| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
776
|
Pissing Stars
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Not a bad call. Hopefully in time they will be worth more attention. Glad I could help! :)
|
04-07-08 08:34pm
|
Reply
777
|
Pissing Stars
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
The dimensions are 720x540 for the 1024 kbps, but they do not look as good as ALS for example at that same resolution. They look more like zoomed in 320x240.
There only a view models, hell there is only like 10 videos! A few of them look okay, others are not as good. I have seen much better looking. Also worth mentioning, they do not speak English, i dont know if that would bother you or not.
A few of the videos have girl on girl peeing. These parts can be fairly hot actually. However, they are not long enough. They also have girls pissing on guys, guys pissing on them....well one guy, and he is ugly! They also have girls peeing in a glass and drinking it. They do not always swallow it when it is someone else's, but they pretty much always swallow their own.
Personally I think this site needs to drop the price and do a lot of growing. They do not have a lot, but what they do have is not bad at all.
Hope this helps.
|
04-07-08 08:19pm
|
Reply
778
|
N/A
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Reply
No problem at all. Hope you never have any issues with them. I have not, yet anyway. When CDs where first coming out more widespread they were supposed to be good for 100 years...I know that newer stuff can not last that long. But that is like any new item, the for a while they over build them, then they cut back on material until they find a sport that will last a while, but be cheaper to make.
Besides, now they will be that much easier to get to. Might find yourself digging through them more! :)
|
04-07-08 03:39pm
|
Reply
779
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Poll
Having never fisted a woman before I would have to at least give it try. Although I bang my girlfriend a good bit she has managed to stay pretty tight. I would rather keep the tightness rather than go for a fetish I would not mind living out.
Otherwise, I think it would be a pretty fun idea! :)
|
04-07-08 12:07pm
|
Reply
780
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I got you...you analogy seemed worded fun, at least to me. Thank you for agreeing! The answer to he question about criticisms I would guess is a little jealousy, which is understandable. I would give shit to anyone with access to a connection like I have too, reason being that we all would not mind having one! Just as I am jealous of those people with 15 or 20 Mbit connections at home because I can only get 3.
Yes Bang Bros needs to work on their speed a little. It makes no difference to me here at 3 MBit, but when I can run up around 100 I would expect to be able to get a getter fraction of that speed from them. Hell Incredible Pass was running at 70-80 consistently! For Bang Bros I hope it is a result of throttling rather than not having enough bandwidth. At 18 MBit just a few more members would end up slowing things down if they are have any bandwidth issues. But I would suspect the connection is throttled.
|
04-06-08 05:45pm
|
Reply
781
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Thanks, I think? I can not say I exactly followed your analogy.
|
04-06-08 09:52am
|
Reply
782
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Honestly, not much at all! I download just as much from home as I do there. Home it runs 24/7, there I am only a few hours at a time. I would like to have a better connection here, it just is not offered at all since I live too far away from anything. The best I can do here is 3 MBit although I am very close to getting 5, but cant because they can only push 4.5 to my house :(
However, I am not "footing" the the bill directly, so I guess it makes no difference. On the other hand, it costs a lot of money to be there, so I might as well get use out of it. As I am told, the IT guys like that people go in on off hours and use the bandwidth because it assures them that it will not be taken away because it is never used. I am sure if they did not want me there they would tell me, I make no effort to hide who I am....of course I do not let people see what I am doing! Also, they make no effort to throttle connections, I frequently see 15 MBit from a single connection, most people browsing the web or reading email do not need this! I hope I did not sound like a jerk, it is a kinda interesting situation.
|
04-05-08 07:15pm
|
Reply
783
|
N/A
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Reply
I hope you do not literally put them in the attic!! DVDs do not last forever, the adhesive holds them together comes undone and the DVD is done. Attics get pretty hot, heat is not that good for them. So get them out of the attic!
It is good that you look through your backups though. This why you can find any that are bad disks. Terrible thing when you lose a hard drive, then you find the backup is junk too! :(
|
04-05-08 06:35pm
|
Reply
784
|
N/A
|
Reply of
heff's Poll
Hum...20 Hard drive failures, I dont see that happening. But you never know. I would cry for a year!!! 9 TB is a lot to loose! I would have to go ape shit for a year to get it all back and then some.
I have lost more porn than most people have collected...so I know exactly how it feels :(
|
04-05-08 10:33am
|
Reply
785
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
You are very observant! I have a 3 MBit hat home, and unrestricted access at the University. For example, yesterday I downloaded exactly 100 GB. I say $10,000 because that is what I pay to tuition! It would cost much more than that a month to have a connection like this at home! I know downloading from university sounds stupid, but they do not track traffic so that why they are not liable for what people do, steal music and such.
|
04-05-08 09:41am
|
Reply
786
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Pay $10,000 a year!
|
04-04-08 06:52pm
|
Reply
787
|
Zero Tolerance On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
You say your speed is in MB? That seems extremely fast. I am assuming then that you meant MBit, Mbps, however you would like to say it. Please try to stay consistent with your units, and correct. There is a difference between 8 MBit/s and 8 MBytes/s, the difference needs to be spelled out in reviews. :)
There have been a few other places that have dumped the DRM, but I wish more would do it. Thank you for mentioning this. Would you be able to tell us about how much content is on the site since you are a current member?
|
04-04-08 12:42pm
|
Reply
788
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Let me know if you have nay questions about them, or many of the others on this forum could answer many of your questions. Once you start using them you will wonder how you every got by with out them, they make life so much easier, plus you will download more, faster!
|
04-04-08 09:44am
|
Reply
789
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It is a feature that is not that useful to many people, but it hurts no one by being there. I would say the easiest way to track favorites is the the scores the person assigns. No one gives their favorite site a 62 score! VideoBox is my favorite site, and that is fairly clear to anyone who looks in my profile.
I can see the usefulness for storing site names that you have not visited yet. I might actually try that out myself. There are so many sites I wouldn't mind trying out that it is very hard to remember 90% of the ones I say "hey, I need to check into them when I am done with whatever I am working one." Maybe it is more useful that I originally thought!
|
04-03-08 07:44pm
|
Reply
790
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Glad to hear that you have no issues with most sites. I have heard of more people over seas from here having more issues with speed, but it does not seem to be everyone and it is not constantly the same sites they have issues with. Perhaps they are getting unlucky with a few sites and assuming it is because of location.
Either way, the videos on the sample page did not look like they were of that high of quality anyway! There were 1500 KBit/s which is "okay" but these did looked more like 500K videos than 1500K.
|
04-03-08 09:42am
|
Reply
791
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
He was referring to the bottom half of the home page. It was missing for several days. I did not like it either when it was missing. It is there now, so no need for alarm!
|
04-03-08 09:35am
|
Reply
792
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
satchel's Review
Poor video quality and download limits? Sounds like there is not much to enjoy to me.
|
04-02-08 09:19pm
|
Reply
793
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I would say that a 20 minute scene should be around 500 MB, 200 can be getting pixelly when they movie fast. Of course this only counts if the original and the compression method are good.
There is a certain appeal to the 8 MBit video though. It does look great, but unless you are going to spend good money on a system to store and play it loses its appeal. Brooke Sky has some 8 MBit video that looks wonderful as well.
Personally I do not worry about file size too much, but I can see many people fretting over 2 GB per scene. Unless you want to start dropping $100 for 500 GB drives you are not going to be able to keep very many of these 2 GB'ers on hand. But on the bright side, at least it is not at Blu-Ray Bit rate!
|
04-02-08 08:43pm
|
Reply
794
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Oh no! I only looked at the site because you mentioned having issues with the preview videos, so i thought I would look at them to see if this was affecting everyone you just seemingly you. Plus, they are samples (FREE!) so it did not cost me anything to check.
I have heard of many people having issues with many site when accessing from Europe. Most of that stuff is transmitted by satellite to get over seas. Downloads should still be okay unless they are throttling the connections, but that would give a minimum half a second delay on everything no matter what the connections are like. Speed of light governs this.
How is your connection to other US sites?
|
04-02-08 03:05pm
|
Reply
795
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
It didn't sound like they cared about downloading so much as getting people's complaints about the stream being jittery. What the webmaster said makes perfect sense to me.
But, Denner, I do have to agree that 1980x1080 is not absolutely necessary. Many people have great looking videos at a fraction of the file size. InFocusGirls and ALS for example, they both have great looking videos at 400-800 MB depending on length, granted they are usually shorter. Good a 2 MBit video with great filtering can look better than a n average 6 MBit video, and be that much smaller in size saving us and the webmasters both space and bandwidth.
Consider, 2.5 GB at 8 MBit/s would be just shy of 42 minutes long. At 4 MBit/s the same video would be 1.25 GB, obviously. InFocusGirls uses that bitrate, although the resolution is 1280x720, they still look great. Plus those videos play easier. Not everyone can use a high end computer for porn watching. I would say for them to keep that in mind when posting new videos. Perhaps posting both sizes would be the thing to do. I am not a member currently, so I can not say if they do that or not.
|
04-02-08 02:03pm
|
Reply
796
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
Reply of
PerfectGonzo's Reply
Very nice! I want to add though that this video is at 8 MBit/s, so dont try to have bunch of other stuff running when you watch it. I will have to watch it in my other computer, mine has trouble with 8 MBit videos when it is downloading at the same time.
The HD looks promising, I will have to rejoin in the near future to check it out. Nothing like crystal clear big natural boobs! :)
|
04-02-08 01:07pm
|
Reply
797
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Denner, try the site again. I just downloaded a few of the sample videos and they came in quick. It "should" work fine for you, either you got there at a slow time or you are the unlucky one that their site will not send stuff too. It seems every site has an unlucky user! I downloaded 3 videos at once and it peaked off my 3 MBit connection here.
|
04-02-08 01:03pm
|
Reply
798
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Well there is a lot of things to choose from. It really would depend on if you are willing o pay for a program or want a freebie. My thinking is that if you are willing to pay $30 for a website you better be willing to pay that for a manager to download it. Also, it is sites like Karups that the managers are extremely useful, they can save you a lot of time and the need to babysit the computer while you are downloading. I let mine run 24/7 now! Using a manager it is possible for me download about 1 TB per month on a 3 MBit/s internet connection since they keep the downloads going all the time without me needing to be there.
What it breaks down to is personal preference. Go to download.com and look for a download manager. Try a few of them out, most let you try them out for free for a few weeks. Some will download and reconstruct entire website, scan for certain file types (videos, zips, etc.) and accelerate downloads by splitting downloads into several connects. Personal I use Internet Download Manager which has a free trial. I like it because it can schedule downloads. For example I am downloading from Bang Bros right now. It has been running with me watching it for more than a day, and downloading 4 videos at a time. When one is done it begins the next. I usually manually queue my downloads so that i get everything and do not end up missing things or downloading the same video twice. Some sites can be queued up in a matter of minutes, others take hours by manually grabbing the links, or I can let the program do all the work.
Keep in mind though that the managers are not intelligent. They will only do what you tell them to do. If you say download all the WMVs that is exactly what it will do. It will grab the full video and the chunks. Or can say all WMVs larger than say 300 MB, but if a video you want is 299.99 MB it will skip over it. So, they have their ups and downs. Another plus though is that most will allow you to pause the downloads and resume them later on, even days later.
If you have any specific questions please let me know. I would be glad to try to answer! :) Good luck!
|
04-01-08 04:52pm
|
Reply
799
|
Dawn's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Yes I did see that. Thank you. Gotta love the drawing...it just paid for most of a 750 GB WD :)
|
04-01-08 10:31am
|
Reply
800
|
Dawn's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I have seen this before actually. They choose how the licensing is set up. Hustler for example set there DRM to retest the license every 3 days, others will set them to a certain date, usually the date you subscription would end, and you would have to reacquire the licenses assuming you were still a member. The goal being that if you dont stay a member you lose the ability to watch the movie..unless you change the system date on your computer. :)
What they are saying is that once you acquire the license for the video, it is yours to keep forever. Their goal would seem to be to prevent file sharing, unfortunately they would also be preventing us from making a back up or putting it on another computer after the membership expired. That sort of DRM is reasonable, but it still can get you later on if your computer crashes, you get a different computer, or want to use a different media player or DVD player.
|
04-01-08 09:40am
|
