| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Comment
Very positive indeed. It's good to hear news about this sort of thing, so thanks for the observation, Marcus. They would go way up on my list of potential sits to join, but still have pre checked cross sales.
|
12-27-12 09:39am
|
Reply
302
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
No it's not your fault admiral, it's the fault of these organisations once again. It's not designed by chance, it's designed to deceive. This type of behaviour, is robbing people of money, and causing a lot of bad feeling towards porn networks. This sort of thing doesn't happen when you visit tube sites, and doesn't happen when you download for free. They are scaring and chasing away the few of us left who do wish to pay for our porn.
|
10-14-13 10:21am
|
Reply
303
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yeah I agree, the soundtracks on those things can be absolutely ridiculous at times. I think that most of the people who make these things don't actually like porn at all.
|
12-07-08 09:08am
|
Reply
304
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Great stuff - very thorough review. This sounds like the sort of site that leaves me totally cold.
|
12-07-08 08:30am
|
Reply
305
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Agreed. This is a very impressive review.
|
02-18-09 06:10am
|
Reply
306
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Great review Denner. I agree with everything you say with only one exception. The only thing we disagree on is the navigatiion. I find it really irritating and hard.
It's a shame there is a relatively small amount of hardcore compared to softcore, and that the video quality isn't a little better. Drooler also brought up the point about there being too many pussy oriented close ups.
Some of the models are a little average, but a lot do look like amateurs. Like you, I mentioned in my review that I considered the place to have an almost old fashioned kind of feel, and that's not a bad thing at all. Given the state of current porn, I think some of us like a place where they don't abuse or insult the model, have mouthy cameramen, or models with tons of tats and fake breasts. I gave it fewer points than you did but I'm a really mean S.O.B.
|
10-25-10 06:17pm
|
Reply
307
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
IK - the least they could have done is send over a couple of lap dancers. Come to think of it the least they could have done is absolutely nothing, which is what they did. Shameful.
Drooler - Yeah it also takes me longer to pee than for one of those newbies to write a 3 line review. But that's age. What can we do about the ever increasing threat of the newbie 3 line review? Suicide bombers, that's what. I'd do it myself but had to take an early retirement. Job was just killing me.
Messmer - The trouble is what we want is now a niche. Everything that isn't what the majority consume (whether they comsume it because they really want it, or because it's foist on them) is a niche. You would think your wanting a simple strip from clothed to nude and sometimes involving lingerie would be simple, or my wanting a simple hardcore set of pics or videos with the same style and class as softcore would be easy to find, but it isn't. I'm probably going to end up doing a wittyguy type rant in the forum. I think Drooler and yourself also noticed something about what was missing in some of the Karups sets. Could have done with more ass and whole body shots, although maybe you have to be a real perv to want a whole body shot.
|
08-01-10 05:07pm
|
Reply
308
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks Drooler, I'm definitely going to have to check out Earl Miller. I'm an ass man myself (err....I hope I have phrased that correctly), and I like to see the whole girl not just groin shots in both hard and softcore. I agree with your points, as I think do a lot of members here. Maybe it's just us and we do no have the taste of a lot of porn consumers. Seems like Ik2 also likes MetArt. If there was just one hardcore site where that sort of photography and camerawork were used, it would be the only place I took out a long term membership to. I would never leave. Have a feeling the search will be as fruitless as Messmer's desperate plea for a site with his particular taste.
|
08-01-10 05:11am
|
Reply
309
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Cheers Drools. Yeah I had that Homer Simpson DOH! sort of feeling when trying to work out how to navigate. I thought there must be an easier way but I just couldn't find it. Most members seem to agree on a lot of the negatives sites have. Those index pics are awful
Is photography on softcore sites better than hardcore sites? It seems to be. Maybe it's because they concentrate on the whole body, and making it look beautiful. Don't see why they can't do the same for hardcore photography, or maybe I'm just plain wrong.
Overall a positive experience well worth the money. The girls looked like normal human beings rather than blow up dolls.
|
07-31-10 07:44pm
|
Reply
310
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yes I agree about the sameness thing. It shouldn't really be a problem because it's the naked girls we want to look at, but at times it's nice to see some different settings, style, and lighting, which sometimes makes the girls look the same too. On the other hand Karups has some good material, is one of the good guys as far as sites go, and there is some really good material.
Have to check out ATK, but I think that is mainly soft core.
|
07-31-10 06:39pm
|
Reply
311
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Shill shill!!!
|
07-31-10 06:31pm
|
Reply
312
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks for the info Denner. I was slightly favouring PC as it looked like it had a little more hardcore than HA. I also slightly favour European to American women, so that definitely tips the balance.
|
12-19-08 11:53am
|
Reply
313
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
This looks like a great site, and the customer service has an excellent reputation. I have never joined but am considering it. The question is, which is better, PC or Hometown Amateurs? Oh yes - and NO regional discrimination I presume.
|
12-19-08 10:33am
|
Reply
314
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Comment
Ik2 - Look under the comment and your vote is there, even though it doesn't register if you ring up his profile.
Khan - Yeah I sorta figured you'd have to be the one who decides on the trust votes! You shoulda been a judge.
|
03-12-09 07:30pm
|
Reply
315
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Look at the top of the page. He has a talkback badge. It's under "Khan PU Staff."
|
03-12-09 07:26pm
|
Reply
316
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Sounds reasonable. I sort of guessed you and Rick must have been working on something in the background. They were really taking the piss.
|
03-12-09 07:23pm
|
Reply
317
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
As a natural subversive with an evil sense of humour I was tempted to press the "no" button. But the poor old bugger doesn't deserve it.
|
03-12-09 07:19pm
|
Reply
318
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Comment
At last! Hooray! How about removing all the ones that have already been done?
|
03-12-09 07:11pm
|
Reply
319
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Comment
It's about time all these were removed IMO. If anyone wants to subscribe to this oragnisation after all this, you deserve all that you get, which judging by the one reliable review about this site, isn't a lot.
|
03-10-09 07:26am
|
Reply
320
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Ah, it looks like the review is gone, but looks like kinkykarl
is worthy of a "no" too."
|
03-10-09 06:26am
|
Reply
321
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Reply
As Andy has said, most of the members here can spot a fake. It can either be someone affiliated to the site or someone who just registers to go over the top in praise about one particular site. Neither of these reviewer types are particular trustworthy IMO. The signs are all there - a quick review, a first review from a new member, no objectivity, no negatives, full of "what else can I say a brilliant site" type comments, a ridiculusly high mark, and no, or little, tech specifications, then they disappear without any further reviews. Allied to that, you have a number of these reviews all in quick succession. Maybe it's the site itself that deserves a "no" trust. I would strongly suggest the members here take a note of the other sites under the same ownership and treat them with high suspicion. I would also suggest to these new members to hand around and put in some reviews. Then maybe people will treat them seriously and not be so suspicious.
|
03-10-09 06:18am
|
Reply
322
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
This is why I have awarded my first two negative trust votes to the people giving this site a ridiculusly high mark and a review containing no detail and no objectivity. I would have given a negative to the other guy, but it looks like Marshall Khan kicked his ass out of town.
|
03-10-09 05:54am
|
Reply
323
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Review
This is bullshit. I have awarded my first 2 negative votes to the two members who gave this site 100. A well deserving negative in my opinion. As you can see I did not do it anonymously.
|
03-10-09 05:48am
|
Reply
324
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Hmmm - that's exactly what I was going to say!
|
03-09-09 12:58pm
|
Reply
325
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
Thanks for the warning. Conmen are everywhere, and this sort of thing gives online porn a dirty reputation. We know there are many decent customer oriented ones around who are happy to give you a good deal at a fair price. Places like this hurt the good ones. Let's hope this warning helps others.
|
12-02-13 09:48am
|
