| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
626
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slategrey's Reply
perhaps he was referring to a tossed salad? although even that isn't very sexy except perhaps in prisons...
i'd go with popsickle!
|
12-08-10 10:43pm
|
Reply
627
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Review
Nice review, welcome to PU!
|
12-08-10 09:43pm
|
Reply
628
|
N/A
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
There are an aweful lot of scam websites and bait-and-switch websites out there, and I'm sure most of them operate on the idea that most, like me, would not be willing to raise a ruckus over porn. Although I'm sure many of these also use less than reputable billers...
|
12-06-10 12:00am
|
Reply
629
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
brig's Reply
thanks for the info!
|
12-05-10 11:28pm
|
Reply
630
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope.
Probably should have on a few occasions, but I don't like to make trouble...
|
12-05-10 12:05am
|
Reply
631
|
Dream Stash
(0)
|
Reply of
Divinx's Comment
Yeah I noticed it went away a few months ago, not sure if maybe it is at a different location but the last time I was there it didn't appear as though it had updated in quite some time.
|
12-04-10 09:42pm
|
Reply
632
|
Cash For Sex Tape
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
It is interesting content, it is just a bit frustrating to download a scene that is basically home videos for 50 minutes, and like 10 minutes of poorly shot, poorly lit sex or nudity. I like the concept as well, they just didn't execute.
|
12-01-10 09:21pm
|
Reply
633
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree, tease to me doesn't mean striptease, it means tease.
I understand that you want the site to be a striptease site, but it is a tease site, and tease does not have to have a payoff.
|
11-27-10 09:20am
|
Reply
634
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
But Cap'n, tease implies lack of nudity... The name of the site isn't onlysexyoutfitstofullynude.com, eh? I understand that this is what you want, but that's just not what this site is.
While I understand your complaint, it seems similar to complaining that playboy.com doesn't have hardcore material (I assume it doesn't).
|
11-27-10 12:59am
|
Reply
635
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
don't really care. is platin different from blonde - never really heard that term before?
|
11-27-10 12:41am
|
Reply
636
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
not to start any kind of fight, but movie companies have been using aspect ratios larger than 4:3 for decades. I'm no film historian or anything, but I believe most movies starting in the 70s were shot in 2.4:1 panavision. I'm sure there are some films that have been shot in 4:3, but I doubt it is very many. Just because a movie was 4:3 when it originally came out on VHS or Betamax or whatever doesn't mean that was the aspect ratio that it was shot in.
You have it a bit backwards, in that most films were "pan and scanned" to fit the 4:3 aspect ratios of televisions, the widescreen releases of older films are not cropping the original film, they are actually returning to something closer to the orginal aspect ratio, it is the 4:3 film that has been cropped.
In fact Blu-rays of modern movies still have black bars on the top and bottom because they are preserving the original aspect ratio which is greater than 16:9. A full screen HD hollywood movie has likely still been cropped to conform to 16x9, although somewhat less than it would have to be for 4:3.
I looked around for a bit for a resource on this and this is the closest I could find:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect_ratio_(image)
They even note Ben Hur was shot in 2.76:1 - crazy-ass widescreen. doubt they'll be releasing TVs in that ratio anytime soon...
Sorry for the longwinded response, no disrespect, just trying to clarify.
|
11-26-10 11:10pm
|
Reply
637
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
prefer 16x7 for porn, just cause most of my gear is in that aspect ratio. For "real" movies it has to be widescreen, particularly with any kind of action or scenic movie. Pan and scan just doesn't work for me in those types of films.
|
11-26-10 10:55pm
|
Reply
638
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Reply
thanks for the info!
|
11-23-10 09:44pm
|
Reply
639
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
yeah I saw that, pretty funny. and you never know, the pat down might put some folks in the mood for porn.
a friend of mine swears he saw porn playing on the TV of some SUV in bumper-to-bumper traffic.
|
11-23-10 09:44pm
|
Reply
640
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Review
Good review, welcome to PU! Any idea if they are still recycling older content, or are they releasing any new material? I know you were only a member for 3 days, so you might not have seen many, if any, updates.
|
11-23-10 02:16pm
|
Reply
641
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
The company is paying for the network and bandwidth, so they can do whatever they want I suppose. Unless you work in certain industries, I don't think allowing people to look at porn on their computers during business hours is a great idea - especially in a cubicle environment!
Although some companies take it a bit far, mine blocks ESPN, the Onion, and many other not-so-offensive sites, even during lunch!
|
11-23-10 02:13pm
|
Reply
642
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
I once saw a guy on a plane reading a Hustler, and he wasn't trying to hide it. I can sort of understand Playboy, as it actually used to be funny sometimes, but Hustler in an aisle seat? I'm sure if you looked carefully you could catch someone looking at porn on their iPad or something.
|
11-23-10 02:10pm
|
Reply
643
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Well Cap'n, seems like they keep suckering you back in... I have to admit there is one site that I always find very irritating, but still join like once a year. Don't know why I do it.
Personally I think tease can be pretty hot, even without a full-nude "payoff", provided it is well shot.
|
11-23-10 01:37pm
|
Reply
644
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
good info man, i look forward to your full review! this site has been on my maybe-list for a while...
|
11-17-10 07:46pm
|
Reply
645
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
users should be able to give a site whatever score they think is appropriate. If the place only has 5 scenes, but they are all excellent and the user feels it was worth it, why shouldn't they be able to score it well?
|
11-17-10 07:44pm
|
Reply
646
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
None of the above for me as well, the film was a friends - he might still have it however... It was some aweful 90's style fake breasted movie with Ron Jeremy in it.
|
11-08-10 10:53pm
|
Reply
647
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yeah, it has always been around I suppose, it doesn't seem as though it happened as often on my old XP machine...
|
11-06-10 11:34pm
|
Reply
648
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
Yeah, I would fix it myself, although all my porn is on an external drive unless I am actively downloading.
I recently started getting the good ole BSOD in Win7, been too lazy to try and fix it so far, loves me some Microsoft.
|
11-06-10 01:08am
|
Reply
649
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
good, informative review, dracken.
this site has been on my list for a while, just can't seem to bring myself to join. one of these days i'll have to give it a go.
|
11-02-10 10:51pm
|
Reply
650
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Totally agree with BadMrFrosty, I also would have voted indifferent, if given the option. Not typically the part of the scene I focus on anyways.
|
11-02-10 10:32pm
|
