| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from elephant:
I feel your pain Otah, it really is so annoying isn't it cause its just so wrong, I agree exchange rates and that a few dollars more can be hard to take but its something you'd be will to do but when its like this its just very unfair.
I keep to my principals and just will never join one of these sites that thinks its ok to do this to UK and Euro customers.
|
07-12-12 02:07pm
|
Reply
102
|
Andrew Blake
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Capn:
If he is wishing to trade on the net, not only are downloads a requirement, but also in zips, preferably custom ones!
Cap'n. :0/
|
07-05-12 09:51am
|
Reply
103
|
Orgasms.xxx
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(otoh's Reply)
joymii is pretty high on my list, I will probably join it sometime soon, I have been curious for a while. Initially it seemed way too toy-oriented based on the preview, but seems better now.
I agree that this site definitely has a broader range of ages than X-Art, but I think the focus here is also largely on younger models, I'd say most are 18-25 (maybe 20% are older than that based on a quick review of the site's posted model 'ages'), although the ages they list are likely bogus - they say Piper Fawn is 24 and Zuzana Z is 27, both of which seem low to me (given what EBI says).
|
07-01-12 10:52pm
|
Reply
104
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(otoh's Reply)
That's her! Thanks for the link!
|
06-26-12 03:05pm
|
Reply
105
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(otoh's Reply)
Thansk for the comments and thanks for the Joymii tip. I suspect that I'll follow your advice. One of the models on X-Art is an American named Tiffany. I wasn't able to find her on indexxx.com (yet, anyway) because "Tiffany" is a fairly common porn name. But I wanted to see more of her and I see she's a model at Joymii too. There seems to be a lot of models that work on both X-Art and Joymii.
|
06-25-12 03:17pm
|
Reply
106
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from xexbot:
(otoh's Reply)
Their "nylon sites" are pretty interesting. Frankly, those were usually some of the better videos. Basically there was a site for just solo models in lingerie with a focus on pantyhose, then that with two girls, which usually ended up with some fairly hardcore strapon sex or other toys (it's not just muff diving), then there was one for boy/girl action, and then it sort of splits off into other categories. There is a site with trannys in pantyhose, a gay site with men in pantyhose, and a femdom site with the men in the pantyhose get pounded by chicks with strapons. So, I can't say for sure this is what you would be looking for, but as you can see, it is very much the "buckshot approach" to the subject of nylons. they really do seem to be covering just about every human configuration, save for maybe the nylon orgy.
|
06-21-12 10:09am
|
Reply
107
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
And you shouldn't be dissuaded, otoh. If you like retro lingerie you will like this site.
|
06-18-12 09:56am
|
Reply
108
|
The Mosh Room
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(otoh's Reply)
Thanks for your reply! I'm very glad that you found my review interesting and that you'll keep this site in your shortlist.
Even though the site needs (a lot of) work in terms of usability and navigation, the photos are so remarkable that I had to give it a high enough score to get it over the majority of solo sites I've reviewed in the past. In the end, it's the content what matters.
After joining The Mosh Room, I've checked free tours and samples from other sites allegedly in the alt, fetish or pin up genres but none interested me half as much. It's probably the way Mosh manages to balance varying doses of things that aren't my thing with her unique style, looks and poses what appealed and still appeals to me.
|
06-05-12 01:49pm
|
Reply
109
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(otoh's Reply)
Yeah you would be finding it impossible to get through metart alone in a month if you'd never been a member before, would be good I guess for someone with lots of spare time to download to their hearts content.
|
05-15-12 05:22am
|
Reply
110
|
Layered Nylons
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
Yes, I am afraid 'Art Lingerie' doesn't work for me either.
They usually start partially clothed, from what I can gather.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-13-12 12:49am
|
Reply
111
|
Layered Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Capn:
To my knowledge all the 'Only' sites are to all intents & purposes 'non-nude', which is a great shame as they otherwise have some really nice material.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-12-12 04:01pm
|
Reply
112
|
Layered Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from tangub:
A shame there's no mention of it being part of the Only All Sites package. I've been very close to signing up to the OT network recently but can't decide if the Only All Sites deal is worth the extra expense than just signing up for Only Tease...the network just seems like more of the same that Only Tease already gives you.
|
05-12-12 12:35am
|
Reply
113
|
Orgasms.xxx
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from elephant:
(otoh's Reply)
Hi Otah, wow thanks for this, really good to know as yeah I was tempted but was put off by the higher price for the uk. I really am into these type of movies at the moment, they are refreshingly hot and seems like more sites are jumping on the bandwagon, which is a good thing of course.
|
04-29-12 01:34am
|
Reply
114
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from elephant:
(otoh's Reply)
Hi Otah
That doesn't sound too bad then I might join for that price as been wanting to join femjoy for a while, they get some really nice women there.
Have you heard anything back from them if it was a mistake though.
|
04-22-12 01:22am
|
Reply
115
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Abel Semen:
(otoh's Reply)
Thanks for your kind words. I basically wrote the kind of review I'd want to read, I'm glad it seems to be going over well from what little I can tell so far.
BTW (directed at all readers, not just OTOH), I've made a few minor revisions to the review, most importantly clarifying the site's current status (in Cons) and being more specific about why Kamikaze Love doesn't work for me (in Bottom Line).
|
04-18-12 02:40am
|
Reply
116
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from elephant:
It might be a mistake if their sister site is of a cheaper price but there is a few sites now thinking us porn fans in the UK have bigger wallets than in the US when we don't lol. does annoy me quite abit and I do refuse to join sites that do this.
|
04-17-12 07:43am
|
Reply
117
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Capn:
I would stick to my principles on that one.
I see 'regional pricing' & I'm gone.
Cap'n. :0E
|
04-16-12 09:09am
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from Cybertoad:
(otoh's Reply)
I like Linux and find Unbunto very porn friendly, the video players use the memory so much better.
If you want go ahead and shoot me an email and we can talk shop about the Os's.
CT
|
04-04-12 04:32pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from gaypornolover:
(otoh's Reply)
I know what you mean but what annoys me is that Apple are introducing "new versions" of OSX which really aren't major upgrades at all - they're basically the same thing with a few extra features - and they're cutting off support to older systems.
I have a friend who uses Leopard OSX and can't use the latest versions of Apple software - but his boyfriend who has an ancient Windows XP PC can! So Apple will support old versions of Windows, but not of OSX.
OSX Leopard only came out in 2007, Windows XP in 2001 - Apple will support XP but not Leopard.
|
04-03-12 02:44am
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from RagingBuddhist:
(otoh's Reply)
Very well put, otoh!
|
03-30-12 12:36pm
|
Reply
121
|
Graphis
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from My 2 cents:
(otoh's Reply)
Greetings otoh,
If you are tempted by their preview pages, then you may well find that the quality of the content is worth the hassles, I doubt you will find anything of it's type elsewhere which is better quality, at least I haven't been able to as yet.
If only they would make the website user-friendly, Graphis would be up at the top of my list!
|
03-21-12 09:10pm
|
Reply
122
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Ergo Proxy:
(otoh's Reply)
I totally agree with your opinions, otoh. I also think it's basically a decision which has to be made by everybody for themselves what genre to watch. My "problem" with this site was, as I mentioned, the lack of tolerance for other expressions of sexuality and its self-adulation. Concerning your last statement that it's also just porn what they do, I think their webmaster will be furious to read this. If I look up the defintion of porn in my dictionary it says: "Pornography: Books, videos, etc. that describe or show naked people and sexual acts in order to make people feel sexually excited", and now it comes, "especially in a way that many other people find offensive". Furthermore it is said that there has to be a lack of taking into account the psyche and human partnership. I think basically they say that they take everything into account and don't offend anybody, so (for them) it's not porn. Everything else is filthy and despicable. But, like I said, from my point of view the very nature of sexuality is the most deviant thing there is and it has the right to offend as many people as it wants, so cosensual porn in every form is OK with me (excluding child pornography and sex with animals of course).
|
03-21-12 12:59pm
|
Reply
123
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(otoh's Reply)
I'm not currently a member of X-Art or Joymii. And it's been almost 3
years since I was a member of Femjoy. Femjoy has a vast number of extremely attractive models and a vast number of photosets, but I like Met-Art over Femjoy for softcore teen photos. I think the teens are presented more attractively. But that's just my personal opinion. There are Porn User members who prefer the natural Femjoy approach over the Met-Art style.
Although both Femjoy and Met-Art fall into the softcore teen category for photos.
X-Art has been around much longer than Joymii. X-Art started with small photosets (small number of photos in each photoset) of gorgeous young models. I mean, they selected a small number of lovely teens, and presented them in a very attractive way. High quality photos. But no videos. Softcore teen.
Years later, they changed the site name to X-Art, and started offering videos along with the photosets. And they started to offer sex in the photos and videos. They started with female masturbation, then offered female-female lesbian, then finally started to offer male-female sex. The sex was explicit, but not gonzo. I think of the style as softcore sex, but that's not the best term. The sex is explicit, but not gonzo. The sex is basically tender, without the spitting, slapping, name-calling you find in rough gonzo sex.
Joymii is similar to what X-Art is offering today. But since Joymii is so much newer than X-Art, you won't find a lot of content. Joymii started late 2010. If Joymii can keep the same style in the future and keep adding new content, it will be a leader in the "softcore" sex style. Joymii started with female masturbation, but now offers male-female sex as well.
Joymii is a sister site of Femjoy. Femjoy, as far as I know, does not
offer any sex in their photos or videos. Nudity, but no sex. So Joymii is a natural extension of Femjoy. If Joymii can use even a fraction of the lovely models that Femjoy offers, then Joymii should enjoy a long-lasting career. Lovely models photographed and videoed in high-quality softcore.
I tried to answer your question. But I tend to ramble a lot. :)
|
03-20-12 07:24pm
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(otoh's Reply)
Not available as an answer but my starting point is the quality and structure of the preview site. If the site can't create a good preview site I can only conclude the actual site will be equally lousy.
However, once I've checked out the preview site I go immediately to PU. Hands down, a poor TBP and/or PU review is all I need to pass on a potential site, even if the preview site is spectacular.
|
03-19-12 10:22am
|
Reply
125
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
Yes, Eric the new photographer seems to be experimenting to find the required styles.
He has actually posted on my 'Striptease' thread.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-19-12 10:12am
|
