Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
EW, I missed the d/l limit on the facts sheet. That might actually be a bother with a pic site at 2000 res with a limit at 2 GB. That might chalk my interest as it is. Plus, with the fact that PinkPanther's comment about altered images, I may have to put the site on the back burner for now. This is why I love PU and get quality info that I may have missed/not have known. Thanks for the reply.
|
12-22-09 07:38pm
|
Reply
127
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Aw man, this kills me. I am not a fan of image altering and it appears this site is mainly photography in itself? I hope you can bare with me if you can help me better understand what you mean by lacuering of the photos? I'm guessing they make them glossy artifically? I think you are right about the archives, TBP review states they were affiliated with Asian4You at one point so that must be the right assumption. If you don't mind, when/if you were a member here, do you remember which asian countries the models were from? or, is this an Asian American site? Thanks for the feedback, brother.
|
12-22-09 07:35pm
|
Reply
128
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I'll have to put more or less the same. Why? Because I believe that yes, the photo and video quality appears to be increasing but it's the same old sites that are doing this. Rarely these days, are new sites appearing doing the 'right' thing to make me feel that sites are getting better. While the same sites we have all been visiting for years are staying the same or getting a little better, they are still the same old sites. If a bunch of new sites that launched this year were starting at the right quality and were worth a membership, then I'd say that sites are improving. However, it seems like everytime I check out a new site that launches they are roughly at least over 50% (maybe even more) of the time stuck in like 2005-2007 still and may even still feature a shitload of non-exclusive material. But, I believe my favorite niches are in a minority and this may skew my outlook on things. Yes, a few sites (maybe one to three) may look quality that open up new each year but with the thousands upon thousands of sites there are, you would think this day and age it would not just be a few dozen sites that are even worth the price they offer and/or still updating.
|
12-22-09 12:18pm
|
Reply
129
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Just go to a bar and buy a few drinks for a local slut if you are that desperate to get your rocks off. Hell, at least you bought her drinks and paid money that way instead of giving her straight up money. Shit, both of these options are pretty much prostitution huh? :)
Anyways, in all honesty I cannot even think about trying one of these sites. Blind dates in themselves are creepy as it is but at least most are set up by friends so you have a bit of lee way to go by. A blind date from the internet just seems so much more creepier to me that I don't think I could do it. There must be a market if these sites do exist but at least most online friendships turned real life romance involves a lot of time or effort; just like real life. I just can't see meeting up with someone for mutual sex online as fun. While I love sex I need some type of real life exposure before I can do the nasty. My vote: never had, will, or ever try.
|
12-18-09 09:28pm
|
Reply
130
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Thanks for the review after seeing a few machine sex at a mature site I just reviwed and being intrigued. I found that the site I was at was a contraption (sp?) that showed vaginal penetration without the whole buttox and ball banging a hardcore B/G close-up would show and it was great to say the least. How are the machines here when it comes to this? Plus, as you said with the orgasms, these machines appear to get these models off most of the time. Very good distinction when it comes to a lot of softcore sites with the model attempting to get off herself; or with help. Thanks for the review and with an 87 as a score (and you being a valued trusted member), I think I'll have to add this site to my list. Thanks again.
|
12-16-09 08:52pm
|
Reply
131
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
That's a stinker :( Were the videos for purchase webcam videos made especially for members who sent her money? I've seen a few models on their sites do that. Too bad you won't find much of those outfits here as you already know :( So I'm guessing this is the only site that features her, let alone in videos? Good thing you checked back to this site so you get snatch these up!
|
12-15-09 06:42pm
|
Reply
132
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Yeah she's a good model with a nice natural body and a great personality within the videos. Definitely worth it to check her out.
|
12-15-09 05:44pm
|
Reply
133
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
4 or 5 softcore sets to 1 hardcore for each model usually with an occasional model doing 2 hardcore scenes. Photo sets are good but have quite a bit of photoshopping.
Hmm I just wrote a review a few days ago and I'm hoping I covered some of this. Messmer has wrote a well founded and informative review as well, you should check them out for more information if you need it. Or you can ask me more here if you need it, my membership just cancelled yesterday and I have evey single thing you can download up to yesterdays date.
|
12-15-09 05:43pm
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I really wanted to put quality of videos as my major reluctancy to join but I think 'not enough videos' is a good option for my answer to this poll. I understand that a site featuring photography does have plenty of expenses and is not cheap but I think a site featuring only photography is taking an easy way out. In my opinion, a site should always feature videos as well even if the site is an artsy site. While videos may not be everyones fortay, but neither are photos for everyone. I use photography kinda like an aphrodisiac but always end up watching a video/videos at the end. Within videos you get to see a model (usually) as a human and not just some still object within a picture which projects personality and a feeling that the model is still human. While I still love images I really get reluctant if a site has a small amount of videos that may feature low quality videos (res, bitrate, camera work, going through the motions, etc) or if there are only a few available to download as well.
|
12-14-09 11:28am
|
Reply
135
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
lol I totally re-read my reply and realized I totally messed up my question (I've had a few beam and cokes :)) I meant to say have you been a member of any of their sites and have maybe not reviewed them. Lol, I totally dropped the ball on writing that text, huh? :)
|
12-13-09 08:19pm
|
Reply
136
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
haha yeah it definitely is subjective and that's why I asked your opinion as a fellow PU who enjoys older women. I fully agree on what you believe is a mature model for sure. Being a bit younger than you, I suppose I think a 'mature' model would be about 10 years older than me so that's about 37+. However, maybe mature sites think the same way and think that their target audience may be in the 18-21 range and a 10+ year old model would range around 28-35 or so. I never really thought about that until now and I think that may be why models on most 'mature' sites are getting late 20's and early 30's models and marketing them as 'mature'.
So many of these models on these mature sites could keep their original titties and natural features but be more demanding that the models keep in shape and this would result in really hot models. This is my opinion, but I hate the fact that a lot of 'mature' models tend to be early 30 somethings with huge fake tits and that means they are quality mature models. I like a natural sag as well (I think you like them a bit more and I respect that for sure) but I want my photos to feature them in the flesh as I would see them if I MET them in the flesh, ya know? For example, At Anilos, I love Chennin Blanc because of her natural look and her freckles but these are only present in the videos. If you look at her images, they are not there. A huge disapointment in my opinion :(
Now that you bring it up, I would not mind seeing a touch of gray in the hair of these models if they have it. It just adds to the natural look in older women that I love. Thanks for the insight and the reply!
|
12-13-09 08:14pm
|
Reply
137
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Ah yeah I meant a review or comment on PU. I was assuming that maybe you knew the watermarks of the photos may be based on a previous membership that maybe you never reviewed/commented on. As far as the remark about any of the sites, I think (and think it is) that this company had a site that primarily was mature video content, while this particular site is mainly photography. I see now that the reply could have been taken the wrong way and I apologize, but it was a reply that was whole heartedly in good fun when I thought that maybe you were a previous/current member that may have not reviewed the site yet. Thanks for the reply :)
|
12-13-09 08:04pm
|
Reply
138
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
messmer have you been a member of any of their review sites ever? If so, let's see a review or gimme some feedback! Seems like they may have the model selection right?
|
12-13-09 07:02pm
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I think the description in the question is spot on, 'a quick horny look in to the camera' when it comes to how I like it if a model does this. Obviously, a scene that has this description and if the model does this every once in awhile is a good thing. So, if a model is just staring at the camera, nah not my thing. But, a few quick looks to the camera to kinda check 'if we are still here' is a turn on for me for sure. Do I love it? not especially but I don't mind it. My vote is is that it depends of the scene.
|
12-13-09 06:56pm
|
Reply
140
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for the vote of confidence in the review, buddy ol' pal :) This is definitely a site in the forefront for quality mature content and I basically joined based on your review and feedback. And....I was not disapointed! I'm glad you took my 'imperfections' remark the right way, I had a feeling I was going to get some negative feedback on that opinion but I'm happy to hear that I am not the only one who felt that way. These so called 'imperfections' that people tend to observe creates a downfall in some sites, IMHO. One of the largest qualities in mature women is the natural freckles many have (huge turn on for me) and I saw a lot of these attributes 'washed out' with image altering which pissed me off in the photos. You can see them in the videos which is great but they are air brushed in the photos (BOOOOOOOO!!!!). This is probably one of the largest quirks of this site that I found, that and the fact that model selection are a bit young to be featured on a mature site :( Don't get me wrong, they are quite attractive but I wanna see natural older women!
I think this is the most dissatisfying thing I find in sites that are considered to be in the 'mature' niche. While the argument is there for what is a true 'mature' model, I think this site is not entirely spot on in this aspect. However, the site is great and I do feel we think the same way on this issue. What do you think are some descriptions of what makes a true 'mature' model? I'd love to hear your feedback. Thanks again for the reply and take care.
|
12-13-09 06:27pm
|
Reply
141
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
I'm glad you found Messmer and I's review useful in making a decision to join a site that I'm sure you will enjoy as a fellow PU who enjoys mature content. Can't wait to see your thoughts on the site as well!
|
12-13-09 06:18pm
|
Reply
142
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
VHS porn my friend stole from his parents. Good ol' 70's porn mustasches and hairy people everywhere. Eww.
|
12-06-09 03:05pm
|
Reply
143
|
Ladyboy Flix
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I understand this totally and agree 100%. My main concern is why would this person even bother responded with that answer to these questions? The preview page does not include anything about these questions and it's the 'you get what you see 'saying that pissed me off. I don't see shit, so what the hell do I get? :)
Honestly, I'd rather get no response from this person than that answer. It's that attitude that creates poor sites. While the content may look okay for this niche which is quite small, just what he said has made me totally stray away from the site for now. For instance, if he probably did not respond at all I'd (honestly) probably still be interested in the site but it would be put on a back burner until I had more cash. However, if he would have took the few minutes to at least 'attempt' to write something constructive, I probably would have put it on the high up list.
I just get tired of some webmasters that have the exact attitude of what he quoted, you get what you see. Just seems like lately I can count the companies on one hand that provide even minute customer service or care these days.
BTW, I hope I am not going off on a tangent or am taking your response with a grain of salt in any way. The reason I posted this was to get others opinions to the matter and I do believe in your reply.
|
12-04-09 10:50pm
|
Reply
144
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
More interested in other types of scenes but when I occasionally watch a lesbian scene, I think I'm more prone to liking the ones without toys. So, I put that I'm not interested but if that option was not there I believe I would put no I prefer without. I'm more in to fingering, kissing, and the 'scissor' position when it comes to lesbian stuff.
On a side note, so far the only lesbian scenes that have truly interested me thus far were from the Tropical vacation scenes from ALS Scan.
|
12-04-09 12:03pm
|
Reply
145
|
N/A
|
Reply of
OneMan's Poll
I seriously hate camera man talking the most but I'd say the performers come second in this category. I'm not sure what if OneMan meant either of these examples or both of these examples when describing blokes talking all the time, but I'd have to say that anyone besides the model talking a lot is a no-no for me in a video.
|
12-02-09 11:12am
|
Reply
146
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Hmm, I have always found that each model gets like 3-4 shoots in a huge varying amount of outfits. The categories were 9-5, elegant, housewife, and some others that I remember. With that said, I think there is a lot of content outside of glamour at this site. Read my reply to mr smut's recent review as to why I feel I get the most dissatisfied with this site (and mature sites in general).
My 2 cents...
|
12-01-09 06:45pm
|
Reply
147
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Review
mehh, I find the rate of finding daily updates a burden for mature sites with this site as no exception. The true 'mature' niche calls for a discrepancy amongst models and the need to update daily has put a damper on this site. With that said, this is true for the other two 'big' sites of the niche, anilos and karups mature women. As stated before amongst other convos in the forums and replies, I do see the 'plus' of daily updates for most users. However, in a niche like this where models appear to be scarce, in my opinion; the update scheme dampers the content. Don't get me wrong, I have reviewed and agreed that this site is superior in its niche but the need for such quick updates seems to create poor material in my opinion. This includes model selection and actual scene footage. I just wish that this niche would not want to update so damn quick and focus on good, quality mature models that are not only great looking but stay true to the niche. This meaning, as a member, I found a lot of these models here to be a bit unattractive. I do not believe these models are bad looking to age but I can imagine them not even be attractive while they were in their younger years. Why? because the need to update so quickly and not discriminate.
Anyways, I feel I'm ranting a bit and I want to aknowledge that this review is well founded. I can totally see why the score is as high as you gave it but I just felt as a member that the model selection could be a bit more regulated. Thanks for the review and believe me, I am a lover of mature content as well!
|
11-30-09 11:26pm
|
Reply
148
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It appears so far the argument is for being apprehensive about non-exclusive content and poor quality. For me, while I am not a network person and have actually only joined two I think that I am more for being apprehensive about poor quality. Since I rarely join networks, I usually join single sites that exclusiveness can be more expected. But, I do always get worried about the quality. Many sites these days state that 1600 res on pics is 'high res' and 720 X 480, 1000 kbps (just two examples) are HD video. So, many sites state High res photos and HD video on their tours. Sometimes this can be cleared up with an email but sometimes customer service are robots (real robots or a real human acting like one) and just re-tell you everything that's on the tour in the same words. Therefore, in the midst of the argument, I almost switched to poor customer service because if they can't clear up this than I can be apprehensive to join the site to begin with. However, I do admit that my desire for certain content can sway me to join even if the robot-like customer service is managing the site; so I have to say it's still poor quality.
One thing I can see for picture lovers that can create apprehension is if the site may not contain zip files for download. I have joined two 'picture' sites where this has happened by taking a plunge (no reviews really anymore but content looked good) and have been extremely pissed off. While I do have some programs to get the images, sometimes they don't work and I end up just never returning to the site with a feeling of wasting money. I can see having no zip option as a apprehension for picture lovers.
|
11-18-09 11:05am
|
Reply
149
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Right on, I understand that because the name of the site can be misleading because of not being named "Sex Japanese 18" or something. So, with this name one can assume it contains all asian models instead of just JAV. However, as stated above from his response, he stated he was impressed with the models and wanted to let others know. I find this okay but I don't think it's an extremely relevent comment as far as what comments are made for (well at least the way he stated it). If the point was to let others know they had the extremely attractive premium JAV models and wanted to let others know this exactly, a bit more elaboration could be stated.
Anyways, as stated in my original reply I was not exactly trying to single axel2001 out because I have actually talked to this user a few times in replies and read his reviews (and even gave him a trust rating). It was just this past month I have been noticing a lot of extremely irrelevent/pointless comments which seems like people are just trying to get easy tickets in my opinion.
To axel2001: I am not attempting to dirty your name and say that you always type bad comments or are a poor PU. It's just this certain comment came at a certain time that I was waiting to say something about subpar comments and you got caught up in it. As stated above, I do respect your contributions and do trust you.
|
11-18-09 10:54am
|
Reply
150
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Comment
Yeah, and...??? I hope you don't feel like I'm singling you out or anything but what really is the point of comments like these? It's just lately I've found a quite a few comments like this which just seems pointless to add. Maybe they are just looking for some quick tickets or..??
|
11-17-09 11:32pm
|
|
