Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Marcus (0)  

Feedback:   All (448)  |   Reviews (24)  |   Comments (20)  |   Replies (404)

Other:   Replies Received (172)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 376-400 of 404 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
376
N/A Reply of OneMan's Poll

Hmm, hard to decide. I think too much man-ass and blokes talking are tied, but blokes talking seems more prevalent so I voted for that.

05-18-12  10:45am

Reply
377
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think weekly is the bare minimum to be 'frequent' - preferably at least a video and a gallery.

My expectations change depending on whether it's a solo amateur site or a larger site. If there's just one model then weekly is absolutely fine, but if there's not just a single model, then I don't really think weekly is particularly frequent.


05-16-12  11:28am

Reply
378
N/A Reply of Toadsith's Poll

For me, I have a folder for videos, and a folder for images.

Then it's by model name, although if it's a network, it's by network name and then sub-folders for each model.


05-14-12  11:59am

Reply
379
Visit Emily 18

Emily 18
(0)
Reply of graymane's Review

Wow, this is good to know, and definitely a site to cross off my hit-list too. I hate that feeling of joining up to a site, logging in for the first time and realising you've made a massive mistake.

05-13-12  03:37am

Reply
380
Visit Dancing Bear

Dancing Bear
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Yup, it's definitely good advice. I'm normally quite sceptical about trials anyway because it's very rare in my experience you can just rip everything, otherwise the webmaster would surely be doing themselves out of business.

Would be interested to know if omberman got in touch with the webmaster about this. It could just be a technical problem and hopefully they can tell that you didn't manage to download anything. If they fix it and compensate you by extending the trial, then I think that reflects positively on the site.


05-12-12  01:59am

Reply
381
Visit Dancing Bear

Dancing Bear
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

The way I understand omberman's comment is that he wasn't complaining about only being able to view three videos, but that the three he tried didn't work but still showed as having been viewed, meaning he didn't get to see anything - I might be wrong though.

05-11-12  01:33pm

Reply
382
N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

Oh I definitely agree with that, I would class that as being in a similar vein to pop ups and pop overs/unders in that it does interfere with your enjoyment of the website.

05-11-12  11:06am

Reply
383
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

A few, so long as it doesn't get in the way of member content (ie pop-ups/overs) and so long as they're relevant. I don't really like ads for fleshlights etc, but if they advertise similar websites to the one I'm a member of then I have no complaints at all.

05-11-12  09:45am

Reply
384
Visit Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler

Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review

Good to know - I remember Little Lupe's site used to be terrible in this respect where you would download a video only to find out it's totally different to what you expected.

I guess it's not such a problem if you download everything, but I'm quite picky with what I download so if everything is mis-labelled it's a big problem to me.


05-06-12  09:12am

Reply
385
Visit The Art Of Blow Job

The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
Reply of hodayathink's Reply

Thank you for the comments. Yes, it really is a fantastic site, it really captured my imagination and is clearly such a labour of love (in so many respects).

I almost felt guilty about even mentioning it 'just' being BJs as obviously the clue is in the name, but I definitely think there's even more mileage in the idea while still staying true to the unique selling point of just BJs. You know, have 75% of the videos being just BJs, and of the other 25% of the videos, make sure they at least have a long old blowjob but also throw something else into the mix too. There was a video called (I think...) sensual sex and the sex scene part of it was minimal but it was really sexy - would love to see more updates like this.

It's definitely one of my favourite sites I've joined for a while though, and I'll definitely be back.


05-04-12  09:51am

Reply
386
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yesterday!

I normally join one-or-so a month generally. For my favourite sites my membership would normally recur, but this is in the minority if I'm honest.


04-28-12  02:47am

Reply
387
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

Very mixed!

Chica's Place for example were excellent in sorting out a logging-in problem that I had. I always keep her site near the top of my rejoining list because they really look after members.

Another website I joined was the opposite, I was accused of sharing my password and was blacklisted. Those are the only two websites I've had any interaction with technical support wise I think.


04-20-12  09:51am

Reply
388
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Not as regularly as I'd like, to be honest, and half of the websites I find seem to be no longer updating any more.

I think once you discover one new model, you soon discover lots more out of the usual 'circle' of models, so I go through periods of not finding any to finding LOTS within a day-or-two.


04-15-12  04:10am

Reply
389
Visit Carmen Cocks

Carmen Cocks
(0)
Reply of gaypornolover's Reply

Yes, totally. It's a good example of joining the site for the MODEL, not for the CONTENT. I think Carmen looks incredible, but it's definitely a site to join once and then never again. I would have given another 5 points had it not had claims that it was being updated weekly with HD videos.

04-14-12  02:12pm

Reply
390
Visit Carmen Cocks

Carmen Cocks
(0)
Reply of dubya's Reply

Just to let anyone reading this review know that the trial is no longer full access - videos are excluded, and you have to upgrade membership to get to them.

04-14-12  07:44am

Reply
391
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I said 10-25%, not including websites like this (which would probably add another 5-10% onto the total).

When I'm surfing porn and in the zone, I'm all over it, but I also use the internet for news, reading other websites etc etc.


02-04-12  03:49am

Reply
392
N/A Reply of RagingBuddhist's Poll

Hmm, hard one for me to answer. I rejoin Chica's Place quite a bit, every few months. That's about the only site I seem to rejoin with any regularity.

There are a couple of others that I do rejoin over and over again, but only every 10-12 months.


02-01-12  01:32pm

Reply
393
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

In my experience I prefer more petite models, so more-often-than-not that means the younger models, but that said, there are PLENTY of exceptions!

01-29-12  12:58pm

Reply
394
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Definitely just the best stuff, sometimes even to the point of it being the best pics from the best galleries or just a handful of the best videos.

It's a sign of a good model and good website when I want to download more than this.


01-21-12  10:04am

Reply
395
Visit Strip Game Central

Strip Game Central
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment

Wow, I have pretty low standards I'd say for video resolutions compared to a lot of people, but 352x288 is pretty much unacceptable nowadays.

01-15-12  08:42am

Reply
396
Visit GiGi Spice

GiGi Spice
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

Thank you everyone for your kind words. I must admit my first reviews were pretty vague, I made the mistake of going for quantity to try and prove myself rather than quality.

Fortunately someone left me some negative feedback which knocked me back onto the right track.

Also I made the mistake of trying to review sites I *had* been a member of, and frankly it's impossible, so lesson learned.

Karla Spice is next on my list to review. Will try and do that tomorrow.


01-11-12  02:25pm

Reply
397
Visit Television X

Television X
(0)
Reply of falsup's Comment

Wow, thank you for the heads-up.

Yes, it's explained in the terms and conditions, but that doesn't mean it's right or fair. It's clearly there to trick customers so that they end up paying for an extra months membership they don't want. There's no other reason for it, and no other website I've joined does this.

I never join websites with business practices like that because I'm sure that's not the only time the webmaster will try and catch you out, and to me, that's all it amounts to.


01-11-12  12:16am

Reply
398
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't have the best computer in the world (to put it lightly) so am fairly choosy about what I save. I either have problems accessing my external HDD, or have problems playing videos that are too large.

Normally anything over 500mb I will only download if it is totally unmissable.

I did have a problem with my ADSL which meant I couldn't even connect to my WD external drive. My computer's own hard drive soon filled up which meant I either had to delete stuff to save stuff or be very conservative with what I downloaded until my internet connection was fixed properly.


01-07-12  11:15am

Reply
399
Visit Tia Ling

Tia Ling
(0)
Reply of Khan's Reply

That's OK, I would have said in my review but must have not selected the option to say how long ago I was a member. Still learning the ropes here but it's such a great resource.

Thanks Tia for your reply too, will probably be rejoining within the next month-or-so


01-01-12  11:22am

Reply
400
Visit Tia Ling

Tia Ling
(0)
Reply of Khan's Reply

Certainly, it was around July, so 4-or-5 months ago. I see Tia has replied to another review saying since they were a member you can now download stuff.

01-01-12  10:59am


Shown : 376-400 of 404 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.35 seconds.