| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
976
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
I'm not 100% sure but I think the lower price is for Woodman Casting X and if you pay the higher price you get Wake Up 'n Fuck too. WUNF is worth the membership fee. It isn't considered a stand-alone site here so there is no way to add a review, but it is a great site. Let me know if you want more information on WUNF.
|
03-06-15 07:44am
|
Reply
977
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I don't trust tour pages that won't let me see what they have to offer. If they have a great site why not let me see it? Unless the site gets rave reviews I won't join a site that won't even let me see what models they have before kicking me to their join page.
|
03-06-15 07:42am
|
Reply
978
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have to confess that I have no idea what this is...
|
02-21-15 05:44am
|
Reply
979
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope. Not really sure why either. One of my favorite models is Maryjane Johnson. I could look at pics and videos of her all day long. But those of her when she was pregnant do nothing for me. Maybe it's the 'protector' gene in me that comes out and displaces the 'pervert' gene when I see a pregnant woman.
|
02-18-15 02:24pm
|
Reply
980
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pilotguy's Comment
It always baffles me why a site like this has to stoop to such shady practices. As you've probably read in other comments you aren't the first PU member to be burned by BB. I got burned too - twice. I do still join the site but I treat it like a minefield as one errant click of your mouse and you end up with additional charges. BB has some excellent porn so it makes me wonder what they hope to gain by pissing of customers.
Just a warning - don't click on any links in any promotional emails you get from them. If they have your credit card information - surprise! - you just joined. The sender for their emails that I get is "Support." Support, my ass...
|
02-13-15 01:01pm
|
Reply
981
|
I Worship Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
bumbinky05's Comment
Thanks for posting the warning. This is a site that I would have considered joining but I'll definitely stay away knowing what you went through.
|
02-13-15 12:57pm
|
Reply
982
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
Triple's Reply
It's still ticket based. There is a 'free' section, but it's older stuff.
|
02-12-15 03:21pm
|
Reply
983
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most times I've encountered them there was an option to turn them off. Otherwise, I'm no fan of them.
|
02-12-15 03:20pm
|
Reply
984
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
I had joined this site a while back when joining through TBP gave you the upgrade for free. That free upgrade is no longer offered. What I didn't realize was how useless the PSN membership is without that upgrade. I was planning to rejoin soon thinking that it wouldn't be too bad, but after reading your review I think I'll reconsider that. You just saved me some money and frustration. Thanks!
|
02-10-15 06:08pm
|
Reply
985
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
Scotchfan's Reply
Thanks for weighing in on this thread. You make some valid points that will be useful for anyone else considering a membership here.
Towards the end of my one-month membership I realized that I needed to think about the site differently from a traditional membership-based site. I really did need to be more selective, but that isn't a bad thing. The next time I join (and there will be a next time with a three-month membership) I'll go in knowing that I need to approach things differently.
One point you mention that didn't occur to me but really needs to be highlighted is the sheer number of updates available here. It may have been me who contrasted LP with Kink. if I did it was more about the type of porn rather than the frequency of uploads, but you're right: this site adds a lot. And what they upload isn't cheap to make so buyers should expect to pay more.
I've always made the point that I'm willing to pay for porn because that means that more porn will be produced. The LP model is a clear example of that.
I'd agree that even with the confusing business model, the quantity of some unique and amazing porn makes this a best-in-class site. Admittedly this is a small class, but LP rules it.
|
02-10-15 06:05pm
|
Reply
986
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Thanks to TBP and PU I am usually able to join sites that I know I'll like and will be high quality. So once I join I will usually download everything that I want within a week.
|
02-08-15 05:20am
|
Reply
987
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
greg909's Reply
No. The individual photos come in at 1600x1065. To get the higher resolution you have to download the zipped set.
|
02-07-15 12:21pm
|
Reply
988
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I have to plead ignorance on this one. At a minimum, I download 1080x720 but in some cases that still looks like crap. I suspect that the dimensions are just one piece of the puzzle and that bitrate is a big part of it too.
Coincidentally, I think this an apt use of Justice Potter Stewart's comment about porn: I can't define it, but I know it when I see it.
|
02-07-15 05:29am
|
Reply
989
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I look for quality and good reviews. My porn tastes are broad enough that I can be happy with a wide selection of sites.
|
02-04-15 05:46pm
|
Reply
990
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
It seems that so much of porn these days seems to skip over the woman's pleasure. But if we're permitted some editorial licence, my favorite oral to watch is a man or woman going down on a woman who is on all fours. Add some rimming in and I can watch that for hours...
|
02-03-15 05:30am
|
Reply
991
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Reply
I agree. That's ALWAYS a deal-breaker for me too. The only reason I joined was based on stingerxxx's comment that if you have Internet Download Manager the site streams in HTTP so you can capture that. Without that knowledge I would never have joined the site.
I hope I haven't broken any of the PU rules by revealing that.
|
02-03-15 05:27am
|
Reply
992
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I always read the TBP reviews but a disadvantage that they have (and I'm sure that this is the same of any review site, of any product) is that they aren't long-term customers. I rely on the TBP members who spend a longer time at the site over multiple memberships to find the real weaknesses at a site. Take download limits, for example. I don't fault the TBP reviewers for not finding a limit (provided that it isn't really low) because as a reviewer they're less likely to use the site as a real customer. If it's a snowy weekend and that new site I joined has a 100GB limit then I'll find it and report it. A reviewer, who is a more casual site user, would likely not find a 100GB limit.
I don't think that the TBP reviews are less objective than the user-based ones. They're likely more objective. But as a commercial review site they just don't have the time to spend on a site that a PU member has.
As for not flagging that scenes aren't exclusive, I really can't fault them for that either. Some of the PU regulars are encyclopedias of porn and I rely on those members for some of that information.
|
01-31-15 04:58am
|
Reply
993
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
I have done so (or at least I think I have). Legal Porno claims to have a code embedded in each download that they can trace if the video ends up on a tube site. That doesn't bother me at all. If it helps stem piracy then go for it.
|
01-31-15 04:50am
|
Reply
994
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
Pele's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to add your comments. I really like this site but their business model is certainly unusual. The porn they offer is certainly unlike anything else on the internet (that I've seen, and I'm an active buyer).
Thanks for noting that with the three-month membership there is an option to buy tickets at a discounted price. Another commenter figured out that the three-month option is the best deal but your information makes it clear that this is definitely the best way to go. I'll likely rejoin in six months or so, and when I do I'll follow the excellent advice I've been given here.
Welcome to Pornusers. This is the best site I've found for reviews and user-based participation. The staff here are excellent and the members offer a wealth of information. I hope you stay around and continue to contribute.
|
01-31-15 04:47am
|
Reply
995
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Not at all. In most cases I wouldn't know anyway.
|
01-29-15 02:52pm
|
Reply
996
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I agree. Well said.
|
01-28-15 03:04pm
|
Reply
997
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mike11w's Reply
You and I are roughly the same age and for me the golden age of porn was from maybe 1993 to 2000. A lot of the reasons for that are personal and specific in that prior to 1993 porn videos were very hard to get where I lived thanks to draconian laws. But it became available in the early 1990s as porn started to move to gonzo. Gonzo then was a lot more fun to watch then the plot-based stuff of the 1970s and 80s. Those were the days when John Stagliano and Joey Silvera were creating and defining what would become modern porn. I do wish the quality was better, but I'll always be happy with a site that allows me to rebuild the porn video collection from my early days.
(In a way it's like music I guess. I grew up in the 1970s and most of the music I listen to is from that era. I'm not sure I could name five modern, popular bands.)
|
01-27-15 05:25am
|
Reply
998
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
Going under the knife is the only potential reason that I would stop collecting NEW material from a star. It would never stop me from collecting and watching pre-surgery scenes though. And this isn't a hard-and-fast rule for me either. One of my favorite stars is Aubrey Addams and I continued to collect and watch her scenes after she got some (entirely unneeded) modifications. But those add-ons weren't garish and didn't hurt her overall look, except for a diminishment for guys like me who prefer small breasts.
One example of a model I used to actively seek out was Teagan Presley. Her meteoric rise in the business was entirely predictable given her looks and attitude. But then she took it to the next level and modified her looks substantially to join the ranks of models who do that and then seem to achieve a notoriety rather than fame. I don't collect new Teagan scenes, but the old ones will have to be pried from my cold, dead hands.
|
01-27-15 05:17am
|
Reply
999
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with all of the above. The only additional comment I can make is that I'm grateful for TBP/PU.
|
01-27-15 05:08am
|
Reply
1000
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
For me, getting stuff is just as important as having it.
|
01-24-15 10:36am
|
