Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Not life, just one or two sites. As you know, most of my reviews are quite positive and I really do try to give sites a 2nd chance by rejoining when a bad experience may have been a fluke.
I would suggest Irish Creme but since you are lactose intolerant, maybe some warm brandy? It's not eggnog but you won't notice after a while... :-)
Happy Holidays!
|
12-24-18 09:27am
|
Reply
327
|
Flexy Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
That's fair. I think all of the new stuff is in HD but many of the better looking models are in older SD stuff. The popular models I mentioned are in HD. I'll change the review to reflect "many" instead of "most"
|
02-08-18 06:14pm
|
Reply
328
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Nice review. It looks like a genuine and natural amatuer site. But a 97? Really? That is your 3rd highest review rating EVER out of several hundred reviews that include prety much every soft and hardcore site that ever was. Looking at the models and the available videos from this site, I am hard pressed to figure out why it rates so high. I suppose I will just have to join to find out. :-)
|
01-09-19 09:19am
|
Reply
329
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
Ah. OK. Natasha Schon is kind of a mixed bag for me, I've commented on MA many times and these shots of Elin/Aya are a good example. All 3 of the Schon MA sets are fairly dark, stylized and possibly highly altered images that attempt to shroud the model in mood and mystery. We have no idea what else Schon is altering in the name of artistic expression. I can appreciate the effort but prefer a little less alteration. The Hegre shots are mostly exactly the opposite and mostly just show the model in her true and unaltered form. Now, I also notice that Hegre has 35 galleries of this model dating back to 2013 (First set is called 18th Birthday so that says a lot....), so this model is younger and less experienced in the Hegre sets. The Schon sets are all dated 2017, so at this point the model has been working for 4 or 5 years. One huge change? The model's teeth. They are decidedly "European" in all if the Hegre sets including the ones published in 2017. (We have no idea when they were shot and every set could have been from the same 2-3 day shoot many years ago.) In the Schon shots, she's either gotten crowns or Schon has done a lot of editing. Either way, the difference is significant.
In the end, none of this matters. It is all in the eye of the beholder. I like this model's body on both sites. Please hold it against me. :-)
|
12-13-17 12:27pm
|
Reply
330
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
Which model? Most of his shoot of popular Met-Art models are A-MAZ-ing!
|
12-13-17 06:07am
|
Reply
331
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Hi Amanda,
Thank you SO MUCH for taking my comments in the correct and positive light. In the end, we are all pretty committed to making TBP and PU a great place for people to find out what is good and what is bad. If PU isn't the CU of porn, I think it is at least safe to say you are the tomato meter. :-)
Thanks, again!
|
12-12-17 03:20pm
|
Reply
332
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Hi Amanda,
Thanks for the quick response. I know you guys have a LOT of site reviews to manage, but there really needs to be a better way to deal with this type of situation where a site changes its domain name, especially when the old domain name is still active. By not attaching an old domain to a new one, you are inadvertently aiding and abetting those really awful sites that change their name to evade bad reviews and deceive people into signing up for something again. At the same time, this process means that well established and highly rated sites that change their domain name for other reasons are treated like new sites with unknown reputations. Seems like the bad guys win here.
Hegre-Art.com actively links to this new hegre.com domain and the format and content hasn't changed at all. As a member for many years, I didn't even notice that the name had changed because all of my bookmarks still work. In TBP and PU The search for Hegre-Art returns a not-found or a message that says the site is no longer active. Totally not true. Even a search reference as simple as "This site is now X" would be helpful.
On the other hand, I have signed up for a couple of sites that have had no review only to find that it is the exact same crummy site that I had signed up for before where only the domain name had changed. This isn't common, but it does happen, especially among small niche sites.
So, unfortunately, the limitations of the TBP/PU system not being able to cross-reference site names are doing a disservice to your viewers. From my perspective, you are inadvertently helping these bad sites deceive people while hurting the really good, well established ones that change their name for other reasons. As the Consumer Reports of porn, I know you can come up with a better way.
I went ahead and created an updated review so that at least there is a PU score associated with the new domain name.
OK, vent closed. :-)
Thanks,
Skippy
|
12-12-17 08:54am
|
Reply
333
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
greg909's Reply
Yes, for most sites I only sign up for a month at a time, but I have annual subscriptions to a few. You are right about some sets not being that exciting, but I like the format because you can truly see what each model looks like without any stupid props, covered tattoos, airbrushing or clothing designed to hide things. Every single model is real and most are stunning. It isn't up in your face stuff very often and is mostly pretty soft core, but once a week or so there is a set that knocks my...um...socks off.
|
02-26-16 08:43pm
|
Reply
334
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
The images are shot in very high resolution so when you blow them up, they are still sharp (unlike some sites that just take smaller pictures and increase their resolution). Many of the images are very sharp, but unfortunately, when you magnify blurry, you get VERY blurry. It all depends on the source image and the focus point that the photographer chooses.
|
09-17-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
335
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
My subscription was through newnudecash (who, as it turns out, is really CCBILL!). Once I logged in I was able to go to support and click on "How do I cancel a subscription". From there, a pop-up appeared with the link to the cancellation screen. I entered my username and password and got a message that said "your subscription has been cancelled. Welcome back in the future!" Kind of an odd process, but it worked. Before I cancelled, I went to ccbill and entered in my card number and email address and hegre-art was there. As soon as I cancelled (in the site) and refreshed the ccBill page, it showed cancelled. So it looks like you can cancel using either the ccBill page or within the website.
|
08-23-12 08:46pm
|
Reply
336
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Good question. I had to go look to find out. It looks like all of the girls in the massage videos and still shots are already naked and oiled up by the time the shoot starts. A few models have sets called something like "before the massage" where they get oiled up. Most often, though, the "before" sets are images, from every angle, of the girl laying there. As I was just looking through the site, it dawned on me that the vast majority, like 90%, of shoots start out and end with the girls completely naked. It depends a little on the model, but very few of them have any clothes on at all. Ever. For example Little Caprice has 40 sets. She has a corset on in 2 sets, a pair of jean shorts in one set and panties or a bathing suit in 1 or two other sets. So maybe 35 out of 40 sets contain nothing but a completely naked Caprice. Melissa Mendini has 35 sets and she has a swimsuit or a shirt or something on, very briefly, in about 6 of those sets. 44 sets of the beautiful and now retired Marketa. Maybe 8 of those sets have any covering at all. Anna S, one of the nearly-exclusive models and one of the most beautiful models I have ever seen, has over 100 photo and video sets. She is completely naked in about 82 of them. I'm not sure but maybe the point the photographer is trying to make is that these girls are such fine examples of the female form that they don't need to hide anything. So....if you like sets where the girls strip, there are not many of those here. Sorry for the long answer.
|
08-23-12 08:39pm
|
Reply
337
|
Holed
(0)
|
Reply of
superjank's Comment
I have been a member of that network several times and cancelling is not as easy as it should be.
Although it is sometimes very difficult to find the biller site, this is the best way to see what you have signed up for and what is active. I regularly go to ccbill, epoch and segpay to make sure that what I cancelled has actually been cancelled and to see what is active. (Unfortunately, although Epoch takes Paypal, there is no easy way to track your Paypal paid accounts on the Epoch site yet without a subscription number.) I hate to say it but sometimes it is hard to keep track of what I have signed up for and what I've cancelled so this is the easiest way for me.
|
12-15-18 01:42pm
|
Reply
338
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Thanks Amanda, I'll take a look and probably join and write a review soon.
|
01-16-18 01:10pm
|
Reply
339
|
Horror Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
There are a couple of rather gory shoots on Burning Angel, which I honestly skipped right by as soon as I realized what they were, but Horror Porn takes this to a new level... I mentioned elsewhere that I think this is some extension of monster-sex animation that is popular in some circles. There is a site that specializes in selling tools to create 3d porn animation, but I can't find it at the moment. That site has lots of monster models to purchase and include in animations and from what I can tell, the site is moderately successful. So maybe this is just a mental evolution for the type of person that does that.
I have to wonder......anal sex is moderately popular among heterosexual millenials because they have such easy access to porn and consider it a normal sex thing (I think) because they see it there. I wonder what this kind of stuff will bring to sex in general? Hopefully nothing.
|
01-21-19 01:53pm
|
Reply
340
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Nice review, thanks! I also like this site a lot but there is one thing that ensures I will only join once a year or so and only for a month: No discounted long term rates. When you pick a tier, the monthly price is the only option. There is no quarterly rate, no annual rate and no lifetime rate. Although I suppose I understand the webmaster logic behind this, it is flawed from both a revenue and a cash-flow perspective. Like you, I am a VOLUME consumer. I have 5 or 6 annual memberships at various rates equal to, what, about 50-70% off the monthly rate. I would not be a member of those sites for 12 months at the regular rate under any circumstances. Instead, there are a dozen or more sites that I join for a month every one to two years to catch up on. This site, rather than getting $100-130 from me for a recurring annual membership, gets $30-40 from me (or maybe $70 for unrestricted downloads, another PITA) for a single month of a monthly membership every year or two. An annual membership would be one transaction, one servicer transaction fee, one account set-up, and cash up-front rather than once a month for month or two most members probably stick around. So now that my review of this site, which was originally one of my highest, has expired, I will eventually join again for a month and write another review. I'm sure the site is just as good, but the philosophy of the site revenue model and the way they treat subscribers has soured things somewhat.
|
12-16-18 08:43pm
|
Reply
341
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Jack Incognito's Comment
You should take a look at FTVgirls. I don't think there is an exact match to ITC anywhere, but FTVgirls is a similar video style with a little more outdoor stuff and some really good looking unknown models providing some serious close ups. The girls at FTV are almost all American (I think they shoot in Tucson or Phoenix, maybe). ALS is OK. ALSscan is mostly thinner girls and ALSAngels is generally bigger breasted, more popular models/stars, etc. Read my reviews to get an idea or just look at the previews. ALSscan is a Met-Art network site now while ALSAngels is not. Both are run by the same webmaster and both recycle a lot of material.
|
12-22-17 08:19pm
|
Reply
342
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
inthecrack's Reply
My reference to 10GB was in regards to the size of most 20-30 minute 3D video files from the most popular 3D sites. You can go look at my reviews for pretty much all of them.
BTW, I did go ahead and purchase the unlimited plan for $70 so I could download the files I want without being treated like a thief and then cancelled it. I think there is a fundamental problem with offering access to a site and then restricting how much a subscriber can actually download from it. Your use of the term "abusers" in your response is particularly insightful, reflecting your attitude toward "subscribers" very clearly. As I mentioned, I offered to pay $100-150 for an annual subscription, but you aren't interested in that, so I'll be back in a year or two and will again buy an unlimited subscription so I can catch up.
And there is one final point I wish to make here. When I subscribe to a site, I want to be able to watch the videos whenever and wherever I am without having to wait for anything to download or having a stream stutter or having it switch to a lower resolution because of traffic. Actually possessing the file means I can play it instantly, fast forward, skip huge sections or replay the section I like over and over, all on the player of my choice and regardless of where I am or whether or not I have an internet connection. So when I sign up for a site, the first thing I do is download a handful of videos so I have them and can watch them any time once they've downloaded. Except for your site. On your site, I downloaded part of a handful of videos before I hit my quota. The downloads stop so I don't get the files, but the portion download still applies to my quota. So on your site I was unable to apply the same download-and-watch methodology that I have applied to dozens of other sites. Why? Because downloading 5 videos is abusing the system? You really need to rethink this logic.
See you next time!
|
12-19-17 05:45pm
|
Reply
343
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Hi Tangub,
I just looked at my image collection over three years from ITC and it totals 41,770 images, which is probably about 70% of the sets available. Image sizes range from about 1000 x 1600 pixels for the older sets, to 1800x2400 or 3000 x 4500 for the most recent sets. I have videos and images in the same folders, so my computer is having a hard time figuring out how large that is, but it looks like it is about 36GB. So the 300GB level should allow you to download all of the images you want....just not within the first hour. :-)
|
12-19-17 05:25pm
|
Reply
344
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Well, after looking at what was available, I downloaded the material I want and some of that was the picture sets since I last joined. Looking back at my history, I have about 42,000 images that were all downloaded in zip files. That's about 28 gigs of unzipped images and I would guess that this is about 80% of the images on the site.
|
11-19-17 09:55pm
|
Reply
345
|
Interactive GF
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Hi Amanda, Thanks for the reply. I honestly can't recall the name of the pay-to-play site. May have been life Selector. I remember a teaser that allowed you to get a few choices in and then hit you up for tokens or something so you could keep playing. Seemed rather expensive as I recall...the cost seemed roughly the same as a live chat model. Life Selector looks like it might have been it.
In the isn't that funny department, I think I had a copy of the CD called "Penthouse Interactive Photo Shoot, Volume 1", hosted by Bob Guccione and released in 1994. It was interactive in the same way as these sites (well, except it was a photo shoot, not sex), and at the end you were critiqued by the voice of Bob Guccione himself. It was interesting the first time, OK the next ten times and cheesy after that. So the concept is far from new.
In a more pragmatic sense, I think a lot of porn consumers may be editing their own videos anyway. I do. Who has time these days to watch a 30 minute porn video that has a 5 minute lead-up, 10 minutes of fellatio and a 5 minute hand job at the end. The way to make this concept work in my mind would be to provide a monthly subscription rate, then allow the subscriber to build and DOWNLOAD his/her video after creating it to suit his/her specific tastes. BAM! New concept!
Oh, I just noticed that these two sites ( InteractiveGirlfriend and Life Selector) must be owned by the same group because the videos are the same. Maybe they can use my idea above....
Take care!
|
01-17-18 06:00pm
|
Reply
346
|
Jerkoff Instructions
(0)
|
Reply of
Colm4's Reply
Hello Colm4,
OK, I can appreciate that the genre may be a little different and that this may be a fetish, of sorts, but I wrote a review based on my observations, expectations, etc. I expected the scenes to be more engaging. Yes, the scenes are longer than 30 seconds, but that includes the long, long set-ups and the close-outs that are not action related. Yes, there are many different types of scenarios, but the idea that ALL of them are telling somebody how to masturbate, as in for the first time, is a little excessive. There are many, many similar scenes on dozens of sites that are more engaging and a few sites/porn stars do an absolutely spectacular job of dirty talking. Having a physically and visually disengaged girl telling me how to masturbate just doesn't do it for me. Far worse than a pity fuck, this is dozens of re-enactments of the 40 year old virgin with a leading female who isn't even remotely interested in the guy and often time belittles him. In the world of show and tell porn, this site is almost entirely just tell. I can appreciate the niche, but it does nothing for me.
|
01-02-17 01:21pm
|
Reply
347
|
Katie Fey
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
Looks like I need to keep looking around. There is one bonus site that isn't bad called Ariel Rebel. Although I don't recall seeing the girl before, the solo site has Recent updates, decent vidos, etc.
|
02-18-13 08:55pm
|
Reply
348
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
SelenaMetArt's Reply
Hello Selena,
Yes, the issue has been resolved. THank you very much! :-)
|
01-11-19 05:14pm
|
Reply
349
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
OMG this is a pain in the ass. It has happened to me five or six times in the last year or so. I a couple of annuals and a couple of highly discounted monthly subscriptions (cheaper than annual), plus I rotate through most of their their sites once a year or so. Every time I sign up or cancel a site, my master account gets screwed up. For me, the problem is usually because they use different billers for different promotions. So two subscriptions are Epoch, two are rocketpay and one or two are ccbill. When they reset things, the different biller accounts don't synch up and logins fail. I had one account that continued to charge me for a couple of months before I realized that I wasn't actually cancelled like the site said. Of course, once I point all this out, they fix it within a day or two, but damn it is frustrating!
|
11-23-18 07:10pm
|
Reply
350
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
SelenaMetArt's Reply
SEE!!! THIS is what I mean by awesome customer service! Thank you!
|
01-22-17 07:47pm
|
|
