| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
If someone thinks a site is excellent they should have the ability to rate is as such, I'm probably a bit too nitpicky to score a site 100, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be allowed to.
|
10-30-10 12:43am
|
Reply
652
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
by sex ed do you mean safe sex and such, or learning "skills" for sex?
if it the former i'd say school as i actually had a decent sex ed class in high school, as for the latter i'd probably say non-porn internet. so i said other...
|
10-27-10 12:36am
|
Reply
653
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
squirrel,
this type of annoying navigation is pretty common in porn sites these days, as RustyJ said it is a good idea to open a model page in a new tab, which isn't that much of a nuisance.
i haven't been a member of this network in about a year, but based on the last time i was a member i didn't find the navigation particularly poor (i've seen many that are much much worse).
|
10-22-10 12:37am
|
Reply
654
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
dump her. withholding sex is manipulative as is, doing it out of spite just makes it that much worse (as pat362 pointed out).
its one thing to have sex less frequently with a partner over time (naturaly), this is a whole other animal.
|
10-21-10 12:07am
|
Reply
655
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If someone writes a decent review, I typically trust them right away, if it is an iffy review I will wait and see if they post anything else. I agree with BadMrFrosty that giving newbies trust ratings helps motivate them to post more reviews as it helps them feel appreciated and like they fit in, certainly nothing wrong with that.
|
10-19-10 02:49pm
|
Reply
656
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
The site is entirely based on their DVDs with some magazine content as well, and the video content is not HD. The best video bitrate they offer is 1700 kbps, which is decent - but not great (and is only available on stuff released more recently, like the last 6 months or so). The DVDs are split up into scenes, if your preference is single scenes not from DVDs, this probably isn't the place for you.
The subsite set-up is pretty much bullshit, as far as I could tell most of their content could be found on either Hustler or Barely Legal, the subsites are somewhat useful in sorting content I suppose, but it is basically just mirrors of subsets of their content from what I could tell.
They have photos from their magazines on the site as well, however it is a real nuisance to dig through these and the picture qualitiy is generally mediocre anyways (also the sets are typically small - 8 pictures or so).
|
10-19-10 02:41pm
|
Reply
657
|
Young Courtesans
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
yeah, but based on those comments I would be hesitant to join their sites until I hear otherwise! Hopefully someone will take the plunge and update us sometime soon...
|
10-12-10 12:47am
|
Reply
658
|
Young Courtesans
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
based on other user comments from this company's sites, it also seems as though streaming only is common with them...
|
10-11-10 12:08am
|
Reply
659
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
yeah looking back at my review it does seem a bit negative given the score, I was mainly trying to point out all the flaws, as this place certainly has its problems.
I did enjoy the site, there were just many scenes where after it downloaded I looked at it and was like, what the fuck is this? I guess I am just willing to overlook the bad for the good in this case...
|
10-08-10 11:57pm
|
Reply
660
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I agree with pat362, anything but porn - probably just generic bullshit, and perhaps even politics if the conversation was headed a more intellectual route (one can always hope, right?)
|
10-07-10 11:12pm
|
Reply
661
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Hey man, a site like this is kind of difficult to review. On one hand they have some excellent content, but then there are other scenes that are pretty big "misses". I am personally a fan of castings with interviews and stuff before the model gets naked, so that is probably why I scored the site so high even though the content is pretty variable. He definitely gets some attractive models, it is just too bad that a lot of the hardcore castings are single-camera on a tripod type deals, although that it pretty much what I expected.
|
10-07-10 11:08pm
|
Reply
662
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for the info, man!
|
10-05-10 02:10pm
|
Reply
663
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
messmer, is it only the new updates that are realeased as downloadable, or are the letting you download older HD releases from a few months ago as well? Thanks!
|
10-05-10 01:12pm
|
Reply
664
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
she's still cute, the back tattoo isn't that bad (not nearly as bad as belicia's anyway). looked around a bit and didn't see any photos showing her huge feet, so i'll have to take your word for it on that one...
|
10-05-10 12:52pm
|
Reply
665
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Can't say that I've used tech support all that frequently, but the only times I have it has been reasonable enough I suppose.
|
10-04-10 11:22pm
|
Reply
666
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Just trying to help...
|
09-28-10 03:43pm
|
Reply
667
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Umm, Margaret Thatcher naked?
|
09-28-10 02:30am
|
Reply
668
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the info!
|
09-27-10 09:59pm
|
Reply
669
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope, but there are way too many that do! I still hear bozos talk about how nudity in art is too sexual for kids to see - it is the human form jackass!
Edit: the jackass was directed at the bozos I spoke of, not the pollster.
|
09-26-10 12:04am
|
Reply
670
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I agree MetArt definitely gets more attractive models to pose nude, but it is a bit too "artistic" than "erotic" for my tastes. I imagine the artsy nudes are what allow Met to get more attractive models to pose - "hey its art, so don't worry about nudity"
|
09-25-10 11:58pm
|
Reply
671
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
TeenModels's Reply
Thanks for clarifying Mike, I wasn't really sure about the bonus content, it seemed like licensed material when I looked through it, but I'll take your word for it.
|
09-25-10 11:55pm
|
Reply
672
|
Rough 18
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Curious, I never had any problems downloading from any of this company's sites. Perhaps the files were so big your connection timed out after a while, I dunno. Partial WMV downloads sometimes work for me...
|
09-25-10 09:54pm
|
Reply
673
|
Rough 18
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Hey man, interesting review. I actually kind of liked some of the material on this site, probably just cause I thought the Flora model was cute. I agree the site navigation is poor, but it is consitent with all of the network sites. And the site is small. But I think it was kind of nice to have a somewhat "lighter" BDSM site, instead of the crazy rought stuff you often see - or at least in the scenes I downloaded. Also, in my experience scenes from sites in this niche often run quite long.
|
09-25-10 03:00am
|
Reply
674
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
You can check out porn at work, I'm so jealous! My company blocks everything, I can't even read the Onion anymore...
But, good info, I agree it is poor form to at least not offer you a way in which you can rectify the situation.
|
09-24-10 12:49am
|
Reply
675
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I went the spunkybee route that you recommended, seemed like the best offer.
combative was the word I meant, I am a typo king.
|
09-17-10 02:39pm
|
