| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Boat Girls Gone Wild
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
Yes, agreed GPL, this is what the forum is for. Hopefully it highlights the good ones and exposes the bad ones, and at the same earning itelf some money.
|
09-06-12 12:31pm
|
Reply
202
|
Boat Girls Gone Wild
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Cheers mate! I am being a bit evangelical about this, but these sort of practices do piss me off. This is the worst sort of site. Deiberately deceivng free sign up, with a paid for short trial followed by a massive subscription. This is the sort of thing that could put paid for legal porn out of business, or at least in trouble. They need to be weeded out before they hurt everyone.
|
09-06-12 05:45am
|
Reply
203
|
Body Parts.biz
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
Great thorough review RB. I like the idea of amateur girls rather than glossy professional, but closeups leaves me cold, and it sounds like the site has more than its share of faults.
|
03-03-12 05:10pm
|
Reply
204
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Brainpat's Reply
Thank you, I appreciate your comment, especially as I did list a number of negatives. On the other hand I do think there are a number of positives and consider the site is good value at the price available through TBP. I revised the review a number of times to try to get it as accurate as possible. I would add one further positive - No sign up pre checked cross sales, or nasty tricks. In the current climate that is one thing a lot of us appreciate.
|
06-01-09 09:12am
|
Reply
205
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I agree with everything you have said. I think your reviews and those of Denner are very accurate. I would not have subscribed if the FirstSexVideo site had not been added to BrainPass. A lot of PU members have been saying how everything looks the same. For me, this is one site that is different and I knew I would like, simply because I enjoy casting and amateur videos. I have seen many of the videos featured on FirstSexVideo 3 or 4 years ago, because they were broadcast on satellite. But it's the sort of thing you either love or hate. If you're not into that sort of thing, which a lot of members aren't as they like the fantasy thing, they are definitely not going to rate it.
I don't review many sites, but I had this one in the pipeline as not many seem to have reviewed it. It's my last review because I feel I should not be contributing to a site that has censorship. I know PU has some good points, and the members are great. It's just on principal I feel uneasy about contributing to a site that has censorship, and talk about free stuff is forbidden and clamped down on. I know there are reasons for this. There's no right or wrong. Just a personal thing. I shall always be checking in here and even making an occasional post if I really think a point needs to be made, but I shall go back to being an observer.
|
05-29-09 11:40am
|
Reply
206
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Very good, informative review. I have been looking at your reviews of the Brain Pass sites with interest.
|
04-15-09 09:08am
|
Reply
207
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Good comprehensive review Wittyguy. Place looks good apart from the tats, trickery and fake breasts. I've never been a member but might be tempted if they did away with the cross sales.
|
11-28-13 08:07am
|
Reply
208
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
pawn3d's Review
Likewise welcome to PU.
I suppose it's all a matter of taste, but I am stunned by the number of high 90's scores I see given to Brazzers, Reality Kings, and Bangbros, so this well below the norm sort of score is a welcome balance.
Personally I don't agree with 50, or the reason given, as they don't claim to be a teen site (Try 21 Sextury or Teen Mega World), but given some of the stuff that has been written by PU members about the negatives of these companies over the years, I don't mind seeing them getting a 50.
Virtually every company claims to be the "best" or "world's best." Each and every one of them, except for one, is lying. That's porn.
I hope you stick around and let us know what you think of the teen sites.
|
10-15-12 04:41pm
|
Reply
209
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
kennydog's Comment
Likewise. We've heard this sort of thing happening so many times with this network. I wouldn't touch em with a barge pole.
|
07-18-11 09:36am
|
Reply
210
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
It was another good review Frosty. One of those cases where the review is better than the network. I'm never subscribing to any site that only scores 30.
|
02-20-11 06:10am
|
Reply
211
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
The site has some serious supporters on here. I'm not one of them, for all the reasons stated. My taste also does not stretch to enjoying tons of fake breasts, tattoos, and 30 or 40 somethings with a ton of make up trying to look 20. Even if the girls were to my taste, I would not touch the place given what some some say about customer service.
I guess I know the site is not to my taste. I could join, give the place a 60 and so could others. I am not going to join just to give the place a low mark. I think this is the reason for the high average. The high marks come from those who know they are going to love the place. If you look at Trashman's justification for such a high mark when I questioned the 98 he gave, he said that he does not "downgrade on the type of content." If you look at his review it will give you a very good idea about the site, and the reasoning behind his score. At least he gave his reasons for such a high mark. I know enough about the site to not want to join, even if it were 5 dollars a month.
|
03-11-09 09:31am
|
Reply
212
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
creolo's Reply
Sounds like an awful experience. I am not sure if sites make these things complicated by design, so that customers have difficulty finding out how to cancel. My strong suspicion is yes. I am sorry to hear your first experience has been so awful. Some sites are less complicated than this. But this is the drawback of temporary or trial subscriptions. Sometimes it's better to just get a month's subscription. Incidentally TBP does a number of discount subscriptions. You can get a month's subscription to a site for as little as $9.95. They discount $10 with quite a few sites. So for $10-15 you can get a month's subscription. (I am sounding like a shill for TBP!)
I have never had a trial with any site. I think one of the reasons is I have always feared running in to the same difficulties you have had. All you can do is check with your credit card company and make sure you have not been charged, or to contact them now, to tell them you have not authorised further charges. Some people do not like to do this. That's another reason sites get away with overcharging and signing people up for sites they did not originally mean to sign up for.
No wonder free porn and piracy is rife. This poor guy finally signed up to try some genuine site, and then gets all these problems.
One of the problems with trials is, they are so quick, you have very little time to cancel, and get confirmation.
|
03-10-09 06:47am
|
Reply
213
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Good reply. All of those things you mentioned are very important. It also shows you are thinking and using your own guidelines, which is more than can be said for some of the reviews. Clearly the site is customer friendly. I like your reviews I just hope you take the content a little more into consideration in the future. Even if you don't I would not argue against your right to set up your own criteria when reviewing. It is part of what makes the site so interesting. The only thing I would say is what about if you had all the great stuff that Brazzers has, and then has stunningly beautiful girls as well? Surely it would deserve more than 2 more marks. This isn't meant as a harsh criticism, more a continuation of my theme a few weeks ago about not marking too high, because then what do you do if a truly sensational site comes along? Okay I know - dream on, it probably isn't going to happen.
|
01-19-09 05:43pm
|
Reply
214
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Well I can't say it isn't a thorough review, but 98!? Noooooooooooooo........
Okay I know it's personal taste and all that. To me this site is a total turn off. The reasons are, too many breast jobs, everything looks the same from what I can make out, too many tattoos, and too many over 40's girls. Once again it's those over made up girls with phony breasts.
There seem to be 2 types of girls. The blonde, looking orange from so much makeup, well over 35, with fake breasts so unnatural they create sagging lines from pulling all the natural flesh out of its normal position, so many tattoos they look like they've been in a bar fight with Mike Tyson, and won, looking like they are 50 trying to look 18 but ending up looking 70. Or there's the brunette, looking orange from so much makeup, well over 35, with fake breasts so unnatural they create sagging lines from pulling all the natural flesh out of its normal position, so many tattoos they look like they've been in a bar fight with Mike Tyson, and won, looking like they are 50 trying to look 18, but ending up looking 70.
Okay, you disagree and love the site, and its just taste and all that - but you have noticed these things from your review. 98!!?? NOOOOOOOOOOO.
|
01-19-09 04:43pm
|
Reply
215
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Like you I visit tube sites. Most of my memberships over the past two years have been inspired by checking out material there. 320x240 is ridiculous, and is a waste of some attractive girls. They are clearly not customer oriented and aren't going to be selling many memberships.
|
10-06-13 04:14pm
|
Reply
216
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The one argument for not going to tube sites is because of the poor quality. If the quality isn't any better on the original site, that's one group of potential customers gone before they've started. They should be going for better, not worse quality.
Admittedly free download forums will have the same quality as the original, but if the webmaster chooses to fight piracy by producing something no one wants in the first place, he could be in the running for a Darwin award.
|
10-05-13 04:43pm
|
Reply
217
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another great review admiral. I like this sort of material myself so was tempted by this one, but the quality sounds absolutely awful! Looks like another place that has been left to die.
|
10-04-13 10:22am
|
Reply
218
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
merrell's Comment
I would say avoid any site with download limits to stop this sort of thing happening. If you don't pay your money they can't lock you out of the account.
|
09-14-12 01:50pm
|
Reply
219
|
Butt Man
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
What I meant to say, and should have said, was the overall quality of today's material is superior to the overall quality of older material, but for me, Buttman's movies still stand head and shoulders above almost anything that's ever been produced. I think the reason is although he focuses on the butt, he doesn't forget to include the whole girl. Too many of the others turn it into a gynaecological show.
|
10-12-13 06:47pm
|
Reply
220
|
Butt Man
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Cheers Admiral. Yes I love those old Buttman movies. They were broadcast over here on porn satellite stations 10-15 years ago so I have quite a few of them on video. Ah them were the days!
Although some of those Buttman movies were sensational, I think the overall quality of what we have today is superior, but what Buttman did was to produce erotic porn which made the girls look sexy and gorgeous. Given the inability of most porn directors to do that, it can't be very easy. In my opinion too many have failed to make attractive girls look sexy. It should be easy, but obviously isn't. Buttman's an original. Not many of those in any walk of life.
|
10-12-13 04:18pm
|
Reply
221
|
Casting Couch Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Another dertailed informative review. One of the reasons I never signed on there was the download limit. I presume that still applies. It looks like it's virtually dead.
|
11-08-11 05:23am
|
Reply
222
|
Casting Couch X
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yep, that's why I always give trials a misss. Same for sites with pre checked cross sells. If it looks like a site that is likely to try and trick you out of your money, it's best to give it a miss.
|
12-08-12 07:31pm
|
Reply
223
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
Congrats on a great review. Even though this site isn't my thing I can tell you took a lot of time and care to put this together.
|
01-26-13 06:33pm
|
Reply
224
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'm getting that way myself. What looked great a couple of years ago now looks merely okay. Some of the modern higher resolutions look gobsmackingly sensational.
|
01-04-14 09:42am
|
Reply
225
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another excellent review. This is another one which has been on my shortlist for about two years, but I've never got around to joining. Your review at least gives me an idea of what I'm buying, so thanks for the info.
|
01-03-14 07:56pm
|
