| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Homegirl:
(kkman112's Reply)
It is hard to believe that eleven years ago this was fresh and new. It needs a bit of freshening up and a more modern feel.
|
05-27-20 12:06pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from lk2fireone:
(kkman112's Reply)
Sounds like the outline of a novel. Go for it!
|
06-30-12 12:38pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from turboshaft:
(kkman112's Reply)
Far too expensive? Really? I've seen new players for under $150. I think Amazon currently sells a Sony Blu-Ray player for about $130. Of course this is just the player, and these rarely, if ever, come with an HDMI cable that's required to send a high definition signal to the display (which needs to be HD to show the best picture, BTW). These cables usually start around $15 dollars and can easily go over $100 so I'm sure it's a complex cable-player manufacturer conspiracy devised to nickel and dime consumers for their recession dollars. ; )
I would argue a complete system--HD display, player, and sound system (optional but it's nice)--is where the initial cost comes in. My real problem is the disc prices are outrageous. Unless you're a genuine film aficionado with money to burn and DVD resolution just doesn't cut it for you I can't see much benefit (literally, my vision is terrible) in buying a Blu-Ray version of a release over the DVD one. Studios don't seem to be pushing Blu-Ray versions much beyond mentioning them first in marketing; "Available on Blu-Ray and DVD Tuesday!"
And I'd assume the studios, or whoever they contract to author the discs, simply make two compressed versions from the final cut of the film or whatever show they are selling. They might offer additional audio tracks and bonus crap if it fits on a Blu-Ray disc but DVDs still sell. But I don't even think a lot of buyers' decisions are based that much on specific extras or bonus features--they really just want the movie to play, not skip, and be able to do that over and over again for years.
|
03-21-10 10:30am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from OneMan:
(kkman112's Reply)
Just use "Truecrypt" to create a "device" from an entire hard drive. It is impossible to tell if it is anything other, than corrupt data.
Windows doesn't recognise it, and asks if you want to format it......"plausible deniability"......!
|
11-14-09 06:34am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Cybertoad:
(kkman112's Reply)
No room for other sorry.
|
06-08-09 07:53am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Drooler:
(kkman112's Reply)
The more I think about it, the more I like this idea: As the guy is about to go off, the girl waits to hold up that little whirring fan at just the right moment. Will it hit her face or the fan?
That would be fun to watch. Since cumshots are so stupid anyway, might as well have some stupid fun with them.
|
02-14-09 01:16pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from TheRizzo:
(kkman112's Reply)
I agree with your list in exactly the same order. The video split I don't mind in 4-5 min but the 30 second to 2min drives me nuts.
|
01-02-09 10:14am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Monahan:
(kkman112's Reply)
Me too (Toshiba 17" Laptop).
|
10-22-08 02:57pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from asmith12:
(kkman112's Reply)
> I've never joined any trial. To pay a few bucks for any trial for a few
> days and have to remember to cancel if I do not like the site or be
> charged full price automatically is just too much of an issue. I
> research a site a lot and then make my decision to join or not to join.
Ditto.
|
05-21-08 05:03am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Kevin:
(kkman112's Reply)
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. The problem has now been fixed!
|
04-14-08 09:17am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(kkman112's Reply)
Thanks for the additional info. Some users mentioned (a bit ago) that they were having problems with the home page not fully loading. Your remarks here might help the programmer track down the issue (and a fix)
So again, THANK YOU for the additional info.
|
04-10-08 11:57am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#30
from asmith12:
(kkman112's Reply)
> rather allowing them to go out to a bar where many provide fake ids and go seriously overboard.
And I should add it's a lot safer to start drinking (illegally) in small amounts at 16, rather than to get absolutely drunk on perfectly legal grounds all at once when child turns 18 and happily brings his ID to the bar.
On the other hand, aren't these laws there meant to protect children? If so, why we should sit and silently agree with laws which in fact HARM our children (if alternative options are safer, it means that the law at least isn't as good as it should be)?
|
12-18-07 12:31pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Rick:
(kkman112's Reply)
Funny you mention. Next week we're going to work to make the tabs on the homepage use ajax so it doesn't redirect to another page. Hopefully we can get it to function properly.
Happy thanksgiving to those celebrating!
|
11-21-07 07:54pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from asmith12:
(kkman112's Reply)
Movies on BitTorrent and other P2P networks? No thanks. I've got a feeling that most of movies there are pirated ones, and I've got another feeling that people making movies are entitled to get money for it.
About QT vs DivX/XVid - my experience with them was that QT is a stable product, which I cannot say about both XVid and DivX. QT original .MOV format is inferior to both WMV and MPEG-4, but as QT started to support MPEG-4 (including AVC) it became about the same quality/bandwidth-wise as WMV.
|
11-18-07 09:23am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from asmith12:
(kkman112's Reply)
> A LOT of videos now-a-days are encoded using it and it is a really good file format.
Let's look at TBP: 6200+ sites provide WMV and only 566 DivX (plus 84 XVid whatever it means); and of those which provide DivX most provide WMV too (I took a random sample and 7 out of 10 sites with DivX also provided WMV), which leaves us with about 3% of sites with DivX and without WMV. Not that much IMHO.
As for format: DivX/XVid = MPEG-4, right? Then QuickTime7 (which I have anyway) is supposed to play it; I'm wondering if it really can do it; do you know link of any free clip in DivX/XVid so I can try it (or maybe if you have QuickTime you can try it yourself and tell)?
|
11-18-07 01:53am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Rick:
(kkman112's Reply)
Hi kman,
This is something we considered, but there were a few reasons we didn't:
1. Previous NO trust ratings were all anonymous without comments and we didn't feel right about removing them all (or requiring users to go back and add comments). If we required comments, then we would have wanted to start from scratch so it's consistent.
2. Users could still input whatever they wanted in the comments (like random characters). It's not something we wanted to start monitoring like we do for reviews, comments, and replies.
3. If we required comments, we would want to do it for both YES and NO votes (so it didn't appear as if we were trying to discourange NO votes). Doing this would definitely limit the overall number of votes, which would be counterproductive.
4. By now requiring 5 points prior to submitting Trust Ratings, this solves most of the issues we previously had.
Overall I think most users should be comfortable with the current format. Newer votes appear to be much more clean and a lot have included comments. I do wish all users would explain why they don't trust someone, but this is a situation where we're giving the community the freedom to express themselves as they wish. I personally think that's how it should be. :)
|
05-08-07 04:45pm
|
Reply
17
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
kkman112's Comment
from kuckles:
I recommend you save up your pennies kman112 and rejoin Abby Winters, I did and have never looked back, It's wonderful as you say, very natural Aussie chicks doing what comes natural and sharing that experience with us, for us, but not exclusively like movie actors who egotistically own their part, these gorgeous girls give all and I hope expect all from us in fellowship and in honour of the human sexual spirit, they are so lovely, so endearing, I wish I could invite them home just to be my friends but Abby Winters is home to me;
One actual practical home where I live and act out my given social position in life, and the home of Abby Winters where natural pleasures are encouraged with the reassurence of sisterhood and I feel, love!
|
04-06-07 10:20am
|
Reply
18
|
All Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
kkman112's Review
from Allhairy:
Thanks very much for your review.
To answer a few of your questions:
90% of our images are 1280X960 in size from the past year. This was in response to member requests for a bigger size than 1024X768.
We are in the process of redoing all the past movies to a size of 740X480 which offers amazing clarity and quality. Currently all exclusive movies are already in that size.
85% of our updates from the past 6 months are exclusive to Allhairy and will continue to be going forward. We use non exclusive when we are short in a category due to not being able to find hairy models which sometimes happens in the ethnic category for example.
All movies get offered in parts so that broadband and dialup users can pick the scenes they want. These parts are usually 30 megs in size. We then offer the whole movie to be downloaded once all the parts are in the system.
Thanks again for your review :-)
|
06-19-07 11:22am
|
Reply
19
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
kkman112's Review
from nygiants03:
I don't know what happen last month, but the images are viewable now. I just reviewed the site
|
06-10-07 06:54pm
|
Reply
20
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(kkman112's Reply)
You make a good point but I can't help but think it's someone who bought a couple memberships and is trying to make a few easy bucks
My concern is those videos have an upload date from a year ago and no one has done anything about it. If Clips 4 Sale only offers the "a posteriori" copyright control you suggest, I can't help but doubt they are doing much in terms of enforcing other legal aspects like model releases and so on.
|
08-03-09 03:54am
|
Reply
21
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Bo M:
(kkman112's Reply)
I fully agree with you. My problem is that I can't put down all the effort I want to when commenting. But Jami is a very special lady and she also is one of the most active hostesses on the web. She really take very good care of all her fans.
|
06-07-07 01:40am
|
Reply
22
|
Ema's Place
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Robby:
(kkman112's Reply)
well, im a current member and the site is not a 100, it's very good and if you like the girl might be a 90, but not 100... is still pretty new.
But worth a join just because Emanuella is hot IMO.
|
05-10-07 06:08pm
|
Reply
23
|
Homemade Paysite
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Boobs4ever:
(kkman112's Reply)
agreed with Kman
|
06-14-07 08:58am
|
Reply
24
|
Homemade Paysite
(0)
|
Reply of
kkman112's Review
from DpornGuy:
thanks for the review.
how many boy/girl vids are there exactly? just curious since allot of sites look good but feature mostly solo and girl girl sets.
also, how's the camera work? annoying povs and closeups? or good angles and variety?
|
05-15-07 03:05pm
|
Reply
25
|
Homemade Paysite
(0)
|
Reply of
kkman112's Comment
from Penelope:
with a few girls that I seem to remember from other porn sites (ehhh...).
another bullshit post, you will not find any of the girls on my site on any other site. They are my friends or friends of my friends. Comments like this should be deleted. Can you name the sites? I have added my videos to some VOD sites but that is all stuff I maintain.
And about the age LOL , The oldest girl is 22. good night
|
03-31-07 08:42pm
|
