| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I answered YES.
I like to check just to see whether the reviewer tends to be generous or stingy with points. If I see a score of 90 or more and the review is OK but not glowing, it makes it easier to understand the rating.
PU is a totally great site. Frankly it has steered me to some truly superb sites that I would never have found and away from sites with deceptively good preview sites.
The best part is the very high quality of participation in the discussions by fellow members who are both articulate and are also into high quality erotica (the PC way of describing porn).
That's why, as my primary resource, I tend to use every feature of PU.
|
10-12-12 10:23am
|
Reply
527
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Totally agree with Toadsith! I'm into basic vaginal insertions and really don't get the appeal of anal. Most pornstars look like they endure it for the bucks but don't really enjoy it.
|
10-09-12 08:52am
|
Reply
528
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Having been burned badly by unkept promises by 21st Sextury, I no longer trust anything offered unless the long term price is far better than a monthly price.
That said, I have been a member of VideoBox since 2005 and renew with annual memberships. Yes I have some issues with the site but at $7 per month and at least 5 updates a day (that's 4.6 cents per full title), it's really hard to go wrong.
|
10-09-12 08:48am
|
Reply
529
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Hoping the sites see the trend and offer more deals.
|
10-09-12 08:31am
|
Reply
530
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Agree. If the site uses, say, CCBill an d the price is low, I might give the site a chance on a one month membership if the subject matter is otherwise of interest to me.
|
09-28-12 08:03am
|
Reply
531
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I find it easier to remember picking my own.
But the real issue is the sloppiness of the process when a site issues its own password. My experience is that about 50% of the time the assigned password will not work resulting in trying to get a valid password from the site.
|
09-25-12 12:35am
|
Reply
532
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
What Pat said. Pee shots are fine when the shot of the cunt is clear and clean and the pee doesn't get misused. But the old saying still applies, "it's better being pissed off than being pissed on."
Seriously, I like pee scenes, like Pat, when the grass is being watered (or the floor washed) but I don't get the scenes where the pee is directed at someone else. How is that a turn on?
But the thing that crosses the line is when the babe pisses in a glass or bowl, then pours it on herself. The really disgusting scenes are when the babe actually pours the pee in her mouth.
|
09-23-12 09:35am
|
Reply
533
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Me too. I'm not sure what the attraction is.
|
09-20-12 11:10pm
|
Reply
534
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Which is the clinical term; humility, bogus boobies, "hard" to tell or mammaries? ;->
|
09-20-12 11:06pm
|
Reply
535
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
In all humility I agree with Denner. A great bogus boobie job is one where it's very hard to tell.
In those cases I prefer to assume they are her God given mammaries.
|
09-18-12 09:30am
|
Reply
536
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said usually because there are some recent superb boob jobs where it's nearly impossible to tell.
But I hate the God awful jobs done on some babes who were simply gorgeous as they were originally.
Back about twenty five years ago there was a blonde boober name of Sandra Scream who really rocked my socks. Then she went for the king size balloon models and totally screwed up everything.
|
09-17-12 12:38am
|
Reply
537
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I use the old name and add a parenthetical reference to the new name.
|
09-15-12 02:04pm
|
Reply
538
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
One year update...still nothing added since June 9, 2009.
Unless you have never been to the site and grabbed some of it's rather good, but low def content, in which case it's worth the $18 for one month, there's no reason to become a member.
Bang Bros. is promoting this site big time which is why I checked it out again, but nada, bupkus, zilch.
3-1/4 years without any updates and they're still trying to peddle it!
|
09-14-12 10:35am
|
Reply
539
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Roger that. Exactly my answer too.
|
09-12-12 12:52am
|
Reply
540
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I canceled through CCBill last week. Wayne, the webmaster, offered me an extension to compensate for the lost 10 days after I canceled.
|
09-12-12 12:50am
|
Reply
541
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Update. Wayne, the webmaster saw my post in the Wet And Pissy comments on PU and provided me his email address on 1 Sept. I responded and he replied saying he would refer the problem to is technical associate. Yesterday, 10 days later and at my suggestion, he provided me a different member name and password which actually worked, which i was rather surprised about.
Meanwhile, I drained all the videos offered on Wet & Pissy while I was waiting.
I will post a review of both sites once I've had a chance to see what Wet & Puffy offers.
First impression is that it's all HD (or damned close to it) and is directly focused on PUSSY as advertised, with all kinds of activities involving PUSSY including pissing, beads, dildoes, bedposts, candles and many other items that can be stuffed inside a PUSSY.
|
09-12-12 12:48am
|
Reply
542
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
One thing about good porn is that they always have good makeup artists do the job. Occasionally they may overdo it with an especially difficult case but still it's better than seeing a messed up face au naturel.
|
09-09-12 11:44am
|
Reply
543
|
Teens In Nature
(0)
|
Reply of
My 2 cents's Comment
Thanks for your comment. This site has been on my "let's give it a try" list for a while, but no longer.
I really don't like the "what you see is not really what you will get" preview sites.
|
09-07-12 09:14am
|
Reply
544
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Absopositively good value! In the last decade I'd rent videos at a 3 fer price of $7.00 and copy off the good stuff using two VCR's. (Most porn videos had no copy protection back then.)
But many of the rented videos were "crap shoots" because the only clue I had about the quality of the content was the box and the reputation of the producer/director. I would guess that 50% of the stuff I rented was returned without any copying at all because it was really crap.
Now, I not only get a whole lot more content, I also have the ability to preview everything before downloading. Better yet, my 2Tb external drive is a whole lot better than a closet full of copied over videos that are a real pain in the butt to find the "good stuff."
|
09-07-12 09:04am
|
Reply
545
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Excellent review.
My adds:
A big uptick to VB for its continuing effort to list the cast for most of its material.
A big downtick for its incorrect spelling and/or identification of the cast names which, with the size of their catalogue, makes it impossible to find all of the material for a specific performer.
A big uptick for the quality of member commentary. Many members are true pornophiles who know their stuff and are willing to share.
A big downtick for VB's laziness in making corrections in cast member names that are identified by members in their comments.
I've been a member since 2005 and it's still my favorite source for my stash, especially when they exploded from one update a day to 5 or more a day. But I do agree with the score for all of the reasons cited.
|
09-05-12 09:17am
|
Reply
546
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said often.
I usually unzip but when I d/l a large bunch in one session, there may be some that get missed.
The bigger question is whether I spend time looking through the unzipped pix. The answer is no. Too many. Which raises the question; why keep them?
Dunno. I guess it's because they will always be there if/when I get around to it, which never seems to happen.
|
09-05-12 09:01am
|
Reply
547
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
I have no argument at all with nadiencendia's review. However users need to be aware of the site's less than honest business practices.
I signed on to 21sextury on August 28, 2010 through its Zoliboy.com site. The deal back then was that the longer one stayed, the more sites were accessible until a subscriber was permitted access to all sites.
I got what I was promised until sometime in January, 2012 when the network split into two networks; 21sextury and 21sextreme. Because I was originally signed up through Zoliboy, I lost access to 21sextury because Zoliboy was now part of the new 21sextreme network.
Initially I was promised continued access to 21sextury but every month when the membership renewed, I was bounced off the 21sextury site and had to submit a trouble ticket for reinstatement. Then I was told that my original "lifetime" deal expired and that I would need to sign up separately with a new subscription to regain access to 21sextury.
Be warned. 21sextury is, indeed, a superb site for great content and production values, but if they decide to split the network again, all bets will be off and all promises will "expire."
I agree with the 93 score for content but give it the lowest permitted score of 50 for its business practices.
|
09-02-12 07:50pm
|
Reply
548
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
wetandpuffy's Reply
I did as Wayne asked a few minutes ago. I'll update my comment when I hear back.
|
09-01-12 01:09pm
|
Reply
549
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
wetandpuffy's Reply
Hi Wayne,
I have already cancelled my membership through CCBill because of this problem. I haven't tried logging in since I cancelled but I'll give it a try.
May I suggest you create a support capability on your site so that when others have this problem they can address it directly with the site and not go to a public forum?
Regards,
Jack
|
09-01-12 08:53am
|
Reply
550
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
The biller is CCBill, which I trust from good experience for years. I like your idea of requesting a full refund, which I will do now.
|
08-30-12 09:18pm
|
