| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
826
|
Porn Mastermind
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Interesting group of sites. I was a member of one of the sites a few years back but I don't remember it being part of a network. If that's new I might need to take another look at this. Access to some select bonus scenes is a big plus too. Thanks for pointing this out.
|
01-16-16 10:11am
|
Reply
827
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Bummsi's Comment
Welcome to Pornusers!
I'm also not able to answer you specific question, but I'm confident that Wittyguy is right. I'm in Canada where the obscenity laws are definitely tighter than in the US and I never have any worries about the sites listed here causing me any problems.
If you join Teen Mega World I think you'll enjoy it. Please be sure to post a review too!
|
01-12-16 05:36pm
|
Reply
828
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I'm not usually into solo girl peeing, but I'd make an exception for Riley Reid! Let me know if you rejoin and find the scene.
Riley has her own site now and she seems to be doing a lot of stuff that she doesn't do in mainstream DVDs - like more anal. Maybe she'll do some peeing scenes on her own site.
|
01-12-16 05:32pm
|
Reply
829
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I write most reviews off-line and then copy-and-paste them into the site. My first drafts of a review always exceed the limits and there are times I think they're too low. But... I think the limits are just fine. They force me to edit my reviews more than I would if I had no limits and I think those edits keep the review more on point and readable.
My vote is to keep the current limits.
|
01-12-16 05:28pm
|
Reply
830
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Amen to CC processors losing some of their clout. It bugs me when sites are compelled to self-censor to appease the bankers.
On a semi-related note, I really like finding peeing in scenes where it is unexpected. Last Year Maddy O'Reilly had an incredibly hot scene at Brazzers (http://www.brazzers.com/tour4/scenes/vie.../8361/sex-on-wheels/). The scene was hot anyway but at the end the guy pees on Maddy. I wasn't expecting that and that scene will be a favourite of mine until I can't watch porn any more. I've read that Maddy has since developed a bit of a pee fetish. I should see if I can find more of that.
|
01-10-16 08:46am
|
Reply
831
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I pretty much stick to what I like. I have a bunch of sites that I rejoin on a regular basis so I know what I'm getting. I do occasionally join some sites that are beyond my normal interests. Like BDSM sites at Kink, for example.
|
01-10-16 08:37am
|
Reply
832
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I like the idea of a 'like' button but I selected 'other' as I think it is a good idea but I'm not so committed to it that I think it warrants an exclamation point. It is definitely something that I'd use though.
|
01-09-16 07:14am
|
Reply
833
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I didn't realize that peeing was such a narrow niche. It isn't something I'm into all that much but I'm definitely not opposed to it. I suppose that to someone who is opposed to peeing content might look at my collection which includes past memberships to VIPissy and Pissing.com and wonder why I say I'm not a peeing content collector but I guess I just don't see myself as being on the same level as someone like you.
That's too bad that this seems like a tough niche to crack into.
I wonder if this isn't a sign that we're coming into a time when censorship (including self-censorship) is more in vogue?
|
01-09-16 07:13am
|
Reply
834
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Thanks for the detailed answer. It has always baffled me that people bash stuff that is outside their main interest without realizing that there are lot of customers who like specific things. So maybe that particular forum was a bad choice for Kink to discuss the new site since Kink is all about hardcore. The reality too, is that for a lot of BDSM people, watersports can be a big part of D/s play so maybe if Kink marketed the site to a specific audience they could have done better.
But, as you say, they were pushing the limits so this outcome was probably inevitable. I wonder if this is what happened to Water Bondage? But I suspect the risks on that site probably caused them to rethink it.
I can definitely say this though: I'll never delete the Pissing.com scenes I have. Same with Water Bondage.
|
01-06-16 03:28pm
|
Reply
835
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Comment
I had subscribed there a few times and liked it, but the content certainly had changed. I remember when the site first went up it was much harder than it was when I went back more recently. I didn't follow the site closely enough to see storm clouds though. What happened? What did you notice? Did they go so far as to remove the content?
|
01-05-16 01:55pm
|
Reply
836
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I have opportunities when I have the house to myself for a couple of days when I'll hibernate and watch a lot of stuff, porn included. I might not make it through 20+ scenes entirely without a little fast-forwarding, but I find this works great for finding gems I may have missed earlier.
|
01-05-16 01:52pm
|
Reply
837
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the clarification. I try hard to not make mistakes in my reviews but I somehow misjudged how old some of the photosets are. They must be mixed in and not in chronological order.
|
12-31-15 02:04pm
|
Reply
838
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the additional information. I really can't confirm the start date for the site because the older videos and photos aren't dated, but I've done more digging and you're definitely right that the site pre-dates 2007. I based my information on going to the oldest video (which gives no date information) and the oldest photo set, which is dated from 2007. But based on what you said I dug around a bit more and I can find photo sets that are 'newer' given their location on the site but date from 2005. If I continue to dig I might even find older stuff.
It seems odd that they have older material that is newer in the update schedule. That might point to recycling content, as you note.
|
12-29-15 05:03am
|
Reply
839
|
Tiny 4K
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Thanks for the comment. Coincidentally I'm thinking that I'll be rejoining soon. I look forward to reading any additional comments you have.
|
12-27-15 12:21pm
|
Reply
840
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Roberto281's Comment
I've been a member at both of these sites and you've pretty much summed up the differences between them. Blacked is a more art-like, couples-oriented site where BOB is more typical hardcore porn. There has been a lot of buzz around Blacked since they started and some of that buzz is deserved because it really is high quality stuff. I'll definitely rejoin Blacked because the models are so hot but I prefer the hard-edged stuff at BOB.
|
12-24-15 08:25am
|
Reply
841
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
Less than 300 GB per month of porn downloads would be unheard of. I think if I dropped below that on any month my service provider would check on me to make sure I was okay.
|
12-19-15 04:47am
|
Reply
842
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
???
|
12-16-15 04:24pm
|
Reply
843
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This is an excellent review. Thanks for posting it. I appreciate the level of detail and that you kept your comments objective. I don’t find reviews to be particularly informative if all they say is “I don’t like this site.” I need to know why a reviewer does or doesn’t like a site (or parts of it) because that is often subjective and I may not share those same thoughts. I’d like to think that I could write an objective review of a site that I had zero interest in and still do it well by explaining the pros and cons of the site objectively. That’s what you’ve done here.
The comparison to Videobox is easy to make because they are so much alike. I’m into a VB membership now and based on your review I plan to join Videosz later this week so it’ll be a great opportunity for a comparison.
I’m really glad to hear that Videosz has dropped adding five DVDs per day. I wish VB would do that as well because the current model trades quality for quantity. If sites like Videosz and Videobox want to draw paying customers away from the tube sites they need to offer something that the tube sites don’t and that could be quality.
I’ll be joining Videosz later this week based on your review.
|
12-14-15 02:17pm
|
Reply
844
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Thanks to the staff here at TBP, especially Mike, there was a solution. I didn’t get the refund I was asking for but I was compensated. I still think my request for a refund of the annual membership and me paying for a one-month membership was a reasonable request. As I understand it both Playboy TV and Brazzers are under the same company though the individual sites are owned separately. The parent company obviously couldn’t persuade the Playboy TV site owner to issue a refund so they compensated me with a membership at Brazzers. The parent company didn’t need to do that so I am grateful for their generous offer.
I wouldn’t exclude joining Playboy TV because of my issue. I made a mistake and if I was paying attention I wouldn’t have made that mistake. Think of it as being like not noticing a pre-selected cross-sell. I think the Playboy join page is a little misleading in that the TBP one-month discount is highlighted but the annual membership is pre-selected. But still, I should have paid more attention.
Thanks for asking.
|
12-05-15 07:38am
|
Reply
845
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I'm not sure if this means tube sites or not. I only visit free video sites if I'm doing some digging on a site I'm interested in joining and there isn't much information here.
|
11-28-15 07:52am
|
Reply
846
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
It really would be a combination of several factors, but price is probably the most significant.
On a related note, I'd be much more likely to stay a member on a discounted recurring monthly fee than join for an entire year upfront. It baffles me why many sites don't offer a 'loyalty' discount. take, for example, one of my favourite sites, Amateur Allure. I joined that for a month several years ago and downloaded just about everything. Now I rejoin every four months or so to get the new stuff. I'd stay if they offered a recurring fee less than the full monthly subscription. They upload one new scene per week so that means that if I stay a member each new scene costs me nearly $10. I just wait and rejoin when the cost per scene is lower.
|
11-20-15 05:44am
|
Reply
847
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
mistacee's Reply
Thanks for your comments on my review. This could be such a great site if they just improved a few things.
|
11-18-15 01:21pm
|
Reply
848
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
Organizing my collection is important. I have a pretty decent collection and I'd lose track of it if it was organized in some way. I have a folder for each movie or site and then within those folders I have scenes with the name of the woman or women in that scene. I have a Word document with a three-column table where I track the movie or site name, the model's names and then the drive number where this folder is located. I also tag favorite scenes and keep a separate list of those. I guess you could say that I'm anal about organizing my collection.
|
11-08-15 05:26am
|
Reply
849
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
The first three on the list work for me...
|
11-05-15 06:13pm
|
Reply
850
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
My guess is that it would expire at midnight in their time zone.
|
11-01-15 04:45am
|
