| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Young Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
stingerxxx's Review
Well thought out and informative review.
|
07-14-13 05:17pm
|
Reply
102
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Excellent review. I agree about the camerawork being one of the negatives. It's a shame about it being a one man show, as this material would be vastly improved with people behind the camera, and having better lighting and angles.
|
07-10-13 07:32pm
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Pros and cons are basically quick notes, whereas the bottom line is where you have to explain how it all weighs up in decent english, describe what the site is like, who it would appeal to, and for what reasons.
|
07-10-13 05:59am
|
Reply
104
|
Zero Tolerance On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
genericusername's Review
I looked at the sign up page today and saw no pre checked cross sale. Is the site no longer using this? If not, this place looks a good one.
|
07-05-13 11:36am
|
Reply
105
|
Throated
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
A belated thumbs up for another excellent review, which have improved beyond recognition.
|
06-30-13 06:30am
|
Reply
106
|
HDV Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
TeeHeiman's Reply
Cool - not that I had a problem with the discount it was just the longer term price price didn't make much sense for either customer or site relative to the monthly discount (if that makes any sense).
Looks good.
|
06-28-13 02:47pm
|
Reply
107
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Comment
I very much agree with you, I have always hated ignorant immature comments on some sites. They are repugnant and sum up the intelligence and spirit of those sort of people. I am very surprised they do not moderate that sort of thing.
|
06-26-13 05:06pm
|
Reply
108
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
As a porn fan I find you're not reputable because you try to trick customers. If they get to try something they wouldn't get to try otherwise then fine, put in the cross sell but don't pre check it. If you say it's easy to see then it's easy for them to check it if it's uncrossed. They work for sites like yourselves because customers are tricked into paying for something they don't want, and then are too embarrassed to complain to credit card companies. One customer services representative at one company was honest enough to admit customers hate them and end up signing for something they don't want.
If you want to be considered reputable clean up your act, because no, companies like yourself are not reputable at all from my perspective.
Here are some other recent comments from members.
From tiemac1 on 31 january 2103
"Warning Cancelation Problem and Extra Charges
Be warned this website or billing company attempts to charge you extra for useless and or dead sites. (3 day trial)
They are also very difficult to cancel.
-Odd cancelation site."
From bibo on 20 December 2012
"Cancellation problems
No other site is cheeky enough to ask for FOUR different identification parameters in order to just CANCEL an existing account. Sorry, ddf, but this is my last visit to your site."
From Denner on 25 November 2012
"Cancel rebilling??????
When you join a site and want to cancel re-billing, it got to be smooth...
But this site certainly makes it hard:
When joining, I could not see which billing co. was in question - AND never got a mail back - so luckily I could remember the chosen login/password.
And when trying to cancel rebill, I have 7 choices of billing co. and all of the DDF-sites to choose from - none of them worked - and it took a hell of a time to go through all.
|
06-26-13 05:44am
|
Reply
109
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
madgreedy's Comment
This is the problem with pre cross checked selling. I may not have said it a hundred times, but I've said it a lot. If you're a reputable site, don't try to trick customers. It reflects badly on the whole industry and means people will be reluctant to ever part with their money again. It takes customers away from the whole porn industry. Reputable sites can get the benefit of the doubt if a misunderstanding occurs, but as far as I'm concerned, if you have pre checked cross selling you're not a reputable site. It's about time PU/TBP stood up for the customer, supported reputable sites, and spoke out against dirty tricks, but they are weak and in trouble themselves. Not good.
|
06-25-13 05:50pm
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Only when I need them.
|
06-24-13 07:14pm
|
Reply
111
|
HDV Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks slutty, yes I'm always wary of that renewal charge. This is getting to be more of a problem. People need to be able to buy with confidence, or they wont buy at all.
|
06-23-13 04:29pm
|
Reply
112
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Reply
For me ECG and Czech First Video (part of Czech AV), are the only sites I know (along with Backroom Casting Couch) that do this sort of thing, and do it well. There are plenty of other audition type sites, but for me these three are head and shoulders above everything else in this niche. Most of the others are phony and have some very regular and professional models pretending to be amateurs, or have truly dire quality.
|
06-21-13 05:16pm
|
Reply
113
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes, but it is far from cookie cutter porn. The use of the split screen is another thing that varies. I think it is used more now than it was a couple of years ago. It's effective at times, but sometimes imo it detracts from the action.
|
06-20-13 02:51pm
|
Reply
114
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Thanks Capn, yes hardcore is a big part of this site, with the reaction of the girls having sex for the first time on camera quite a prominent part. There are some softcore pics, with stripping, some updates have no pics, some have softcore only, and some have hardcore.
|
06-20-13 02:20pm
|
Reply
115
|
Teens Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
One thing to add - unfortunately Anal Euro is not currently part of the Team Skeet package, which is a real shame. Hopefully it will be added as a promotion sometime in the near future. If it is, I would rejoin this network.
|
06-18-13 07:36am
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Yeah right - now my S.O. is a dear and without her life would not be the same, but..but...but...give it 20 years. 20 years of being told half of what you do, you're doing it wrong. 20 years of being asked by a non driver, "didn't you see that car, lorry, cyclist?" (yes I saw it) "because you nearly hit it." 20 years of being a clumsy idiot when I bump into something, but when she bumps into something, it's the layout of the place that's wrong. 20 years of being a clumsy idiot when I drop something but when she drops something, accidents will happen. 20 years of being told "you're going deaf" if I don't hear what she just said, but being told I'm not speaking clearly when she can't hear what I just said. Just saying...in fact forget 20 years, I'm giving you six months (if you're lucky, of bliss). Then welcome back to porn.
|
06-18-13 05:49am
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Well put Cybertoad, I'm agreeing with you 100 per cent, and I am trying to work out the TBP/PU reasoning.
I could be right in they were discussing closing PU, decided against, but had to do something quickly to cut costs. There was nothing in place to replace the raffle, and no time to think of a plan on what to do with PU, so now they have been working out what to do to with it. I think PU may become a very unimportant and unsupported wing of the organisation, with TBP and new sites being the main earners. I think it will probably close eventually.
|
06-17-13 03:33pm
|
Reply
118
|
Gay Life Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Ambition's Review
Very detailed and informative review. The first new one in some days. I don't mind seeing quality over quantity anyway.
|
06-17-13 03:23pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
No - but take a look the number of recent reviews and activity. I rarely put in a review that wasn't knocked off the front page within 24 hours. My most recent one (which I only did because they ended the raffle) is still there. Activity has dropped off dramatically. Things are so bad I may do another.
|
06-16-13 03:26pm
|
Reply
120
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Absolutely right Monahan. In the past shady dealing porn suppliers made money out of ripping people off by not having what they claimed, then took the money and ran, or delivered absolute rubbish. This lot have great material and should in my opinion, be charging more for it. They certainly don't need to resort to dubious practices (or maybe they do). I dunno...strange very strange.
|
06-14-13 10:22am
|
Reply
121
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks Graymane, yes we both know it takes some time and effort to create a decent review. I wasn't going to do a review for 21 Sextury becaue of the cross selling, and had decided I didn't have much time to do them anyway. Then the raffle ended, so I figured I'd do one to muck in and keep things going. Things are quieter here at the moment.
There are signs that maybe 21 Sextury is occasionally trying to get some build up in, but it's not something they excel in, the Jalace video on Pix And Video for example. Nice idea, but build up should feature more of the girl and less of the guy's face. Then after a little build up and oral there's a fadeout and straight into anal sex. Oh well, nice try.
|
06-14-13 05:59am
|
Reply
122
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Bdot's Reply
It's one thing I didn't encounter on TCC this time around because capturing pics became such a waste of time and energy, I stopped downloading videos too. This is mainly because I like to have both video and photo sets. I downloaded relatively little this time. I gave up on the site because the time and effort wasn't worth it.
|
06-10-13 08:20pm
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
Normal clothes, and I mean normal, not the porn uniform clothes which I hate.
|
06-08-13 06:16am
|
Reply
124
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Stas RC's Reply
Thanks Stas, I thought it must be something like that, because when I looked it was gone, then when I looked a few days later it was back.
|
06-04-13 05:11am
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I put several times a month. Given the current climate once a week is about as much as you can expect.
|
05-29-13 08:34am
|
