| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
I don't believe it, would be a miracle!
|
01-23-09 12:20pm
|
Reply
52
|
Hustler's Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Thanks for the information. How can they let this site die with all the beautiful models and talent they have? It's a pity.
|
01-16-11 01:18am
|
Reply
53
|
Hustler's Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
buzmeg2's Comment
You are right concerning the small galleries. But since the women are extremely attractive at Hustler's my strategy is to join with a trial membership from time to time and download as many galleries as possible in two days. I have never pondered to subscribe for longer. They should really consider to change the site from ground up.
|
08-26-08 02:34pm
|
Reply
54
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I totally agree with your opinions, otoh. I also think it's basically a decision which has to be made by everybody for themselves what genre to watch. My "problem" with this site was, as I mentioned, the lack of tolerance for other expressions of sexuality and its self-adulation. Concerning your last statement that it's also just porn what they do, I think their webmaster will be furious to read this. If I look up the defintion of porn in my dictionary it says: "Pornography: Books, videos, etc. that describe or show naked people and sexual acts in order to make people feel sexually excited", and now it comes, "especially in a way that many other people find offensive". Furthermore it is said that there has to be a lack of taking into account the psyche and human partnership. I think basically they say that they take everything into account and don't offend anybody, so (for them) it's not porn. Everything else is filthy and despicable. But, like I said, from my point of view the very nature of sexuality is the most deviant thing there is and it has the right to offend as many people as it wants, so cosensual porn in every form is OK with me (excluding child pornography and sex with animals of course).
|
03-21-12 12:59pm
|
Reply
55
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Comment
To some extent I agree with your experiences. After experiencing problems to cancel my membership involving also a different company I had to apply for a new credit card. Luckily I was only billed once.
|
03-19-08 01:03pm
|
Reply
56
|
January Seraph
(0)
|
Reply of
SeraphOmniMedia's Reply
Hi January,
What a superfast reply. Nice to hear from your new projects. Sad to hear from the litigation thing. Looking forward to see the updates.
EP
|
02-28-11 12:39pm
|
Reply
57
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
Keep it up's Comment
I agree with the above two comments. Don't be hasty and cancel your credit card yet. That's the last resort.
|
06-30-12 12:33am
|
Reply
58
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
Sorry to hear that. I am a regular customer there and never had this problem. Wait for the customer service to answer. Usually they are very concerned about customer problems.
|
05-01-12 11:39pm
|
Reply
59
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
I perfectly agree with you.
Some time ago I contacted KINK.com in order to offer something like this. My problem was that I liked one or another movie but paying for a membership was a bit too pricy. This is the worst solution they could have come up with. Ridiculous pricing and only old movies.
It's like a time travel into the ancient past of internet.
|
04-27-08 02:41am
|
Reply
60
|
Kinky Kicks
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
For this niche it's not uncommon that the man who gets kicked in the nuts wears a mask. I am not really sure why they like to remove the facial expression during the kick. Maybe it spoils the aesthetics, I don't know. It's always amazing how much the balls can take. I once saw a scene at clubdom.com where a guy was literally drawn across the floor with the domme pulling his ballsack to her. He was nearly passing out though. I agree with you that I don't recommend this practice and also the sexyness is quite gone going to such extremes.
|
06-03-12 12:38am
|
Reply
61
|
Latex Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
I am not sure if this site is the official successor to Latexotica but it looks like a perfect copy to me. Always wondered how they could (in good conscience) produce such generic work over more than approximately eight years. Looking at the galleries always gave me the feeling of mass production.
|
05-19-12 02:20pm
|
Reply
62
|
Latex Style
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Yeah, I was pondering to give something below 80% since the shortcomings were beginning to mount up a bit. I don't have more justifications than those from my bottomline though. Will consider to go down to 75% or something like that.
|
02-28-11 09:43am
|
Reply
63
|
Latex Style
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Thanks for this nice comment.
|
02-26-11 12:37am
|
Reply
64
|
Latexotica
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
Hi JBDICK,
I appreciated your review very much and understand your opinion especially about the generic content and the sterility of the shoots since I was a member some time ago. But you have so much cons (and not minor ones) that a 85% rating is a little bit exaggerated. I would suggest a 75% or something similar but nothing above 80%.
EP
|
02-26-11 03:49am
|
Reply
65
|
Lesbea
(0)
|
Reply of
monty2222's Review
Nice review. It's a shame they don't offer preview videos and only just one shot from each photoset in non native resolution...Oh wait there are some preview vids, sorry.
|
08-11-12 12:50am
|
Reply
66
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Oh, thanks, really appreciate the info!
|
04-25-12 12:08am
|
Reply
67
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Yeah, I agree that 65 is damn low for such a site. I am a member now for 2 months or so and still not bored. And they DO have more than three models, that's for sure. The girls are cute and they are not overacting like on some other sites. And the focus on anal play is just nice. But OK, ten people ten colours...
|
03-06-10 12:32am
|
Reply
68
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
At LOL Lesbians they use the expression "Real Teen Lesbian Girlfriends Shooting Hot Sex Tapes At Home And Submitting Them For Cash". This surely sounds better than "Messing around with dumb porn users for selling professionals as amateurs who shoot their lesbian experiences at home". Anyway, providing just one 2 min. preview clip is not enough to keep me hooked.
|
05-06-12 03:09am
|
Reply
69
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
The preview clip is kind of nice, but if these are really professionals faking to be amateurs the site wouldn't be so interesting anymore.
|
05-06-12 01:00am
|
Reply
70
|
Lovers In Latex
(0)
|
Reply of
lyncher's Comment
Just a suggestion. I wouldn't do a review and a comment on the same site at the same time. Mostly it is redundant and also too much work for you ;).
|
12-16-12 10:11am
|
Reply
71
|
Lovers In Latex
(0)
|
Reply of
lyncher's Review
Thanks for the review. I was tempted to join some time ago but didn't do it. What bothered me was (as mentioned in your review) that their preview pages didn't indicate recent updates and I felt that the perv factor was too low for me. And you are of course right concerning the subscription price. I feel that every site which claims to deliver "fetish" content reserves the right to skyrocket their prices, even if they are mediocre at best.
|
12-16-12 10:06am
|
Reply
72
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I think it is difficult for them to include such sets because of their massive update schedule. I don't want to beef here. MetArt is still the best site concerning nude photography. Femjoy is also sort of cool. Was a member there for some months. They are rather on the full naked side but I also like to see some lingerie so MetArt is still my favorite.
|
10-19-12 01:35pm
|
Reply
73
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
MetArt is the kind of site you can easily get lost archiving ad infinitum and forget to enjoy the pictures because their content is so huge. Do they make efforts to bring back some more artsy shoots like from Ronin back in the days? I would love to see some more of this kind.
|
10-19-12 09:58am
|
Reply
74
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yeah, it's probably like that. Anyway, it's cheaper than before, but unfairly distributed over the world.
|
04-26-12 11:51pm
|
Reply
75
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I will make a suggestion for such lists on PU and will be the first to participate, no problem. Seriously, has there ever been such a suggestion?
|
04-23-12 03:04am
|
