| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
All Network Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
I agree that 10 bucks is a good price, but I think I went in expecting too much.
I guess that we'll just have to agree to disagree.
|
08-08-07 08:50pm
|
Reply
277
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
Thanks for the enlightening review. I just cancelled my VideoBox membership and was looking to join a new DVD site, including VideosZ. After your bad experience, I will probably try a different site. Thanks.
|
08-08-07 09:05am
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use Kaspersky. It does a scan of high-risk areas daily and a complete system scan weekly.
|
08-07-07 10:05am
|
Reply
279
|
Chanta's Bitches
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Thanks for responding. After going through both sites' previews, I kind of came to the same conclusion. I am a bit infatuated with Chanta, though, so I will probably join that site first. Thanks again.
|
08-04-07 07:13pm
|
Reply
280
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
No, I've been lucky. But I have had the credit card company call me to check to make sure that they were valid online charges.
|
08-03-07 08:54am
|
Reply
281
|
Rico Shades
(0)
|
Reply of
magic's Review
This company seems to have a lot of sites and Rico Shades lists 8 or 9 as bonus sites.
Given that it costs $24.95/month and you said that there is not a lot of content, do the rest of the bonus sites have more content than this one? Or are they about the same?
|
08-01-07 08:41pm
|
Reply
282
|
Kirsten Price XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
Thanks for the review. I saw the full trial and nearly went for it. But your comments about the low video quality and "ignored" site saved me $8. Thanks.
|
08-01-07 09:56am
|
Reply
283
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
While I agree with Schnitzel that it is nice to enjoy a beautiful model in her entirety, there is also something fascinating about looking inside her. I'm sure that if I was a gynecologist, I would have a different opinion, but as a layman, you don't get to see that perspective in everyday life.
|
08-01-07 08:47am
|
Reply
284
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Thanks for the comment. I was a member a long time ago and wasn't terribly happy with the video quality or the number of models. Seeing these new updates might get me to try the site again.
|
07-31-07 08:12pm
|
Reply
285
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Poll
I agree with Jay G. If I can only afford the limited trial, then I am better off just waiting to join the whole site.
I really dislike limited trials, especially the ones that give you the first parts of an amateur porn shoot, but leave the actual sex for full members. All that does is give me the impression that you are just out for money.
|
07-31-07 08:10pm
|
Reply
286
|
Adult Movie Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Fulltilt's Reply
Fulltilt,
I don't NOT trust you. However, neither 95% nor 99% is 100% completely removed. With my luck, the 1% that is still DRM will include the movies that I want to download. That's why I am waiting for TBP to update their review when it is complete.
I was also hoping that a comment following up on your review might get TBP or the webmaster at Adult Movie Club to respond to our posts about DRM and state, once and for all, about the status of the removal process.
I saw that you have 4 anonymous no trust votes. Rest assured, I was not one of them: I don't believe in anonymous voting. If you would post a few more consistent, good reviews, I'm sure that the rest of the community would issue trust votes to reflect the quality of your work.
|
07-30-07 05:44pm
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I put "Maybe" because of a concern similar to Jay G's. It deals less with the fact that she would be a porn actress and more with the fact that she is an actress, period. The same concern applies to dating anyone in the entertainment industry.
A similar issue is that entertainers tend to live, work, and play in an isolated and insulated world. I would certainly date an entertainer who was more down-to-earth and wasn't living in this bubble.
|
07-28-07 08:52am
|
Reply
288
|
Mega Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan,
Thanks for the quick response. I agree: there is no singular login and access is granted via joining one of the site. I didn't know about MegaPorn until after I had already reviewed most of the sites.
BTW, what does FWIW stand for?
Thanks.
|
07-26-07 04:36pm
|
Reply
289
|
Boobs Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
That is some dedication to put all of that info up. I've run out of space before, but I haven't thought to use the comments to add more detail. I'll keep that in mind for next time. Thanks for the new idea.
|
07-26-07 11:15am
|
Reply
290
|
Next Door Nikki
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
Thanks for the update. I always thought that she had a nice body, but the charges for her site were high back then and now are just plain ridiculous. It's a non-nude site, for goodness sake.
I didn't know that she was pregnant. Not trying to sound mean, but I guess she realized how expensive her baby is going to be.
|
07-26-07 11:13am
|
Reply
291
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Comment
Wow, that's a lot of detail. Thanks for the info. I know that you said you couldn't tell a difference between the 2 low speed options, but could you tell a difference between the low speed and high speed?
|
07-26-07 11:10am
|
Reply
292
|
Third Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
lespaul76's Comment
Like you said, they are in the process of removing DRM from their site. How much content is working vs. not working right now?
|
07-26-07 07:59am
|
Reply
293
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's a matter of value. If a site is charging more than my entire porn budget, but delivers some amazing content, then I would not consider it over-valued.
But, it's a Catch-22: for a site to charge that kind of money, it would need amazing content. Of course, amazing content isn't cheap, so a site might not have the initial budget to create (or buy) that content. Since it doesn't have great content, it couldn't justify charging a high price, etc., etc.
In the end, I probably wouldn't join any site that is priced above my porn budget, just for the fact that it is a budget and I'd have to take spending money from other areas to cover it.
|
07-26-07 07:57am
|
Reply
294
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I answered this poll question from the perspective of "do the scores typically match the reviews?" Like exotics, I am reticent to tell someone whether their opinion is right or wrong. However, if you are rating a site with a 95, it had better be a darn good site and you should be able to defend that score in your review. Conversely, if a site is so terrible that it scores in the 50's, you should be able to explain that, too.
I have found that the reviews are very useful and, for the most part, reflective of the point scores that the reviewer gave out. Like Jay, I also really appreciate the warnings for sites, especially the marginal sites that I'm not sure about joining.
Since there are so many different ways to intrepret it, I look forward to seeing more replies to this poll.
|
07-20-07 09:13am
|
Reply
295
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
If I remember correctly, CD Girls has a similar search engine. It was really useful and very detailed.
I agree: all movie sites could use search features like this, particularly the amateur sites.
|
07-19-07 09:08pm
|
Reply
296
|
Dreamy Danica
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Good details. I would have considered it, given its relatively low price, until I saw that it is lacking in video content and is completely non-nude. Those two facts turned me off from this site completely.
|
07-19-07 09:04pm
|
Reply
297
|
Black Ebony Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
CJ34's Comment
I know what you mean! Can't stand trials unless they are full access. My only suggestion is to check the TBP or PU reviews first. I've saved myself the headache a couple of times that way.
|
07-19-07 01:15pm
|
Reply
298
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I used to burn archive content, but like Boobs, I could never find what I had archived. Now, with hard drives being so cheap, I either buy a new drive or start deleting the marginal scenes that I kept.
|
07-18-07 08:30am
|
Reply
299
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Sorry to harp on this point, but a no-trust vote with a comment is less than optimal.
Not to make this too personal, but I received an anonymous no-trust vote with a comment that I had reviewed too many sites too quickly and that something was fishy with the fact that I could review 20 sites in 2 weeks.
This could be a fair criticism except for the fact that almost all of the sites that I have reviewed belong to the same network, a network which is not reviewed on TBP or PU (PervNetwork). I mentioned this in all of my reviews for the sites, so the person voting no-trust obviously did not read the actual reviews, but simply saw that I was a relative newcomer with a lot of reviews. This is reflective of the last point that I made in my earlier post: anonymous reviews like this can influence honest people to stop coming back to PornUsers or to stop contributing reviews, either of which kills the community. Is discouraging enthusiasm for this site really a good idea for helping it grow?
Furthermore, only allowing 150 characters to respond to those types of criticisms is too few. I couldn't respond fully to the anonymous comment by pointing out that, of the sites not in the network, most were reviewed after I stopped being a member, but within the 6 month window for reviews.
I don't think that the admins can or should moderate the trust comments. There are too many and trust is too personal. However, I think that it would be helpful for other users to know who was making uninformed trust comments because those comments reflect on the person who made them just as much as on the person who is being rated.
Not to put too fine a point on it but anonymity is great unless you can use that anonymity to destroy other people's reputations with impunity.
|
07-14-07 10:08pm
|
Reply
300
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Honestly, this is the first time that it has happened to me. I'm usually very careful to check the TBP review about streaming vids or DRM, but there were no reviews, TBP or PU, for this site. I guess that someone had to be first and bite the bullet.
|
07-14-07 09:56pm
|
