| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
The "substantial number of people" is the problem (and OK, this is the result of the attitude). I would happily boycott MetArt if I knew a substantial amount of users would do the same. There should be a list with participants and if the number goes up to a reasonable amount it would have the desired effect.
|
04-23-12 01:18am
|
Reply
77
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I really doubt it will change their pricing scheme if I join or not. Just like I wonn't save the planet if I turn my lights out overnight.
|
04-22-12 11:45pm
|
Reply
78
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Hmm, converting 19,97€ to $ it's about 26$. It's a little bit cheaper than before, but not much though. It sucks that one has to be so attentive to the currency. So it's still the same. Living in the US, join, living in Europe don't.
|
04-22-12 12:12am
|
Reply
79
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
"Well, fine, great for US-citizens.....across the Atlantic it's still regional pricing, so that offer means about $28....."
Maybe check again. When I tried, it said 19.97€/month. I am seriously considering to join again.
|
04-21-12 01:56pm
|
Reply
80
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gyang79's Reply
I get it that everyone has his own views of beauty, but by all fair means finding the women of Metart that repugnant? And where comes the following from?
"If you like women that look like they have been starved nearly to death then thats you"
In what possible way on holy mother's earth are the models there "nearly starved to death"? I was making an "effort" here and dug out my MetArt folder and skimmed through a bunch of galleries and couldn't find a single model which can be suspected of bulimia. Anyway I don't want to argue that much anymore.
But I really want to know, did you subscribe to FTV and are you satisfied there? Just curious.
|
04-18-12 07:53am
|
Reply
81
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gyang79's Comment
Your comment has some flaws:
1. East european models are the most beautiful women there are and they don't look the same, maybe look closer.
2. The human body has only a limited number of poses. What do you expect? If you apply this criterion the galleries would turn into boring after the 3rd set or so.
3. Blank stares??? Maybe you joined the wrong site.
4. MetArt has the most diversified shooting locations one can think of.
I admit that the newer sets are all glamour and polished, not like the old sets from 2002-200x but they are still worthwile. It sounds like a rant here but I think you are just pissed that you joined and did not get what you wanted but from their previews it should have been pretty clear to you what to expect. I am just puzzled from your reaction.
|
04-16-12 03:11pm
|
Reply
82
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Yeah, I also agree on the animals topic. Even if the girl is totally naked it's not totally awkward or disturbing if there is a cat or dog in the room. There is also this nice thing where girls are riding buck naked on a horse without a saddle but I don't know if it's ever been the case at MetArt.
One point which maybe interesting to others is that the most creative and experimental photography can be found in the time between 2000-2003. The pictures of Ronin etc. are outstanding. I think they lost some creativity in the last few years but how many intelligent variations can there be considering their 1 Gazillion galleries?
|
01-10-12 10:20am
|
Reply
83
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I joined this site about two weeks ago, so maybe I have not the complete perspective...
But what immediately attracted my attention was the bad camera handling in most of the videos. Sometimes it feels like you are on a rollercoaster when the camera is shifted to a different position and you can always hear some weird creaking of the camera support.
Just an observation...
After all the site's not bad (I am more the gallery freak, not the video type) but definitely not a 95 for me.
|
03-22-09 03:58am
|
Reply
84
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Thank you for this nice review.
Concerning the shortcoming of HD videos you are right. I am honestly asking myself why they make this much advertisement for HD if they don't keep their promises.
Concerning the photoshoot style videos, this is in fact a style which I like very much. At Latexotica.com they sell DVDs of their shootings and I bought a lot of them :).
One comment at the softcore nature of this site. It's in fact a great turn on for some people to look at high res pix of pantyhose clad asses or high heels etc. (btw you should have stressed that there are really high high res pictures on OT, sometimes too high for my taste). I forgot who said it but it's the "hidden" skin which enhances the eroticism and ones fantasy so it's understandable why there is so much lingerie out there ;).
|
04-17-09 12:38pm
|
Reply
85
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
lostdutchman's Review
It is interesting to get to know your (bad) experience with this site. But you should have posted this under comments. That's not a review.
|
10-02-10 02:29am
|
Reply
86
|
Riding Boots
(0)
|
Reply of
UKInet Media Lt's Reply
Oh, OK, that's nice! But you should mark them accordingly. I was clicking away on all the "not first row" pictures and always forwarded to your join page. I know many other sites which have the same strategy and it's just annoying. Would it hurt to change the whole preview page into clickable full size pictures (would be 20 instead of 5 then)?
|
05-04-12 10:26am
|
Reply
87
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Actually the site I was posting has clips to buy, so it's no tube site. It's like Clips4Sale.
|
11-17-12 11:43am
|
Reply
88
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan, can you please give a reason for the tube exception? Just curious.
|
11-17-12 10:54am
|
Reply
89
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Concerning DVDs (but clinic stuff) the company Viola did some awesome stuff. But that's dated back in the 90's (of course it was VHS then).
Maybe try Rubber-Passion too? Lucy also does some f/m fucking but the action there is mostly solo or f/f.
|
11-17-12 10:52am
|
Reply
90
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I am too a little bit disappointed by all the sites you mentioned. They are doing so, so and have great potential (that's the main thing which hurts me) but lack some aspects. I am not sure if I understood what you are searching for correctly (concerning bizarre+f/m or just latex f/m). My general experience is that if you start searching there is not much appealing out there (or it's all softcore or model sites). Perhaps I can recommend a tiny something:
"fetishkitsch.com":
It's a couple doing quite a lot of fucking in latex, so you have f/m. There is no clinic content here but some bondage, inflatables, masks etc.
"http://www.bpclips.com/0000094/rubber-fucking-c-1.html";
Rubber Fucking had its own site some time ago but degraded into a collection of clips from BP productions. The name speaks for itself. I have most of their clips and they are pretty decent. The downside is that there is just one guy banging the girls and the variety of women is limited to a small number. If you look around they have some other niches there like breathplay and that sort.
Quite frankly when it comes to hardcore and latex most of it is just garbage nowadays.
|
11-17-12 09:46am
|
Reply
91
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Reply
Compared to Rubberdoll, Eva's site is angelic! Not to be harsh again, but I always disliked Rubberdoll's site. Talking about boring shootings and lifeless scenes they would win a prize. But I see where this is going, so I will stop here ;-).
|
05-16-12 05:42am
|
Reply
92
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
Nice review. All points you mention are pretty valid. Especially the non DRM thing surprised me. Over the years I always tried to warm to this site but never could (Rubberclinic included). The models were not my type and personally it felt they had only two or three at all. The acting is kind of crappy with all the faked moaning from the start and the exaggerated slow motion of the models in every scene. I also didn't like Eva's preference for yellowish and frilly rubber. And the silly suspense music in nearly all of their videos is a real deal-breaker. The list could go on but I will stop with the bashing here. Suffice to say that's only my humble opinion. If 90 for you is the score of choice so be it.
|
05-16-12 12:26am
|
Reply
93
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes, I have the latest VLC version. I think it has something to do with the DRM crap. The Adobe player asks for my Member ID and password. Other players don't and consequently don't play. It's the only explanation I have so far...
|
04-03-10 11:20am
|
Reply
94
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
DRM is probably still around. At the bottom of the signup page it says:
"Please note: Downloads are only viewable on Windows Media Player. If you have a Mac this is only possible if you have a partition on your hard drive that allows for Windows."
So, if you can only view the clips exclusively on WMP, it is because of the verification which doesn't work with VLC or other players...it's a shame because she has added some nice clips and galleries lately.
|
09-16-12 11:09am
|
Reply
95
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
carteresque's Review
I aborted my membership because of the DRM stuff. If you don't subscribe you can no longer watch the videos.
Nobody with a sane mind should support such a shit, though I really love this site. It really hurt to leave it.
|
01-31-10 02:01am
|
Reply
96
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
brucelee's Review
Don't think I am a smart ass, but what was the additional information in your review compared to mine? I would have appreciated some different point of view, but it's also the same as in the first review.
|
12-10-09 12:43pm
|
Reply
97
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
Reply of
RubberTanja Co's Reply
I am really sorry for your loss due to copyrigth infringement but I will refrain from joining again and will support the general DRM boykott position of most of the PU community.
|
01-20-13 02:39am
|
Reply
98
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Reply
If they go DRM, they are digging their own graves. Besides, it is very uncommon to have "massive" copyright infringements for this niche material. I can only speak for myself but if DRM arrives I will leave asap.
|
05-16-12 07:43am
|
Reply
99
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I put some paragraphs into it. I hope it's easier to read now.
|
05-07-12 11:42pm
|
Reply
100
|
Saffron Taylor
(0)
|
Reply of
Latex Addict's Comment
OK, it's the best site in the world, we get it. But you should also listen to the advices you got from here.
|
03-16-12 03:41am
|
