| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
601
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Nice review Denner, good to see this network is keeping the new talent coming. This network is definitely one of my favorites, my main complaint being I wish they were a bit more clear on the join pages exactly what sites you were joining - as it isn't always super clear.
|
01-10-11 02:12pm
|
Reply
602
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Rotterdam854's Reply
One of my cons was that the camerawork wasn't the best, and I stated it was POV for the most part, so I sort of figured that covered it. But I agree the camerwork is sketchy.
It's an okay place, but if you were to join one of the two I'd go with casting couch first, I think it is defnitely better - unless you like asshole male talent, in which case you might prefer this one.
|
01-10-11 02:07pm
|
Reply
603
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Lovely Drooler, I can just imagine that first baker coming down to the kitchen after nailing his lady and thinking to himself, hmmm...
I chose real life cumshot, although I don't really need to see the money shot in any form, as they tend to focus on face or wherever the specimen was placed, and often are pretty degrading.
|
01-08-11 11:14pm
|
Reply
604
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
pretty much always, and i haven't experienced many places where download managers don't work - or there is some kind of workaround to get them to work.
|
01-06-11 09:57pm
|
Reply
605
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Reply
i have an active membership here, and i haven't experienced any noticeable slowdowns from the last time I was a member a year or so ago. download speeds aren't great, but decent at 600 KB/s the last time I tried. I have always found the page load times to be sort of slow at this site (especially if you open a bunch of tabs really quickly), but nothing terrible, and I've definitely seen worse.
|
01-05-11 09:54pm
|
Reply
606
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I suppose, but even when she was younger it was more about acting than singing. Either way she's got a nice backside...
|
01-04-11 05:15pm
|
Reply
607
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'd definitely go with Tina Turner, or maybe Beyonce or Lopez (although I don't know that Lopez really counts as being in the music business).
|
01-04-11 09:41am
|
Reply
608
|
BB Films
(0)
|
Reply of
Th3Dodg3r's Reply
I have also been curious about this place for a while, but haven't yet joined because I'm a bit unsure of their content quality and particulars. Hopefully someone will provide some feedback soon.
|
01-02-11 10:31pm
|
Reply
609
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
yeah, for the most part i just trimmed out most of the chit-chat. I like setup to some extent, but this place took it kind of far...
|
01-01-11 11:40pm
|
Reply
610
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Totally agree with your review pat362,
Although I sometimes like this type of material, I also found the site more or less frustrating. I didn't even end up downloading much from here when I was a member because I kept going in and trying to cut the films down to reasonable sizes (eventually I just gave up on the site entirely).
|
01-01-11 01:13am
|
Reply
611
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As sort of the opposite of Lionheart (fewer expenses but less income), I'll probably should be joining less - but it'll probably end up being the same.
|
01-01-11 01:09am
|
Reply
612
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
ha, now I feel stupid, I see too big, too long and just think size not time... duh.
|
12-30-10 12:18am
|
Reply
613
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
It is possible to hit a woman's cervix, I'm sure a longer penis (and inconsiderate partner) would make this more likely. Although I don't think this leads to soreness, so much as immediate pain
|
12-29-10 03:50pm
|
Reply
614
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
yeah, i'm sure some would disagree with the score given a lot of folks seem to complain about the short sets and short videos, but I think the site is pretty decent.
|
12-28-10 10:50pm
|
Reply
615
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Too bad man, no one likes being lied too. This site has been on my "maybe" list for a while, I guess it will just have to stay there.
Thanks for the info, though.
|
12-28-10 10:11am
|
Reply
616
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Never been called the old part, but my partner calls me a dirty man all the time. Perhaps when I get older she will include the old too...
|
12-28-10 10:09am
|
Reply
617
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Reply
I didn't think your initial response sounded cocky, although your use of the word communist in this context is a bit off.
The reason for the poll is that some folks here believe people are too quick to "trust" a new user - as trusting enough users in a week gets you a ticket in the drawing. I tend to give users trust votes if they provide useful seemingly trustworthy information, which is the basis for the trust, it has nothing to do with my personal opinion of that users overall trustworthiness, just that they seem to have provided trustworthy information on this site.
|
12-23-10 11:39pm
|
Reply
618
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Curious, I wonder what the problem is. When I was a member about a year ago I had no problems downloading - I have at least 50 scenes on one of my externals, and I don't recall ever experiencing any problems. Perhaps they just don't have the server capacity to meet demand. Does streaming work well, or is there a ton of load time, lag, etc.?
|
12-23-10 10:55pm
|
Reply
619
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Reply
If the user has submitted useful information, that is apparently trustworthy, what is the harm in trusting them? I think trust votes for new users can help get them to submit more reviews. No one wants to be a part of a standoffish community.
I gave you a trust vote Thedebilman666, as I though you provided useful information to fellow PUs, and hope you continue to.
|
12-23-10 12:48am
|
Reply
620
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yeah, with the downloads it is definitely a pretty good value. I found the site navigation to be quite annoying when I was a member, and I agree that some videos were glitchy - although I'd say most of the scenes I downloaded were decent quality with no major glitches. I went back and watched a few, and didn't notice any audio sync problems, so perhaps it was just that one scene or movie?
|
12-19-10 11:39pm
|
Reply
621
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Do you mean there are no downloads at all PinkPanther, or no downloads of newer videos? When I was a member practically everything was downloadable, most of the newer stuff downloadable in HD. It'd be a shame if they got rid of that feature...
|
12-18-10 04:44pm
|
Reply
622
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
glad you don't hate it, man. I was fearing your wrath!
did you join the network or just 18onlygirls? there was something when i joined about getting free access to an additional site, but since i joined the network this didn't apply to me.
|
12-10-10 09:49am
|
Reply
623
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
you are right that recently a lot of the more attractive newer girls are only doing photosets. But, hopefully that will change.
the sites that are still updating are:
younglegalporn
18onlygirls
alicewonderbang
natashashy
vikanymph
beataporn
sashablonde
ivanafukalot
|
12-10-10 09:43am
|
Reply
624
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Hey Denner,
It isn't really a clone anymore they release material on the two sites seperately now - although the older material is pretty commonly shared. The videos I dowloaded all seemed fine to me, the camerawork can be a bit poor - given the self-shot nature of some of the shoots, but this didn't really bother me that much The mid-mp4 was plenty crisp for me.
I went all the way back to their 2007 releases, and they have both low and high h.264 videos (mp4). I'm pretty sure they had these when I was a member here last time...
I agree the login is fucking irritating, but they email you a link now that fills out all the security info for you except the captcha.
I can understand the frustration of joining a site and finding a lot of duplicate material from another site, I haven't seen any of that lately, but maybe its just new to me.
I'm not sure about your complaint on variety, there are 300 models on this site. Given they are all young, and euro, so there isn't a lot of variety in ethnicity or age. But I think it is a reasonable variety of models that is consistent with most euro sites.
Everyone has their own tastes I suppose, I think the material is pretty good here and I don't feel as though I wasted my money. I guess maybe I go against the grain sometimes, I for one can't understand why people like 21sextury so much, that place just pisses me off for some reason.
|
12-09-10 01:26pm
|
Reply
625
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
To each their own, I suppose. I also read Denner's review, and I agree with many of his cons for the site, browsing photos on the site is a nuisance, although I usually just check a couple and download the zip if it looks good so this didn't bother me. This site and Youngporn.net share a lot of the same content, especially with older material, however newer updates appear to be released seperately on each site. I am not sure why they don't just merge the two given the large amount of overlap.
I think most of their newer content has been good to me, I hope you like it if you join, I don't need any more enemies!
|
12-09-10 01:03pm
|
