| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I would only pay for such a service when the content is really something exciting. It isn't something I'd do very often and I agree with the previous reply that I'd be wondering the whole time if the performer was trying to keep me paying for as long as possible to increase their payday.
|
02-11-07 10:22am
|
Reply
152
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
That's pretty cool...things just keep getting better and better! This really is a great site. Keep it up!
|
02-11-07 10:12am
|
Reply
153
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I honestly can't remember what site it was, but essentially I bought a trial and even though I had cancelled it they charged me past the end. I was downloading content off the site until I presumed they would lock me out. However, because I accessed the site after the trial it automatically charged me for the month. Fortunately, that hasn't happened in a long time (might even be illegal now) and my experiences have been very positive.
Hey roseman, how did you get to post a poll? Cool! :)
|
02-10-07 09:29pm
|
Reply
154
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
That's usually what I end up doing too, but I wish I could keep up with a site because I do like the interaction. Just getting photos and vids without real contact to the girl can be a turn off, although not in all cases. :) I imagine it's because people join, download everything, and then quit the site. I'm guilty of that myself, but it can suck the big one (no, not THAT one...the other one!) LOL
|
02-09-07 04:36pm
|
Reply
155
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
This is a hard one because I don't think either can be done simply. I've spoken out here against people giving perfect reviews with very little information. However, how can you determine if it's biased or just a completely satisfied member. Sometimes it will be obvious, but other times not so much. I think a third option is needed, although admittedly I don't know what it would be.
|
02-09-07 04:24pm
|
Reply
156
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
I do tend to forget, so I was tempted to choose that option. However, the real issue is that most sites make it too expensive to stay a member for very long. Even on sites I like I have to cancel and then come back, usually having to pay the larger first month fee! You just can't win!
|
02-07-07 07:25am
|
Reply
157
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Love those lovely ladies...big...small...all different sizes and types. :)
|
02-06-07 09:18am
|
Reply
158
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
It's definitely pop-ups by a mile. I'll work through them if it's actually part of the site, but blind links from a website really turn me off. The chances I'd join a site like that are pretty much zero.
|
02-05-07 09:20pm
|
Reply
159
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I joined a site that had it and nothing is worth that much trouble.
|
02-04-07 05:21pm
|
Reply
160
|
N/A
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
LOL! Very good point!
|
02-03-07 10:46am
|
Reply
161
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
No, but I'm pretty careful about such things. TBP and Porn Users make that easier to avoid though!
|
02-02-07 11:41am
|
Reply
162
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
I thought the original review was very well written and there was nothing that sugested to me that Davit was biased other than honestly liking one network over another. I think the webmaster overreracted a bit here, especially since 75 is hardly a terrible score. When I think a site (or a network) has interesting content that I think could be improved, the score is likely to be somewhere around 75. I recently reviewed GeekGirlsOnline with a similar score and if you read my review you'll see that I actually liked the site very much.
In the end, Davit is entitled to his opinion and I actually think he's owed an apology here. I encourage webmasters to engage reviewers to see how improvements can be made, but I was truly dismayed to see him accused of impropriety so quickly. If he doesn't like your site, he has every right to say as much and if people don't feel able to speak frankly about their likes and dislikes then what are we doing here?
Just my $0.02.
|
01-03-08 08:48pm
|
Reply
163
|
4 Real Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Bruce's Reply
Hey Bruce,
Just wanted to let you know I posted a follow up to my original review of your site and upped the score a couple points that are well deserved from how well you treated me, even though I caused the problem in question. I wish you the greatest of success in the future!
Best,
SD
|
10-05-07 08:07pm
|
Reply
164
|
4 Real Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Bruce's Reply
Hey Bruce!
I'm glad my feedback was useful and it sounds like you addressed the points I made perfectly.
I was very pleased with you site overall, but do have to admit I've had an issue with your billing folks. It's mostly my fault, but apparently I didn't cancel soon enough and got charged for an extra month. I'm used to the larger billing companies that allow cancellations through the last day of a 30 day membership, so admittedly I am in the wrong, but I would suggest giving some folks a bit of leeway if it happens in other cases. I'm all for independant billers, but you should realize what we're used to with sites like CCBill.
Regardless, glad I could be of help on the other issue and it's cool when webmasters are so responsive to users comments. That rocks!
Best,
SD
|
09-08-07 09:40pm
|
Reply
165
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Getreal's Review
I'm not sure what you mean when you say that Sapphic Erotica is a better lesbian site, with emphasis on lesbian. Do you mean that it features real lesbians? Or something else?
|
10-23-07 03:49pm
|
Reply
166
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
rogertheduck's Review
I see from your signup date that you just recently joined, so I'd suggest looking around the site a little while first before posting many reviews. To give such a high score people really want to see why you liked it that much, so a little more detail would have been ideal. However, I don't like to scare new folks off either so I do hope you hang around.
|
04-04-07 06:23pm
|
Reply
167
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
I agree with what everybody said, especially the part about it not seeming like a real review. The pros part is ok if he loves it that much, but the rest seems like an advertisement. It is definitely not helpful to the site to have him give it a 100 because no site is perfect. The only way I'd probably give a site a 100 is if they hand delivered everything to my house and I got to meet with the performers! But, as roseman pointed out, I would like to hear what he has to say because many have rated this site only a couple points lower than 100 and maybe it has fufilled all his needs, which would be awesome if I could find that for myself.
|
03-14-07 07:07pm
|
Reply
168
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
I honestly hadn't thought of that, but I think you are definitely correct. I do remember reading that all the boy/girl scenes were existing couples, which follows with what you said. It's a shame, but understandable. Thanks for replying!
|
02-09-07 04:32pm
|
Reply
169
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
abbywinters's Reply
Hey Abby and Co.,
I appreciate you replying to my comments! Although you have had boy/girl vids in the past, you quite rightly point out that such isn't the focus of the site and I had lost sight of that in my comments. Still, you can't blame a guy for wishing! You do very good work and any boy/girl content you may add would merely be icing on an already delicious cake.
|
01-31-07 03:42pm
|
Reply
170
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
abbywinters's Reply
I always wondered about the reason for cutting up the segments and since I have a high spead connection I didn't really see the angle about those with dial up. I remember downloads kept timing out years and years ago (before I was downloading this amount of porn mind you), so I can see the issue. I agree with the webmaster though that they are making the right decision and setting a higher priority on getting more content out there.
|
01-31-07 01:01pm
|
Reply
171
|
Action Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Reply
Hey Boobs Dude!
That's a valid point, but I think it's the same quality for the full subscription since TBP reviewers said something similar. It's a real shame since the concept is pretty original.
-SD
|
07-25-07 01:49pm
|
Reply
172
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Thanks for the info! ;)
|
01-28-08 08:39pm
|
Reply
173
|
Alyssa Doll
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
I'm very glad my review could be of help!
|
05-10-07 07:39am
|
Reply
174
|
Alyssa Doll
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Very interesting to hear how you guys review sites! Just like Drooler, I always figured you guys got free access.
I had noticed that the site facts were updated after my comment and I just looked at it as an example of PU working as it was intended.
So, as I said in my response to Drooler, I'll still sign up for trials that TBP says are full access, but pay attention a bit more to when the facts were verified...which I assume is why TBP puts that info there in the first place.
Keep up the good work guys!
|
05-05-07 04:06pm
|
Reply
175
|
Alyssa Doll
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hey Drooler,
I wouldn't go so far as to say that TBP isn't reliable since they have to check so many details at a variety of sites. Quite frankly, it can be easy to miss something like that and I might have missed it myself. And for all we know it's something that was changed after TBP went through to get site facts, which they only claim to be valid as of a certain date.
So, personally I'm not going to hesitate to join a trial if TBP says it's full access, although I may take a closer look at when the facts were verified. TBP has done pretty well so far and no one is perfect. In fact, incidents like these are why they created PU in the first place since we'll catch stuff they don't!
Anway, that's my $0.02, but I can certainly understand your frustration.
-SD
|
05-05-07 03:55pm
|
