| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1551
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
What is the total bitrate of the video files you think are low quality? It could be that the files you think should be high quality are much lower in quality (bitrate) than you are expecting.
Bitrate is a major factor in the quality of a video, although there are certainly other factors.
|
10-06-10 02:17pm
|
Reply
1552
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Salvation is what I voted. The only way this adorable woman will get into heaven, where she belongs, is to be saved. And she can only be saved by sleeping (and doing other things) with yours truly, because I am the gateway to salvation and heaven on earth. Or maybe she is the gateway to heaven and earth. Anyway, it should be a lot of pleasure and fun getting into the gateway. Yahoo, ride 'em, cowboy!
And if that doesn't work, go to Plan B: Beg her for sex.
|
10-06-10 12:40am
|
Reply
1553
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
Excellent review of a very nice site. The photosets and videos are top quality, and I like the hardcore flavor they are now showing.
|
10-05-10 05:18pm
|
Reply
1554
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
We were both teasing. But sometimes it doesn't come across as clearly as it should. :)
But I also mean it when I say there are new, attractive girls turning up in porn all the time. Back in the 1970s (which is ancient history) an attractive-looking girl in hardcore porn was rare. But now it's very common. You can find them easily.
And in softcore, they are all over the place.
|
10-05-10 04:45pm
|
Reply
1555
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I'm truly sorry, I should not have said anything. I know my own favorites have flaws, but I love them, flaws and all.
One good thing about porn stars, there are new ones coming out all the time, and some of them are truly lovely. Or sexy. Or mouth-watering. Lol.
|
10-05-10 09:45am
|
Reply
1556
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Denner, did you notice that Hayden Winters has ink marks on her back (better known as tattoos), a belly button ring, and feet that are overly large? She even has a stud in her tongue. So I would not rate her as a top porn model. But I have seen the video "My Little Panties", and find it disturbing: A porn star should be wearing new underwear in her movies, and it appears she's been rubbing her panties over-much and needs a new pair (the old one has lint-balls or something over the crotch area). LOL
And that guy sniffing and chewing her panties? Does he have a fetish or what?
|
10-05-10 08:49am
|
Reply
1557
|
N/A
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
justme, the poll is supposed to be answered based on your own personal experience. If the first poll selections do not supply the answer you believe applies to you, select the "other" option, and then write in a brief explanation of your response as you already did.
Seems like a fairly simple thing to do. Which you appear to have done already (I am assuming you voted for the "other" option).
|
10-04-10 02:48am
|
Reply
1558
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I thought we had a similar poll recently, until I saw the "submitted by" name. I must be going brain-dead. Lol.
The usual response from tech support is none. Rarely do I get a fast response. The last fast response I got was no help at all, it indicated tech support did not understand what I thought was a good explanation of a simple problem. I don't know if tech support did not understand English, or did not bother trying to understand my email request and just sent a form answer that was not helpful for my problem.
I have found a fast, helpful answer from tech support is rare.
But I only use tech support only sometimes, when I have a problem. If I used tech support more often, maybe I would have more positive experiences with it.
So my most common experience with tech support is no response (tech support appears to be dead or unoccupied or missing in action).
PU tech support is excellent, they are fast and helpful. But PU is not a paysite. :)
|
10-04-10 02:39am
|
Reply
1559
|
Rock Star Porn Star
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks, Denner, rearadmiral, my review was honest, but maybe some PU members will enjoy the videos at this site. My tastes are far softer than many PU members, even though I do find some hardcore that I enjoy. I like many Pierre Woodman videos, even though I think he is sometimes abusive to the girls. And I still don't understand how he is able to get them to do what they do, and even apparently enjoy his rough treatment.
But this site was a waste for me.
In spite of that, if you get a membership to this network, and this site happens to be included, you should check it out for yourselves. Because there are some models here who are actually porn stars. So you might easily enjoy the videos more than I do. Or want to view them out of curiosity because of the model in the video.
|
10-03-10 11:57am
|
Reply
1560
|
All Gravure
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
My impression is that some of the gravure models who do nude work start that late in their career (after losing or not getting the popularity/attention they were hoping for?). A few will even get into hardcore.
But the major work of gravure is non-nude photography. Because the girls can be lovely, and the photography so excellent, the photos can be erotic as well. I can't stress how lovely some of these models can be in their photos.
But it also appears that this site is showing a lot of non-exclusive photos. These were photos taken over the years, not for this site, that were already published. And this site has collected a number of these photos and is posting them to make its contents much larger than it would be otherwise. I was looking at one model at this site, a lovely teenager (I'm not a member, I was looking at the preview area), I looked the model up on the internet, and it turns out the model is now in her early thirties. Japanese girls can look much younger than their real age, but this photo was taken many years ago, when the girl was still a teenager.
She's not the only model who has pictures taken 5-10+ years ago that are posted at this site.
As long as you have a good understanding of what the site contents will be before you join this site, you might be satisfied with your membership.
But someone who expects a lot of nudity will probably be disappointed.
Also, the number of photos for each model is pretty small. You see a model you like, you will only get a tiny taste of her.
|
10-03-10 11:42am
|
Reply
1561
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Last month was my most recent join, since the current month is still only 2 days old.
|
10-02-10 02:20am
|
Reply
1562
|
VIP Area
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Does Shawna Lenee (featured at this site) look like Lexi Belle? Their faces look similar, at least to me.
|
10-01-10 05:05pm
|
Reply
1563
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
If he stays to watch, then he should pay 35% of the bill.
If he participates, then he should pay 90% of the bill, because I don't think I would be able to perform that well compared to him. But maybe I would enjoy the watching part myself.
Just kidding.
The bodyguard business would freak me out. "Wrong address", I would say, and close the door. Who is going to protect me from getting conked on the head and robbed? That happens in real life sometimes.
|
10-01-10 09:10am
|
Reply
1564
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Comment
Fuck Studies is part of the Royal Limited network. I've been a member of that network in the past. It's a real network, not a scam.
I don't know what is causing your login problem. I don't remember sending any emails to the Royal Limited tech support, so I don't know how responsive they are. But you should send them an email explaining your problem. Also, use a toll free number to explain your problem to Epoch.
Since you were charged through your bank account, if all else fails and you don't get a satisfactory solution (a refund or login privileges to your paysite + login privileges to the bonus paysites that are supposed to be part of your membership), you can contact your bank and explain that you were charged for a service you did not receive. And the bank should refund your money.
I've never had to deal with a bank about reversing a charge to my checking account from a paysite. It's much easier dealing with a credit card company about such a matter.
But since you say your bank account was charged, you definitely need to straighten this out. Because if your account was charged, whether the charge was legitimate or not (a possible scam), you have to be able to stop any future charges that you don't authorize.
|
10-01-10 08:41am
|
Reply
1565
|
Horny Thief Tales
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
Not a member, not a lawyer. But the masked intruder(s) forcing a girl to have sex just seems like one more fantasy/fetish. The idea doesn't really appeal to me. TBP will be doing a review of this site very soon. From the TBP data, the site itself is tiny, with only 10 videos so far. The site is part of a network, and you get access to 26 sites if you join this site.
|
09-30-10 07:06pm
|
Reply
1566
|
Private School Jewel
(0)
|
Reply of
Cryton's Review
Agree with graymane1777, this review has great details and opinions. Very well written.
|
09-27-10 11:11pm
|
Reply
1567
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
All of the above are good answers. Plus plenty of other answers would fit as well.
|
09-26-10 03:35am
|
Reply
1568
|
Jan Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Appreciate the moral support, graymane1777. :)
There are sites out there that give far better value for the money.
This site is not a scam, just very small. After it grows the content, it will be a better value.
|
09-25-10 06:35pm
|
Reply
1569
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
It depends. But neither one is a great favorite of mine.
|
09-25-10 09:36am
|
Reply
1570
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Good review. The site has a number of attractive teen-early 20s models. But a lot of these models are starting to blur together in my mind. I just don't get the sense of "Wow" that I used to from my early days of looking at nude photos. Metart, which is softcore, and has a huge number of models and photosets, does give me some sets where the model comes across as super attractive.
|
09-25-10 08:40am
|
Reply
1571
|
Rough 18
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
slutty, the reason I gave the site an extra-low score was because I could not see a lot of the material. I need to download the video file before I can view it. And after downloading a couple of video files, I was not able to download any complete files because the download would stop after downloading about 1 GB (the file would be incomplete). And you can't play a partial file, you need the entire file to unzip it to get a playable file. So my experience with this site was very frustrating.
Obviously, if you did not encounter the problems I did (made worse by my slow DSL download speed of 150 KB/s), then you would score the site higher than I did.
But like I mentioned elsewhere, a site score can depend a lot on the personal experience you (or I) have with that site.
I would be interested in reading your review of this site, or any of the other sites in this network. That would also give PU members further information on the sites, that could be helpful.
There are definitely some good-looking models at this network.
|
09-25-10 05:03am
|
Reply
1572
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Angi and Devi are nonstarters for me.
Zhenja at AV Erotica is one of my favorites at that site. She is named Geki A at Metart. At Metart she was in a girl-girl photoshoot, but the lesbianism was ultra-softcore, per Metart style, with Anita B.
I asked this question before, but did not find the reason. The AV Erotica photosets for the model named Lora have been deleted. Was any reason given for this? I really liked that girl.
She appears at other sites, named:
Lora at Domai
Darsi A at Metart
Darsi at Metmodels
|
09-23-10 04:10am
|
Reply
1573
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I rarely go to bars. Just my luck to go to a gay bar. What bars have dancing? I think you must mean a night club, and it's been like 35+ years since I was in a night club (alcoholic drinks + a dance area). As you might have guessed, I rarely went to night clubs. Lol.
Never been in a gay bar or gay night club.
|
09-22-10 12:56am
|
Reply
1574
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
Great review. A well-known site, but you give a wonderfully clear and informative summary that is a pleasure to read. I also agree that Sophie M. is probably an easy to remember variation of Sophie Moone. Lol.
|
09-21-10 10:22am
|
Reply
1575
|
Rough 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks for the support, Denner. I wanted to download a few videos from the site to see what they were like. But as I said in this review, I can't currently download a complete video file. And a partial file is not playable. That is why I gave the site an extra-low score.
There are other sites in the network that are much better.
|
09-18-10 11:01am
|
