| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
551
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
When I was checking out the preview site for Wet And Pissy it specifically said the other two sites were part of the package and that my logon credentials would provide me with full access. For some strange reason I actually believed it.
That said, I thought about signing up directly with Wet And Puffy, but because the two preview sites were very similar in style and both offered the same deal, I just went ahead and signed up on Wet And Pissy. My mistake.
And with no customer support access, there's no way to resolve the matter.
BTW I've cancelled my membership through CCBill, one day after enrolling. That way I am reasonably sure I won't be rebilled.
|
08-30-12 08:31am
|
Reply
552
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfizzywig's Review
Update. See my comment in the comments section.
Wet And Puffy said they offer access to two other sites as part of a subscription in their preview site. Nope. You get only one site and are required to sign up separately and pay for the other two sites.
Question for oldfizzywig. You mention the two sister sites in your review but you didn't say whether you were able to access those two sites. Did you have the same experience I did?
|
08-30-12 12:11am
|
Reply
553
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfizzywig's Reply
I'm into pissing as well and also don't really know why...unless it's from the good old days (late 90's, early 2000's)where an outfit "Private Performance Videos" made exceptional solo videos with a lot of truly erotic scenes of bladder purges in a tasteful manner, if that makes sense. (No drinking or pouring piss on the girl's body.)
In any case I've been procrastinating signing up for this site but your review has gotten me over the hump (along with the PU/TBP discount).
My main interest in this site, besides the urges to purge, is the "big taco" and "juicy cherry stuff."
I'm also hoping there is some good pussy flossing stuff as well.
|
08-29-12 10:11am
|
Reply
554
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Poll
How does "oooh" "Fuck me" "ahhhh" etc. translate?
|
08-29-12 09:58am
|
Reply
555
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Ditto. I've been burned by no-namers too often.
|
08-26-12 12:43am
|
Reply
556
|
Hanna Hilton
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Thanks for the review. I've been thinking about signing up but hesitated with no reviews. My experience jumping into sites with no PU commentary is uniformly lousy.
I'll pass on this site unless and until a more positive review is posted.
Thanks again.
|
08-19-12 10:43am
|
Reply
557
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Nope. Not at all. When I see a gorgeous babe literally gagging on a guy's sausage, I wonder what, besides $$$, she is getting out of the experience.
And isn't the objective of having a big dick to pierce a pussy? I like a BJ but I like a straight fuck a whole lot more.
I dislike extended deep throat scenes intensely.
|
08-12-12 10:38am
|
Reply
558
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I have been a member since 2005 and never experienced any technical problems, just content issues.
I tried logging in this morning and got an offer to join. I thought maybe by 1 year membership had expired but I have another 5 months left.
Based on these comments I think I'll just sit back and wait a few days to see if things get better.
|
08-04-12 09:38am
|
Reply
559
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
On reflection another element that is worth considering is the vicarious experience of the fuck scene. I never liked the process of condum-interruptus where when Willy was at full attention and the love hole was juicy and ready for action. I also preferred the tactile experience of unhindered contact between my joystick and my partner's passion box.
That aspect would make me switch my vote to "I don't care for it"
|
07-29-12 12:12pm
|
Reply
560
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
Good review and xexbot's comments about navigation and quality match mine. My only beef, and, in my case, it was a deal killer, is their unethical behaviour in regards to their membership deals.
A CAUTION NOTE TO ANYONE WHO SIGNS UP FOR THE OPPORTUNITY FOR FULL ACCESS.
I signed up on 10 August 2010 and was promised full access to all sites after 4 months, which I received. I was very happy with the deal, the content and the quality.
Then in January, 2012, I began being denied access to the 21Sextury site immediately after the automatic monthly renewal. The access denial started at the same time they split the site into two sites, 21Sextury and 21Sextreme. At first they blamed my access problem on their biller (EPOCH)and corrected it 48-72 hours after a trouble ticket was submitted. Later they said that my "lifetime" full access deal was expiring in June 2012.
Because my original membership was through Zoliboy, I would be permitted the $9.95 price only for 21Sextreme. I would have to purchase a new membership in 21Sextury to get the combination deal with 21Sextury. As you might guess, that price was considerably higher than the $9.95 I was paying.
If they could do that (change the rules) once, it's easy to see how they could do it again by splitting the network site again and again until each site becomes independent of the others requiring separate memberships for each site.
I cancelled my membership for that reason and really miss the high quality, but I don't miss their lack of ethics.
|
07-29-12 11:51am
|
Reply
561
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I don't mind it.
After all, the female body parts are what I enjoy, not whether a dong has a skin on it.
|
07-29-12 11:23am
|
Reply
562
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
While the $10 makes the site a good deal, their failure to keep their promises of access to all sites made me quit the site despite the high quality of the sites that I was still allowed to visit. I plan to wait it out to see how my fellow PU's feel about the quality of the site and whether the site improves its ethical behaviour.
|
07-25-12 11:02pm
|
Reply
563
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As a horndog interested in PTA*, I really prefer nice teenie weenie itsy bitsy polka dot bikinis, not coverups.
*PTA = Pussy, Tits & Ass
|
07-21-12 12:08am
|
Reply
564
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'm interested in your observations about Videoz and VB. Does Videoz have enough non-duplicated content to make it worthwhile to subscribe to both at the same time?
|
07-16-12 09:43am
|
Reply
565
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My preferred method is phone because if you get someone with half a brain you can resolve the issue(s) quickly and efficiently.
But my usual method is instant message. The combined IQ of the staffing of the phone banks can't be much more than Tiger Woods' golf score for a single round,
Besides using IM or Email provides a written record of the discussion if needed later.
|
07-15-12 10:14am
|
Reply
566
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
A few comments about Rearadmiral's review:
5 updates per day - Totally agree that, with 13,345 movies (today's total) there is a bunch of crapola. However their recently added feature of quickie previews gives the discerning porndog the ability to get an idea of the content of a video before spending any time on it. I'm fine with 5 per day and like the opportunity to sort through the offerings myself rather than have someone else do the selecting for me.
New VB3 feature - Totally agree that I prefer the old front-end over the new one. It's good that the VB folks give us the full choice.
Compilations and duplications - Would be an annoyance except there's a loyal group of VB'ers who accurately point out duplications. The good part about that is if you find a scene that you want to download, you may find an earlier posting that runs longer or even that is available in HD.
Inaccurate identification of talent - One major failing that is not mentioned in Rearadmiral's review is the frequent inaccurate identification of the talent. Worse is when there's no effort to identify the talent. With a catalog of 13,345 videos, each averaging 5 scenes, that means if you dig a particular babe, and that babe is not accurately identified, you'll need to dig through over 120,000 scenes to find her stuff; ain't gonna happen. The good part is that the VB'ers who comment frequently provide an identification and/or correction, but the bad part is that comments are not searchable. I've stumbled on some of my favorite babes totally by accident which makes me wonder how much more is out there that is undiscovered.
D/L speeds - Agree. Never had a problem with speed or with simultaneous multiple downloads.
No excuse for using a freebee site - Totally agree. Not only is there no excuse from a cost standpoint, the quality of the video on VB is usually much better.
|
07-14-12 09:53am
|
Reply
567
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
MiztaBlu,
Having been badly burned by the Hustler site several years ago I have largely ignored this site. But there are some babes exclusive to Hustler that I'm interested in.
Has the download problem been resolved to your satisfaction?
|
07-07-12 03:27pm
|
Reply
568
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mike11w's Comment
Bad news...ain't working.
Good news...I thought it was my machine.
|
06-30-12 12:04pm
|
Reply
569
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Federal law limits the consumer's fraud losses to $50. The credit card issuers must eat the rest. Accordingly issuers are becoming increasingly aggressive in dealing with merchants (web and others) who have more than average numbers of consumer disputes.
What you experienced with Bang Bros is happening with many (most?) porn sites.
My experience has been that the major billers like CCBill and Epoch have a much higher credibility than some of the no-name billers so that becomes one characteristic I always look for in signing up.
Danni Ash has created its own biller (DHD) that some sites use but their record is less than stellar.
|
06-29-12 11:02pm
|
Reply
570
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
The state of the porn art in June of 2002 compared to today can be a guide.
In 2002 the major source of porn was magazines and VHS videotapes. Magazines were timidly entering the hard core business. Back then most of the major magazines were experimenting with mild insertions (dildoes, fingers, etc.) and men with woodies were showing up in some cases. The "good stuff" was available on VHS tapes available in rental stores and we horn dogs copied off the salient parts for our collections.The internet porn biz was just starting with what now are called low res photos and short, lousy quality videos.
Today the vast majority of porn is web based with most of the remaining video stores barely hanging on with copy protected DVD's and marginally popular non-mainstream stuff. Magazines are struggling for survival.
The delivery systems for porn in 2022 are most likely going to be exclusively web based with a very simple interfaces to large screen 3-D TV screens. Magazines will disappear as will many of the video stores.
While there have been some who have discussed the possibility of reality delivery to include olfactory elements (smell-o-vision) and even tactile capability (simulated touch capability).
I've heard ideas like virtual sex being available but my limited mental capacity can't imagine how that can be accomplished.
In any case it will be a fun ride to see how porn advances over the next decade.
|
06-29-12 10:42pm
|
Reply
571
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Lousy Nav & Search functions can kill my willingness to stay a member of a site.
|
06-27-12 11:50pm
|
Reply
572
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
My personal preference is for a 50/50 mix of new vs. repeaters.
|
06-24-12 09:49am
|
Reply
573
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
All of the above as well and I agree with the other comments.
Just one additional aspect that I really like is the participation of webmasters. That tells me they care what we customers think and their comments are very helpful in many cases.
I have dodged so many lousy sites and have found so many superior sites with the insights I've gotten from PU (with some help from TBP) that I haven't bothered with any other review sites for a good long time.
|
06-17-12 10:30am
|
Reply
574
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Exactly. My answer also is "all of the above."
|
06-13-12 09:08am
|
Reply
575
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Being a boob fan, there's nothing like strolling up and down Oxford St in London on a hot summer's day watching those braless British babes bouncing along. WOW!
|
06-12-12 11:45pm
|
