Dozens of others. This was long before Danni's, Playboy-Plus and Twisty's. I still have images in my archive but they are way too small to enjoy now.
|
12-21-18 03:08pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I have a filing system and a naming/rating system that keeps the best stuff at the top.
|
12-21-18 02:49pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Some basic items that will discourage me from joining a site:
1. No reviews anywhere.
2. A link to the site that originated on a "hunter" or repost site. (This is different from seeing a watermark on a repost site)
3. Stolen images in the tour or ad.
4. A no-name payment processor.
5. Documented bait-and-switch tactics (i.e. having to pay more to download)
6. Cross-check complaints.
All of that is AFTER I look and see good looking models and quality sets. Without those, I'm gone.
|
12-21-18 02:47pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
OK, this is an odd question. I think a hands free orgasm would be called premature ejaculation in most cases. :-) Never had one.
|
12-21-18 02:42pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
Depends on what you call fetishes. I love intimate bondage, whether it is in porn or in real life. There is nothing that says trust in your partner like allowing yourself to be tied down and teased into orgasm, or, for my wife, orgasm after orgasm after orgasm.
|
12-21-18 02:40pm
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
The disturbing thing about age is that many porn stars will do all kinds of stuff to stay popular. Rather than working out to stay fit, tat often means having work done. Having work done ages a porn star far more than birthdays do. Those models that can age gracefully without submitting to the knife have my utmost respect. And those stars that can stay fit and trim are at the top of my list.
|
12-21-18 02:33pm
|
