Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I don't know, messmer, but I never noticed anything "darkish" or otherwise physically different about Toby's sets on ATK's various sites or in his work elsewhere. I did notice that his sets were extremely predictable and instantly recognizeable, at least with the older material, which comprises most of what I've seen since I'm not into the new style of softcore at all. Predictable as in: girl in doorway, expose one breast, expose other breast, lift skirt, turn around, get on floor, lift knees, open knees, turn on side, turn over...done. The models spent WAY too much time on the damn floor in most of Toby's vintage sets.
Over-all, however, I do agree that ATK lags behind some of the premier sites and are resting on their laurels technically and esthetically. I have always enjoyed my visits to their sites because of the sheer amount of content and the wide variety of photographers they use. But I do visit now far less than I did in the years past.
|
11-20-08 11:04pm
|
Reply
52
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
Karasek's Review
Each to his own, but I wouldn't touch her with a ten-foot-pole.
|
05-25-10 02:53pm
|
Reply
53
|
Best Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Comment
I agree with your sentiments in regard to cumshots. I had a membership to a famous facials site a while back and was thoroughly bored as well as somewhat disgusted by the content. Judging by what I saw, these guys could barely get it up and almost always finished by hand (sometimes for an absurdly long time) and all they could manage was a pathetic dribble which they smeared on the girl's face. What a complete waste of time. They don't call cumshots "money-shots" for nothing. I think these guys do this stuff too often and the whole act is becoming meaningless to them.
I think there's something deeply rooted in the male libido which makes it exciting to us for the female to witness ejaculation. Something primordial, as if it's a kind of visual proof that we are viable males who can procreate. Thus, the more powerful the ejaculation, the more impressed the female will be. Not that it really does impress her, but I think it goes something like that on at least a subconscious level for males. Hence the popularity of the money-shot in adult film and video, and all the more reason to be irritated by male performers who have to jerk-off for ten minutes before finishing, and then produce nothing but a weak dribble.
You must have seen Peter North's "work". There are not too many people like him, however. In fact, I think he might be one of a kind. Lucky bastard.
|
01-25-08 06:46pm
|
Reply
54
|
Boob Study
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
ace of aces,
By "not heavy" I mean it is not as fixated on masturbation as most sites nowadays. There is plenty of it, but even when there is it comes after a decent length of time.
Some of the vids are in one part, some in segments. I'd say slightly less than half are available as a single file.
Yes, actual content appears exclusive, but many of the models are found elsewhere.
|
09-25-09 11:27am
|
Reply
55
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
Thaeral's Comment
Okay, this is strange. I went back to the site, clicked member's entrance, and got the member's page without a prompt. However, when I went to download a video, I got the prompt. Twice.
It's got to be some technical problem. No one who wanted to make money would do this stuff on purpose.
|
05-15-08 11:05pm
|
Reply
56
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
Thaeral's Comment
I just signed up and the same thing happened. Can't log in after paying my money. Sent off email. Will see what happens.
If I get no response, boy will there ever be hard feelings.
|
05-15-08 10:57pm
|
Reply
57
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
I tried the trial here and I've seen the preview vids, so I can say that it certainly looks as if this girl knows EXACTLY what she's doing, even though what she does will not cater to everyone's taste. She reminds me a little of Wifey from Wifey's World, not in her appearance, but in the way she does her thing. I'd gladly be putty in her hands. I'm about to take the plunge, I think. Thanks for the comment, jd1961.
|
05-15-08 10:19pm
|
Reply
58
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
Tao of rope's Comment
DO NOT click any of the links here. I clicked the one on the bottom out of curiosity and was greeted with a warning pop-up/console thing that wouldn't go away. Had to do control-alt-delete to exit.
|
10-28-09 11:07pm
|
Reply
59
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Reply
Doug!
Sorry I neglected to thank you for your explanation of the site's name! I'm surprised they have stuck with the name.
|
04-18-08 08:10pm
|
Reply
60
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
You're welcome, Wittyguy. Glad you liked my review. This whole raffle thing is kind of cool aint it? You wanna talk about making it big, check out exotics4me's winnings! Yikes! He might as well be on the payroll here!
Regards,
WWW :)
|
04-15-08 08:23pm
|
Reply
61
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hi Drooler,
Thanks for the reply. When we do a review we sort of harp on the negatives, that's part and parcel of the whole thing; but when all is said and done, if the people behind this site were to take all the material they have and present it in a more accessible fashion, say, the way ATK does, then they would have one of the best sites going. Higher-res pics would be a good move - a necessary move now that it's 08, in my opinion - as would a slight drop in price, though that might be a problem only for those of us in the states.
To be truthful, I prefer the European approach to presenting beautiful young women, and the hardcore material, vid-wise I mean, comes across as being far less mysogynistic, and just less sleezy in general, compared to American porn. If Club Seventeen could manage to offer at least some of their DVDs in full, via download, now that would easily justify the 46 US dollars.
|
02-08-08 08:35pm
|
Reply
62
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks for the reply, Drooler. I suppose I should be happy that I've saved 46 USD. It's just that I've been tempted by this site for so long I finally figured I'd give it a whirl.
|
01-03-08 08:18pm
|
Reply
63
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Lest this thread suffer the Wrath of Khan, a question about Cosmid: I wonder why the site is not in the busty niche, and doesn't seem to sell itself as a busty site. I've seen many samples at TGP's and I have yet to see a model who wasn't stacked to the rafters.
|
11-22-09 07:45pm
|
Reply
64
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Back Door Angels! Martin Barre at his finest. He is one of the most under-rated guitarists ever, probably because he has always played in Ian's shadow, which looms pretty damn large.
Mark Knopfler (sp?) of Dire Straits remarked that Barre's playing with Tull was "Magical." That's a good nod.
Here's a great clip of Barre at his best, for those who think Tull was nothing without Ian:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mv1Vy6iCcfI
|
11-21-09 07:20pm
|
Reply
65
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Holy crap, a Tull thread at PU! Jethro Tull happens to be my favorite band, ever since my brother came home in 1979 with a copy of the Songs From the Wood lp. He had been at a party in the woods and the album literally smelled like a campfire, plus it was ice cold, it being winter in upstate NY. Imagine how that helped with the whole woodsy, outdoorsy theme of that amazing album!
I've written a handful of Tull reviews at Amazon. I saw them twice in concert, but unfortunately I never saw them in their heyday.
|
11-21-09 07:10pm
|
Reply
66
|
Cum Blast City
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
I thought it could be fun if done well. I joined this site because I am a big fan of the hand-job/CFNM niche. Unfortunately what I've seen so far is very disappointing. First, given six or seven minutes of a real, non-faked hand-job, the switch to the faked stuff is obvious because of terrible editing and terrible acting. It is not convincing at all, although if the participants tried a wee bit harder it could be a "blast".
Better to look for guys like Peter North who can do it for real (well, within reason!). There must be other males out there who could compete. ??
|
01-10-11 08:24pm
|
Reply
67
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks. I'll have a look.
|
12-20-07 02:32am
|
Reply
68
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hi ace of aces,
Vids first, since that is most people's main interest:
I've only been a member for two days, but so far I've downloaded about a dozen or so vids. Two are long, good-quality (640x480,2000 kbps) handjob scenes where the only panty content is about thirty seconds in the beginning. Both clips are over eleven minutes long; two of the vids are lower quality (320x240,705 kbps) masturbation clips where the panties stay on, both about ten minutes long; then there's a very good quality (768x576, 2009 kbps) masturbation vid with toy which runs three minutes; there are also a few mild spanking vids here of fairly low to middling quality. There's a couple teaser vids and a stripping/interview vid. This is definitely a softcore site and NOT a non-nude site. It seems to me that it's a grab-bag of various types of content with panties figuring somewhere in the mix. Some of the material looks familiar, like the handjob vids, but I can't place them. There are lots of vids here and by the looks of the thumb-links there is more than likely more masturbation. As for the pics, same thing: a lot of the sets are similar to the ATK/Teen-Flood type of softcore: full nudity, occasional masturbation/toy stuff. The material is not exclusive, as I am sure I've seen quite a few sets at other sites. Again, the quality is hit and miss. Most of it is negligible.
|
12-13-07 12:34am
|
Reply
69
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hi ace of aces,
Can't answer that I'm afraid, since I was never a member at One By Day.
|
01-20-09 01:42pm
|
Reply
70
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Hi Monahan,
Thanks for the trust vote, by the way. To answer your questions:
1. The site tends towards the real much more than silicone enhancement, although I do recall a few phonies in the mix. I can't stand fake breasts either. That being said, this is anything but an "all natural, girl-next-door" kind of site. The models are high-end all the way, are heavily made-up, and dressed to kill. Or undressed to kill.
2. Yes, the price is high, and yes, I do think it's worth the money, considering all the dough I've wasted on sites that have crappy content and no user-friendly features. which caused me to waste time as well as money. It all depends on your tastes. Normally, glamour and polish isn't my cup of tea, but I still enjoyed the site. There's a lot of hardcore here as well. I don't even look at that and yet I found the site worthwhile.
I wouldn't do the three months myself, because the site isn't huge.
3. No network, and I don't recall any bonus sites.
|
01-20-09 01:40pm
|
Reply
71
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
True, badandy, but allow me to explain why music ruins the experience of video for me, especially regarding solo models.
First, I am at an age where I don't look for this type of stuff solely to get off in a sexual way. For me, I enjoy the whole sensual experience of watching a beautiful woman strip and move and do various things, on video, and particularly if the vid is of decent quality. I've got good speakers and I like to keep the volume up a good ways. I want to hear the sound of high heels on a solid wood floor - something that you get in spades at a site like In The Crack. I want to hear the sound of the girl's clothing crinkling and rustling, the sound of her hands on it, the sound of female hands on nylon, the jingle of jewelry, the clicks and clacks and thuds and bumps of a warm human female in close quarters with ME. I like the ambient sounds in the room to a certain extent, though these should be kept to a minimum. Each sound generated by the girl, the floor, her clothes, her body, constitute another point of contact between her and me. If there is music, all these subtle points of contact are destroyed, or non-existent, and watching in silence doesn't help to generate a sense of union with the model, a sense of actually sharing the same and space.
It isn't just music that destroys the experience for me, but a chatty narrator is also a downer, in a serious way. The person behind the camera should be as anonymous as possible, a silent conduit between me and the girl.
Many sites seem to be doing silent videos now - silent as in no music and no talking - and I hope the trend catches on. In The Crack is by far the best for a one-on-one sensual encounter with a beautiful woman, with Panty Amateur a close second. I was hoping that DDF would give me much of the same, but thus far I am finding that at least half of the newest solo vids feature a music track, and the ones that don't seem to be deficient to some degree in sound quality, although that may be on my end. I must say I am a bit disappointed thus far, although the pic sets are top notch.
|
12-06-08 07:57pm
|
Reply
72
|
Downblouse Loving
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Holy crap, Monahan, I only just noticed this in my swamped email account. In case you never opted for a sub here, it's a great site! The vids are great. Some of them are too talky for me, but there are also plenty where the model is not talking. No silly music tracks! Lots of wonderful boobies!
WWW.
|
06-12-14 05:40am
|
Reply
73
|
DVD Tube
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
Thanks for the warning. I hope not only that the site dies, but I wish the person behind all those pop-ups would have the guts to come here and explain the reasoning behind that kind of bullshit. I don't blame anyone for wanting to make money, or even for exploiting the naivete and/or gullability of certain people. I wouldn't do it myself but I recognize it as all a part of the game. However, the kind of crap that you describe, apoctom, is not salesmanship in any way, shape or form.
Imagine being at a car dealership and this guy is showing you a car. You say, "That's okay, not interested," and suddenly the guy yanks you by the arm and shoves you into the car. "Come on, start it up!" he cries, and then when you try and get out of the car, he leans up against the door. You go for the other side, and there's another "salesman" blocking that door, and all the while they're shouting at you, demanding that you start the car and think more about whether it interests you or not. You start the car and slam it into reverse, trying to get away from the two idiots, but there's another idiot who's just parked a big truck behind you. "Come on," they all shout, "You know you want this car...just sign the fucking contract and we'll let you go!"
It would be no worse than what the idiots behind all that pop-up hell are doing.
|
04-17-08 05:15pm
|
Reply
74
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Judging only by your review, it seems to me that this material is NOT about sex, but is about violence and abuse.
None for me, thanks.
|
10-14-09 09:40pm
|
Reply
75
|
Fame Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
Wonderful review, graymane! I agree with you about the attractiveness of these three young beauties. Legs! Legs up to their earlobes!
The non-nude approach is MORE stimulating than nude for me. Once you've seen The Prize in all its glory, it gets a bit old seeing it pulled and yanked and twisted and gaping every which way. I much prefer the subtle, barely concealed suggestion of The Prize, the bittersweet agony of the known unknown.
Great review. The models are drop-dead gorgeous and the preview pics alone make me feel like I just got an injection of testosterone.
WWW.
|
09-25-11 04:59pm
|
|
