| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1726
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
You took the words out of my mouth. Actually, you put it more compactly than I would have.
|
04-01-10 10:52am
|
Reply
1727
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Poll
In folders by site seems to make the most sense. But I lose track of models that have different names at different sites. In the world of porn, it seems that models can change names more often than they change the color of their hair.
|
03-30-10 05:48am
|
Reply
1728
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler, if you ever do run out of money and bs, just tie a tin cup around your dog with the message: "Will work for food". With a mug as cute as his, people will be glad to drop dollar donations into the cup.
|
03-29-10 04:41am
|
Reply
1729
|
18 Magazine
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Do you know if they are updating again at 18magazine? Looking around the preview pages, the last update seems to be in late 2009. I joined a few years back, and the site was not updating at that time, all the material was from years earlier, I thought. A lot of cute models, but the material did not impress me much. The photos were just ok, and the videos were poor. This is strictly a softcore site, and the content is from years ago. The comparable content from mega-sites like met-art, mplstudios, etc. is so much better.
|
03-28-10 10:45am
|
Reply
1730
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I didn't join the site because of the raffle. But I think it's a nice feature, and I probably post more often because of the raffle. Then again, I also post whenever I have a thought bonging around in my brain, to clear the air inside my head.
|
03-28-10 10:27am
|
Reply
1731
|
Double Anal Zone
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
I'm seeing the same $30 sign-up rate when I click thru on the PU and TBP links to the site. So I guess that PU hasn't fixed the discount rate issue yet.
|
03-27-10 08:05pm
|
Reply
1732
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
streamingeagle's Comment
Kills a lot of the motivation for signing up to site more than once.
|
03-27-10 08:01pm
|
Reply
1733
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Considering how new this site is, the site has a large amount of content. And the update rate is extremely strong.
Besides, video fans are a breed apart. Photo fans are the ones who are constantly thinking. :)
|
03-27-10 10:13am
|
Reply
1734
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
TBP earns money when members (and others) join thru their links. I have more faith in TBP reviews (which give a large number of factual details in their reviews) than in the reviews at most porn review sites. But the best source of information is the PU reviews, which are written by people who are, like us, actually paying for the porn they see.
PU reviews often have less factual details than TBP reviews, but the opinions of the site value are easier for me to understand and evaluate than the scores at TBP. I certainly don't agree 100% with all PU reviews, but the reviews can be useful in judging whether a site might be worth my money to join.
|
03-27-10 06:48am
|
Reply
1735
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
The softcore teen glamor sites emphasize photosets over videos, although they are now producing more videos than in the early years (2003 and earlier). Today's videos are also better quality than in years past, in terms of resolution and other technical factors. Maybe one day the videos at softcore teen sites will even be interesting and worth watching.
|
03-27-10 06:38am
|
Reply
1736
|
Teenamite
(0)
|
Reply of
Willard's Comment
CCBill is usually an easy billing company to deal with. My suggestion would be to ask for a refund of your membership fee. Explain to CCBill why you are asking for a refund, and you should get one. And then sign up with a site that offers you better service. There are many sites on the Internet that offer you, for the same price as this site, a much greater amount of content (videos) than what this site offers. Look through the sites that have similar content (hardcore teen videos) and a high score at Porn Users, and pick one you might like, after reading the reviews or looking at the previews of the sites.
|
03-27-10 03:12am
|
Reply
1737
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
Didn't we have a similar poll a while back?
10 minutes is long enough, especially since there is no story leading up to or as part of most scenes. Most scenes are straight sex. If there was some story to make it more interesting, then a scene might last longer. But if it's just straight sex, then 10 minutes is long enough; after that it starts to get repetitious.
|
03-26-10 01:19am
|
Reply
1738
|
Zemani
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I actually joined Zemani as a member 3 days ago, based partly on Drooler's review and partly on the site preview. I like pretty girls, and this site has a few beauties.
|
03-22-10 02:12pm
|
Reply
1739
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
For a young guy, I can see you turning into a dirty old man like the rest of us perverts. Lol.
But that is generous on the part of Pink Visual. And decent as well.
Thanks for the info.
|
03-22-10 02:07pm
|
Reply
1740
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
There's a lot I don't understand, but what's the sense for blocking a single porn site for users with Czech IP addresses? Is there a Czech crackdown on porn, and the Czech government or the porn provider is placing the block for legal reasons? I've read that some countries make porn illegal. So is that part of the reason the Czech IP addresses are being blocked?
|
03-22-10 11:08am
|
Reply
1741
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
How about a frozen meat locker and a lifetime supply of twinkies? Then I can think about my porn stash and some real live playmates from the 1970s (when the girls were still real) or their equivalents today.
|
03-22-10 01:37am
|
Reply
1742
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Basil's Reply
God bless, I've never seen the quick responses from any Webmaster to a PU member like this. This Webmaster seems really on the ball. I just wish the rest of the Webmasters were 1/4 as responsive as this one.
|
03-20-10 11:24am
|
Reply
1743
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
By the time BluRay becomes widely adopted, there will be a new and better technology that will be promoted.
|
03-20-10 11:12am
|
Reply
1744
|
Zemani
(0)
|
Reply of
wildstar's Comment
The problem is not with the billing company, but with the webmaster or the site itself. The billing company is just following the instructions of the webmaster in how to bill. That's my understanding, anyway.
And I agree that it seems unfair to charge different prices, based on where you live.
|
03-19-10 08:08am
|
Reply
1745
|
Muse.org
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I can't tell you how often the site is currently updating.
My membership ended last week. I had problems trying to enter the site. I kept getting the error message that I was not authorized, even though my membership was still current.
I sent emails, asking for help.
No replies.
I also sent emails asking for my membership to be extended, because the site advertised, for a while, that 1-year memberships (and I paid for a 1-year membership) would be extended due to the site not updating in 2008 and most of 2009.
No replies to my emails.
So I just gave up in frustration.
The site has a number of very attractive models.
But the photosets are very small: about 15-20 photos per set. So even though the model might be attractive, the small number of photos per set is just enough to make you hungry for more. Or frustrated. I want a larger number of photos in a set, where I can look at the photos, and focus on the ones I like best. I can get large photosets at most mega-sites, where you get 50-100+ pictures in a set.
The site says they are emphasizing quality over quantity, but the quality is not any better than at the mega-sites like met-art (where Richard Murrian, the site photographer for m-u-s-e.org, has some photosets), or mplstudios, or a bunch of other mega-sites. Actually, the quality at the other sites is better, in my opinion, because the photographer tends to put a lot of shadows and "artsy" focus in his small photosets, making the number of photos that I really like even smaller.
You are not substituting quantity for quality if you join one of the quality mega-sites. You get both quality and quantity.
This site has a much smaller content. The archives go back several years, but I just don't like the idea and practice of a small number of photos in a photoset.
I believe you will be better satisfied, spending your money on a softcore mega-site, than at this site.
But if you are a Richard Murrian connoisseur, then the site might be worthwhile. I thought one Murrian photoset at met-art was really striking. But when I looked at the same set at m-u-s-e, I found a small set, with a smaller number of photos. Grrrr.
|
03-19-10 07:15am
|
Reply
1746
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
None of the choices are favorites of mine, except for the none option, which seems kind of negative. Isn't there a better way to approach sex than a hand job? I've seen a few videos where a gorgeous girl masturbates, and that can be interesting. But most masturbation videos are crap. Excuse the french, but that's the truth.
|
03-18-10 11:16am
|
Reply
1747
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Break the law and your new 'friend' may be the FBI
By RICHARD LARDNER
Tue Mar 16, 3:25 am ET
WASHINGTON – The Feds are on Facebook. And MySpace, LinkedIn and Twitter, too.
U.S. law enforcement agents are following the rest of the Internet world into popular social-networking services, going undercover with false online profiles to communicate with suspects and gather private information, according to an internal Justice Department document that offers a tantalizing glimpse of issues related to privacy and crime-fighting.
Think you know who's behind that "friend" request? Think again. Your new "friend" just might be the FBI.
The document, obtained in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, makes clear that U.S. agents are already logging on surreptitiously to exchange messages with suspects, identify a target's friends or relatives and browse private information such as postings, personal photographs and video clips.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based civil liberties group, obtained the Justice Department document when it sued the agency and five others in federal court. The 33-page document underscores the importance of social networking sites to U.S. authorities. The foundation said it would publish the document on its Web site on Tuesday.
|
03-16-10 03:59am
|
Reply
1748
|
Teen Sleepover
(0)
|
Reply of
jutter's Comment
Are the pics even worth downloading? This seems to be a site that emphasizes vids. The pics would be an afterthought, extremely doubtful the pics would be high quality. So what use would the pics be? As a fast reminder of what the vid was about?
|
03-14-10 09:12am
|
Reply
1749
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I think the least objectionable choice is in a studio, where you have the most control over lighting, noise, etc. I don't understand the appeal of an old warehouse. Many years ago it might have been a new place to shoot porn and therefore possibly interesting, but porn shoots in warehouses have been done to death.
|
03-14-10 06:24am
|
Reply
1750
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FuckingGambler's Poll
My main interest is softcore pix. And they are exclusive at sites such as Met-art, MPL Studios, Femjoy, JustTeenSite, etc., where you get high-quality softcore pix. I don't really care if the the pix are exclusive, that's just the way they are marketed, which means if you like a certain model a lot, you have to join different sites to try to get more of her photosets.
|
03-12-10 03:32am
|
