Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Flower Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Thanks for the review, ace. I'm hard-wired to respond to the word "panties" like one of Pavlov's dogs, and I've been semi-tempted to try this place out. I'll probably ignore it for a good while now, before the word "panties" brings me salivating back...
WWW
**by the way, it's what's in the panties that counts, not the panties all by themselves. I don't huff them or wear them (OK, one time, when I was very drunk). Men in panties is a travesty! Nor do I hang around playgrounds in Highgate looking for Cross-eyed Mary! ;)
18+ please.
|
04-24-08 10:40pm
|
Reply
77
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I know, lk2fireone, I was grinding my own particular axe at your expense (pun intended).
Believe me, I understand having to budget one's self for this kind of entertainment.
This is a BIG issue for me, and I think I might start a thread in our forum about it: the concept of value in light of the Internet, and how ideas of value have changed dramatically in the last few decades.
Sorry, mate! You're right, and I was just being an (_!_)
|
09-19-15 08:01pm
|
Reply
78
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
And, lest I be accused of not having to care about money - in my current job I make 19 cents above Arizona's minimum wage, and I have to share digs with my brother to make ends meet.
Also should note: I'm aware that works in the public domain can be downloaded for free on any number of sites in any number of file types.
Sorry, this is an obvious sore spot for me.
|
09-18-15 02:32am
|
Reply
79
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
The idea that 30 dollars is considered "expensive" for a month's access to a HUGE amount of adult entertainment - that would have cost you thousands and thousands of dollars a relatively short time ago (say twenty years - if they even had content this good then, which they obviously didn't) - is proof to me of just how jaded people are becoming, and how upside down the concept of value has become in these modern times.
Another example is, and this is just one - Amazon Kindle. I can download enough classic literature to last me a hundred lifetimes for FREE. Or, if I want tables of contents and other nifty things, I can pony up a dollar, or two dollars, for the complete works of Thomas Hardy, Charles Dickens, Aquinas, Chaucer, Shakespeare, etc. BUT - if I want to download a modern-day piece of literary ephemera - any one of a thousand crime novels, romance novels, fantasy/sci-fi novels, self-help books, etc, I will pay at least ten to fifteen dollars. The worst part is, the more useless the book, the more expensive it is - say for instance some university-educated simpleton's book-length navel-gazing excreta about the poetry of Derek Walcott (one of the greatest living English-language poets) sells on Amazon for upwards of two hundred dollars - if you want the "prestigious" cheaply-printed hard or soft cover - while the actual poetry of Derek Walcott sells for the price of your average crappy dimestore-quality "best-seller".
Not to single you out, like2fireone, but 30 dollars for ANY high quality content of this nature is highway robbery, and it's YOU robbing THEM, not the other way 'round.
|
09-18-15 02:23am
|
Reply
80
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
sorry - double posted.
|
09-18-15 02:22am
|
Reply
81
|
G Queen
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Reply
This may be a bit late, but:
I never noticed the DL limit. I would have mentioned it, had I been aware of it.
|
07-03-09 12:42am
|
Reply
82
|
Gagging Whores
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Review
I retract what I said above. I sometimes forget that some women are actually into this kind of thing. As long as everyone's an adult and it's all consensual than my "sickening" comment doesn't apply. Thanks for the review, Lionheart, and apologies.
WWW
|
04-23-08 09:09pm
|
Reply
83
|
Gagging Whores
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Review
Sounds sickening to me. But each to his own.
|
04-22-08 06:55pm
|
Reply
84
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Where the fuck do they find these beefed up thugs? How the fuck can a man with an endowment like that brutalize a woman in such a way? These thugs are like animals. Is this the only way these poor girls can make a living? Fuck these gorillas and their sickening, psychotic energy. Disgusting.
|
11-18-10 07:20pm
|
Reply
85
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
This shit is worrisome. What the fuck is going on in a man's mind who gets turned on watching shit like this?
|
11-18-10 07:13pm
|
Reply
86
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Good review. I might check it out in the future.
|
05-08-08 05:55pm
|
Reply
87
|
Girls Planet
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I asked admins to delete my review, and I deleted my comment here myself.
|
12-12-08 05:46pm
|
Reply
88
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
No, I haven't joined. I won't be joining any sites for the indefinite future, as my interest in sex and even self-pleasure as waned considerably over the past year.
|
06-18-10 03:51pm
|
Reply
89
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Okay, thanks, jd.
|
11-14-09 09:08pm
|
Reply
90
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Hi jd,
Thanks for the heads up, as this site is the next one I will sign up with, and probably soon. The headshots alone show me the girls are drop-dead gorgeous here. For me, the face is of prime importance.
TBP site facts state a higher rez for video, but I realize they list the highest offered. I can't watch 1280 vids because my PC can't handle them. Is each vid offered in multiple formats, or is it just that some are larger, some smaller? I will be happy if enough vids are offered at 640x480.
I'm not too crazy about their point system, but I'm sure it's not as bad as one particular site I joined where they rotated content and kept only a tiny amount of material available per month (we're talking about twenty pic sets and a handful of videos, and for 40 USD a month, no less).
|
11-08-09 02:26pm
|
Reply
91
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
I agree with Denner. These are excellent reviews.
I've avoided these artsy sites like the plague though I suppose I might join one at some point. I appreciate the difference between art and dirty pictures, but while I like art, I'd rather spend my money on dirty pictures. The former has the greater virtue, but I'm addicted to the latter. Ah well...
|
04-11-08 06:50pm
|
Reply
92
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Review
Thanks for the review, axel. BUT, all of the photo sets (that I've seen thus far) are zipped at this point.
And yes, the models! Hot and sexy just doesn't cover it for some of these girls. Many of them are so beautiful I just shake my head and say "My God" over and over...
|
09-29-09 10:23pm
|
Reply
93
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yeah, it was Epoch. Site replied to my query with automated response. Real response should be in a few days.
Another lovely thing: On their contact page, you get a form-email to fill out, and then you have to answer the question in the box to prove you're human. So far so good. The question was "58 - 7 = ?" I entered 51, and was told this was the "wrong capture, please go back".
Had to finally re-open the page, re-type email, and answer the new question. This was "93 + 8 = ?" This time my amazing mathematical skills were successful!
Oh, and by the way, the naughty bits (vag, at least) are blurred out even in the pictures here, at least with the older sets, which is thus far all I've looked at. I thought this was only with the videos.
|
09-24-09 04:31am
|
Reply
94
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
A few things:
mbaya: When you say "miss tease", I don't quite understand, since what you seem to be saying is that the site is *too* long on the tease factor and too little on what you call the 'interesting action'. Was there a typo? Most likely I just didn't get what you were saying.
Yes, I certainly agree that the gyno aspect of the site is overdone, BUT - their mission statement plainly tells the prospective customer what to expect, so, it is what it is. I'm not disputing you, or trying to argue for the sake of argument (I HATE that!), just basically agreeing and reiterating things (because I like to type!).
Unfortunately, my review left a few things out, and these are big things, so I need to add:
PROS
- The male presence is virtually non-existent on this site, and even when so much as a male hand will be in the video, the customer is warned beforehand (pun intended). I think this is a cardinal virtue, and should be applauded, and copied on other sites of this nature. Since this site isn't about sex between men and women, but about the adulation and worship (literally) of the beauty and - what used to be - the mystery, of adult females, the customer is NOT interested in seeing or hearing another male. The people behind this site understand this and the total absence of the male voice and male presence is intentional and adhered to religiously.
- The absence of silly music, which I mentioned, is of UTMOST value and importance on a site of this nature. We have FIVE senses, and we can interact with the models here via TWO of those five: seeing and hearing. We can't touch, taste, or smell them (but in time we'll be able to do something like that in a "virtual" sense). Hence the utter silliness of sites that put a music track to their videos, which effectively reduces our real contact with the models by blotting out the sounds generated by the model: her footsteps, the rustle of her clothing, her breath, her utterances, and whatever other blesséd noises that come from her body. I refuse to pay even a cent for a site that offers video content of models posing and stripping if there is a music track. It almost destroys the experience for me. Music is an art. Worshipping a woman in the privacy of my cave is not an art, and I don't want art while I'm worshipping a woman.
- There is nothing but complete respect for the dignity of these models as individuals, as human beings. Yes, they are being objectified here, but they are being well-paid, and these girls know the deal. The site should be applauded and copied by other sites in that they DO NOT refer to women as sluts, bitches, whores, or any of those dehumanizing terms, and the site does not belittle the models or speak of them as anything other than the equals of the men behind the cameras and the consumers. There is a strong sense that these models are well paid, respected, and above all, SAFE, while they do their work for ITC.
- If I think of something I left out, I'll return.
|
09-15-15 06:09pm
|
Reply
95
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
greg909's Comment
Yes that's the dimensions of their large sized pics. I must be old, but this size is ridiculously huge enough for me. I can count the hair follicles on any square millimeter of a model's lovely bits. What else do I need?
|
09-14-15 10:24pm
|
Reply
96
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
I agree, williamj. I'm amazed by many things at this site, the models as well as the high-end, luxurious sets. There's sometimes so much ornament, color, and detail that it's like Ridley Scott decided to direct some soft porn for a change of pace.
And I can't say too much about the silence factor: no music, ZERO blather from the cameraman, and precious little from the model.
Oh, and they seem to be holding the camera much steadier than a few years ago!
|
02-09-10 12:37pm
|
Reply
97
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
I don't have a Comcast connection, I have a cable connection. I never heard of Comcast before this thread.
|
02-09-10 12:29pm
|
Reply
98
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
You mean, I presume, that the DL came in at 2,200kb a second? Holy crap, that's more than three times as fast as my optimal speed, which is around 700k a sec. I thought I had a reasonably fast connection. Yikes.
Oh, and by the way, the downloads have been okay for me recently, ranging from 300 to 700k.
|
01-27-10 08:39pm
|
Reply
99
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Ok, disabled it.
File coming in at around 600k with AVG disabled, without download manager (I've never used one), which is on the high end of what I typically get.
|
01-12-10 01:05pm
|
Reply
100
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I will try as you suggest, RB, and let you know how it went.
edit: OK, how do you disable AVG?
|
01-12-10 12:51pm
|
|
