| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
776
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Yep - "Is now shot in Full HD" might mean - "We just got our cameras, but we're promoting HD anyway." Hopefully it doesn't mean, "We're not really doing anything in HD - but everybody expects it so we're putting up there anyway."
|
07-19-09 07:30pm
|
Reply
777
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It doesn't have anywhere near the excitement factor to see a woman totally naked, then covering up.
|
07-19-09 10:38am
|
Reply
778
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
moby dick's Review
Stay away from 21st Sextury sites with this English Only perspective - I quite agree with you that Sapphic Erotica is boring - there is lots more exciting les action to be found on the internet - the points you make as to WHY you find it boring are different than anything I would have come up with, though - lol
Funny review.
|
07-18-09 03:49pm
|
Reply
779
|
N/A
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
The performers in porn don't know that anal is happening a lot in porn?
What?
How is that the case?
|
07-18-09 03:45pm
|
Reply
780
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I'm not sure how "finally" this is - hasn't this site been just recycling old sets as they do over at MyaDiamond.com for quite some time?
|
07-18-09 12:04am
|
Reply
781
|
Planet Mandy
(0)
|
Reply of
kered's Comment
Yes, Mandylicious, Planet Mandy, Sinful Mandy - all the same person - but BadAndy - different person - lol
In none of her various names and on none of her various sites is she producing new material, though the site owners may pull some long-lost set out of their archives and present it as new - or do the EveAngel.com, MiaDiamond.com hustle of recycling old sets and presenting them as new
|
07-18-09 12:02am
|
Reply
782
|
Sinful Mandy
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
These are all dead sites. I have read nothing but unhappy comments from guys that have joined in recent months expecting otherwise.
|
07-17-09 11:57pm
|
Reply
783
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
It's their bodies - they take the risks with anal sex or whatever - if they don't want those risks, I have no right to claim that they're copping out.
It's interesting that Jana Cova has started doing more boy/girl stuff at her web site - and has done increasing amounts of it even though she had many members and guys that worked on her site asking her NOT to do it. She wanted to, so she is - good for her. Just like she passed up a lot of money that she could have been making doing boy/girl for major porn studios up to now.
|
07-17-09 11:56pm
|
Reply
784
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Comment
Count yourself lucky, rome. I wish that I had been unable to join when I did - would have saved myself trouble and money. Private does a lot of great stuff and you can join Videosz or Videobox at good prices and get a lot of great Private stuff and other stuff as well - but I found Private.com to be a pain in the ass to deal with.
|
07-16-09 07:23pm
|
Reply
785
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
With women, it's like anything else. There is a ripening period when hot women do indeed get better and then there is a point when women are no longer in their prime. Hell, nobody's gonna stay in their prime forever or keep getting better forever - shit, what would it mean if they did?that after they expired was when they were the best sexually?
|
07-13-09 08:28pm
|
Reply
786
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I had an underground rock club for a while years ago (it was a rehearsal space we used to have shows at every once in a while) and some friends found some of that old porn stuff - and it was so amateurish and endearing in a certain way - not a turn-on sexually but oddly compelling and fun to watch - that we decided to show it behind my friends' band at the next show.
A lot of people (mainly women) were offended, which cracked me up because it was so inoffensive to me - rather innocent because it was just ordinary people going at it on cam. Oh, well - it was definitely a conversation-starter and my friends and I were quite amused by all the hubbub.
|
07-11-09 03:53pm
|
Reply
787
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Bigger than that - similar to Misha Online. I don't recall exact dimensions, but they were in the middle of the pack for glamour site photos.
|
07-11-09 03:39pm
|
Reply
788
|
Suze Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
If you join Suze's site for the shortest possible amount of time and then leave, you will get multiple offers a week to rejoin at a really low price - and to join Holly's site at a really low price too. So that's a bargain-hunter's tip for you, Witty
|
07-09-09 07:51pm
|
Reply
789
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
The first site that I ever joined was LisaBoyle.com. And Lisa's a number of years older than she was then and now has Flauntgirls.com, which features her own photography. I probably joined Lisa's site when she was past her prime anyway, originally so several years later she doesn't look anywhere near as good to me
|
07-09-09 07:48pm
|
Reply
790
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
I had a friend who used to trade clips with me via Yahoo messenger a few years ago - but it would be pretty impossible these days with the size of files, so it's just as well that I lost touch with the guy.
I think he got married and settled down - good for him.
|
07-07-09 06:36pm
|
Reply
791
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Yeah, it's the internet - In clicking around on sample sets, I have clicked on something that led me to a site that looked like child porn to me. I closed it and got the hell out of that whole area of sample sets.
|
07-06-09 10:14am
|
Reply
792
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveF's Review
Yeah - they don't respond at all about vid links that don't work.
|
07-05-09 11:35am
|
Reply
793
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
The other issue - and the issue that really gets me - is their false advertising. If Brazzers thinks it's such a great deal to offer downloads of HD material after 6 months of continuous membership, how is it that 2 weeks after they announced that this is how they are handling this, they haven't put up "Download All HD Vids After Only 6 Months Of Continuous Membership!" all over the outside of their site. There is no indication on the outside of their site that there is any waiting period - never mind a 6 month waiting period.
They haven't put that up because they know it's a deal that nobody would want, if they told people in advance - so instead they do this totally dishonest bait-and-switch bull-shit.
It's thievery, in my opinion. There have been sites that have had crazy multi-level memberships - and if they're going to do that and be honest about it, that's fine with me. Brazzers is being completely dishonest about the way that they are handling this HD issue. And just try to deal with their "customer service" about this.
I just despise this site for their business practices.
|
07-05-09 11:33am
|
Reply
794
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
As a fan of petite models, I joined for a month when I got an e-mail from ATK about this new site and a nice one-month-join offer.
Where this site lost me was on the excitement factor, which is totally subjective. I just didn't feel it from this site in hardly any of the material that I looked at. For my tastes, Nubiles.net & ALS Scan have much more exciting petite girl material.
|
07-04-09 05:47pm
|
Reply
795
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
Yeah - a site that lets you download their HD vids after only 6 months of uninterrupted membership - what could beat that?
Only every other site that lets you download their HD vids right when you join - oh, and Brazzers is so proud of their "download our HD vids after 6 months of uninterrupted membership that they still don't mention that little caviat anywhere on the outside of the site - sorry, but this is flat-out bait-and-switch bullshit!
|
07-04-09 05:34pm
|
Reply
796
|
Misty Anderson
(0)
|
Reply of
JDuB's Review
The other major "con" to this site for me - and one that has kept me from joining - is the infrequency of her updates to the site - at least if the front page of her site is accurate - she has a most recent update on June 10 - 3 weeks ago. Before that she did an update on May 22 - more than 2 weeks before that. Before that she did an update on May 11.
I'm flat-out never going to join a site that updates that infrequently, despite her statements on the front page that she pours her heart and soul into the site. She ought to pour her heart and soul into updating more frequently if she wants more members.
|
07-03-09 01:54pm
|
Reply
797
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Comment
I joined in late May, so I haven't been rebilled yet. I did receive a confirmation that specifies that I'll be rebilled for $29.95 every 60 days so it is not a one-billing cycle deal as they have done at times in the past.
|
07-01-09 08:51pm
|
Reply
798
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I vote yes. Sasha Grey has commented that when she did that non-porn film, she was pretty much expecting that she'd be getting attitude from the cast and crew and was pleasantly surprised at the fact that she was treated as respectfully as everyone else was. She's gotten decent reviews for her performance and "porn star" is just part of the description of her.
Attitudes are definitely changing in an opening way - at least at this point. Given how things go, that doesn't mean that there won't be a backlash further down the road.
|
07-01-09 07:55pm
|
Reply
799
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Editing to try to avoid repeating what Sarah said above
She makes the point of how much more material thay shoot than can be posted on a regular schedule - so why don't the less popular models show up more?
They wouldn't be as successful if they were posting the less popular models in place of the more popular models so it wouldn't be in their interest to do so.
The thing to do with ALS Scan, since you say that you know that's how they work, is to make your voice heard. When you like a model, e-mail them, make sure they know. If there's material that you've been waiting for but haven't seen, e-mail them, make sure they know. Because, as you and I both know, it's not just the order of scenes, but when or if the scenes show up at all.
There have been times when a model was mentioned in the Director's Blog or a Casting Special and then you never see her material because they're more excited about other models and so are the members.
I'm encouraging them to put up some Anita Pearl stuff from the Caribbean '09 trip. Every pic I've seen of her and every moment of vid, she looks fantastic, but they haven't put up anything featuring her - apparently they have quite a bit, so I'm hoping to see more of her very soon - If not, I'll keep asking.
|
07-01-09 06:39am
|
Reply
800
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Releases at ALS Scan are very much dependent on member feedback - if they're hearing from members that they want to see more more more of a certain model, they'll put up her stuff fast. If they don't hear from members, it can be a long time - a year or more - before more of her scenes are put up.
Not a problem to me.
|
06-30-09 08:44pm
|
