Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
I just checked out the offer and it is there. It is an offer for ONE day of "unlimited access." I do not know if "unlimited" means full access or if it is just like their old trial that would only let a few videos be downloaded during a trial.
The offer is NOT for a month, so do not misunderstand it. One day only.
|
08-30-08 12:01pm
|
Reply
452
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I can agree 100% to that. That price has kept me there for over a year now! And I am not one too stick around for nothing.
|
08-12-08 04:27pm
|
Reply
453
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
They seem to be doing this a lot lately. I got on their discount some time ago as a retention offer they gave me after I was canceling after a $30 single month. For all the content it is hard to beat $10 a month. And, it is a good site, so joining here really is a no brainer for anyone who likes big breasts.
|
08-11-08 05:52pm
|
Reply
454
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Roseman is right on both counts here. I like a lot of pictures, sometime the picture the site owner might like is not the one I would like. They put them all here and let us decide which we want.
The new navigation is a huge plus for this network. It is so nice to not have to go into each site all the time.
There are some girls with extremely obvious implants, but if the site does not say "natural" on it then you have to assume that many models with have implants when the site is based on big boobs. Not every girl has natural 32 EE, so it would the same three girls in every scene!
|
05-02-08 02:54pm
|
Reply
455
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yes I did notice the Amy Reid video. I am a huge fan of hers. I get excited every time I see something of hers coming out.
Small breast are okay, but Brazzers is all about big breast and this is what keeps me around. Now some of the newer women are pretty good looking which goes a long way for me. I doesnt really matter if a woman has large, perfect breast if her face looks like a turd!
If they keep growing like they doI think I could justify staying as a life member! Cant say that about many sites at all.
|
04-24-08 09:50pm
|
Reply
456
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Comment
Try emails the company and ask them why there is a difference. Let us know if there is any resolve.
|
03-27-08 10:35am
|
Reply
457
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
tester007's Comment
I used this same offer from them a good 6 months ago and have been pleased ever since. I have never had any issues with access.
|
03-02-08 11:37am
|
Reply
458
|
Bring Me Your Sister
(0)
|
Reply of
PapaGMP's Reply
If this is the case, you owe at least six programs an apology – and possibly damages for false claims resulting in lost memberships.
I am going to have to agree that this comment is a bit worrisome from a customer's perspective. You are going to ask some one to pay damages for lost membership because they have an issue? The idea of suggesting it is scary. If this is the case, you owe at least six programs an apology – and possibly damages for false claims resulting in lost memberships. The guy is just saying that he had a problem. Usually when someone has a lot of problems the site offers to give them their money back, not the other way around.
That being said I do not think I will be joining your sites for a while. So in fact it was your own comment that caused you damages in loss of membership revenue.
|
10-05-09 04:49pm
|
Reply
459
|
Busty Milly
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
I had noticed before that this site has not been updating. It is a shame, Milly is definitely a hot woman. If this site got started back up i would love to join again.
|
10-20-08 04:30pm
|
Reply
460
|
Busty Romina Lopez
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
Can you tell us how big the site is. I am just looking for an idea. I like to know if there is 10 videos or 500. It makes a big difference on which sites I join and when. Also, video and picture quality information would be nice.
|
09-03-08 04:50pm
|
Reply
461
|
Cartoon 69
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
You do not seem to be having any luck with joining sites that you can download from lately!
How can a cartoon site, name cartoons, not have cartoons? Something seems seriously wrong here. Webmaster must have got his website names mixed up. He probably has a normal cartoon site named.... :)
|
09-29-08 10:14pm
|
Reply
462
|
Change Room Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
Xororos's Review
I was a member here a while back so I am wondering what the newer videos look like. What is there resolution and bit rate?
Yet another one of those site, kinda like American Pie: Band Camp that makes a guy wonder what "really" goes on in the girls shower room.... :)
|
03-31-09 12:49pm
|
Reply
463
|
Chica's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
Big Wave's Reply
Those sound pretty good.
|
03-25-08 11:04pm
|
Reply
464
|
Chica's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
Big Wave's Reply
Do you have the bit rates and resolutions for the SD and HD videos? The more of these detail we can get the better.
|
03-25-08 08:39pm
|
Reply
465
|
Chica's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
Big Wave's Review
If you join any site with HD videos please let us know who they look compared to what is on this site. How many videos are there in HD versus SD?
|
03-25-08 07:59pm
|
Reply
466
|
ChickPass Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
I wound tend to agree with Aces on this one. There is a few things on the site that are good, but over all the site is not worth much. The only stuff I liked on here was the food sex scenes they have, but still the quality could be so much better!
|
11-20-08 10:25am
|
Reply
467
|
Chloe Jones
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I tend to agree. But there is the matter of where does her royalties go? Hopefully somewhere good.
The site should make mention of her death though. Perhaps a memorial on the site. I would also think the site should mention on the join page that she would no longer be make new content, obviously. But I do not think her material should be pulled.
I always think it is so sad when people commit suicide, or foul play as some might suspect here. What good is the fame if it ends up killing the person. If it is foul play I really hope it can be found. I would like to be able think that she did not feel any need to commit suicide and lived a good life before someone else ended it for her, rather than living while wanting to be dead. :(
|
05-03-08 06:40pm
|
Reply
468
|
CL Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
That is too high of a price. A few months ago was there and I thought paying $30 was too much. Even the newer "HD" videos are no where near up to par. The photos are kind of a pain to download. Another case where Download Them All comes in handy.
Some of the scenes do have a sexual hint to them, but others are more like watching a gymnastics practice. That can be hot, but it could be a lot hotter!
|
04-07-08 08:46pm
|
Reply
469
|
Club Amber Rayne
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Mbaya! Congrats on the triple digits and all eight badges!
|
01-28-09 07:11pm
|
Reply
470
|
Club Ginger Jones
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
I just checked out their homepage and such. It looks like they name their files in a less than descriptive way. this is one of those things that i find to be extremely annoying. Will definitely keep your warning in mind.
Oh hey, I see you have reached triple digits. Only one badge to go! I would vote for you to get you one closer, but I already have :)
|
10-08-08 02:38pm
|
Reply
471
|
Contortionist
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
Considering all the crazy positions pornstars have to get into it is not surprising that sites like this would pop up. I bet a lot more girls could do this than we may think. Granted these woman may be able to go a little farther, but with a little work I believe many of the usually pornstars could do this.
If you want to see this taken farther check out cl-bikini. The girls can really stretch there, but it is all extreme softcore and very little nude.
|
06-09-09 12:01pm
|
Reply
472
|
Cum Brushers
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
In your reply to the original post you posted a link to Incredible Pass review page here on PU. Of course the outbound link is not active. Simply the link to the review page did not work, and only the link in your reply. Otherwise there is no navigation issue. It honestly is no big deal to me but I still though I should mention it in case it happens to be an indicator to something larger that you guys would like to know about.
So again, I am only referring to the link in your reply, which I believe would direct to the Incredible Pass review page. Sorry if this is confusing.
I did notice that the URL is dev.pornusers.com/... instead of www.pornusers.com/... the difference being the "dev" whatever that is. I am guessing this has something to do with them being evil and having their outbound links cut?
|
08-11-09 07:28pm
|
Reply
473
|
Cum Brushers
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
"For example, if you look at the listing page for "Incredible Pass" I think you'll understand better why this company is one we do not do business with at this time."
To say the least!
On a side note, I clicked the link to Incredible Pass and was taken to a page that said this, "Forbidden You don't have permission to access /review/incrediblepass/ on this server." I can get to that page using normal means, but that one link did not work for me several times.
|
08-11-09 06:15pm
|
Reply
474
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Curvy Kitty's Reply
I think you missed many of my points. I was not saying 100s of reviews, I as referring to reviews with scores of 100 or close too.
Everyone says they have "high res" photos and HD video but many people do not. You say that you have been around PU for a while, you should have noticed that many of us want the actual specs. Physical resolution, bit rate, photo dimensions and so on. That is what I am looking for.
HD in the past six months is well behind par. HD has been affordable for years now. You are going to get no sympathy there. No HD five years ago is to be expected. I would not expect an amateur site to front $100,000 for an HD camera that many computers would not be able to play. Not asking to be ahead of the curve, but certainly keep up with them.
Limited trials are limited robbery. Those are 99% of the time a rip off.
Something you need to consider is that when reviewing a site you compare it to similar sites for content alone. I would not go to your site and then complain that you do not fit into a size 2 dress. That simply would not make sense. Comparing content niche to niche is good. I think you understand that part. The other part is the more of the technical aspects. Video size and quality, photo sized and quality, navigation and on and on and on are comparable globally. Your product must look as good as the best otherwise it is not the best. Score of 100 indicate a site that is the best on the net, not just a single niche. Others have more content, Videobox, many have better HD, you may very well have the best niche content but that does not account for the other aspects.
"The member that posted, I will be honest is quite well a friend and perhaps was not fair for him to post." That was my initial point and is what I wanted to hear.
|
04-02-11 04:47pm
|
Reply
475
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Curvy Kitty's Reply
Well, I have been in the porn world for a good while as well and I had not known of your site. That in itself does not speak well for your exposure.
Frequently when someone is a member of a site for several years they do not get around the porn world much and do not have much to compare to. Reviews from fanatics do not do people much good. Only one of the reviews you have comes from a known member here at PU. All the rest come from people with a single review, yours. We have seen previously when a series of unknowns submits 100's and similar score and it turns out to be shilling.
It would not be a stretch to conclude, or at lest speculate, that you asked these people to write reviews for you. We a webmaster is in contact with their members it is very easy to get to that. That makes for bias reviews because they do no want to disappoint you.
The flip side of that is that you do have contact with members which is a good thing. Having not been to your site I can not say if it is good or not.
On that note, I will not join your site because there are no trust worthy reviews, my opinion, and I feel that you are trying to manipulate the system here. We have no information about your site, types of videos, media specs, cancellation policies, or any of the important stuff many of us here look for.
In reading other comments you have wrote to other members I have noticed you try to sneak out of people compared to other sites. You ask not to be compared to professional sites, skinny site, granny sites, and so on. The simple fact of the matter is that my money is equal no matter which site I subscribe to. You ask us to ignore obviously superior sites.
Being a solo site we would not expect for you to have as much content as the huge network site. Sites do get held to different standards based off of what they are, particularly when it comes to archive size and update size. What no one mentions is the physical quality of your videos and pictures. I would expect a 100 site to produce full HD no matter the niche, as an example.
Bottom line is I do not trust you or those who have reviewed your site.
|
04-01-11 07:52pm
|