Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : GCode (0)  

Feedback:   All (585)  |   Reviews (54)  |   Comments (100)  |   Replies (431)

Other:   Replies Received (313)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 101-125 of 431 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
101
Visit Only Cuties

Only Cuties
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

Thanks. Appreciate the kind feedback. I hope the review helped and/or was fun to read. Take care.

03-06-10  01:38pm

Reply
102
Visit Ladyboy Wank

Ladyboy Wank
(0)
Reply of IslandDollars's Reply

Thank you for the information. Much appreciated.

02-26-10  05:22pm

Reply
103
N/A Reply of badandy400's Poll

I agree with Wittyguy about banding together if this happened. But, I would say I'd cry and beg for TBP/PU to come back. This is by far the best place to get conclusive and real informative reviews about sites to join. Plus, the community is just damned great to talked to. I've said it before and I'll say it again, talking with mostly everyone here is way more friendly and somewhat professional than I've probably ever experienced on any site; let alone real life in both the work place and personal. Kudos to TBP/PU, keep up the good work as usual.

02-16-10  08:32pm

Reply
104
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't get too concerned. Sometimes I write in word and save them for later. I add/delete as I go with my membership. So, sometimes I'll even have 3-4 reviews already written and just post them all at once or quickly together. I bet others do this as well. You just have to read them and get a feel if the site was reviewed with what they probably feel is thier best opinions and facts, then criticize or praise from there. Usually, most here can get a feel if someone is putting up a bunk review and state their opinion or ignore it. Or, even ask a question in a reply to get further info.

02-14-10  06:00pm

Reply
105
Visit Brazilian Transsexuals

Brazilian Transsexuals
(0)
Reply of Russ's Reply

Thanks for the concern, I have always had faith in the customer service at Grooby. I emailed you with the trace and I hope I can figure out what the problem is. I like the site so far but the download speed is quite the burden. Thanks again.

02-14-10  05:55pm

Reply
106
Visit SF Bay Models

SF Bay Models
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

Thanks for a detailed response and opinions. I am totally 100% with you on the weight of PU reviews over TBP. However, one of the reasons I was trying to found out more is that fact that this comment was over a year ago and sometimes (most of the time no, I know) sites change things they are doing wrong and improve. So, I suppose I was attempting to see if anyone joined the site recently and can compare with Drooler's negative feedback. Then, maybe they would know if the site has stayed the same or improved based on these comments. Until that happens, I would never join this site based on what Drooler has been through and commented on.

I usually skim through new and old TBP reviews that have decent reviews, then go straight to PU to see what has been said about sites. Usually the combo of TBP, PU, and the tour (with the PU comments pulling the most weight) is what helps me whether I'll join a site or not.

I have stumbled upon what are considered average or maybe slightly above average Asian softcore sites but I have only come across one site specializing in this category involving Asian Americans from the company Grooby. Maybe the site you are talking about is 88 Square? I've been trying to dig out Asian American sites for awhile to no avail, maybe something will pop up someday.

Thanks again for your response and intuition. The site probably has not changed shit and until I can get a clear cut answer otherwise, I will be moving on :)


02-02-10  11:57am

Reply
107
Visit Tranny Boss

Tranny Boss
(0)
Reply of seahorse's Comment

It sucks that you joined this site. I actually joined this site and they charged my card several times one month later with a few other sites well over $100 with no help or response. Watch your card with this site, they seem to be extremely fraudulent.

01-21-10  06:05pm

Reply
108
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

lol at people actually saying to keep them seperate in the poll (it is the majority right now). As messmer said, porn is porn. This is PU not SPU (straight porn users). I can't even fathom why anyone would want it seperate. Oh wait, the porn users who like gay porn cannot speak to us straight porn users? lol x10.

01-18-10  11:36am

Reply
109
Visit Ladyboy Ladyboy

Ladyboy Ladyboy
(0)
Reply of alexmedia's Reply

Thanks for the response and I'm glad you enjoyed or found the review helpful. I appreciate any feedback and I'm happy you enjoyed the site yourself. See ya around.

01-17-10  01:00pm

Reply
110
Visit Little Mutt

Little Mutt
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review

Just to kinda reinforce and add to what may be wrongly worded statements by the reviewer, dracken, but I felt that as far as reading this review that I would expect Russian models as well. Clearly, dracken stated a language barrier was involved and with that stated and the combination that 'anyone who wants to see more Russian girls...', I'd definitly see this as a Russian site with these words. However, the webmaster states that this is not so I think there is a legit argument for the response that is not a Russian site nor contains Euro women and should maybe be re worded to get it straight. However, I can see where dracken is coming from if the models do not talk much in the videos because this is something that is very dominant in euro videos. But, that is if the models do not actually talk which was pointed out by dracken.

I'm not trying to say either one of you are wrong or right, nor trying to take sides. I can just see how the webmaster could see this review as portraying a Euro site when the site is not, while I can see how the reviewer could think this was a Euro site. Good luck and I hope this may add more insight between both of your discussions as a third party.


01-13-10  08:46pm

Reply
111
N/A Reply of David19's Reply

Of course this is true and I agree. However, the truth to the matter is that maybe even 16 years old (in the USA) can even be seen as too young to drive because at this age a youth has a feeling of invincibility and are not entirely self aware enough to know that by just simply drinking a few and driving can result in dire results (not just getting a DUI) and will most likely do such regardless of what is heard/told to them. Why? because this also ties in to the fact that most youth also feel not only invincible but the fact that nothing will actually happen to them, until it usually does. However, this can be argued for 'adults' as well but I think a heightened sense of self awareness and maturity increases the feeling that these things can and will happen to ones self as you age. It's an interesting discussion but I just feel that any youth who wants to drink for whatever reason and wants to drive will pretty much be done anyways unless credible sources can truly get through to the youth before it happens. This is quite a hard thing to do but that is what life and maturity is, making decisions with certain results and learning from them.

01-13-10  08:24pm

Reply
112
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Reply

Why is it not worth arguing or discussing? Yes, that's where it is but why would a statement such as 'not worth arguing about' be stated at all from anyone? I am for saying that the age 'limit' is a bit low in my opinion and I can discuss or argue (whatever u want to call it) that many other things involving an age limit are quite misleading as well. For example, a person in the USA being able to put their life on the line and kill others in war but not being able to drink a beer legally. So, a 'woman' can get gang banged by 50 guys on film which can be shown world wide but cannot sip a beer legally? Hmm, I think that's grounds for discussion right there. I am by no means advocating that there should not be an age limit for any of these acts. However, the poll topic is involving a 17 year old and as I said earlier, I find it laughable that anyone would find a difference between a 17 or an 18 year old doing any porn as one being 'okay' while the other as 'bad'. But, I do know that 18 years old is where the legal age is at world wide and I respect it in the fact that I would not seek out or search content of 18 and under models. Nor do I think it is right for anyone to do so. Therefore, I think it can and should still be discussed or argued that the age limit may still be a little young for it to be 'okay' for a girl (yes, a girl) to be doing such acts on camera legally at 18. Personally, I think 18 is still too young but many can argue that it is okay. I think it is valid to discuss or argue this and quite interesting to get others takes on this subject. Therefore, I think there is grounds for discussion. My 2 cents....

01-13-10  08:11pm

Reply
113
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I do know the reasons and respect the law of drawing the line somewhere when it comes to aspects of legality. This goes for pornography, alcohol, smoking, and driving. I would obviously delete the material after finding out because I consider myself a law abiding citizen. However, sometimes these ages really make me laugh as "legal" ages to do certain things. Honestly, it's almost laughable that 18 year olds (both males and females) are considered 'old enough' to do porn. Honestly, there is an extremely minute difference in maturity level of a 17 year old and a 18 year old. While all people age differently physically, I believe the majority of women look the same at 17 than at 18. As far as a so called mental maturity (at least enough to do porn and make that decision smartly) I'd so there is no difference between 17 and 18 or even so on. I'd say 21 should be the right age for it 'legal' to make porn. Personally, I can honestly say I was quite stupid at 18 even though I thought I was as smart as an adult and 21 I even felt that way. Too bad I was wrong even at those ages.

I know that it's hard to do cut offs when doing laws in terms of 'old enough' to do things but I think many are a bit young or even too old. I'm going to stick to porn because I could rant about the other things and I don't want to get off track. I have been working with youth in psychology in the age ranges of 12-18 and I can honestly say that no one in those age ranges should be doing porn. But, I'd say most children are mature in ranges of clusters. This meaning, if I had to lump maturity in terms of age ranges I'd say it goes 12-14, 15-16, and 17-18. If no stopping at 18, I'd go 17-20. I think these clusters have the same maturity level in the majority. Of course, a 17 year old could be like a 14 year old and visa versa but this is majority.

I guess the point I'm getting at is in terms of this poll, a 17 year old being featured in porn is about as laughable and creepy as an 18 year old being featured in porn. However, I do understand that 'one' is legal and one is not, so if the model was discovered to be illegal I would of course delete it. My 2 cents...


01-13-10  10:45am

Reply
114
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Well I can see a friend or lover asking about it but if anyone other than that asked me I would have to see them as creepy for asking in the first place. I put that it's never came up because I've never had someone from that area ask me but I have had discussions with friends about porn and even watched it with them as well. It's not like a large topic that's discussed and it is rarely watched together but it has happened. However, if it ever came up from a friend or lover I would never deny it (I'd probably deny how nasty some of the shit I watch can get) but probably state some mainstream shit that I've seen.

01-07-10  02:30pm

Reply
115
N/A Reply of Duante Amorculo's Poll

I'll say sometimes. To me, it's more of a star that has a huge list of multiple names on different sites. This can either be due to thier request or the site just changes it for some reason. Either way it can annoy me when I'm seeking out other work by them, especially if it's on a site that has an extremely large model index. But, sticking to the poll I'd have to say this can annoy me sometimes but if it is a common name or just first name and they keep it the same everywhere; it is extremely easier to find their content.

01-05-10  03:18am

Reply
116
Visit ALS Angels

ALS Angels
(0)
Reply of plan b's Reply

Thanks for the reply and yes I was still looking for an answer. I hate that DivX files rarely play on the PS3 and even some WMV's. The worst thing is when I join a site that says WMV and I assume they will work for PS3 and they don't.

01-01-10  04:43pm

Reply
117
Visit Shemale Strokers

Shemale Strokers
(0)
Reply of malikstarks's Reply

I appreciate the compliments and thoughts about joining sites based on reviews I've done. If you have any questions or details that would help you on any sites I've reviewed, don't hestitate to respond and I'll whip out the old hard drives to look at shit for you. After writing my response I did go to the site and noticed it looks exactly the same. What a poor site design, lol? Stinks that the Rodney Moore site is still $19.95 and this site jacked the price up, ughh.

On a side not totally off the subject of Shemale Strokers, but did you check out the bonus site for Shemale Club (Private Transsexual)? Honestly, with the combo of both of those sites together for one price I honestly think it's the best site for TS content from the Americas.

Brazzers is quite wishy washy for me. I do think that's a great price just to check out a site, I just dunno if I can do it. I've been back to an asian TS streak lately and have joined a few sites in that realm that I have never joined. Brazzers is something I may do down the road (may be a long one) because I can and will always love a big tittied (even fake) real chick!


12-30-09  07:22pm

Reply
118
Visit Selena Spice

Selena Spice
(0)
Reply of james4096's Review

Another fine review james4096. By the way, I don't think I mentioned this early but congrats on breaking the 100 points mark. Always appreciate the reviews and I think I share a lot of common interests as you.

12-30-09  06:54pm

Reply
119
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

As long as it takes me to get everything off the site if possible. Usually I start at the model index at A and download everything I can till Z. Some sites I can get this done in half a month, while others it takes me more. Twisty's and Shemale-Yum were the largest sites I've joined and it took me almost all the time I had in the 30 days. However, I do always miss a lot of days from just doing things in my personal life. So on average, I miss anywhere from 1 to 5 or 8 days no matter what from this. I don't think I've ever joined a site and made it there every single day of my term.

12-30-09  06:51pm

Reply
120
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(0)
Reply of exotics4me's Review

I'm guessing DDF primarily uses Euro models? I'm am still quite a novice when it comes to these types of sites and I have a few questions.

I may be a jackass at reading but I am kinda confused about the 1byday site. Is this site part of the network?

What's the network's specialization? I know you say all is covered, so is there a good ratio of all the fetishes covered or would you say one type stands out the most?

Thanks for your time and great review as usual.


12-30-09  06:48pm

Reply
121
Visit Only Cuties

Only Cuties
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

No problem brother, I'm always willing to answer stuff that I may have some insight to. I do think it is a good site and I actually scored it quite high myself, but I think we may not share the same tastes. If you have any more questions or want deeper info, I can pull out the external HD that has the sites content on it. I think I have every video and about 1/4 of the photos up to the date of the review I published. Good luck hunting man! I know how hard it is these days with the pickings we have....

12-30-09  06:41pm

Reply
122
Visit Shemale Strokers

Shemale Strokers
(0)
Reply of malikstarks's Reply

Oh my, I totally misunderstood you I think. Plus, I want to add that I was not trying to argue and I know I stated that term in my response; I think I should have used debate instead. Also, I was just typing out a really long reply because I was extremely bored at that time and after re-reading it I think I came off as a bit harsh.

In regards to the price change, I am quite mad considering the site is maintained and shot by only one videographer/photographer and the site design is strictly amateur. However, I guess that's the huge advantage to the site as well because if you love Sammy Mancini's work then you will love the site, hands down. This is because a lot of other sites in this realm feature work done by a lot of videographers/photographers and you may only like 1 or 2's work.

You are right that both of these sites you mentioned probably do have more solo content available. I actually like Shemale Club a bit more when it comes to TS content because of the great ratio.

Don't get it twisted as far as knowledge, it appears that you have quite a bit yourself and I would not take what you say with a grain a salt :) One of my favorite things about Shemale Strokers is that he is revamping old videos and making them better which a lot of sites don't do. On top of this, he is adding new ones in better quality as well. However, I would never go so far to say that even his best videos that are considered 'HD' can compete with the two sites you mentioned in terms of video clarity. Sammy really needs to learn to encode cleaner or get a better camera. I think if he could get videos to look like Club or Yum, he could compete a lot more.

You mentioned Rodney Moore sites, is this a in the TS niche? I am always looking for suggestions these days on some sites to join. Be the way, thanks for your insight and replies! I love discussions with other PU's and I apologize again if I came off as arrogant or malicious :(


12-30-09  06:36pm

Reply
123
Visit Only Cuties

Only Cuties
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment

All the models are quite petite and the fake tits are the minority. However, these models are not as petite as models in maybe ALS Scan. Meaning, the models are usually skinny but smaller tits are not the main concern of the site. While I'd say some of the fake titty models are there, the site rarely shoots models with fake tits that are overwhelmingly big. So, if there is a shoot of a model with fake tits it is probably a model going from A to B or C or B to C but not really over this.

The only thing about the site that is my main concern is the overall routine that each scene gives a feeling of. For instance, I'd say the majority of the scenes (videos) are models going through the motions. Standard strip, masturbate, then orgasm (a lot of theatrics). Plus, the hardcore is your standard girl on bed/couch, man walks in, she sucks his cock, he goes down on her, missionary, doggy, cowgirl, reverse, jack off in her face. Also, the hardcore scenes are a minority here. I'd say about 1/4 of the content unless they have been doing a huge amount of hardcore updates since my membership.

While that may stray you away as it is from what I said, I can say that the videos and photos are at the right quality for this day and age. Plus, the lighting is quite well and the settings are colorful and bright. If you are a photo lover, I know the resolution is high and can be downloading via zip (plus the other sizes). However, I know the watermark is non-intrusive but I don't remember how much they are shopped up.

Plus, as I recall you are a fan of 'keeping the bush' and I do believe most of the models here are highly trimmed or completely bald. Hope some of this helps with your decision.


12-30-09  04:49pm

Reply
124
Visit Shemale Strokers

Shemale Strokers
(0)
Reply of malikstarks's Reply

Yes but the price was at $24.95 which means this site was $10 less than those sites for a long time. However, being $5 less is still better than going up to the price that the other two sites that you mentioned. But, there is something one has to realize when it comes to this site and both Shemale Club and Shemale-Yum.

Shemale Club specializes in all aspects of content and therefore should be a site that has a large variety of content when it comes to overall types of scenes. Argument: Shemale Strokers (please read the name of the site?) is a solo shemale site only featuring full masturbation to cumshot scenes and any other content you are getting from this site is considered bonus material. Therefore, of course Shemale Club is going to have hardcore and more/better of it. So, basically there is no basis for an argument when even comparing these two sites. Yes, both contain TS models but the vision of the sites are completely different. Basically, that's like going to a site like Met-Art and expecting hardcore scenes.

Shemale-Yum: The guys at grooby bring TS models from mostly the Americas and that is what basically Shemale Strokers does. Plus, I can see where many would like to compare this site and Strokers because of this. However, Shemale-Yum has a different vision as well. This site features TS models but attempts to range the material by including many different types of shoots which may include masturbation scenes but also just stripping, hardcore, lesbian, and fetish. But, Shemale Strokers is once again a site dedicated to just solo masturbation scenes. However, I think Shemale Strokers is one of the only sites featuring these types of models that does it right. You know you will get interviews, stripping, masturbation, and a climax (cumshot) during each video while Shemale-Yums solo scenes are a lot more scattered. So, I see where the sites are more closely related to each other but I'd say they are still different in many ways.

I do understand in a way where you are coming from and I agree the price going up is a bit unsettling. However, the site is still cheaper than both those sites. Plus, the new videos are like 100% better than what was offered before and the director gets these models to do a lot of kinky shit that most sites featuring solo material do not do which is probably the largest reason to join this site. But, I'd say both Shemale Club and Shemale-Yum are definitely premier sites in the TS niche; I just think all these sites being in the TS niche is the only major comparison one can make.


12-30-09  02:49pm

Reply
125
Visit Action JAV

Action JAV
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment

I've never been a member here but as far as your remark about the update scheme, when I was a member of SexAsian18 they updated roughly that many in a week. However, they are not doing daily updates from what I remebered months ago. However, I do recommend this site for quality updates and great JAV for a reasonable price. Plus, they usually offer scene downloads and/or full movie downloads which is great for a DVD site IMHO. Anyways, thanks for the info about this site.

12-22-09  07:47pm


Shown : 101-125 of 431 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.33 seconds.