| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Capn:
Further to this...
Rather than addition it is substitution!
I have had to review my assessment of the content accordingly.
This site is now of no interest whatsoever to me!
A great shame!
Cap'n. :0(
|
03-09-12 06:25pm
|
Reply
127
|
90s Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from RustyJ:
Well, to me 90's are like the golden years. 80's are retro but often too retro. 90's Private especially brings memories to my mind :)
|
03-02-12 09:12am
|
Reply
128
|
90s Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from atrapat:
Regardless of 90s being retro or not, the title seems a clever idea for recycling photos shot in the 90s. Guess it's reached a point where the same old galleries seen a 100 times no longer pass as new so why not recycle them as vintage?
|
03-02-12 07:57am
|
Reply
129
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from turboshaft:
(otoh's Reply)
I don't think many lawmakers argue for "preserving mystique" when it comes to defending most legislation, especially public nudity/indecency laws. Granted, I personally think politicians are professional bullshitters so the issue is kind of moot. :-)
Still, beyond the standard squawks of the puritanical outragers I don't see any reasonable, rational argument for separate laws for the sexes in terms of public dress. I could understand more stringent laws for children for safety reasons but the opposite usually seems to be true (up to a point, of course). Try letting your girlfriend stroll around in a diaper or just totally nude down at a public beach and see what happens...
Private property is totally different so the sky--or your personal courage to get naked--is the limit in those places. Interestingly, in the U.S. it seems "public nudity" is really only legal in private places that explicitly allow it. Go figure.
|
02-24-12 01:28am
|
Reply
130
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from LatexRyan:
(otoh's Reply)
I am familiar with Mosh and I do like some of her stuff. If you take a peek at Latexotica.com then you'll see a new front page, and you'll get an idea as to what Lilly is looking to do with the site.
Lilly's site is ok, there aren't any zip sets, and the videos are limited in terms of quality and length. Updates are also somewhat sporadic, you can be a member and see not a single update, I love her, but her site sucks, and webmasters are totally non-existent.
|
02-22-12 08:56am
|
Reply
131
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from LatexRyan:
(otoh's Reply)
You would like Latex Heaven, not heavy rubber and more of a glamour look. You would also have liked Latexotica, prior to it's shut down. Latexotica is now under new ownership and this summer a new site is coming, under the ownership of the most popular model on the site, Anastacia, aka Lilly Roma. Was speaking with her on webcam (hell yeah!) and she tells us that the site will have a slight pornographic edge to it, so I'm hoping it's all good.
|
02-20-12 11:36am
|
Reply
132
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from MisterMark:
(otoh's Reply)
I think both sites lose that "spirit" in some of their sets and or there is a lack of enthusiasm. The bottom line is it both sites are soft. For me, FemJoy is a site I would check in with every two years but I am a photo buff but came away somewhat underwhelmed by the lates experience. It's a very streamlined site that would work better at 14.95 or so IMO. They don't offer the "Live" girls or search features that it's comp does. Of the three art nude photo type sites, it is clearly at the bottom of the list. There was a 99 bucks offer for year when canceled which is to me a waste of money. Like I said, I treurned after two years and found only a moderate amount of savable new material. If you are looking for explitiness, this site will disappoint and bore you quickly.
|
02-20-12 10:33am
|
Reply
133
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from monty4321:
(otoh's Reply)
First thanks all for replying to the my opinions of the website.
Now I have to gripe at all of you. At no point in my review did I say that I want the girls to be glamorized and full of makeup.
This is what I said: "In my opinion most of the woman on the site are not too attractive. 50 - 75% of the woman is a 5 out of 10. 5 being average. If you like stunning women from time to time - look else where."
Maybe my use of "stunning" made it appear as such. What I was saying that those who do like stunning females - they would be disappointed IMHO. Stunning or a 10 does not have to mean full of makeup.
I actually hate twistys and probably DDF because when I visit their sites, all of the models appear to be bathed in makeup. I hate airbrushing and all of the photo editing after-shoots. I like the natural looks by far, but I don't mind a little makeup.
Now, the women aren't ugly. But IMO most of them are only average. But they are more attractive than the women on ATK Hairy.
I love natural and prefer it over makeup. But on this site, I think they would do good to have a certain portion of them put on a little makeup - because some of them need it. That's just my opinion.
|
02-08-12 09:08pm
|
Reply
134
|
Lacy Nylons
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
I can see what you are getting at, otoh! I can also see why tights would appeal to many because they indeed both hide and reveal what's underneath. I think my problem is that I like the contrast of white thigh and stocking top, and tights take that away from me! :-)
|
02-08-12 06:17pm
|
Reply
135
|
Lacy Nylons
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
I carry a huge grudge when it comes to pantyhose (tights), otoh. I rejoiced when the mini skirts came out: `wow, now it will be even easier to see the tops of the stockings and those lovely thighs above them, bisected by the straps of the garter belt (drool) .... and then some idiot decides to invent pantyhose in order to make the mini skirts look more modest and to make sure that nothing WOULD ever show.
It`s understandable, of course, after all who wants to go around with the tops of their nylons showing, but that man or woman who invented those abominations destroyed a dream. No, I will never forgive! :-)
|
02-07-12 12:19pm
|
Reply
136
|
Angel Afterlife
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Afterlife Cash :
Thanks for the input otoh. Flash was my original design and I have been transitioning away from it ever since. I just finished updating the navigation, model pages, categories, etc to html and php. You will find the browsing much more familiar and user friendly. Many more updates to come.
|
02-06-12 12:17pm
|
Reply
137
|
Action Matures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
I would personally steer clear of them, otoh. The set-up is too primitive and the watermarks rob me of any joy in their videos. Still haven't received a reply re. "why couldn't I download the zipped picture sets," so that too counts against Ferro.
Talking about nylon-themed sites. Modern times mess me up here because my heart goes pitter patter when I see "nylons" and then find mainly pantyhose (tights). The definition of nylons must have changed dramatically over the years. Talking about nylon in general I much prefer it to cotton which absolutely turns me off to this day. I got used to shaved but never to cotton, or to thongs for that matter! :-)
|
02-01-12 02:15pm
|
Reply
138
|
Steve Bones
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from BubbaGump:
I was trying to figure out what I was looking at as the screen was loading slow at their home page. I guess there are all kinds of fetishes out there. Can't say I ever thought about having sex with a medical school skeleton as something that would draw enough interest for a pay site to stay in the green.
|
02-01-12 11:18am
|
Reply
139
|
Steve Bones
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Capn:
Talking of odd stuff.
This one was a bit bizarre.
https://www.pornusers.com/review/flexidolls/
Cap'n. :00
|
02-01-12 10:59am
|
Reply
140
|
Steve Bones
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from tboy:
Can't say this gives me a 'boner' (sorry, someone had to)...
Yes I agree, one of the more fringe fetishes to have an entire site dedicated to it, I wouldn't be surprised if the number of vids was very low as it's a network site though.
And I mean, the dude can't move so it's gonna get pretty boring pretty quick no?
Unless it becomes steve re-animated bones which is one step to zombie-porn which I just can't bring myself to google...
|
02-01-12 03:21am
|
Reply
141
|
Angel Afterlife
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from messmer:
Aha, thanks for that comment, otoh. I recently re-subscribed to Videosz and while I like the site a lot all those requests to reload the page when I'm trying to go back one step are driving me crazy. I always wondered why I had to do that when with other sites a back button click will do it! No wonder I like PU. Flash, hunh? Who would have guessed!
|
01-30-12 10:47am
|
Reply
142
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from TalonIcefire:
(otoh's Reply)
Why thank you sir. I sometimes consider myself a connoisseur to the natural beauties in life.
|
01-30-12 02:43am
|
Reply
143
|
Angel Afterlife
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Drooler:
Well said! I also get tired of webmasters who think we're going to add wow factor with these cycle-wasting, RAM-rooting do-can's of worms and just wind up pissing us off.
The KISS principle, KEEP IT SIMPLE (STUPID), is the way to go.
|
01-29-12 12:16pm
|
Reply
144
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Capn:
Yes, otoh, you are correct there.
This from the members area:
'Published on 2 Dec 2011
Today we not only welcome new model Alexa, but this is our first set shot by our friend Eric. Please welcome both Alexa and Eric to FigureBaby. You'll be seeing alot more from both of them!'
I agree his work is so far a welcome addition!
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-16-12 11:34am
|
Reply
145
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from BubbaGump:
(otoh's Reply)
Hi. Thanks, guys.
I try to offer the kind of info I like to see. I try not to overdo a review, but considering we spend money on this stuff, it is certainly worth it to give the straight poop.
I always thought of porn review sites as simply fronts for studios, as a lot do seem to be heavily biased. This site seems pretty objective and fair so far and the members giving reviews are not just someone from the company in disguise.
|
01-16-12 09:12am
|
Reply
146
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(otoh's Reply)
Yeah, after I thanked you for steering me away from the site with your review it seems odd that I'd join. But the offer was good. I think if I were really a fan of the site I'd need to spend a much longer time there to apprecaite it. And regardless of hardcore or softcore preferences, I think it's safe to say those of us into hetro sites are all into beautiful women. And Met Art has them by the hundreds.
One thought that kept going through my mind was "where do they find all these stunning women and how do they get them into nude modelling?" Obviously a big draw here is that these women aren't being asked to stick baseball bats up their bottoms, so that increases the potential number of models right there. As for the site size, I assume that based on the type of material they also pay less and therefore can shoot more.
But I'll admit that I was surprised at how much I liked the site. It certainly does well at what it does.
|
01-11-12 09:34am
|
Reply
147
|
Juliland
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from BradlyH:
Nice review as always Otoh, i think I'm going to put this one back on my list. Although i was a bit detoured by it before your views have changed my mind a little bit, It will be a nice change from the type i have been subscribing to lately. Although a woman fully covered in glitter kinda freaks me out :/
|
01-08-12 05:17pm
|
Reply
148
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BradlyH:
(otoh's Reply)
Haha! I'm blaming auto correct on that one, It was supposed to say definitely, I need to learn how to proofread better :p anyways i agree 15 is More then a steal for this type of site.
I do miss the outdoor shoots a little bit, Maybe we can persuade Jam on maybe a Balcony set ?
|
01-08-12 04:52pm
|
Reply
149
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tangub:
(otoh's Reply)
Yes unfortunately there's quite a few models who only have 1 photo set or 1 video. Sadly that Valentina set here is not even exclusive, i'd previously downloaded it from Babes.tv although here it is in a larger resolution so i did keep it. There are much better sites around for finding Valentina Vaughn content
|
01-08-12 12:20pm
|
Reply
150
|
She Don't Blush
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Drooler:
I'm starting to wonder if Querro has snuffed it, too. No updates since Dec. 30th.
|
01-06-12 10:53am
|
