| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I agree that scoring is very subjective, and I wasn't intending to throw it out there as a disagreement with you, that was just my opinion of the network so far - sorry if I came off as compative. I have been pleasantly surprised so far, and there are a good number of models I hadn't ever seen before. The outdoor sex site and light bondage site are both pretty decent as well.
I haven't downloaded a huge amount of stuff from here yet, but I'll have to check out Klara.
|
09-17-10 01:12am
|
Reply
677
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Good review man.
I would say, that while the navigation is better than the rest of the network, it isn't exactly good (different models listed under same name, same model listed under different names, etc.). There are also some duplicate scenes across the network. Also, download speeds are a bit inconsistent for my tastes.
All the same, I agree with most of your points, I'd probably score it a smidge lower - maybe 86 or something including the bonus sites.
I agree that the material is definitely better than most euro sites, and plenty of American ones.
|
09-17-10 12:04am
|
Reply
678
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the info man, very useful comment. I will have to look into it...
Also, it says the special offer ends on the 30th.
|
09-15-10 10:59am
|
Reply
679
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Good info man,
I hadn't really lokked at this site since it had "stream" in the name. But after looking it appears as though it isn't a streaming video site, I guess I'll have to look into it more...
|
09-15-10 01:34am
|
Reply
680
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I think the reason they charge extra for these two channels is that they are perfectly aware that most of the material on their site is crap, and thus they feel they can charge more for material that has a higher percentage of decent content.
|
09-14-10 12:18pm
|
Reply
681
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
In my opinion, no, especially if you have joined as a member of both anytime recently. Of course, I generally dislike evil angel, so others might value it more. The updates from those studios aren't super-common, and for the most part I don't think they are all that new of material.
You can easily browse all they offer and decide if it is worth it to you, unless they have significantly changed the preview in the last couple of months.
|
09-13-10 11:52pm
|
Reply
682
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Not really a fan of BJ scenes either, angles are always bad and don't really get to see the body usually. Strip first would be best though, I suppose.
|
09-11-10 01:14am
|
Reply
683
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Ah, me stupid. Sorry Khan...
|
09-09-10 01:17pm
|
Reply
684
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
Thanks for the review, I've been curious about this place for a bit, sounds like I can cross it off the list!
|
09-09-10 12:32am
|
Reply
685
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Agree with pat, I think the "star" part is a bit overused, but I am always in for more hardcore performers - provided they don't have stupid tats or ridiculous fake parts...
|
09-09-10 12:30am
|
Reply
686
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
Yeah, I have edited a few of the scenes to take that content out, I have never heard of anyone who was a fan of this niche either. Perhaps my porn veiwing habits are more mainstream than I though...
|
09-06-10 10:46pm
|
Reply
687
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I gotta say, all three are pretty bad from my perspective. Last time I joined RK I was quite surprised by what seemed to be a significant increase in plastic.
|
09-06-10 02:10am
|
Reply
688
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
No problem, when I joined I looked through all the company sites listed on PU to see if any had Fuck Studies as a bonus site, and none of them did, so I just joined that site directly. Unfortunately it seems full price is the only option for now...
|
09-05-10 11:09pm
|
Reply
689
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Hey elephant,
When I was a member, I got all of the sites you listed as bonus content. However, be careful when you join, as this company often switches bonus content around, and sometimes you don't get the same set of bonus sites if you use the PU discount. In my experience what is listed on the join page is what you get.
|
09-05-10 01:41am
|
Reply
690
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Hey Denner,
The last time I was a member I re-downloaded some of their older material as I had also lost it, and the quality didn't appear to be any better. Perhaps they have re-encoded some stuff since then, that was back in March. I doubt it though, I'm sure their focus is much more at getting new material out.
|
09-04-10 01:18pm
|
Reply
691
|
Polish Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Roy Stone's Review
You made several good points in your review that I'm sure people will find useful, although not exactly my niche of choice. Welcome to PU!
|
09-03-10 07:40pm
|
Reply
692
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Surprising responses, I would have thought more folks would have said yes.
|
09-02-10 03:28pm
|
Reply
693
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Yeah he's a pretty major tool, for some reason I thought it was the same guy as backroomcastingcouch, then realized this guy didn't have the outie... I like this type of niche as well, that's why I joined, but the negatives are pretty major.
|
09-02-10 02:59pm
|
Reply
694
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
As many have said, probably not a discussion worth joining - I'd probably shrug my shoulders and walk away unless I were particularly drunk and they were being particularly obnoxious about it.
|
08-31-10 10:11pm
|
Reply
695
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Sorry, price listed at PU when I looked said 29.95, you are right, it is correct now. I will try to be more clear with my comments next time!
|
08-31-10 10:02pm
|
Reply
696
|
Kscans
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree, any site with sketchy cancellation processes is a poor site in my mind and I would skip it. Although, I would skip it anyway given the content...
|
08-29-10 01:52am
|
Reply
697
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
? I must not browse enough porn, as I can only think of having seen this a couple of times. Are there sites dedicated to this activity, how long do they keep them up there? Do they tie a string to 'em tampon-style so they don't get stuck?
|
08-27-10 03:27pm
|
Reply
698
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Wow, that is crazy low. Weird, maybe it is a Europe thing? Perhaps local ISPs in the UK were capping their bandwidth since they are such a hog? What'd it take, like 5 days to download a small video?
|
08-27-10 03:23pm
|
Reply
699
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Really? I never had any problems with download speeds, sometimes during what I'm sure are peak download times it would slow a bit. Perhaps you were logging in at bad times or they had technical problems when you were a member? Certainly not the best download speeds, I'm sure they use a ton of bandwidth.
I agree that a lot of people probably join the site and think "holy shit, what a ton of content", but in my experience I have typically only downloaded like one scene out of every 10 DVDs (which is not a good ratio) - and I probably end up going back and deleting 50% of those later...
|
08-27-10 03:12pm
|
Reply
700
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Rob12's Reply
Thanks, its a pity they don't improve the navigation elements a bit, this site would be so much better if they did. As you said, I assume they just don't care since the site is so enormously popular - why bother?
|
08-27-10 03:07pm
|
