| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
801
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
creepingdeath84's Comment
So much of what we like in porn is purely subjective that it's almost impossible to separate that from an objective idea. I agree with a lot of what you say here but I have to add that I find all the ingredients that ECG adds together gives a sum greater than the individual parts. Some of the things you dislike I like a lot, such as the interview while the model is having her makeup done. I like that the site isn't unnecessarily complex. For me though, the best part of the site is that the models are amazing.
The value of PU is that we have a place to express these opinions, and I'm glad to see the webmaster weighed in too.
|
03-04-16 10:06am
|
Reply
802
|
Stripper Facials
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Glad I could help. I still watch a couple of scenes from the site but otherwise it really isn't worth the fee.
|
03-02-16 05:40pm
|
Reply
803
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the answer - even though I was hoping for a different one! They had some great public nudity stuff and those Caribbean shoots were amazing. I'll never delete those from my collection.
|
03-02-16 05:39pm
|
Reply
804
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
creepingdeath84's Reply
A great thing about this site is that we can agree to disagree because of different tastes. I'm a big fan of Exploited College Girls and many of the things that you see as negatives I really like. Sure, I'd change a few things but I like the interviews because so many of the models don't show up elsewhere.
I will have to admit to coming around a bit on NVG. I was a member recently and I found I liked many of the scenes more than I had in past memberships. I just wish they'd ditch the 1990s looking website!
Welcome to Pornusers. I hope you feel welcome here and stick around. This site used to be a lot more active but with some recent changes it seems to be coming back. There are a lot of new names here. I doubt you'll find another porn forum with the comraderie and decorum that you'll find here.
|
03-02-16 05:38pm
|
Reply
805
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This is one of my favorite sites too. My favorite videos are the Nude-in-Public stuff and the scenes shot in the Caribbean. When I was last a member here (about a year ago) there were very few new NIP videos and no new Caribbean shoots. Have there been any of these added recently that you can see?
Thanks!
|
02-24-16 02:44pm
|
Reply
806
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the comment.
I’m not very technically-minded so I was worried that I might have misread my specs. But I checked and I do see download speeds of 25MB/s using Internet Download Manger. Could IDM make a difference?
I wish I could tell you how much I’m paying for this but I can’t with any certainty because my wife pays that bill and our internet service is bundled with two separate landlines, one cellphone with long distance and data, and TV. One advantage that we may have is that we have fiberop right to the house. I realize that many ISPs get fiberop into neighbourhoods, but I have a fiberop line right into a box in my house. I think if the internet was bought as a stand-alone service it’d pretty pricey. Looking at their pricing guide I think I’d pay between $80 and $100 per month. It’s lower than that for me because of the bundle.
Having said all that, I may have to update my answer because for some reason my internet connection is really slow right now. I did a speed test that showed it much slower than I’m used to. Then I went to an active membership I have at Swallow Salon where I see fast downloads and tried downloading last week’s update again. The file size is 1.08GB and I know when I downloaded it last week it took about a minute. Tonight I’m seeing 1MB/s and the download would have taken more than eight minutes if I let it continue. But I know that it was only a minute or so last week.
I suspect that the rates are likely higher here in Canada. They certainly are for cellphones.
I hope some of this helps.
|
02-23-16 02:53pm
|
Reply
807
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
rooka's Reply
Agreed. I suspect this is part of the whole budget issue...
|
02-23-16 02:28pm
|
Reply
808
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
What Jay G said.
|
02-15-16 01:39pm
|
Reply
809
|
Wake Up N Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I ran out of space in my review and forgot to mention a few key details:
- There are 178 scenes here
- The site updates regularly
- Some newer scenes have 4K as the top resolution. File sizes are over 10GB so I haven’t downloaded any of those. (These file sizes make the need for a 720p option more acute.)
|
02-13-16 05:08am
|
Reply
810
|
Wank Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Enjoy it! It isn't a great network but if you know that going in you'll find lots to like.
|
02-11-16 04:50pm
|
Reply
811
|
Wank Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I wish I could help but femdom isn't something I even consider when I'm on a site. Sorry, my friend...
|
02-10-16 05:12pm
|
Reply
812
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Review
Your review perfectly encapsulates the real value of Pornusers - that someone with the knowledge of a site's history can weigh in and give an objective view of a site. I could have joined this site and reviewed it but my review would have none of the weight that yours does.
On a semi-related note, I have no idea why a site would remove older material. I can accept that older stuff will be lower quality resolution but I appreciate that it remains available. If the site puts a date on the older stuff then it becomes self-explanatory as to why it is lower quality.
|
02-07-16 05:42am
|
Reply
813
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
Excellent review. When I saw your review uploaded I read it hoping that you might see some signs of improvement but you've noted the same flaws I did. They offer some decent porn but they really need to step up several notches on the technical stuff to even match their competitors.
|
02-06-16 10:07am
|
Reply
814
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I've joined some specialty BDSM sites that are quite expensive. I think Infernal Restraints is probably the most expensive. For me, price is only one part of my decision process. If the site is expensive but offers great value then I'll still be likely to join.
|
02-05-16 01:09pm
|
Reply
815
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to comment on my review. I appreciate your feedback.
I tend to ignore user ratings mostly because they can be so subjective. For all I know someone might give a low or high rating simply because they like or dislike a specific model. I often, but not always, read comments and they sometimes influence whether I'd download a scene or not. For example, I like seeing facials and a comment may say that the scene has an amazing facial. That comment would influence my decision.
And I agree with your general comment on Team Skeet: it had been about a year since I had been a member and this time is seems so much better - and I really liked it all the other times I've been a member there. It's good to hear that I'm not alone in this assessment.
|
02-05-16 01:01pm
|
Reply
816
|
Teens Love Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
rooka's Reply
Thanks for your comment Sir. I appreciate the feedback.
I'm a big fan of Woodman Casting too. It's on my list of sites that I join regularly though I only join it once per year or so because it is fairly expensive. The price is higher for me simply because I always buy a membership to Woodman's other site called Wake Up 'n Fuck. https://www.wakeupnfuck.com/ WUNF isn't listed here so there is no review. It's getting near the time when I should be thinking about rejoining Woodman Casting and WUNF so maybe I'll see of TBP can list WUNF so I can put up a review. Pierre Woodman makes some amazing porn for those of us into anal stuff, and while this is a personal preference, I prefer WUNF to Woodman Casting. But I always buy a membership to both...
I haven't joined WUNF in over a year so I can't say for that this is still the case, but Woodman had a lot more American porn stars on that site and he had a lot of first and rare anals too. The last time I joined WUNF it was specifically to get Asphyxia Noir's first anal scene - and one of only a handful she did.
Sorry to ramble there...
|
02-05-16 12:56pm
|
Reply
817
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for posting this review. Reading it made me wonder why I haven't rejoined it in over two years because when I was last a member there I really liked it too. And with the TBP discount it is a great value. (Though the main 21 Sextury site doesn't list the discount I did go in through one of the sub-sites and it does appear to still be offered.)
So thanks for posting the review and thanks for refreshing my memory of a great site.
|
02-01-16 05:19pm
|
Reply
818
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I think you're 100% right.
|
01-31-16 07:31am
|
Reply
819
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
papermarvin's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to comment on my review. I've been a big fan of your site for several years but this most recent time I joined was even better.
|
01-31-16 07:30am
|
Reply
820
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I think the allure of IR is that it is perceived by some as still being taboo. I have no idea why that is, but it is. Consider all the threads on other forums about which starlets will and won't do IR. It's a major fascination these days for some. I can't fault Mason for wanting in on the craze. If Dark X's success helps fund more Tushy.com scenes then I'm a fan too! Bring on more first anals on Tushy!
|
01-23-16 07:14am
|
Reply
821
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
More good points...
You're probably right that the TBP discount influenced my decision a bit and that if I had to pay full price I might not have been so generous.
Your contrast of Dark X with Hard X and Tushy is correct too. I paid full price for Tushy because of the three sites that was (is) the one that offers something distinct and valuable. They offer a lot of first anals and I'm willing to pay to collect those.
But Hard and Dark are really much more mainstream and could really be rolled together. I do think that for whatever reason "IR" is popular so Mason wanted to take advantage of that.
|
01-22-16 08:50am
|
Reply
822
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
rooka's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to say that. I get a lot of value out of the TBP and PU reviews so I'm glad to learn that I'm giving other people the same kind of information.
|
01-22-16 08:45am
|
Reply
823
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jake88's Review
Carefully consider any decision to add Evil Angel as a premium to VB. It may be that it works for you, but it might not. I know that with a monthly membership the Premium channels are pro-rated so they can be inexpensive if you wait to add them on until later in your monthly membership but I don't know how it works when you have an annual subscription.
The other thing to consider is video quality. I was a VB member a couple of months ago and added Elegant Angel. While it is true that the Premium channels offer 'HD' you can do much better on the actual studio site. It may not make a difference to you, but I'd join Evil Angel at the TBP discount and get true HD instead of adding the EA Premium channel at VB.
I should add that Evil Angel is among my top three favorite studio sites so that may influence my decision too. Your choice may be different, but think about quality and not just price.
|
01-21-16 01:56pm
|
Reply
824
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I prefer street clothes that reveal some skin and curves. For some reason I'm also drawn to women in ball caps.
My preference with street clothes peaked at the time when low-cut jeans and crop tops were in fashion. God I miss those days! I hope to live long enough to see that trend come around again. There was nothing better than a beautiful woman dressed like that with her jeans just above her pubic area and a flat stomach for all to see.
I'd better go now before I drool on my keyboard thinking about this.
|
01-20-16 02:44pm
|
Reply
825
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree 100% that the material for this site could just as easily be uploaded to either Hard X or Erotica X depending on the scene. I gave the site the benefit of the doubt because times are tough in the porn business and if a producer/director can spin off a separate site to generate more earnings then I can live with that - as long as the quality is good, and it is very good on all of Mason's sites.
|
01-20-16 02:40pm
|
