| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
776
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
akm77's Comment
These offers are normally legit. When they are offered while you are canceling it is just the site realizing that a smaller sale is better than no sale at all. Many, not all, site have a retention offer. I was on Brazzers a long time for more than half off because of a retention offer. If you like the site I would say to go for it if it is tempting. Hell, even Direct TV has a huge retention offer on their NFL ticket. I canceled mine and their third offer was $20 per month off the normal price. Retention offers are nothing new and are a nice thing for customers. I have even started the cancellation process on sites just to see if there is a retention offer for a site I was thinking of staying with a bit longer, you can always cancel the cancellation process, they make that really easy!
|
09-15-09 01:25pm
|
Reply
777
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Hum. I hope this is good news and not an error that will be corrected soon. When I was there the 15 large movie per day was there and it was there every day. Sounds good, but I am curious to see if it stays this way.
|
08-10-09 04:40pm
|
Reply
778
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
Also keep in mind that while 10 GB per day may or may not be bad for you, you do only get 15 attempt at the larger videos. So if you start with one you dont want, that counts. If you have one stop in the middle of downloading, it counts. So if someone is like me and has several videos downloading at a time and the internet stops momentarily new attempts must be used to continue the download of those videos.
|
08-03-09 01:48am
|
Reply
779
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Lets also hope that when they say HD they do not mean up-converting what they shoot on the same old cameras they have been using to higher resolution and bit rates. We have seen some people do what seems to be exactly that. We get higher resolutions and larger file sizes with no increase in quality.
On the hopeful side of things, HD has been out there for a little while now so hopefully they can see how to do it right. It is only a shame this could not have been done long before, and the same goes for Brazzers.
|
07-20-09 03:10am
|
Reply
780
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
I think we all get spam! I have not personally noticed any spam that I can attribute to Reality Kings. But, that is not to say that they do not. I get spam from Brazzers but it always seems like it is coming from someone else trying to get referral kickbacks.
|
01-30-09 12:48pm
|
Reply
781
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Robbi81's Comment
Because these clips are smaller in size. They figure many people will not spend ten times as much time clicking around to download 10 clips rather than 1. Well, I should not say that since it is usually 3 clips, but you get the idea.
Another thing it prevents is porn enthusiasts, like myself, from downloading everything in a single month. Thus forcing us to spend more money if we want the better quality which they know we do. Not saying that their higher quality stuff looks that good anyway.
Finally, it also prevents hacked password from being used by everyone and their brother to steal their stuff. Although, with the limit they set I do not believe this is entirely their motivation.
|
01-09-09 11:47am
|
Reply
782
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Reply
If you are downloading the "big" videos you get 15 attempts. So 5 gigs would be about right depending on their size.
|
12-19-08 10:24pm
|
Reply
783
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
laxattack34's Review
Did they bill you a second time, or after you called to cancel?
|
10-15-08 03:00pm
|
Reply
784
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
pornhawk's Comment
I thought the site layout was pretty simple. That could be just me though. There is a lot of stuff here and it can be hard to puck where to start.
|
10-07-08 02:07pm
|
Reply
785
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Mischif's Reply
It is pretty annoying. I have downloaded most of this network at this point. But the download limit have certainly done its job. It has cost me a lot more money to do so than would have been necessary.
|
10-05-08 11:52am
|
Reply
786
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I do not know anything about the price option, but it would not be worth it. Sounds like a wordy package for a limited trial. The pictures here really are not worth joining the network for, stick with the videos.
|
09-16-08 12:24pm
|
Reply
787
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
From what I can see so far there has been no change in the picture size. Although, they do seem to look pretty clear.
As for the download limits, they are still there. I got 15 movies yesterday before being stopped until today. If you have an average internet connection than the limit should not be huge issue since many of the videos are about 500 MB and some more than 1000 MB. It does take a while to get up to 15 if you are going after newer stuff anyway.
$18 really is not a bad price in the end. Besides, half of the download failure complaints probably came from me anyway! :)
|
06-11-08 03:58pm
|
Reply
788
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Ah Yes. You should see my whole collection sometime! I have a tendency to skip around videos a lot looking for that "special part" of each scene that I really like. Besides, I am preparing for when the evil people take porn away from us, this way I should have enough to last me a very long time! Kinda like people stocking up on food and ammo just in case the shit hits the fan.
Oh yeah, I really have a thing for big tit porn, so the biggest reason I joined them was for Big Naturals.
|
05-21-08 03:51pm
|
Reply
789
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I mention this because I am having no issues at all with other sites. Video box will run for a solid week with no issue, The Bang Bros Network has no problem running for a days on end, and most others will at least allow you to finish the downloads you are working on even if your login has expired.
It is not so much of an issue of reliability as an issue of being about to download 15 whole movies in a day. I have been a member for a week and only have 70 movies. I should have 105.
|
05-20-08 04:45pm
|
Reply
790
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Comment
E. Download Limit
As a member in good standing, you may download up to 10 gigabytes of data each day, and additionally up to 15 big movies. Upon reaching this limit, you may be denied access to download any additional data until the beginning of the next day.
So it might be a little better than it sounds if you can have 10 GB plus 15 movies.....but I dont know.
|
05-12-08 05:18pm
|
Reply
791
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
satchel's Review
Poor video quality and download limits? Sounds like there is not much to enjoy to me.
|
04-02-08 09:19pm
|
Reply
792
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Wow...and I though I was going to catch shit for my VB review! I hope this dude has some good answers for the ratings he just posted. As a mechanical engineer I assure you there is no new math....1+1 still equals 2. Perhaps he is on dial up where a 1 GB limit would not be an issue, but for someone even with a lame broadband this becomes and issue with a few hours at least and 10 minutes for others. The reason he is recommending being a member for life is because it would take that long to download everything with that harsh limit!
Sorry, cant say I trust this dude, and that is bad coming from me.
|
03-23-08 08:32pm
|
Reply
793
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
hafty's Reply
5 or 6 GB per day will not cut it! Are you trying to host this site from home or something?
I will not join a site with bandwidth restrictions this tight. The only thing this tells me is that the site can not afford bandwidth. If you can not afford bandwidth how can you afford to keep the site updated with good material? The only explanation is that you have a good deal on hosting that has restrictions about traffic and you dont want to lose the host, or you have a terrible deal and can not afford to pay for bandwidth when you exceed your limits!
I can understand having a limit though, to protect yourself from having your servers falling off the racks when an account get hacked and 300 people are all downloading full speed. But anymore it is reasonable for a person to be able to download 30 GB in a day. I can on my # Mbit/s DSL for $30 a month. 20 GB per day would be tolerable, but make sure the user can unlock his account if he assures you that he is in fact the one downloading, IP addresses?
Unless of course this li8mit is simply to force people to have to buy several months worth of membership in order to be able to download the entire network! Webmasters like this piss me off. If I could I would download the site as fast as possible just to make things break. It is really just the principle that people should be able to have access to what they are paying for. Your download limits are turning a lot of people away.
Invest more into bandwidth ot simply face having less members and less income. And eventually I will find a way around the download limit and download the whole thing of an OC3...that should make things go smoothly!
Wonder why I am a several year member of video box? I can downlaod all day every day if I want..which I dont actually. Plus I can download for 6 hours or so at 45 Mbit/s from them alone and they dont cry about it.
|
03-10-08 08:51pm
|
Reply
794
|
Restrained Elegance
(0)
|
Reply of
Fid533's Review
So far you are the only person who has reviewed this site, but you give it a 100. People will not trust this. To give a site a 100 you need to provide some very good reasons for it. Give us much more detail, otherwise your review is pretty much useless. Tell us how much content is there, customer service, resolutions, bit rates, update schedules, familiar models, anything! We need to see much more, especially to trust a 100 review. What you posted would be more appropriate for a comment rather than a review in my opinion. Dont be shy to share information, that is what this site is for!
|
03-27-08 09:22pm
|
Reply
795
|
Round and Brown
(0)
|
Reply of
gamblinman's Comment
It is worth mentioning that you get access to many other good sized sites with the membership here. There is a little something for everyone here.
|
10-14-08 06:24pm
|
Reply
796
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Thanks Exotics. That review did seem a little sided.
|
01-19-09 08:59pm
|
Reply
797
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
I think that part of what they are trying to simulate is young teens getting into girls perhaps for the first time. The shyness can also be seen as innocence. As we so frequently say here, it is a matter of taste. Exotics is right in saying there is only so much they can do. Sometimes a site seems repetitive when they update daily such as the case for SE. It becomes easier to get bored with when you can see so much of the same thing, but that could simply be because they provide so much.
|
08-07-09 10:02am
|
Reply
798
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
enigma's Review
I like the perspective this review gives. Some site do not change, which can be a good thing. If the keeps the same style than people can know what to expect if they had been there before or seen the videos elsewhere. This site is on my "join soon" list. I was a member a while back and am looking to update my collection.
Welcome to PornUsers!
|
03-10-09 08:29pm
|
Reply
799
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Whizz's Reply
There is no need for hindsight, just go back and change what you feel needs to be changed.
|
02-24-09 11:16am
|
Reply
800
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Whizz's Review
While I will agree it is a good site, it certainly is not the Holy Grail as you make it seem. Any why is concern about HIV a con for the site? I do not wish HIV on anyone, but it would hardly hurt me if the somehow it were transmitted between a few of the girls, and it certainly has nothing to do with the content of the site.
Basically what it comes down to is this review is advertisement for the site. Although I am not sure why? The site has decent reviews and scores here. I would not think they would need to resort to this sort of spamming. Perhaps this person receives some sort of referral bonus for new members, but if someone where to join through PU than PU would get that kick back?
Anyway, not a trustworthy review. The site worth joining, but a reader must be the judge of that based off of other reviews.
|
02-23-09 10:41pm
|
