| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It must sometime improve it but my theory as to why that is has little to do with the performer having new breasts as much as her attitude toward herself.
An older woman looking at her sagging breasts who gets a lift and implants may have cause to get them but a teenager or young woman doing the same thing has none. Other than she is unhappy with herself and thinks that altering her appearance will cure what ails her. It usually doesn't because that was not the problem.
|
09-21-14 05:05am
|
Reply
527
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I got one when I was 18 and I don't necessarily regret it but not having it would not be a issue.
The moral of the story for me is don't get one because it's not going to add anything to your life
and I could have spent that 72$ on something more interesting
|
09-17-14 05:55pm
|
Reply
528
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I could have picked the option all of the above if there had been one but in truth it is impossible for a model to no longer be fresh or too popular. us but anyone stumbling on her for the first time would probably be as thrilled as us when we first saw her.
There are plenty of active performers who I used to love watching but don't anymore because I own so many of their scenes that I don't really care to add more. I still keep track of their stuff in the hope that she will offer something worthwhile but most rarely do.
|
09-13-14 11:54am
|
Reply
529
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Rarely these days but there are so few new sites to join that I mostly join established ones. That's not to say that I'm not partially disappointed in their content but that's another subject.
|
09-09-14 05:30pm
|
Reply
530
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Poll
The face is always the first thing I look at and than it's the body.
|
09-07-14 09:10am
|
Reply
531
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
The bigger they are. The more important it is for them to have a search option but it has to be a well functioning one. I'd rather there not be one than one that gives out the wrong info
|
09-05-14 05:55pm
|
Reply
532
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I used to say that I don't mind it but these days I prefer to see a condom because otherwise I know that one of the scenes I'm enjoying involved the transmission of an STI. In fact probably many of the scenes I watch have that same problem.
|
09-03-14 06:09pm
|
Reply
533
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The thing that most people don't realise is that there isn't anything quite like online porn. Where else can you get hundreds of hours of content for less than 30$? Most mainstream sites require a lot more money to get a lot less content and often most mainstream sites don't allow download unless you buy the individual movie/show and that gets expensive real fast.
|
09-01-14 09:34am
|
Reply
534
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Technically I own three since I have a PS3. One is set up on my 55" TV where I watch most of my movies (that's non-porn movies) and the other two are on my 46" TV. I can't be sure if dvd's look better when played on a BluRay but they sound a lot better and that adds a lot to the viewing experience.
I now own a decent quantity of BluRay movies as the price is now about the same as most dvd.
|
08-30-14 07:01am
|
Reply
535
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I didn't pick hate it because it's not a word that I like to use for something as mundane as porn.
I understand why it still exist today but I don't like pixelated porn and that's why I almost never watch Japanese porn.
|
08-28-14 06:33pm
|
Reply
536
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think that no matter if you are a mostly video only site. The moment you offer pics you must also offer zip downloads.
|
08-24-14 06:03pm
|
Reply
537
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't mind it but most performers don't stimulate me.
|
08-20-14 03:44pm
|
Reply
538
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Although I agree that 24 hrs is a reasonable time. I think 36 is more acceptable because these people also have to sleep and the problem may be one that requires more time than just a day. That said anyone going above 36 is not doing his or her job properly.
|
08-18-14 06:45pm
|
Reply
539
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said not at all but that is only because there is not any site that I actually care to stay for more than a month. I had a long term membership to Brazzer which got on me and this was a 2 year old membership and I visit the site a couple times a week and there is not a single video that I really want to download and none of the upcoming stuff is any better.
I wish there was at least one site that I could say I want to join long term but there is not.
|
08-16-14 12:01pm
|
Reply
540
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'll second Cybertoad's comments.
|
08-14-14 03:28pm
|
Reply
541
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
It's a happened a couple of times and both times it was because someone had supposedly stolen my log in info. I say supposedly because I have no idea how they could have done that but it was resolved so it is now water under the bridge.
|
08-12-14 06:20pm
|
Reply
542
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I like what Drooler said and that's why I picked at least 100. The odds are a lot better that you will find enough pics to satisfy your needs and not so many that you will spend too much time finding them.
|
08-10-14 10:29am
|
Reply
543
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No but then again I also don't think guys should be allowed topless except on beaches, near pools or in water parks. I seem to remember a similar question being asked in the past but I could be wrong. In any case a topless woman is not the same thing as a topless man because men's breast are not considered sexual objects the way women's breasts are. I'm not arguing whether it's fair or not but it's a reality. Guys enjoy watching topless women. I don't know if the same can be said for women when it comes to topless men.
|
08-08-14 01:53pm
|
Reply
544
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
It's very important to me and probably the main reason why I don't enjoy most of the porn made in the last few years. It's not even that I'm not a demanding person because I don't need a long intro but a nice little set up with some dialogue is all I need to be happy.
|
08-06-14 07:04pm
|
Reply
545
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I also do that because these days it's not wise to assume that an established site is still as good as what you thought it was.
|
08-05-14 06:06pm
|
Reply
546
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
In my case it has to be all of the above. I think PU and TBP reviews are a great resource but I still have to check out the site myself because the info in the review may be accurate but it won't change the fact that I would not join that site because I already have those videos/photos or I don't want them.
|
08-04-14 03:39am
|
Reply
547
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I do from time to time.
|
07-29-14 06:23pm
|
Reply
548
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm a primarily video only guy so pics is something I only look at to make a review.
|
07-27-14 09:56am
|
Reply
549
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I think it's great when sites remaster their older stuff because it gives newer members the chance to see those videos but a site should only use 30% remastered content as new updates and that's only if they update multiple times per week. Otherwise remastered content should bea bonus above truly new stuff.
The other important thing should be that older content should never be sold as HD if the site had to crop the older video to a small size so that they can actually make it HD.
|
07-22-14 02:03pm
|
Reply
550
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
It depends on what was removed and why it was. If the shoot was many years old and quality was so bad when compared to other stuff than that's fine but I have a problem when a site removes an older shoot only to bring it back pretending it's s new one.
|
07-21-14 06:52pm
|
