| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
751
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
Reply of
PerfectGonzo's Reply
If that is the case than I stand corrected! However, I will mention that I was never able to get more than four and typically I got three. My download manager is set to only use 1 connection. The merging process for the parts takes too much system resources when I have it use multiple connections per file. Perhaps this was changed since December, or I was unlucky, but truly I was only getting three most of the time.
It is worth mentioning though that the site did not kick me off for exceeding the limits, whatever they are. My browsing and downloading on the fourth or fifth connection was simply paused until on of the other finished. I have been to sites there they will freeze your account if you exceed their limits.
I will confirm the GB limit, it took very little time do download the site. That is not in any way to mean there is little content!!! This is definitely a site I will visit again!
|
03-03-08 03:34pm
|
Reply
752
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Perhaps they want to keep there collection private. DRM is a great way to end up having your sign up page far the most part private. Better off to go to a titty bar than a DRM site. Both make you rely on memory, but at least at the titty bar they were real.
|
09-01-09 09:05pm
|
Reply
753
|
Public Nude Sluts
(0)
|
Reply of
jbgild's Comment
Good question. I would love to hear from the site on this one.
The only thing I can think of is have you every tried download 1 GB of pictures manually? It takes a while and is a pain. Download manager use is always appreciated. But I agree the limit has to go.
|
11-02-09 11:04am
|
Reply
754
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
Reply of
Queensnake BDSM's Reply
Just so the PU members are informed.
I received a direct email from the customer service, which seems to be queensnake herself...kinda cool. She apologized for the confusion, but they had mixed me up with someone that had asked for a refund.
I had intended to write up a review on this site, just had not got there yet. She did seem a little offended, which I can understand, I would be a little too if it was my personal site. Plus, it looked like I had tried to get a refund and complained after getting 97% through my one month subscription. I do not ask for refunds after staying around that long. If I ask for a refund it is 90% of the time within minutes of getting access to the site, we all know those kind of sites.
Now my access was terminated right away after canceling. She claims it should not. Perhaps something got messed up, but I was not complaining about one day. I just wanted my friends here at PU to be aware. Either way, play it safe, set an alarm on your calender and cancel one day before the renew if that is you plan to do.
|
06-20-11 01:36pm
|
Reply
755
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
Reply of
Queensnake BDSM's Reply
Hum....I click cancel they same way I always do. I even selected "no problem, just moving on" so I do not know where the refund idea is coming from?
|
06-20-11 03:48am
|
Reply
756
|
Queeny Love
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Reply
Sounds like a good site to add to our shit list.
|
11-23-08 09:30am
|
Reply
757
|
Queeny Love
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
Use a download manager that uses only one connection and limit it to one at a time. I have done with for sites that limit downloads similarly with good results. This way it is one at a time so they are happy, and you can go to bed while downloading their site.
|
11-22-08 10:14pm
|
Reply
758
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
That is too bad. I wonder if any other members are having issues. This is one of the nicer sites out there and I am sure they would not allow anything like this on purpose. Perhaps they should investigate and if there is an issue take the site down for a day to fix. Sending members any sort of malware is obviously bad for business.
|
03-31-09 05:52pm
|
Reply
759
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
That was the point. To not leave much to be interpreted.
I certainly hope I did not waste my time either. I did not intend for that posting to get that large!
|
12-02-08 01:17pm
|
Reply
760
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Look, I am 23 and I love the look of nice tight teens with ripe, firm racks.
BUT...something about this woman really does the trick. I wish more women looked like her as they aged. She really does have an amazing ability to age....or perhaps an anti-aging machine! :)
A 50 will not hold much merit here with out a lot of logical, intelligent argument to why it deserves to be knock off. Which hopefully we will see.
But as it stands right now it does not matter much to scoring.
Oh and yes, gotta love those shapely naturals.
|
12-02-08 12:47pm
|
Reply
761
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Zack's Review
As always, we welcome new members and try to help them on there way a bit.
My friendly advise is when whenever someone give a low 50s or high 90s score there needs to be very valid reasoning. it is going to be hard enough to convince people here that this site deserves such a low score, but it will not happen if you leave out details on the reason why.
Tell us why the issues you had were such a big deal to you. Saying "it is what it is because it is what it is" will not do the trick either, not that you have done that but it happens more often than we like.
Remember, the reviews we right are not for our own benefit, rather they are to help others. We all have different tastes. You have an issue with the shape of her tits which is fine, but I personally like them. But I can tell without paying whether or not I like how she looks by simply looking at a homepage or tour page. What is important in scoring is everything else. The model not having the features you are looking for does not constitute a 50! That would be like me doing to a solo site about a guy and giving it a 50 because I did not like the shape of his ass. Of course I would not like the shape of his ass, i am not into that sort of thing! So rating the site as a 50 would not be fair simply because it did not stand a chance with me, but someone else might come along and absolutely love the way the guy looks.
What would then be fair is for me to say I did not like his ass, then rate the site based on other features. Price, updates, videos and picture quality, amount of content, and so one.
Not liking a models tits is only worth a few points. There is much more to the site than that, and as I said, that taste will vary with each person that looks at your review. A good way to handle that is to say that you did not like them and to encourage the reader to check out the tour page first to make sure they have no issues with them. That would be a helpful suggestion to the reader and make you sound good. :)
Now about the guys dick. Many people going model sites because they are simply interested in the specific model. The dick she is sitting on becomes a little less of a concern. However, I will agree that an ugly guy can ruin a great scene as it can be distracting. Besides, small cocks make me feel better about myself!! :)
Just try to be as objective about your reviews as you can and load them with information. Your review is barely 12 lines, so it is more of a comment than a review. 12 lines simply is not enough content to convey your message. As for 50s, try not to write reviews while you are pissed off at a site about something. When a review is all negative people tend to not look at them because it is painfully obvious the person just wants to vent.
The bottom line here is: don not be talked out of your opinions about sites you like or dislike, just tell us exactly what puts them on your porntacular list or your shit list.
|
12-02-08 12:41pm
|
Reply
762
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Reply
In that case I can not share a respect you might feel you have earned. Ace of Aces is a valued PU and he has my respect. His "childish" statement was in fact very valid. You can not vote on his trust rating because you have not done any reviews yourself to see the other side of the fence here. Pointing out a fact does not make him childish?
I would like to add that we are not necessarily paid for doing these reviews. What monies we do by chance get through the raffle does not even come close to covering all the costs of going through all these websites. Hell the $400 I have gotten so far does not even pay for the hard drives I have used since I began reviewing. But I am greatful for it all the same, everything helps. Besides, there are those of us who do post here simply to help out another PU to make informed decisions and avoid being ripped off and get a lot from the work of other PUs that have taken the time and effort to post.
Also, sometimes sites lack in certain areas but go well beyond in others and it can make up the slack produced elsewhere. Videobox does post some lame videos, but they make up for it in their absolute size and that if you do not like a few videos there are plenty others to move on to. When reading a reviewers reviews you have to look at a few of their others to get a feel for that reviewers style and taste. If a reviewer has a taste for blonde teens he might give a blonde teen site a little higher score than you might feel is warranted simply because he got what he wanted.
|
08-04-08 07:46pm
|
Reply
763
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Reply
About Videobox, how would a site make a video truly in HD if it was actually filmed in standard quality? That would be cheating. Videobox does have speed as well. I have spent countless hours downloading at 40 MBit/s and a fair amount of time even faster. I can not comment about customer service either way, I have never needed to contact them.
I believe the Xmovies score difference compared to Videobox is justified. They are basically the same site fundamentally. However, Videobox has more videos, more options for download, higher bit rates, and costs less especially to users who do not join trough TBP. Therefore, Videobox in fundamental areas is superior thus warranting a higher score. Analogy: If you compare a Camaro to a Firebird one might get a 98 while the other gets a 95 since they are about the same in many respects, now compare that Camaro to Saleen S7 TT and now the S7 gets a 99 and the Camaro gets a 80 simply because of what it is being compared to. Videobox gets its score because no other site in that genre has touched them on fundamental issues and because many people simply like it better.
As for Rachel Aziani, there is some hardcore content. Admittedly there is not a lot but it certainly does exist. Solo sites can be repetitive on what goes on, but that is understood when joining. If someone joins a site that features one model they typically have a keen interest in that model and want to see her in as much as they can get their hands on. I for example I am huge Amy Reid fan and would download 100 scenes of her doing about the same thing with out thinking twice about it. Many times the only true difference is a change in setting and clothing, which is enough. I love seeing the same model in different outfits. Solo masturbation is usually about the same across any site, some sites show many different models, but they are doing about the same thing. On a solo site you get the same model which can be nice because you are familiar with her and do not have to wonder if the scene is worth downloading and watching because you do not know if you will like the model or not.
If you do not like the reviews and scores given to sites then you should consider writing some yourself. It is much easier to critic someone else's writing than to write your own, I noticed this myself quickly when I first started writing reviews here.
"The intelligent reader," I would like to point out that I do have a reasonably high IQ and I would be willing to bet than many of the top posters on this site are above average as well. We have managed to keep things fairly civilized around here, unlike many other forums which typically is a sign of intelligence.
Also, we do not appreciate insulting Ace of Aces. Intelligent people should be above that. Besides, I doubt that a 13 year old has signed up for and wrote reviews for 60 sites or so using mom's credit card while going unnoticed! These things tend to stand out. Ace of Aces has my respect.
|
08-02-08 09:44pm
|
Reply
764
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Reply
First of all, you should bitch about Videobox on the Videobox page. Ace of Aces is experienced at reviewing yes, but not on the payroll.
You seem to have a real problem with this site, so what things about it do you not like? I have read your comment already, but their has to be more than that making you mad about it.
|
07-23-08 04:14pm
|
Reply
765
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hum....looks like someone is on the rag!
Admittedly I did not give the site a 99 either, but it certainly is not far from it in my eyes. There is a lot of good things going on here. Besides, it is not like you are a "one review wonder" here after all you are in the top 10 rank here at PU. Dont worry, they guy in 12th agrees with you!
You just cant make everyone happy. At least he cant vote against you yet...haha!
|
07-23-08 04:10pm
|
Reply
766
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I would not get to rough on him though. He is right after all. I found that to be an extremely annoying part of this set of sites. Granted though it is worth the hassle to get the content. Besides, we were all "one post wonders" until we posted again. I am sure people thought the same of me when I made a big stink with my 100 score for Videobox, and look now, I have something like 300 posts. Gotta give people a chance, especially when they are right. Just do not be too blinded by the fact that you love a site to ignore flaws that other people might think is a big deal. I have been very irritated by things before and wanted to knock a site for it. I can understand him being mad because this site really does screw up download managers.
At the same time you guys are right as well. It is not something worth causing someone to overlook the site over. I loved the site and it is on my permanent rejoin list!
|
07-07-08 06:17pm
|
Reply
767
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I was setting several up as well, but if it took a while sometimes they would time out and end would have to start over! No resuming here.
|
07-03-08 01:09pm
|
Reply
768
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
I agree. The woman is worth a little hassle for. But, they do need to reconsider the timeout and frequent relog in. As I have mentioned in my reviews, this is pretty annoying and screws up download managers.
|
07-02-08 02:47pm
|
Reply
769
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I will be doing this one shortly...dont worry. Actually I have a good number of reviews to write!
|
06-12-08 02:18pm
|
Reply
770
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I am not logging in after every video, but it is rather frequent. It is less than three hours for me. I will try to see how long it takes before logging me out.
|
05-06-08 08:42am
|
Reply
771
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
AHHH!!! I joined! But, I did not realize that the photosets did not have zips for them! Also, I am noticing that I have to keep relogging in download the next video. So my download manager is not doing me a whole lot of good.
From before we talked about the bit rates. The new stuff is 2.59 MBit/s I believe, but Windows shows them as like 5.5 MBit/s....kinda weird. They are actually 2.5 and do not look bad at all.
No zips and lots of logins....I wont be giving it a 99 because of this, but the content is not bad. Brazzers does a login deal like this too and lost a few good points. Video box makes me login Saturday early afternoon, so once a week, and so far BangBros has never made me login except for the first time.
|
05-05-08 04:14pm
|
Reply
772
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Well. That depends on a lot of things. But here even the lower end should look good still. A decently compressed and filtered 4000 Kbit/s video should look wonderful. Usually when videos get over 2000 they start looking pretty good. Of course there are exceptions, some still suck! Of course the higher the better, but there is a point where is make little difference to increase the bit rate and just makes it harder for a persons computer to play it. Try taking and average computer that is 4 years old and skip around an 8 MBit video....it does not work so well.
Thanks for the info, I just might have to join this site and check everything out myself. That is one beautiful woman! :)
|
05-04-08 02:49pm
|
Reply
773
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
One way is to go the folder that you saved the videos and set the view to details, then have it display the bit rate. An other way is to open the video and look under properties, sometimes it will tell you. The last easy option I can think of off hand is simply to calculate the bit rate. Just pick a few videos and tell me their size in MB and there duration.
If the video is say 300 MB. Multiply that by 8, then divide that number by how many seconds are in the video. This would give the bit rate in MBit/s, of course if you want you can divide that by 1000 to get it is KBit/s. So if the video is exactly 20 minutes long, and 300 MB in size, the bit rate would be 2000 KBit/s, now this bit rate would include the audio too but audio is usually very small when compared to video.
|
05-04-08 09:48am
|
Reply
774
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I was actually referring to the bit rate of the videos. download speed is useful too though.
|
05-04-08 09:36am
|
Reply
775
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Grrr...you cant give a 99 either! Just kidding! Could you tell me what the bit rate and durations of the videos is? I looked at the tour page after seeing your review and I am tempted to join. Thanks for any info.
|
05-03-08 06:58pm
|
