| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
All of the above?
|
10-30-08 08:45am
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Lots of interesting discussion so far. I think that more details would need to be presented in order for me to make a real decision.
|
10-26-08 10:28pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I would have liked to pick most of the peeves. Misleading advertising is rampant, but often coincides with lack of promised updates. A poorly designed site is usually also indicative of poor webmasters or slow servers. So, why not have an all of the above?
|
10-25-08 08:32am
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Got a new 24" widescreen, so I'm rocking it at 1920x1200.
|
10-23-08 09:06am
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Is there really any doubt?
|
10-16-08 10:17am
|
Reply
56
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
If you tried, it would be a huge double standard. Furthermore, as asmith said, porn is about fantasy.
|
10-02-08 07:23am
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I'll give them 24 hours to respond. I can understand if it takes longer than that to fix the problem, but silence doesn't solve anything.
|
10-01-08 07:37am
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I still subscribe to a DVD-by-mail service. Sometimes I will buy those DVDs for a reduced/used price.
|
09-28-08 09:36pm
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Absolutely. I also don't think that I've answered the same poll question twice, either. I think that question submitters are checking, too, or that Khan and the rest of the staff are double-checking.
|
09-08-08 08:09am
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Don't know how to categorize it, but I guess that it goes back to the "Do you want your mother to see it on the front page of the newspaper?" criteria. So, no, it's not porn, but yes, it could be considered inappropriate.
|
09-03-08 10:24am
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Copy that about being Shay's first.
|
08-31-08 03:13pm
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Poll
My SO also watches porn, but she prefers a lighter style of HC than I do.
|
08-31-08 03:12pm
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Monahan,
I was actually just pointing out that "nonexlusive" was misspelled in the question.
I do appreciate your definition, though. Also, sadly, there is no Shay Laren content on VideoBox.
|
08-28-08 07:19am
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I pay $14.95 a month for VideoBox which, by its very nature, is nonexclusive content. However, I don't know what "nonexlusive" content is.
|
08-27-08 07:50am
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I don't go in for webcam sites. Quality is usually pretty bad...either laggy or too small. Maybe it has improved in recent years, but there's enough other porn on the net for me.
|
08-19-08 08:26am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Absolutely. A big trailer lets me get a better idea about the content itself. No shame in being a smarter consumer.
|
08-15-08 07:19am
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
All I'm saying is that Shay Laren would be great in hardcore.
|
08-13-08 08:16am
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Absolutely requires that the default option is unchecked. However, like indybt30 said, their hope is that you forget that you signed up for the extra site. Instead, I would prefer to see sites give a limited time trial which does not auto-renew. If someone likes the site, they are more likely to join after the trial has expired.
|
08-09-08 08:00am
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
While it is a positive incentive, I don't know if it is such a good idea. Some of the good limitations on the raffle include that reviews and comments are reviewed by the staff for quality before a ticket is awarded. Would that even be possible in the forums?
|
08-07-08 08:07am
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's always about the girl (or girls). I don't mind more guys or girls, but it's always about the girl(s).
|
08-05-08 01:12pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Same as NMC2008: Got tired of it for a little while. Good thing that phase is over.
|
07-30-08 08:07am
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
For a very petite girl whose breasts get huge, it can be a turn-on. A non-nude example would be Jessica Alba recently. (Too bad it wasn't a nude example.)
|
07-26-08 11:32am
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
pat362 has it right. There are expanded definitions for DPP and DAP. The plain-vanilla DP is pussy and ass. (Plain-vanilla? I've been watching way too much porn!)
|
07-25-08 07:55am
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If the comment or review got my attention, I'll usually want to read if there is a replay. But if it's just any old post, I'll skip the replies, too.
|
07-23-08 02:30pm
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
What exactly would a "non-nude extra in a adult movie" do? Do you just sit in the back and cheer?
|
07-10-08 08:47am
|
